• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

In search for the "perfect" monitor...

I'm kind of bummed that Dell will be coming out with a 3440x1440 monitor (QD-OLED from Samsung) that has a gen 2 panel with some other enhancements compared to mine - including better text clarity. They have used a different sub-pixel layout that is more rectantangular. It doesn't have the full specs of the upcoming Gen3 panel. TFTCentral is calling in gen 2.5. This info was out around 2 months ago, but I missed it. Always something around better around the corning. The Gen3's have a new processor and software to reduce burn in and extend the life of the panel - but it's being saved for high refresh rate 27" QHD and 32" 4K monitors over the next year. Boo hoo :shadedshu: ;). Geez, this forum has the worst emojis!
 
Just buy the one most people buy. There is no such thing as a perfect monitor. Searching for rhat goes down a real deep rabit hole.
 
I bought a Samsung 27" curved monitor a few years ago, but after a while I couldn't see any benefits at all, more of a novelty really.
My wife uses it now for her accounting work and seems to like it, while I'm using an LG 32" QHD 144Hz which I love and see no need to change in the near future. It would be hard to go back anything less to be honest.
 
Sorry to resurrect an older thread, but I’m on the quest for a new monitor. I was nearly settled on the Dell AW3225QF, but I came across this review on XDA where the reviewer describes a calibration drift occurring after leaving the monitor on for a while. He details this under the heading “The big caveat” and describes what looks like “a hazy filter applied over the screen”.

Has anyone else experienced that with this monitor, or with OLED monitors in general? It’s the first I’m learning of this kind of thing.
 
Sorry to resurrect an older thread, but I’m on the quest for a new monitor. I was nearly settled on the Dell AW3225QF, but I came across this review on XDA where the reviewer describes a calibration drift occurring after leaving the monitor on for a while. He details this under the heading “The big caveat” and describes what looks like “a hazy filter applied over the screen”.

Has anyone else experienced that with this monitor, or with OLED monitors in general? It’s the first I’m learning of this kind of thing.
I prefer ratings from RTINGS.com: https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/dell/alienware-aw3225qf#page-top
I have a Dell AW3423DFW OLED, it's been awesome, but I only bought it in Feb of this year. 3 year burn out Warranty. The monitor you listed is Dell's 3 gen OLED monitor with a better QD-OLED panel and better electronics with, supposedly, better OLED burn in management. ASUS ROG Swift has a flat screen, in case you do not like curved (I missed flat monitors). Good luck!!
 
Personally I have two 4K monitors, first I bought a Lenovo 32" 60Hz one which I like, a little over year after my buddy sold me an Acer Nitro 27" 120Hz one with a cheap price.

I know that OLED is the best what it comes to monitors, but I don't have anything to complain with my IPSes. The 32" one is my media display and I absolutely love to have a larger monitor for videos.
 
A lot of people don't like curved monitors.
I thought also that I'd like to try my 1st 2k "144 hz" monitor, then found for cheap samsung curved 27". I thought "whaat" I don't need it but then just TRIED and LOVED it, but also I just LAUGH when I see 24" curved, it's so small for "curved", lol

Thanks! Damn, just did the math. 158Hz max on DP1.4(a) with 4:4:4. That s*cks - thanks for ruining my day ;). Well, 165Hz isn't worth the bump, but 144->240 would be. So I see the desire for some to wait. Thing I don't understand is that the current Chroma scheme is based around 8 bit color - how does it change for 10 bit? I'm not familiar with Chroma other than I know it exists and affects output quality.
at least you understand that 144 vs 165 is just same LOL like 60 and 75. A bit better but still not worth the full "replacement", if you have "lower", then you need to "upgrade" for something "much better" or the price for the exchange should be like ice cream.
 
I thought also that I'd like to try my 1st 2k "144 hz" monitor, then found for cheap samsung curved 27". I thought "whaat" I don't need it but then just TRIED and LOVED it, but also I just LAUGH when I see 24" curved, it's so small for "curved", lol


at least you understand that 144 vs 165 is just same LOL like 60 and 75. A bit better but still not worth the full "replacement", if you have "lower", then you need to "upgrade" for something "much better" or the price for the exchange should be like ice cream.
I LAUGH when I see the term "2K", who the hell invented that 2560x1440 should be called as "2K". If 3840x2160 is called 4K, then why FHD with its 1920x1080 isn't "2K" when it's much more near to 2K than 2560 pixels.

Man I hate marketing and its stupidity.
 
I prefer ratings from ...
It is not wise to rely on any one review site. They could have got a cherry-picked sample to review, or one that just happened to have a problem.

Ideally, the review site buys several samples of the same product and buys them off-the-shelf just as we consumers would. But most reviewers don't have that luxury and often get just one sample that has been passed around from reviewer to reviewer. So check out multiple reviews sites (if possible) and base your decisions on the common findings. Do not depend on the results of a single site - regardless if favorable, or not. And remember, many reviewers base their reviews (especially their conclusions) on their own personal preferences and not their technical findings (assuming they actually performed technical tests - many don't :)).

Also, unless you are a professional photographer, or CAD/CAE user, perfect color reproduction may not be that important to you. This is especially true for gamers where essentially all the characters and background scenery are computer generated - not real. So as long as human faces are not green or purple, and still look real, it does not matter if the color accuracy is slightly off.

But professionals often need the display on their monitors to accurately display reality AND perfectly match the printed page. This requires both the monitor and the printer be calibrated to a set color standard.

I use to calibrate big screen TVs and monitors for clients using a calibrator similar to this. But so often, when calibration was complete, many non-professional users didn't like it how they looked. They would complain the image lacked warmth or didn't appear natural. We humans have been conditioned over the decades, by the manufacturers to prefer our TV and monitor displays to display unnaturally. So those users would re-tweak the contrast, brightness and hues, etc. until it looked right to them - then upset they wasted their money having me calibrate it.

It is the same with home audio reproduction equipment. You calibrate the frequency response to the room to achieve as close to a "flat" "20 to 20KHz" response as possible, and the user didn't like the sound. So they would boost the bass and treble and attenuate the mids.

Oh well. We humans are fickle.

All I am really saying is base your monitor purchasing decision in part, by the specs, but also in your own personal preference.
 
I used novideo_srgb to "un-oversaturate" my monitor's colors in sdr mode. It took my eyes a while to get used to natural-ish colors and I'm not even talking about a professional calibration. Did the same thing on my phone (vivid to natural mode).
 
It is not wise to rely on any one review site. They could have got a cherry-picked sample to review, or one that just happened to have a problem.

Ideally, the review site buys several samples of the same product and buys them off-the-shelf just as we consumers would. But most reviewers don't have that luxury and often get just one sample that has been passed around from reviewer to reviewer. So check out multiple reviews sites (if possible) and base your decisions on the common findings. Do not depend on the results of a single site - regardless if favorable, or not. And remember, many reviewers base their reviews (especially their conclusions) on their own personal preferences and not their technical findings (assuming they actually performed technical tests - many don't :)).
I understand. RTINGS does provide calibration profiles for those who aren't doing professional work and need calibration equipment and software. I usually watch YouTube videos as well. It's not perfect, but it's enough for me.
 
After spending some time with my Gigabyte FO32U2P monitor, I can say that it's been fantastic and I love the thing. The picture is ridiculously good and it just feels so buttery smooth. I was coming from a pretty meh monitor though, so going to QD-OLED is a massive upgrade for me. It has a little bit of quirkiness as it switches modes based on the input type (sometimes goes black for a second then kicks back on with a message at the bottom saying "DisplayPort" or "HDR" or something), but it's fairly brief and doesn't really impact actual use of the thing, it just seems odd when it's acting like I'm switching between different input cables when it's just a different type of video output from the same computer.

I did struggle with Gigabyte's control software making my G.Skill memory RGB lose it's settings (which are applied from G.Skill's app)...but this being my only Gigabyte product and considering I don't use the monitor's rear RGB, so there's no reason for me to even run the control software, I just deleted the Gigabyte software and I'll keep an eye out occasionally for firmware updates I guess. No reason to have this extra bloatware running just to get firmware updates I'm not sure it was even checking correctly for (their GUI acted like I had a motherboard that didn't work because I don't own a Gigabyte motherboard).
 
RTINGS does provide calibration profiles for those who aren't doing professional work and need calibration equipment and software.
So does Consumer Reports for TVs. And that is fine and will get most setting close. But every set is different and so minor tweaks may still be needed.
 
I LAUGH when I see the term "2K", who the hell invented that 2560x1440 should be called as "2K". If 3840x2160 is called 4K, then why FHD with its 1920x1080 isn't "2K" when it's much more near to 2K than 2560 pixels.

Man I hate marketing and its stupidity.
1080p = 1.5K , 1440p = 2K, 2160p = 3K and last but not least 4K = 2880p and 8K should be 5760p if you use the multiples of 720p but they don't heck they don't even use multiples of 1280 so yeh pretty whack arbitrary measurement system when it come to monitors
so a it's rather ef'd up way to name the measurement of monitors as 1K 2K 4K 8K blah blah etc etc ....
 
I LAUGH when I see the term "2K", who the hell invented that 2560x1440 should be called as "2K". If 3840x2160 is called 4K, then why FHD with its 1920x1080 isn't "2K" when it's much more near to 2K than 2560 pixels.
Man I hate marketing and its stupidity.
man I hate marketing too but it's just shorter to write/say. Not a very fan of shortenings but this personally that I like lol
 
1080p = 1.5K , 1440p = 2K, 2160p = 3K and last but not least 4K = 2880p and 8K should be 5760p if you use the multiples of 720p but they don't heck they don't even use multiples of 1280 so yeh pretty whack arbitrary measurement system when it come to monitors
so a it's rather ef'd up way to name the measurement of monitors as 1K 2K 4K 8K blah blah etc etc ....
That doesn't explain that term

man I hate marketing too but it's just shorter to write/say. Not a very fan of shortenings but this personally that I like lol
Why 1440p is too long to write :D
 
If you are super serious about color and gray scale accuracy buy a Eizo, will cost 4 figures on some models.

Hate to break it to you my IPS and my VA both show some image retention on the windows taskbar screen area.
 
That doesn't explain that term
it's not the horizontal <-----> measurement that is used but the vertical ^ so 1440p is 2 X 720p hence the 2K nomenclature it's bollocks I know but there you go welcome to the wonderful world of PC's where measurements are not always what they seem or should be
 
it's not the horizontal <-----> measurement that is used but the vertical ^ so 1440p is 2 X 720p hence the 2K nomenclature it's bollocks I know but there you go welcome to the wonderful world of PC's where measurements are not always what they seem or should be
I simply round 1920 to 2K just like 3840 is rounded to 4K :P
 
Back
Top