• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Haswell-E - Intel's First 8 Core Desktop Processor Exposed

Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
732 (0.25/day)
Likes
367
System Name Current
Processor Intel Core i7 3770 @ 3.8GHz (4.3GHz Turbo)
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme4
Cooling Cooler Master 212 Evo Push-Pull
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866MHz @ 9-9-9-24-1T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC x2 SLI
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD + Seagate 2TB HDD
Display(s) 28" Asus PB287Q 3840x2160p
Case Thermaltake Urban S41
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Cougar CMX 700W v3
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro | Linux Mint
#51
You're going to tell me that three years on a platform is insufficient? Socket 1155 ran from January 2011 to June 2013. 29 months as opposed to 36 from LGA 2011.
^This. A majority of people probably upgrade every two to three years anyway, which is the lifespan of the current sockets.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#52
1st gen LGA 2011 really didn't appeal to me at all considering the current chips are now two generations behind the mainstream ones.
Agreed,

I'm so damn pissed about the fact that Z87 Haswell is such a better platform than X79 SB-E that it was about time Intel did something for its flagship.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
895 (0.50/day)
Likes
114
#53
Sort of...

By pretty much all reviewer accounts Haswell brings almost no performance gains over IB which brought almost no perfomance gains over SB - other than the GPU section. Intel does continue to lower power consumption which is useful for laptops but it really means nothing for desktop unless you are paying some astronomical rates for electricity which most folks aren't. Using a toaster or other common household device would consume way more than any power saving from Haswell. AMD has also lowered their power consumption on laptop Trinity and Richland APUs so Haswell really has no advantage there and is woefully inadequate in GPU performance.

For Intel to release an 8-core consumer desktop CPU, you know they are feeling the heat of poor performance from IB and now Haswell, especially with AMD about to launch Kaveri and Steamroller in Q4. It's all good for consumers because you can pick your poison be it best performance and value or over-priced exploitation. The choice is completely yours.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,546 (3.88/day)
Likes
10,908
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
#54
By pretty much all reviewer accounts Haswell brings almost no performance gains over IB which brought almost no perfomance gains over SB - other than the GPU section.
I don't hold that opinion myself. The performance gains of today aren't as large as they have been in years past, but the difference in actual performance(not benchmarks) between SandyBridge and Haswell is very noticeable for me personally. Is there reason to upgrade through that series of CPUs? No, not really. But processing requirements by software has hardly increased, so the actual performance benefits are not noticed when they do exist.


Haswell is exciting for me for other reasons. Not one single reviewer has touched on why. I fully understand why most are un-impressed. They lack vision. I hate to say that, because I respect a lot of these guys, but really...total lack of vision. Haswell-E isn't going to magically change that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
4,001 (1.32/day)
Likes
1,652
Location
Sarasota, Florida, USA
System Name Awesomesauce 4.3 | Laptop (MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro-023)
Processor Intel Core i7-5820K 4.16GHz 1.28v/3GHz 1.05v uncore | Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 3.1GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WiFi LGA2011-v3| Stock
Cooling Corsair H100i v2 w/ 2x EK Vardar F4-120ER + various 120/140mm case fans | Stock
Memory G.Skill RJ-4 16GB DDR4-2666 CL15 quad channel | 12GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix A8G Gaming GTX 1080 @ 2075/1368 boost | NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB +200/+500 + Intel 530
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 500GB + Seagate 3TB 7200RPM + others | Kingston 256GB M.2 SATA + 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) Acer G257HU 1440p 60Hz AH-IPS 4ms | 17.3" 1920*1080 60Hz wide angle TN notebook panel
Case Fractal Design Define XL R2 | MSI
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | Realtek with quad stereo speakers and subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850i Platinum | 19.5v 180w Delta brick
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 | Windows 10 Home x64
Benchmark Scores GTX 1080 please?
#55
I don't hold that opinion myself. The performance gains of today aren't as large as they have been in years past, but the difference in actual performance(not benchmarks) between SandyBridge and Haswell is very noticeable for me personally. Is there reason to upgrade through that series of CPUs? No, not really. But processing requirements by software has hardly increased, so the actual performance benefits are not noticed when they do exist.


Haswell is exciting for me for other reasons. Not one single reviewer has touched on why. I fully understand why most are un-impressed. They lack vision. I hate to say that, because I respect a lot of these guys, but really...total lack of vision. Haswell-E isn't going to magically change that.
One of the reasons why I have upgraded through the last two generations was first for the nice power consumption decrease with Ivy, but the supposed 10% performance increase clock for clock for each generation was nice in my opinion. I know people are probably tired of me saying this, but I need every ounce of CPU performance for many games at 120Hz, and I can easily see the difference in TF2, even though it is relatively old. That game sees big differences with clock speed, as someone with a 5.2GHz 2500K beats out my 4.3GHz 4770K by a good 30 FPS (164 vs. 134 on the same recorded timedemo). Nobody seems to understand that maintaining 120 FPS even in some older multiplayer games is difficult though so I can't really argue with the "Phenom/FX people" who only play at 60 and don't see the CPU bottlenecks I see on my setup.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,192 (5.03/day)
Likes
4,796
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#56
well it would appear Intel is not worth the point of going to if the Skt 2011 isnt supported for Haswell, Considering Haswell isnt any better than ivb or sb.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Messages
79 (0.04/day)
Likes
17
#57
This hardware could be my next upgrade. Or the server version with 10 cores in dual configuration. AVX2 is just too much improvement to resist :laugh:
PCIe 3.0 certified, DDR4, tons of USB 3.0 and SATA ports, integrated VRM, 6.5 W TDP on the southbridge. Great.

The motherboard manufacturers won't have much room for their gimmicks, like fans or heatpipes.

As for the DDR4, there's hope for the memory to rise up to 4266 Mhz (MT/s), with starting speeds on 2133 Mhz. Tons of bandwidth :D random access latency times in absolute figures we know haven't decreased nor increased, just the ability to chain/interleave accesses or put more GBs without impacting performance. This must be challenging for the new instructions in Haswell that do gathering.

http://www.realworldtech.com/haswell-cpu/2/
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.24/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
#58
hell even Steamroller is meant to fit AM3+ right?
Steamroller can fit in a AM2 or AM2+ board providing their is a bios update. I've seen a few boards from 2007 ish which are AM3+ compatible.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,399 (4.85/day)
Likes
5,479
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#59
Steamroller can fit in a AM2 or AM2+ board providing their is a bios update. I've seen a few boards from 2007 ish which are AM3+ compatible.
Please find them because to my knowledge AM3+ CPUs no longer have a DDR2 controller in the IMC. AM3 was the last set of chips that could drive DDR2.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
282 (0.13/day)
Likes
62
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (stock voltage, 60C on hottest core)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz (from 4890>5870>460>660>680>460)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD (Steam) + 840 250GB SSD (Origin) + 840 EVO 1TB (work install)
Display(s) Samsung 34" S34E790C (3440x1440) + BenQ XL2420T 120Hz @ 1080p + 24" PHILIPS Touchscreen IPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Recon3D Fatal1ty + Z506 5.1 speakers/Logitech UE9000
Power Supply Corsair RM750i 750W 80PLUS Gold
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech PS/2 keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit (not sidegrading to Windoze 10 until I have to...)
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
#60
One of the reasons why I have upgraded through the last two generations was first for the nice power consumption decrease with Ivy, but the supposed 10% performance increase clock for clock for each generation was nice in my opinion. I know people are probably tired of me saying this, but I need every ounce of CPU performance for many games at 120Hz, and I can easily see the difference in TF2, even though it is relatively old. That game sees big differences with clock speed, as someone with a 5.2GHz 2500K beats out my 4.3GHz 4770K by a good 30 FPS (164 vs. 134 on the same recorded timedemo). Nobody seems to understand that maintaining 120 FPS even in some older multiplayer games is difficult though so I can't really argue with the "Phenom/FX people" who only play at 60 and don't see the CPU bottlenecks I see on my setup.
There is only so much expensive hardware you can throw at poorly optimized engines/games, do not waste too much money trying. I have several other games that suffer the same fate (Chivalry: Medieval Warfare, L4D and most other Valve games especially), and I do not ever intend to upgrade for them because they are released either with ancient development kits and never updated or when single cores were the only/main way to go (so devs were expecting 7GHz+ P4s by now, I presume, which of course never happened). Don't be too quick to blame your CPU though, I don't think TF2 is that CPU limited (it is poorly threaded, but shouldn't run that slow with such an OC'd processor), best way to be sure it is a CPU bottleneck is to run it at 1024x768 or another ridiculously low resolution and see the framerate then. If it goes up, it's a GPU bottleneck.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,275 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,362
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#61
Steamroller can fit in a AM2 or AM2+ board providing their is a bios update. I've seen a few boards from 2007 ish which are AM3+ compatible.
Besides the fact that no AM3+ CPU has a DDR2 memory controller, and hence will not work in an AM2 or AM2+ motherboard, AM3+ CPUs are not even supposed to work in AM3 motherboardS. AMD didn't change the pin layout, but they did change the pins to allow more current, and AM3+ CPUs do not officially support AM3 motherboards.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
4,001 (1.32/day)
Likes
1,652
Location
Sarasota, Florida, USA
System Name Awesomesauce 4.3 | Laptop (MSI GE72VR 6RF Apache Pro-023)
Processor Intel Core i7-5820K 4.16GHz 1.28v/3GHz 1.05v uncore | Intel Core i7-6700HQ @ 3.1GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WiFi LGA2011-v3| Stock
Cooling Corsair H100i v2 w/ 2x EK Vardar F4-120ER + various 120/140mm case fans | Stock
Memory G.Skill RJ-4 16GB DDR4-2666 CL15 quad channel | 12GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix A8G Gaming GTX 1080 @ 2075/1368 boost | NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB +200/+500 + Intel 530
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 500GB + Seagate 3TB 7200RPM + others | Kingston 256GB M.2 SATA + 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) Acer G257HU 1440p 60Hz AH-IPS 4ms | 17.3" 1920*1080 60Hz wide angle TN notebook panel
Case Fractal Design Define XL R2 | MSI
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | Realtek with quad stereo speakers and subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850i Platinum | 19.5v 180w Delta brick
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 | Windows 10 Home x64
Benchmark Scores GTX 1080 please?
#62
There is only so much expensive hardware you can throw at poorly optimized engines/games, do not waste too much money trying. I have several other games that suffer the same fate (Chivalry: Medieval Warfare, L4D and most other Valve games especially), and I do not ever intend to upgrade for them because they are released either with ancient development kits and never updated or when single cores were the only/main way to go (so devs were expecting 7GHz+ P4s by now, I presume, which of course never happened). Don't be too quick to blame your CPU though, I don't think TF2 is that CPU limited (it is poorly threaded, but shouldn't run that slow with such an OC'd processor), best way to be sure it is a CPU bottleneck is to run it at 1024x768 or another ridiculously low resolution and see the framerate then. If it goes up, it's a GPU bottleneck.
It's okay, I use all of my systems for distributed computing and I replace old/dead ones with new ones, so I have no problem upgrading my main rig and passing down the parts to work in my farm. TF2 is CPU bottlenecked because I can literally turn down the CPU multiplier and my framerate goes down accordingly. My 7970 usually sits at around 15-40% utilization. Borderlands 2 is close to being CPU bottlenecked but my GPU gets maxed out first. I've seen CPU thread utilization as high as 90% for 1-2 threads in that game as well. Probably one of the worst performing games I have played is Planetside 2, but that's pretty much a given because there are tons of players on each server. :)
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
201 (0.12/day)
Likes
46
Location
Bulgaria /България/
System Name [Ivy Bridge-E + Pascal] desktop, [Broadwell-C + Kepler] HTPC, [Haswell + Kepler] laptop
#63
It's funny how all of you are controversing about LGA1155 and LGA2011, but you are forgetting the real king - LGA1366 - may be the biggest leap in Intel's history. Also this is the chipset with longest life. Even till now, this is kick ass platform. :) So, looking forward for Haswell-E. Everything else (LGA1150/2011) is just a joke.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,192 (5.03/day)
Likes
4,796
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#64
It's funny how all of you are controversing about LGA1155 and LGA2011, but you are forgetting the real king - LGA1366 - may be the biggest leap in Intel's history. Also this is the chipset with longest life. Even till now, this is kick ass platform. :) So, looking forward for Haswell-E. Everything else is just a gimmic.
what sucks is Intel ditched it too fast- despite it being faster in certain tasks than 1156/1155.
 
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
26 (0.02/day)
Likes
12
#65
Yea I know and i thought that to be crazy as the difference between the two was near nothing :confused: I guess im just used to using AMD and having many CPU choices from even three gens back to use in my current mobo :ohwell: unless there is some major major difference, hell even Steamroller is meant to fit AM3+ right?

To me Intel is just making it confusing with all these new sockets, but that's just me.

I can under stand I guess with this new 8 core as its intels first and all, but i just don't get it with socket 1150, that socket is going to be very short lived?
We are talking about a new memory type, that alone changes a lot of stuff on the mobo. Also you are paying 500+ $ for CPU you can fork out half of that for a new platform.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,024 (0.50/day)
Likes
170
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel i7 920 oc to 3.5ghz
Motherboard MSI x58 Platinum
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory G.Skill 6gb ddr3 1333mhz 7-7-7-18
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce 3X GV-N670OC-2GD
Storage Samsung EVO SSD
Display(s) Viewsonic 1440x900 5ms
Case CoolMaster HAF 932
Power Supply Coolmax 950w
Software Win 7 64bit
#66
It's funny how all of you are controversing about LGA1155 and LGA2011, but you are forgetting the real king - LGA1366 - may be the biggest leap in Intel's history. Also this is the chipset with longest life. Even till now, this is kick ass platform. :) So, looking forward for Haswell-E. Everything else (LGA1150/2011) is just a joke.
LGA1366 was awesome. Nice to see Intel throw an eight core bone *next year* to the performance category but I'm waiting on Skylake in 2015 if I can.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
691 (0.36/day)
Likes
85
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
System Name Intel® X99 Wellsburg
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-5820K - 4.2GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage V E10 (1701)
Cooling CORSAIR H100
Memory CMD16GX4M4A2666C15
Video Card(s) EVGA 780Ti K|NGP|N Classified
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB/waiting M.2
Display(s) Samsung P2450H
Case CORSAIR Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Deck 87 Francium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#67
Like most of people probably, and I decide to wait that Haswell 8 cores Black Box.
That worth waiting for people who have everything almost latest.
Now only DDR4, SATA Express and more than 6 cores is important.
This platform worth waiting 100%. Even to everybody leave 50e every month it's enough for
8 cores Intel Black and one Black motherboard.
IB-E is to similar with SB-E, Haswell is same as my 4 cores, DDR3, 7%, SATA III same speed, little better performance,
20% worse OC. Motherboards are much better but for Haswell than for IB but X99 will be even better.
We must attack on Intel and press them to make that monster like people deserve, with 1000MHz OC possible on AIR and good performance difference.
At least 15% clear from IB-E/
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,399 (4.85/day)
Likes
5,479
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#68
We must attack on Intel and press them to make that monster like people deserve, with 1000MHz OC possible on AIR and good performance difference.
Haha. What? Consumers don't disserve anything. It all comes down to what Intel can do and how many resources they devote to improving their platform. They have the market and there is absolutely no reason for them to keep pushing performance; there is no reason to. Any software that your average consumer runs will work fine on hardware that has been out for the last 3 years. Also my 3820 has a stock clock of 3.6Ghz (3.8Ghz boost) and it can overclock to 4.75 before needing too much voltage. Last time I checked that's just about 1Ghz and I'm running on air. I'm pretty sure that's my motherboard holding it back too because I've seen people with ROG boards pushing the 3820 to 5Ghz. :confused:
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
419 (0.19/day)
Likes
116
Processor Intel i7-3820 @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X79-UD7
Cooling Thermaltake Water Pro 2.0
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Leadtek GeForce GTX 670 Reference
Storage Intel SSD530 120GB OS/BOOT, various mechanical drives for storage
Display(s) 2x Dell U2311H
Case Lian-Li PC-V1000
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence ST
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Modular 600W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
#69
They realy should of just kept skt 1155 for Haswell and Broadwell as well, that would of been a realy good socket to keep then? Not like there is a huge difference between them all is there?
I would imagine integrating the VRM onto the chip would make the old socket incompatible, no matter the pin-counts. It's obviously a mobile-focused decision that unforunately affects all of us.

Question for all of us hold-outs is when does this actually release? If it comes out next year then Ivy Bridge-E could very well be the shortest lived product ever.
 

Random Murderer

The Anti-Midas
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
6,977 (1.73/day)
Likes
1,887
Location
Florida, A.K.A. the Sweatbox
System Name TOO MUCH RADIATOR! | The TV Box a.k.a. The Shoebox
Processor Core i7 4930K @ 4.5GHz | Core i5 6600K @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus X79 Rampage IV Extreme | Asus Z170i Pro Gaming
Cooling Custom water on CPU and GPU, dual 360mm radiators | Corsair H80i
Memory 4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX DDR3-1600 | 2x 4GB G.Skill RipJaws 4 DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD R9 295x2 | PowerColor AMD HD7970
Storage Samsung SSD 830 256GB, various others | 2x 1TB Seagate Barracudas in RAID1
Display(s) Dell U2713HM 2560x1440 IPS | Panasonic TC-L32E5 1080p IPS TV
Case Thermaltake Suppressor F51 (stripped down to hold two radiators) | Cooler Master Elite 130
Audio Device(s) RM-DAC -> Xiang Sheng 708b -> Sennheiser HD650 | HDMI sound device on 7970
Power Supply LEPA G1600-MA 1600W | Corsair CX750M 750W
Software Win 10 64
Benchmark Scores over 9000 BungholioMarks, "Bitchin' Fast"
#70
A little disappointing for us X79 owners who were actually looking forward to IVB-E, but at the same time I don't see myself hopping on the X99 bandwagon. The first generation of new RAM is generally pretty slow for its own generation. When DDR3 just came out, there was only a slight jump in speed over high-end DDR2(DDR2 was at 1200+, DDR3 launched at 1066 and 1333).
I'll take my quad channel, high speed DDR3 over that quad channel, same speed or only slightly faster DDR4 that requires a new board and CPU.
Besides, 32GB of DDR3-2800+ and a six-core IVB-E should be powerful enough for a few more years and by then X119 or whatever they plan on calling the next HEDT platform should be out and I'll be ready to upgrade again. Hell, X58 is just now starting to lag behind a little, and it's been around for what, nearly 6 years?
I suppose my point is this: I can justify an upgrade to IVB-E and some new RAM in six months, but I can't justify building an all-new system just for DDR4 and a slight CPU performance boost in a year and a half. To those that don't already have an HEDT platform, this may be appealing, but DDR4 needs time to mature on the open market before I'll consider going there...

EDIT: Another point is that with any of the SB, SB-E, IVB, and Haswell i7 chips, you put a slight OC on them and you'd be hard-pressed to find a real-world application(not benches or crunching/folding) that actually stresses all cores, much less stresses all cores to 100%. Why waste time with four more threads that run a little slower when eight/twelve threads aren't being fully utilized? E-peen, that's all I can figure...
Looking back, I should have built an X58 rig when they were new. I would just now be looking to upgrade, lol. That being said, with this X79 rig I don't even need to upgrade to IVB-E and it should last a few more years. I'm really just looking forward to IVB-E for higher RAM speeds and a new overclocking adventure. I'm sure a lot of people will love their X99 rigs, but the appeal to me is really just getting a look forward.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,024 (0.50/day)
Likes
170
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel i7 920 oc to 3.5ghz
Motherboard MSI x58 Platinum
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory G.Skill 6gb ddr3 1333mhz 7-7-7-18
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce 3X GV-N670OC-2GD
Storage Samsung EVO SSD
Display(s) Viewsonic 1440x900 5ms
Case CoolMaster HAF 932
Power Supply Coolmax 950w
Software Win 7 64bit
#71
Consumers don't disserve anything. It all comes down to what Intel can do and how many resources they devote to improving their platform.
What? Consumers pay for product, if the product isn't up to snuff *Haswell or Ivy-E* then consumers will not buy, switch to AMD possibly or wait until the next upgrade cycle.

You can't deny Intel is innovating [performance wise] at a slower pace than enthuisiasts or early adopters would like.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
6,201 (1.67/day)
Likes
982
System Name Phantom Skylake
Processor Intel i5 6600k @ 4.5GHZ w/ Corsair H80i CPU AiO w/Corsair 120mm SP120 RBG fan
Motherboard Asus z170-A
Cooling 4x120mm Corsair SP120 RBG fans
Memory G.skill DDR4 3200MHz 2x4GB (Soon to be Corsair Vengeance RBG)
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCUII GTX 980 STRIX
Storage Samsung 960 EVO m.2, Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 2TB backup, 16TB Synology DS1515+ RAID-5
Display(s) Acer Predator 34" 3440x1440
Case Corsair 570x RBG Tempered Glass
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Corsair Void Wireless RGB
Power Supply Corsair HX750w Professional Series
Mouse Logitech G602s
Keyboard Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 x64 Professional
Benchmark Scores Coming Soon
#72
This might actually be worth upgrading to.

Still no Thunderbolt? Come on Intel, you're going to let it go the way of firewire.
All the cool sounding names always go the way of the dodo rather quickly.

So you need to once again replace your motherboard, its not a drop in replacement? and im guessing the price will be around $1500?
Even if the CPU was drop in, they are going DDR4 which would require a motherboard upgrade anyway.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
75 (0.02/day)
Likes
5
#73
So much bitching about new motherboards/sockets here, but clearly none of you noted that the new platform supports DDR4 which is highly likely the main reason for the socket change. Considering Intel would have to make major changes to the memory interface of the CPU, it's easy to see why they had to change the CPU socket.
If you don't want to pay for it, no-one's going to be forcing you to upgrade, so there...
I'll bet Intel could make DDR4 work on a 775 socket if they were incline to all they have to do is move around the furniture so to speak.What I'll like to know is why would they promote more motherboard sales if thats a business they are leaving, is it to sell more bridge-chipset and the like . When I buy a new CPU I pair it with a new mobo because of advances in both technologies (Like thunderbolt maybe) but it wound be nice if it were my choice .
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,399 (4.85/day)
Likes
5,479
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#74
I'll bet Intel could make DDR4 work on a 775 socket if they were incline to all they have to do is move around the furniture so to speak.
Yeah, if they wanted to redesign and replace the MCH and every DIMM slot on every skt775 board, then maybe, but that's ridiculous and stupid. It's not as easy as it sounds to just move a platform from what type of memory to another. Wherever the IMC is, it has to support it. So for the example for Haswell-E, they don't just have to re-do the circuitry for the DRAM, they have to redo the IMC in the Haswell-E chip itself to process DDR4.

It's astonishing how people think that it's so easy to change a CPU or how a modern computer works, it's completely outstanding and blows my mind. The reality of it is that it isn't that easy and the more changes you make the more money, time, and effort it will cost.

What? Consumers pay for product, if the product isn't up to snuff *Haswell or Ivy-E* then consumers will not buy, switch to AMD possibly or wait until the next upgrade cycle.

You can't deny Intel is innovating [performance wise] at a slower pace than enthuisiasts or early adopters would like.
Just because Intel hasn't improved performance doesn't mean that they're not innovating. I see a number of changes to Haswell that aren't CPU performance related that are worthy of note.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
419 (0.19/day)
Likes
116
Processor Intel i7-3820 @ 4.5GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte X79-UD7
Cooling Thermaltake Water Pro 2.0
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Leadtek GeForce GTX 670 Reference
Storage Intel SSD530 120GB OS/BOOT, various mechanical drives for storage
Display(s) 2x Dell U2311H
Case Lian-Li PC-V1000
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence ST
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Modular 600W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
#75
I'll bet Intel could make DDR4 work on a 775 socket if they were incline to all they have to do is move around the furniture so to speak.What I'll like to know is why would they promote more motherboard sales if thats a business they are leaving, is it to sell more bridge-chipset and the like . When I buy a new CPU I pair it with a new mobo because of advances in both technologies (Like thunderbolt maybe) but it wound be nice if it were my choice .
It's easy to make stuff work on a 775 socket because stuff (like the memory controller) was still on the north bridge and not integrated into the CPU. In fact, they could probably get DDR4 to work with an old Core2 on Socket 775, but they sure won't get it to work with any current Nehalem, Sandy or Ivy.