1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Geekbench

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by lemonadesoda, Mar 18, 2009.

Page 2 of 8
  1. Mar 20, 2009 at 11:08 PM #26
    Pete1burn

    Pete1burn

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    835 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Pete1burn | 2xFX-70 | 2.6GHz | 4gb DDR2 800 | 4247 | 4648 | 5993| 1733 | 1765 | 1633

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Mar 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM #27
    groothof22

    groothof22 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    197 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Location:
    Leeuwarden,The Netherlands
    [​IMG]
    Thats it:roll:
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 22, 2009
  3. Mar 20, 2009 at 11:46 PM #28
    Pete1burn

    Pete1burn

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    835 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Did you post an image? There's nothing there for you.
     
  4. Mar 21, 2009 at 1:10 AM #29
    {JNT}Raptor

    {JNT}Raptor New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    733 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    NY

    No....I think he was actually talking smack to you......go get him. :toast:

    On topic....I'll pick this up and give it a few runs. :)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. Mar 21, 2009 at 2:09 AM #30
    HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    7,077 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,295
    Location:
    Up North
    Here is my lame score :cry:
    Very upset with such a low score~~~~

    [​IMG]

    HammerON | E8500 | 3.16 GHz | DDR2 1066 | 4607 | 5882 | 4905 | 2916 | 2489 | 1458 | Vista 32bit
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2009
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. Mar 21, 2009 at 11:04 PM #31
    lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,366 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    986
    Bah! I can't get my Xeon system to do this benchmrk without BSOD. Still hunting down the problem!


    *EDIT*

    FAULTY L5420 it seems
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
    10 Year Member at TPU
  7. Mar 22, 2009 at 5:48 AM #32
    sweeper

    sweeper New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2004
    Messages:
    796 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Location:
    SW, Ohio
    [​IMG]

    full specs in sig.... <------- :cool:
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  8. Mar 22, 2009 at 9:05 AM #33
    Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,217 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    im go try it
     
  9. Mar 22, 2009 at 9:22 AM #34

    DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,546 (2.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,384
    [​IMG]

    DanTheBanjoman | 2x L5310 | 2400MHz | FB-DIMM 667 MHz | 7039 | 9902 | 8509 | 1890 | 2173 | Can't find? | Should fix my memory
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  10. Mar 22, 2009 at 9:29 AM #35

    DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,546 (2.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,384
    I took out the 667Mhz memory so it runs at dual channel 800, increases my score to 7081, quite pointless.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  11. Mar 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM #36
    DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (2.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    heh I was obsessing about 66mhz on my ram seems like it wouldn't make a difference anyway.

    DrPepper | Q6600 | 3843MHZ | DDR2-1138 | 6767 | 8985 | 7549 | 3126 | 3557 | 1760 | Cake

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2009
  12. Mar 22, 2009 at 10:36 AM #37

    DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,546 (2.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,384
    When your system is severely bottlenecked by memory it does make a difference. Just need two 2GB 800MHz modules to replace the 667's, don't feel like wasting cash on them though :)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  13. Mar 22, 2009 at 10:39 AM #38
    DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (2.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    I was referring to myself though :p I still can't beat your bloody score :laugh: I've managed to get it at 4ghz and still 21 points behind.
     
  14. Mar 22, 2009 at 11:11 AM #39
    lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,366 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    986
    ========== WANTED =============================================================

    Would someone kindly run the following:

    Q6600 at 2.4 or 2.7Ghz on a PCI-e/DDR2 system. I would like to compare performance vs. my AGP Q6600. Thanks Dr Pepper!

    Nehalem-EP! (hehe)

    A ultra cheapo Core2 celeron or mobile Core2.

    Atom 270. Thanks A Cheese Danish!

    Atom 230/Z5xx esp. a netbook like Samsung NC10 or Asus/Acer

    Via Nano or C7[/COLOR]

    :toast:
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
    10 Year Member at TPU
  15. Mar 22, 2009 at 11:32 AM #40
    DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (2.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    I'l give it a go mr soda :) I was about to compare 2.4 to 4ghz so I've already got the results for 2.4

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2009
    lemonadesoda says thanks.
  16. Mar 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM #41
    Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,904 (1.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Location:
    Australia
    Melvis | FX-57 | 2.8 GHz | DDR 500 | 2144 | 2103 | 2657 | 1627 | 1529 | 763 | Windows XP 32
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 22, 2009
  17. Mar 24, 2009 at 4:27 PM #42
    A Cheese Danish

    A Cheese Danish

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,965 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    415
    Location:
    your local vending machine
    My Laptop:
    [​IMG]

    A Cheese Danish | T9300 | 2.5 GHz | DDR2 667 | 2767 | 3572 | 2949 | 1644 | 1564 | 1107 | Windows 7 Ultimate
    Atom 270 posted.
    And will have Ubuntu and Fedora up for my lappy by tonight as well.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2009
  18. Mar 24, 2009 at 4:39 PM #43
    3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,876 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    691
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    Heres my work laptop:


    3870x2 | T2600 | 2.16GHZ | DDR 667 | 2259 | 2700 | 2522 | 1375| 1572 | 1045.83333333333333333333333:laugh: | My Work Laptop

    [​IMG]

    when I get home ill test my home machine.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2009
  19. Mar 24, 2009 at 4:41 PM #44
    3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,876 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    691
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    That is very low for a T9300, my T2600 gets better than that. Might want to find the cause?

    @ Melvis:
    That score is pretty good for 0 MHZ ram!
     
  20. Mar 24, 2009 at 4:53 PM #45
    A Cheese Danish

    A Cheese Danish

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,965 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    415
    Location:
    your local vending machine
    Yeah, i just got up to 2164...i may do a clean install of 7 and see whats up. Then I'll probably run XP as well
     
  21. Mar 24, 2009 at 5:45 PM #46
    lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,366 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    986
    [​IMG]
    Problem right there. Check CPU-Z and BIOS.
     
    A Cheese Danish says thanks.
    10 Year Member at TPU
  22. Mar 24, 2009 at 6:36 PM #47
    A Cheese Danish

    A Cheese Danish

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,965 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    415
    Location:
    your local vending machine
  23. Mar 24, 2009 at 6:41 PM #48
    3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,876 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    691
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    thats pretty good for 1 core, says alot for the T9300.
     
  24. Mar 24, 2009 at 9:05 PM #49
    A Cheese Danish

    A Cheese Danish

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,965 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    415
    Location:
    your local vending machine
    Lenovo IdeaPad S10
    [​IMG]

    A Cheese Danish | Atom 270 | 1.6GHz | DDR2 533 | 873 | 894 | 736 | 986 | 1063 | 546 | Windows XP x86 SP3
     
    lemonadesoda says thanks.
  25. Mar 24, 2009 at 10:53 PM #50
    lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,366 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    986
    ^^nice. Dual channel DDR running on that Atom 270, right?! (Compare to my Atom 330 in the OP, which is single channel DDR2 667).

    Notice that clock-for-clock the Atom 270/330 is pwning a P4 EE edition. That means that if/when they create an "Extreme" Atom 330 with just 10W, it will do very nicely. Larrabee is going to be ace. Even as a "server" processor:

    e.g. Atom 330 "extreme" at 3Ghz and 10W = 2500 geekscore

    "8" of these on one chip = 80W = 20000 geekscore

    Compared with dual Xeons = 150W = 12500 geekscore

    Twice the performance, half the power.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
    10 Year Member at TPU
Page 2 of 8

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)