• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

HD 7970: Bulldozer vs. Sandy Bridge vs. Nehalem

Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,268 (0.22/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4021 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch C
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 32GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) HP ZR24w + LG 24MB35 on Neo-Flex® Dual Monitor Lift Stand
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/2dey9c
My argument was according to Wizzards review. The Bulldozer performs on par with the i7 Nehalem. If Bulldozers single threaded performance is so subpar, why does the Nehalem get a pass? Sure its older but I bet 7/10 of TPU members still own a i7 920 or had one, and they wouldn't classify it as a shitty performer at all.

It's not that I'm asking for a pass, I'm just pointing out that people buy whats suitable for them. Some people dont mind average gaming performance if they can encode their videos super quick, doesnt mean the CPU is rubbish, just means its not for you.

In this review it only performs on par do to GPU limitations at the higher res. If you look at the lower res it looses. Nehalem doesn't need a pass because it offers superior IPC to Bulldozer. When you start looking at benchmarks outside of games you will see this. I am a TPU user with a 920 and I classify it as a better performer than BD even more so at my overclocked speed.

And I agree people should buy what suits their needs and purchasing level. I didn't say its total rubbish but I think Bulldozer is still a flop because it doesn't offer performance much greater than phenom II or intel 3 year old Nehalem cpu's.

When you spend 4+ years designing a cpu and it doesn't beat your previous model this is bad no matter how you spin it. And yes it offers you an upgrade path but not a performance improvement so why bother upgrading?
 

Hamlet

New Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
13 (0.00/day)
In an equation as performance/€ there are 2 cogs you can tweak, not just 1.
One way is obvious: double the performance.
But there is also another way: Halve the price!

This is what happened with the iteration from HD5850 --> HD6850/HD6870.
The HD6870 was only slightly faster than the HD5850 but the price was smashed into half.
In my book that's just as good and led me to buy one.

Of course there are also some other factors playing into that equation (e.g. power consumption), where the HD6870 also did better than its predecessor.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (0.82/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
When you spend 4+ years designing a cpu and it doesn't beat your previous model this is bad no matter how you spin it. And yes it offers you an upgrade path but not a performance improvement so why bother upgrading?

Fair enough the development for bulldozer took far too long.

To say it's upgrade path is "not a performance improvement" is a misconception. Look at the FX-8150 reviews in encoding, 3D rendering, compression and general productivity and you'll see that for people coming off an Athlon II, Phenom II X4/X6 and you'll see the upgrade path does yeild an big improvement.

Not all upgrades are based on gaming. I can go from a low end Athlon II X4 to FX-8150 spanking an i5 2500k in rendering, just by dropping in a new CPU. The perfect upgrade path for a 3D animator.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,268 (0.22/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4021 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch C
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 32GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) HP ZR24w + LG 24MB35 on Neo-Flex® Dual Monitor Lift Stand
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/2dey9c
Fair enough the development for bulldozer took far too long.

To say it's upgrade path is "not a performance improvement" is a misconception. Look at the FX-8150 reviews in encoding, 3D rendering, compression and general productivity and you'll see that for people coming off an Athlon II, Phenom II X4/X6 and you'll see the upgrade path does yeild an big improvement.

Not all upgrades are based on gaming. I can go from a low end Athlon II X4 to FX-8150 spanking an i5 2500k in rendering, just by dropping in a new CPU. The perfect upgrade path for a 3D animator.

yes in those area's it will show an improvement over phenom.

The 8150k will indeed beat a 2500k in rendering but it will not beat a 2600k which is in the same price bracket.

with a am3 board you don't really have much of a choice when upgrading. And that would be the only reason I would buy one because there is no other option.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (0.82/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
yes in those area's it will show an improvement over phenom.

Gd gd
The 8150k will indeed beat a 2500k in rendering but it will not beat a 2600k which is in the same price bracket.

In the UK the FX8150 price falls inbetween both.

Ebuyer.com
2600K - £240
FX 8150 - £210
2500K £170

Anyways if I render all day as a job, I'm running socket AM3 and I have limited money and it's a choice between dropping in a FX-8150 or changing platforms specifically for a 2600K. Most people would select the FX-8150 all day.

And to be fair, there are some situations where the FX-8150 does outperform the 2600K, transcoding comes to mind. Now if you transcode all day, Intel doesnt have a commercial solution.


with a am3 board you don't really have much of a choice when upgrading..

Huh??? Socket AM3 has more CPUs on it's support list than any current Intel socket.

And that would be the only reason I would buy one because there is no other option.

Granted if coming from a Phenom II X6, yes you'll have little option.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
11,111 (1.97/day)
In this review it only performs on par do to GPU limitations at the higher res. If you look at the lower res it looses. Nehalem doesn't need a pass because it offers superior IPC to Bulldozer. When you start looking at benchmarks outside of games you will see this. I am a TPU user with a 920 and I classify it as a better performer than BD even more so at my overclocked speed.

And I agree people should buy what suits their needs and purchasing level. I didn't say its total rubbish but I think Bulldozer is still a flop because it doesn't offer performance much greater than phenom II or intel 3 year old Nehalem cpu's.

When you spend 4+ years designing a cpu and it doesn't beat your previous model this is bad no matter how you spin it. And yes it offers you an upgrade path but not a performance improvement so why bother upgrading?

I7 is a hell of a chip. :respect: As are all the other current chips and again this is dumb, buy the cheapest cpu and oc the hell out of it and use the extra money to buy the best performing gpu your system supports whether it is Amd or Intel.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,268 (0.22/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4021 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch C
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 32GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) HP ZR24w + LG 24MB35 on Neo-Flex® Dual Monitor Lift Stand
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/2dey9c
Gd gd


In the UK the FX8150 price falls inbetween both.

Ebuyer.com
2600K - £240
FX 8150 - £210
2500K £170

Anyways if I render all day as a job, I'm running socket AM3 and I have limited money and it's a choice between dropping in a FX-8150 or changing platforms specifically for a 2600K. Most people would select the FX-8150 all day.

And to be fair, there are some situations where the FX-8150 does outperform the 2600K, transcoding comes to mind. Now if you transcode all day, Intel doesnt have a commercial solution.




Huh??? Socket AM3 has more CPUs on it's support list than any current Intel socket.



Granted if coming from a Phenom II X6, yes you'd have little option.

I agree with all you have said, and sorry when I said am3 I was talking about just moving from a phenom level chip you are correct there are many more choices on the AMD side as this has been one of the areas AMD is better than Intel for socket compatibility.

as for the transcoding part all of Intel 6 core chips I believe bulldozer cannot touch. So gulftown and sb-e and yes if you mention price they won't be comparable but then again if that's my job and a business expense cost is not that big a factor.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,670 (4.96/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
I agree with all you have said, and sorry when I said am3 I was talking about just moving from a phenom level chip you are correct there are many more choices on the AMD side as this has been one of the areas AMD is better than Intel for socket compatibility.

as for the transcoding part all of Intel 6 core chips I believe bulldozer cannot touch. So gulftown and sb-e and yes if you mention price they won't be comparable but then again if that's my job and a business expense cost is not that big a factor.

Depends as a small business I would choose to towers with an AMD processor vs one tower with a highend Intel. Buisiness right off or not you still have to have the up front capitol.

As for the GPU comparison an HD2900XT smoked a 3870 yet which was the better seller?

As for GPU limited benching I'm just saying the $280 for a cpu another $150-200 on mobo and $500 on a GPU I'm buying at least a pair of 1920x1080P monitors and running eyefinity. At that point it makes no sense to choose anyone cpu for its vast gaming improvements. That would be GPU limited I7, I5, AMD it doesn't matter they will all push the same framerate.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,268 (0.22/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4021 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch C
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 32GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) HP ZR24w + LG 24MB35 on Neo-Flex® Dual Monitor Lift Stand
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/2dey9c
Depends as a small business I would choose to towers with an AMD processor vs one tower with a highend Intel. Buisiness right off or not you still have to have the up front capitol.

As for the GPU comparison an HD2900XT smoked a 3870 yet which was the better seller?

As for GPU limited benching I'm just saying the $280 for a cpu another $150-200 on mobo and $500 on a GPU I'm buying at least a pair of 1920x1080P monitors and running eyefinity. At that point it makes no sense to choose anyone cpu for its vast gaming improvements. That would be GPU limited I7, I5, AMD it doesn't matter they will all push the same framerate.

Yes it does depend.

If my business was rendering work for clients time is money. So yes cost of Intel's rigs would be higher but the investment will also pay for itself sooner.

I don't remember difference being as large as you state for it to be considered "smoking" it.
its been awhile since I looked at benchmarks but I do own an Asus 3870 512mb in my closet somewhere.

I'm someone that prefers high-end single gpu's to xfire/sli due to the stuttering issue and drivers that come with that kind of setup.

But good point if going that route.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
51,400 (8.25/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles
Processor Ryzen R7 5800X (PBO tweaked, 4.4-5.05GHz)
Motherboard Asus x570 Gaming-F
Cooling EK Quantum Velocity AM4 + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate. Dual rad.
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @4000 C18 (1.4V, SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Often underclocked to 1500Mhz 0.737v
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Gigabyte G32QC (4k80Hz, 1440p 165Hz) + Phillips 328m6fjrmb (4K 60Hz, 1440p 144Hz)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 |Razer Leviathan | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE (custom white and steel keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS)
Benchmark Scores I don't quite know how i managed to get such a top tier PC, I am not rich.
As for GPU limited benching I'm just saying the $280 for a cpu another $150-200 on mobo and $500 on a GPU I'm buying at least a pair of 1920x1080P monitors and running eyefinity. At that point it makes no sense to choose anyone cpu for its vast gaming improvements. That would be GPU limited I7, I5, AMD it doesn't matter they will all push the same framerate.

that argument has never made sense.



yes, if you slap in more and more video cards, eventually you end up CPU limited... but thats it.

people always use the 'logical' extension of 'so that means, CPU doesnt matter!' that is wrong.


your CPU requirements matter just as much, or even more - and who's to say you cant lower one or two CPU settings to get higher GPU usage/FPS? every percent matters when you want to get the most out of your video cards.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,670 (4.96/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Yes it does depend.

If my business was rendering work for clients time is money. So yes cost of Intel's rigs would be higher but the investment will also pay for itself sooner.

Rendering performance isn't 2x on a 6 core SB-e, but it is double the cost. You can shave some money off of both with lesser boards but most companies will pick an Intel mobo so to be fair I picked a midrange AMD 990FX. With the entire PC price factored in its still only a $400ish difference. So for every 2 SB-e's you could pretty much build 3 BD rigs... I would get better turn around running 3 "slower" rigs than 2 "faster" ones.

SB-e

I7 3930K $599
Intel X79 $279

$878


BD

FX8150 $269
Gigabyte 990FX $154
$423

rest of rendering rig

Geil 4x8GB $279
Powercolour 6770 $106
Seagate 1TB $104
Coolermaster Case+PSU $160

$649

I don't remember difference being as large as you state for it to be considered "smoking" it.
its been awhile since I looked at benchmarks but I do own an Asus 3870 512mb in my closet somewhere.

It was only a couple of %'s in all honesty the stock oc'd cards were better performers overall.
I'm someone that prefers high-end single gpu's to xfire/sli due to the stuttering issue and drivers that come with that kind of setup.

But good point if going that route.

I like whatever gives the best performance last setup I had was dual 4870X2's or dual 4850X2's before that dual 3870X2's before that quad 3850's with nvidia stuff thrown about in the mix.

that argument has never made sense.



yes, if you slap in more and more video cards, eventually you end up CPU limited... but thats it.

people always use the 'logical' extension of 'so that means, CPU doesnt matter!' that is wrong.


your CPU requirements matter just as much, or even more - and who's to say you cant lower one or two CPU settings to get higher GPU usage/FPS? every percent matters when you want to get the most out of your video cards.


I am saying with currently available GPU's and high resolution what difference does CPU make? <2FPS? When GPU's drop new CPU's will be out and as you can see with Intel's 3 year old i7 920 again not huge performance gain. As it sits at a resolution I would play there is next to no difference between a 3 year old i7, 3 year old phenom x4 or brand spanking new SB. Current/last generation highend CPU's have more than enough performance for all current games GPU's are still the limiting factor. Anything below 1080P is pretty much a useless resolution on a $2000 PC.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
427 (0.11/day)
System Name AMD
Processor Phenom 2 x6 1075T @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair 4 Extreme
Cooling Custom Water Cooling Loop
Memory 4Gb Kingston Hyper X 2000Mhz
Video Card(s) Power Color 4870x2
Storage 2x WD Carviar Blacks 64mb Cache - RAID 0
Case Cooler Master Cosmos S
Power Supply Jeantech Absolute 1000w Modular
Review is fail... Average frame rates only tell half the tail when it comes to CPU performance.

TPU should of included the minimum frame rates as that would of showed a much wider gap between the 3 architectures used in the testing.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
1,929 (0.54/day)
Location
Sydney NSW, Australia
System Name Белая коробка | Alienware 13R3 | Asus T300 Chi | Synology DS418 w/ 4X8TB WD Red | iPhone 12
Processor Intel Core i9-10850K | Intel i7-7700HQ
Motherboard MSi Z490i Unify | Dell/Alienware thing
Cooling NZXT X63 w/ Arctic P14 fans | Double fan
Memory Crucial 2X16GB Ballistix White RGB DDR4 3600mhz | DDR4 2X8GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 VISION | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB, Samsung 860 QVO 2TB | 256gb M.2 SSD, 1TB Intel 760p
Display(s) Gigabyte G34WQC 34" UWQHD 144Hz VA & TIEM 32" QHD 165Hz VA | 13" 1080p IPS & Sony X90J 65" 4K TV
Case Lian Li Q58 White PCIe4.0 | Alienware 13R3
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X3 (HiFiMAN HE-4XX & Sennheiser HD 6XX) | onboard sound -Onkyo 808 Receiver
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum | Dell 180W brick
Mouse Roccat Burst Pro | Roccat Kain 202
Keyboard DIY Geek 64 PCB (Kailh Box Silent Pink - Matcha XDA Keycaps) | Red Square OLD SCHOOL TKL
Software Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores 2018 BMW 125i F20 LCI-2 | M-Sport | Sunset Orange | Shadow Line | Sunroof
i am still surprised how well the nehalem processors are holding up especially because of how old they are. I upgraded from my 920 at the start of last year to a 2600k only because it seemed more fun and it ran much cooler.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,840 (1.86/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Review is fail... Average frame rates only tell half the tail when it comes to CPU performance.

TPU should of included the minimum frame rates as that would of showed a much wider gap between the 3 architectures used in the testing.

Yeah, cause things like updates, slower hard drives, network congestion, and many other factors are always the same.



Wait, they aren't.


Minimum frame rates on a system are not indicative of overall performance, they are useful, but not as much as common sense. Common sense tells me that if it is less than 40FPS it should have the settings dropped, the resolution dropped, or its time for a upgrade.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
427 (0.11/day)
System Name AMD
Processor Phenom 2 x6 1075T @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair 4 Extreme
Cooling Custom Water Cooling Loop
Memory 4Gb Kingston Hyper X 2000Mhz
Video Card(s) Power Color 4870x2
Storage 2x WD Carviar Blacks 64mb Cache - RAID 0
Case Cooler Master Cosmos S
Power Supply Jeantech Absolute 1000w Modular
Yeah, cause things like updates, slower hard drives, network congestion, and many other factors are always the same.



Wait, they aren't.


Minimum frame rates on a system are not indicative of overall performance, they are useful, but not as much as common sense. Common sense tells me that if it is less than 40FPS it should have the settings dropped, the resolution dropped, or its time for a upgrade.

Very very rarely doors any thing that you listed above cause low minimums.

And common sense should tell you that :rolleyes:
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
51,400 (8.25/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles
Processor Ryzen R7 5800X (PBO tweaked, 4.4-5.05GHz)
Motherboard Asus x570 Gaming-F
Cooling EK Quantum Velocity AM4 + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate. Dual rad.
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @4000 C18 (1.4V, SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Often underclocked to 1500Mhz 0.737v
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Gigabyte G32QC (4k80Hz, 1440p 165Hz) + Phillips 328m6fjrmb (4K 60Hz, 1440p 144Hz)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 |Razer Leviathan | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE (custom white and steel keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS)
Benchmark Scores I don't quite know how i managed to get such a top tier PC, I am not rich.
Very very rarely doors any thing that you listed above cause low minimums.

And common sense should tell you that :rolleyes:

it takes just one stutter from a hard drive or SATA controller or background windows task to cause a min FPS dip. reviews that use them, always have to manually look for such dips and remove them from their results, so you're still getting an average - just say, the bottom 10% averaged, instead of the total amount.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
427 (0.11/day)
System Name AMD
Processor Phenom 2 x6 1075T @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair 4 Extreme
Cooling Custom Water Cooling Loop
Memory 4Gb Kingston Hyper X 2000Mhz
Video Card(s) Power Color 4870x2
Storage 2x WD Carviar Blacks 64mb Cache - RAID 0
Case Cooler Master Cosmos S
Power Supply Jeantech Absolute 1000w Modular
it takes just one stutter from a hard drive or SATA controller or background windows task to cause a min FPS dip. reviews that use them, always have to manually look for such dips and remove them from their results, so you're still getting an average - just say, the bottom 10% averaged, instead of the total amount.

If a HDD stutter causes a frame dip then its either a bad engine or you need more memory.

All game should be kept in local memory so a HDD shouldn't affect it at all.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
51,400 (8.25/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles
Processor Ryzen R7 5800X (PBO tweaked, 4.4-5.05GHz)
Motherboard Asus x570 Gaming-F
Cooling EK Quantum Velocity AM4 + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate. Dual rad.
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @4000 C18 (1.4V, SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Often underclocked to 1500Mhz 0.737v
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Gigabyte G32QC (4k80Hz, 1440p 165Hz) + Phillips 328m6fjrmb (4K 60Hz, 1440p 144Hz)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 |Razer Leviathan | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE (custom white and steel keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS)
Benchmark Scores I don't quite know how i managed to get such a top tier PC, I am not rich.
Code:
If a HDD stutter causes a frame dip then its either a bad engine or you need more memory.

All game should be kept in local memory so a HDD shouldn't affect it at all.

sorry, but you've clearly never dealt with this stuff before. short of running everything from a ramdrive, you're never going to prevent these kinds of problems.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,670 (4.96/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
Code:

sorry, but you've clearly never dealt with this stuff before. short of running everything from a ramdrive, you're never going to prevent these kinds of problems.

And even then memory controllers are not perfect. There will still be dips running a ram drive.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
427 (0.11/day)
System Name AMD
Processor Phenom 2 x6 1075T @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair 4 Extreme
Cooling Custom Water Cooling Loop
Memory 4Gb Kingston Hyper X 2000Mhz
Video Card(s) Power Color 4870x2
Storage 2x WD Carviar Blacks 64mb Cache - RAID 0
Case Cooler Master Cosmos S
Power Supply Jeantech Absolute 1000w Modular
Code:

sorry, but you've clearly never dealt with this stuff before. short of running everything from a ramdrive, you're never going to prevent these kinds of problems.

My drives are in active when I game.... And have never gone crazy and lowered my fps.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
51,400 (8.25/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles
Processor Ryzen R7 5800X (PBO tweaked, 4.4-5.05GHz)
Motherboard Asus x570 Gaming-F
Cooling EK Quantum Velocity AM4 + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate. Dual rad.
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @4000 C18 (1.4V, SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Often underclocked to 1500Mhz 0.737v
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Gigabyte G32QC (4k80Hz, 1440p 165Hz) + Phillips 328m6fjrmb (4K 60Hz, 1440p 144Hz)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 |Razer Leviathan | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE (custom white and steel keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS)
Benchmark Scores I don't quite know how i managed to get such a top tier PC, I am not rich.
My drives are in active when I game.... And have never gone crazy and lowered my fps.

you cant see the dips with the naked eye, they show up in FRAPS logs and such, hence ruining the minimum FPS benchmarks. if your drives are inactive, you must be playing small console ports. every game has a load screen, every OS has background tasks. this isnt worth arguing over, what i've stated is fact - minimum FPS is tricky to measure.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
427 (0.11/day)
System Name AMD
Processor Phenom 2 x6 1075T @ 4.1Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair 4 Extreme
Cooling Custom Water Cooling Loop
Memory 4Gb Kingston Hyper X 2000Mhz
Video Card(s) Power Color 4870x2
Storage 2x WD Carviar Blacks 64mb Cache - RAID 0
Case Cooler Master Cosmos S
Power Supply Jeantech Absolute 1000w Modular
you cant see the dips with the naked eye, they show up in FRAPS logs and such, hence ruining the minimum FPS benchmarks. if your drives are inactive, you must be playing small console ports. every game has a load screen, every OS has background tasks. this isnt worth arguing over, what i've stated is fact - minimum FPS is tricky to measure.

Its not tricky at all, And fraps is not 100% accurate and causes issues itself.

If you get to the point where HDD access is affecting your frame rate in a big enough way for you to notice it without using frame rate counters ( again not 100% accurate and there own issues ) then there us something wrong with your rig.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
51,400 (8.25/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles
Processor Ryzen R7 5800X (PBO tweaked, 4.4-5.05GHz)
Motherboard Asus x570 Gaming-F
Cooling EK Quantum Velocity AM4 + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate. Dual rad.
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @4000 C18 (1.4V, SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Often underclocked to 1500Mhz 0.737v
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Gigabyte G32QC (4k80Hz, 1440p 165Hz) + Phillips 328m6fjrmb (4K 60Hz, 1440p 144Hz)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 |Razer Leviathan | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE (custom white and steel keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS)
Benchmark Scores I don't quite know how i managed to get such a top tier PC, I am not rich.
Its not tricky at all, And fraps is not 100% accurate and causes issues itself.

If you get to the point where HDD access is affecting your frame rate in a big enough way for you to notice it without using frame rate counters ( again not 100% accurate and there own issues ) then there us something wrong with your rig.

this has nothing to do with the original discussion of why minimum FPS wasnt used in the reviews.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
23,040 (3.61/day)
Processor Core i7-8700K
Memory 32 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 3080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
And fraps is not 100% accurate and causes issues itself

doesn't that mean "tricky" ? actually your statement confirms that.

how do you propose to reliably measure minimum fps? how to ensure decent accuracy? what resolution and accuracy for the measurement do you consider acceptable?

how is minimum fps defined? (just one frame? over one second?)
when does a frame start and end anyway? what about the time between frames?

everybody who shows minimum fps in their reviews uses fraps.
 
Last edited:

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,670 (4.96/day)
Location
Houston
System Name All the cores || Into the Blue
Processor 2990WX || 5960X
Motherboard Asrock X399M || Asus X99M WS
Cooling CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL || TBD
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16 || EVGA 3200 2x8GB
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's || EVGA 1080Ti FE
Storage 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB || OCZ Vector 180 480GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz || TBD
Case Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal || Supermicro S5 (GS5A-753K)
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w || Seasonic Snow Silent 750w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller || TBD
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX, Steam controller || Corsair K70
Software W10P || W10P
doesn't that mean "tricky" ? actually your statement confirms that.

how do you propose to reliably measure minimum fps? how to ensure decent accuracy? what resolution and accuracy for the measurement do you consider acceptable?

how is minimum fps defined? (just one frame? over one second?)
when does a frame start and end anyway? what about the time between frames?

Haha I read that post as go play in traffic antuk15. You know what W1zzard probably has no idea what he is talking about I mean he only runs a forum with 65 thousand members and 2.4 million posts, not to mention some of the most in depth reviews on the internet. :shadedshu
 
Top