• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Ice Lake" IPC Best-Case a Massive 40% Uplift Over "Skylake," 18% on Average

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel late-May made its first major disclosure of the per-core CPU performance gains achieved with its "Ice Lake" processor that packs "Sunny Cove" CPU cores. Averaged across a spectrum of benchmarks, Intel claims a best-case scenario IPC (instructions per clock) uplift of a massive 40 percent over "Skylake," and a mean uplift of 18 percent. The worst-case scenario sees its performance negligibly below that of "Skylake." Intel's IPC figures are derived entirely across synthetic benchmarks, which include SPEC 2016, SPEC 2017, SYSMark 2014 SE, WebXprt, and CineBench R15. The comparison to "Skylake" is relevant because Intel has been using essentially the same CPU core in the succeeding three generations that include "Kaby Lake" and "Coffee Lake."

A Chinese tech-forum member with access to an "Ice Lake" 6-core/12-thread sample put the chip through the CPU-Z internal benchmark (test module version 17.01). At a clock-speed of 3.60 GHz, the "Ice Lake" chip allegedly achieved a single-core score of 635 points. To put this number into perspective, a Ryzen 7 3800X "Matisse" supposedly needs to run at 4.70 GHz to match this score, and a Core i7-7700K "Kaby Lake" needs to run at 5.20 GHz. Desktop "Ice Lake" processors are unlikely to launch in 2019. The first "Ice Lake" processors are 4-core/8-thread chips designed for ultraportable notebook platforms, which come out in Q4-2019, and desktop "Ice Lake" parts are expected only in 2020.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Hang on a second there, didn't Intel say they only wanted to use real world benchmarks from now on?
That means this is against their own policy and clearly irrelevant, no?
 
Assume this graph is true.

Ryzen 3th gen gets 13 points every 100MHz
Intel 9th gen gets 15 points every 100MHz
This "super OMG Ryzen killer" SunnyCove only gets 9 points every 100MHz ?

Numbers don't add up.
 
FWIW, Where I have seen this posted elsewhere the general consensus seems to be that this is not genuine.

The Intel slide or the Chinese "benchmark"?
 
even if true, I still say we should let Intel sweat a little, make them work harder and make up for years of slacking.
 
That CPU should not have any meltdown/spectre mitigations yet enabled in kernel, that benchmark is very sensitive to it.

Thus the performance uplift is really small.
 
18% over four years is pretty terrible, especially if you consider how much performance was lost because of security mitigations.
 
That CPU should not have any meltdown/spectre mitigations yet enabled in kernel, that benchmark is very sensitive to it.
Thus the performance uplift is really small.
Yeah, Intel's testing without security mitigations is shady.

On the other hand, these new cores definitely have fixes for Meltdown/L1TF in hardware and at least hardware-assisted mitigations for other Spectre-likes. And they are comparing these against Skylake which has none of that. When this is tested without security mitigations, Skylake should get a bigger boost than Ice Lake, making the uplift from new cores even bigger when taking security mitigations into account.

18% over four years is pretty terrible, especially if you consider how much performance was lost because of security mitigations.
I don't know about that. On the other side 13-15% over 3 years is lauded as a great achievement.
 
Heads Up- just posted on the News here in Israel:
"Intel to suppliers: The establishment of the new plant[10nm] is postponed.
As revealed in Calcalist, Intel summoned one of those involved in setting up the factory in Kiryat Gat, one after the other, and announced a delay of at least half a year.
Intel CEO Bob Swan: "We look forward to the new plant"

So whats going on? Intel CEO Bob Swan is currently visiting here, Maybe they have change of plans? going 7nm or other plan?
 
Hang on a second there, didn't Intel say they only wanted to use real world benchmarks from now on?
That means this is against their own policy and clearly irrelevant, no?

What does a random person in China have to do with this? This isn't Intel... it's an engineering sample in the wild.

Heads Up- just posted on the News here in Israel:
"Intel to suppliers: The establishment of the new plant[10nm] is postponed.
As revealed in Calcalist, Intel summoned one of those involved in setting up the factory in Kiryat Gat, one after the other, and announced a delay of at least half a year.
Intel CEO Bob Swan: "We look forward to the new plant"

So whats going on? Intel CEO Bob Swan is currently visiting here, Maybe they have change of plans? going 7nm or other plan?

There have been rumors in the past that Intel will skip to 7nm for high end desktops. I hope it is true.
 
What does a random person in China have to do with this? This isn't Intel... it's an engineering sample in the wild.



There have been rumors in the past that Intel will skip to 7nm for high end desktops. I hope it is true.

Not reply to above:
Remember when ryzen scored crazy in cpu-z ?... yeah, was a bug in the benchmark :)
I think Ice lake should be Highly competetive in laptops but it's ipc should be marginally better than zen 2.

Reply to above:
7NM doesn't really help Intel with what they're struggling with, Performance.
It should be worse in fact...
 
What does a random person in China have to do with this? This isn't Intel... it's an engineering sample in the wild.

I have no idea, but your reading comprehension clearly needs to improve.
The first image is from an Intel presentation, using only synthetic benchmarks, whereas when AMD used them during their presentation at Computex, Intel went out and said that from now, we should only use real world benchmarks. Yet Intel clearly seems more than happy to use synthetic benchmarks when it suits them. As such, this is irrelevant even by Intel's "new" standards, no?
 
"The first "Ice Lake" processors are 4-core/8-thread chips designed for ultraportable notebook platforms, which come out in Q4-2019, and desktop "Ice Lake" parts are expected only in 2020."

Did Intel ever mention 10nm desktop in last 6 months? Dell leaks of roadmaps showed 14 nm desktop well into 2020. If there really will be Rocket Lake 14 nm desktop part with Willow Cove architecture in 2020, 10 nm Ice Lake after that would be a regression...
 
If Zen 2.0 already got ~12% IPC advantage over current Intel parts, how do you think the Zen 3.0 gonna perform? another 5% IPC + 10% performance at same TDP[Higher All core boost]? this make very big gap for 2020, so maybe Intel is reconsidering it's timeline?
 
Nothing more than Intel (unofficially of course) trying to steal thunder from AMD. Especially when you take in to account the complete butchering of Intel CPU performance over the last year. You would need a lot more than a 40% improvement to make up for the loss of Hyperthreading, as well as the Spectre and Meltdown "fixes".

Some Intel CPU's will have lost more than 50% of their performance under some circumstances, so a poultry 18% (average) improvement on average is simply not enough.

Too little, too late Intel.
 
Last edited:
Low quality post by TheLostSwede
so a poultry

I think you mean paltry, not
Poultry_Classes_Blog_photo_-_Flickr_-_USDAgov.jpg

but I could be wrong...
 
Those numbers are questionable to me. Ryzen 2600X (4250MHz) - 480 points in CPU-Z test, Ryzen 3600X (4500MHz) - 609 points. That's ~28% increase. I wish it was truth though..
 
There have been rumors in the past that Intel will skip to 7nm for high end desktops. I hope it is true.

Intel has other plans. At least thats what it told its investors this year.

2019-Intel-Investor-Meeting-Renduchintala_12_575px.jpg


Intel will be using Arizona and Ireland for 7nm. Expansion at those fabs is expected to be completed late 2021 for Arizona, Ireland est sometime in 2022.

2019-Intel-Investor-Meeting-Renduchintala_13_575px.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top