• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel and AMD Postpone 100% DDR3 Transition


Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Oct 9, 2007
35,917 (8.85/day)
Hyderabad, India
System Name Dronacharya
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage Crucial MX500 500GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
That is so gay... I am really wanting to have DDR3 with my 940.
A PII X4 940 doesn't support DDR3 memory. It won't run on an AM3 motherboard.
May 17, 2008
490 (0.13/day)
That statement is a common misconception. AMDs do not always prefer lower speeds with tighter timings. My amd rig performs better at 1066MHz CAS5 than 800MHz CAS4 with the cpu set to 12*267. When you crank the ram speeds up, the latencies naturally go down when all else is equal. We then normally have to raise the latencies in the bios to make them stable again. Sometimes the speed increase offers more of a boost to latency than raising the timings takes away from it.

As a general rule of thumb, divide the frequency by the CAS to get a rough idea how different speeds and latencies stack up per clock.

For instance, 800/CAS4 = 200 while 1066/CAS5 = 213.2. That means 1066 CAS is slightly faster per clock.

It isn't always that way, on a pre-i7 Intel, the chipset plays a major role, and sub-timings can play a role as well, on both AMD and Intel, but for the most part, the above equation is an excellent indicator.
note i said "decently clocked"? i wasnt saying 800 at cas4 was better then 1066@cas5, i was saying amd isnt really being crippled by bandwith issues.
Jul 14, 2008
625 (0.17/day)
Copenhagen, Denmark
System Name Ryzen/Laptop
Processor R7 2700X/i7 6700HQ
Motherboard AsRock X470 Taichi/Acer
Cooling Wraith Prism/OEM
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 16GB/8GB DDR4 2133
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Windforce GTX 970/Intel HD 530 - GTX 950m
Storage Samsung 960evo NVMe 250GB, 3x4TB WD gold enterprise /1TB Toshiba
Display(s) Samsung S27C350 + Dell 2407WFP-HC/OEM
Case Phanteks Enthoo Luxe/Acer Barebone
Audio Device(s) SoundBlasterX AE-5/mojo
Power Supply Enermax 650Watt/165 Watt power brick
Mouse G203 Prodigy/M705 Marathon
Keyboard G19
Software Win10 pro 64bit/Win10 pro 64bit
That is so gay... I am really wanting to have DDR3 with my 940.
correct me if im mistaken but i believe that the present PII are not compatible with DDR3 configurations

ps i saw bta's reply just now
Aug 9, 2006
1,003 (0.22/day)
System Name [Primary Workstation]
Processor Intel Core i7-920 Bloomfield @ 3.8GHz/4.55GHz [24-7/Bench]
Motherboard EVGA X58 E758-A1 [Tweaked right!]
Cooling Cooler Master V8 [stock fan + two 133CFM ULTRA KAZE fans]
Memory 12GB [Kingston HyperX]
Video Card(s) constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer nVidia]
Storage constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer Hitachi/Samsung]
Display(s) Triple LCD [40 inch primary + 32 & 28 inch auxiliary displays]
Case Cooler Master Cosmos 1000 [Mesh Mod, CFM Overload]
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D1 + onboard Realtek ALC889A [Logitech Z-5300 Spk., Niko 650-HP 5.1 Hp., X-Bass Hp.]
Power Supply Corsair TX950W [aka Reactor]
Software This and that... [All software 100% legit and paid for, 0% pirated]
Benchmark Scores Ridiculously good scores!!!
Global economy is not doing so good these days. Outside of enthusiast community the situation is not so nice. The OEM's are struggling and they are usually the major force behind any major technology switchover. Sure, enthusiasts are responsible for a chunk of the market, few hundred thousand units here and there, but OEM's buy everything in the millions and all this new stuff that's coming out (well, relatively new) whether DDR3 or new chipsets or whatever is just too much of a financial risk in this kind of economy. Heck, Intel is postponing the release of their Lynfield desktop processor and P55 chipset and I wouldn't be surprised if it gets pushed all the way to September-October, or maybe even later if the economy keeps getting worse.

All you got to do is look at the i7 adoption rates. They are terrible, even after several months in the wild. AMD's PII is not doing any better. In fact the current AM2 iteration is dropping in price like Enron stock circa 2001, yet very few takers in or outside of enthusiast community. $100 for PII in month or two? I wouldn't be surprised.

DDR3 is getting cheaper and cheaper yet people are still reluctant to go DDR3 route (along with everything that goes with it, new chipsets or CPU's). Yesterday I saw a decent Corsair DDR3 4GB kit for $70 on Buy.com. Cheaper than many DDR2 kits. Money is tight and people are not spending as much.
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2009
318 (0.09/day)
New York, NY
System Name The Baconator
Processor Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.00GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-790FX
Cooling Zalman 9900 CPU Cooler
Memory 16Gb DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD 5870
Storage OS: WD 300Gb @ 10,000rpm. Storage: 2 x 1Tb @ 7,200rpm
Display(s) ASUS 27" LED 1080p Monitor
Case Cooler Master Sniper Medium Tower
Audio Device(s) MoBo Integrated
Power Supply Corsair PSU 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
I see AMD moving slow on DDR3 just like NVIDIA is going slow on the transition to a higher GDDR memory. NVIDIA has been stuck at GDDR3 for a long time and by the time they make the jump, they'll completely skip GDDR4 and go to GDDR5.

So why doesn't AMD do a similar thing and just hop right onto the DDR4 board when it's out 3 years from now? Nah, that'll be too much of a long wait, I still think they've made the right decisions up to now though. Best wishes for the green company.