• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Rocket Lake-S" Die Annotated

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
40,863 (8.28/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Intel is betting big on an 8-core processor to revive its gaming performance leadership, and that chip is the 11th Generation Core "Rocket Lake-S," coming this March. In its 2021 International CES online event, Intel disclosed more details about "Rocket Lake-S," including the first true-color die-shot. PC enthusiast @Locuza_ on Twitter annotated the die for your viewing pressure. For starters, nearly half the die-area of the "Rocket Lake-S" is taken up by the uncore and iGPU, with the rest going to the eight "Cypress Cove" CPU cores.

The "Cypress Cove" CPU core is reportedly a back-port of "Willow Cove" to the 14 nm silicon fabrication node, although there are some changes, beginning with its cache hierarchy. A "Cypress Cove" core is configured with the same L1I and L1D cache sizes as "Willow Cove," but differ with L2 and L3 cache sizes. Each "Cypress Cove" core is endowed with 512 KB of dedicated L2 cache (which is a 100% increase from the 256 KB on "Skylake" cores); but this pales in comparison to the 1.25 MB L2 caches of "Willow Cove" cores on the "Tiger Lake-U" silicon. Also, the L3 cache for the 8-core "Rocket Lake-S" die is 16 MB, spread across eight 2 MB slices; while the 4-core "Tiger Lake-U" features 12 MB of L3, spread across four 3 MB slices. Each core can address the whole L3 cache, across all slices.



The next big component on "Rocket Lake-S" is the Gen12 Xe-LP GT1 integrated graphics. The "GT1" differentiator denotes the smallest trim of Xe-LP, and amounts to 32 EU (execution units). The "Tiger Lake-U" silicon features the larger "GT2" trim of Gen12 Xe-LP, with 96 EU. Intel could give the GT1 on "Rocket Lake-S" some lavish clock boosting headroom on virtue of this being a desktop processor, to try and overcome some of the EU shortfall compared to "Tiger Lake-U." Even with just 32 EU, Intel is claiming a 50% iGPU performance gain compared to the Gen9.5 GT2 iGPU on "Comet Lake-S."

The third major component is the uncore, which looks visibly larger than the one on the 8-core "Coffee Lake Refresh" silicon. This is because it features a PCI-Express Gen 4.0 switching fabric, and additional SerDes to put out 28 PCIe lanes, compared to just 20 on the older generation. We imagine the memory controllers are largely unchanged, as Intel is sticking with dual-channel DDR4 as the memory standard for "Rocket Lake-S." The switch to DDR5 could probably herald a new socket, with "Alder Lake-S."

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2020
Messages
32 (0.08/day)
Location
Australia
System Name MacBook Pro Mid 2015
Processor i7-4770HQ
Motherboard Apple HM87
Cooling "Stock" with back panel off + extra copper shim
Memory (16GB) D3L-1600 dual channel (Micron D9QBJ)
Video Card(s) (default) Iris Pro 5200 + (M.2 PCIE 3x4) Galax 1650 Super EX
Storage (default) "APPLE" MZ-JPV2560/0A4 OR (eGPU) SAMSUNG ST500LM012 via USB3
Display(s) ViewSonic VX3211-4K-mhd, Kogan KAMN24F1CLA
Case Apple A1398
Audio Device(s) WH-1000XM2
Power Supply TT ATX-400 (TT03XA) (~18 YEARS OLD)
Mouse Thermaltake Black V2
Keyboard ROG Strix Flare PNK LTD
Software Windows 8.1 Embedded Industry Pro
@btarunr "PC enthusiast @Locuza_ on Twitter annotated the die for your viewing pressure."
some may find die shots a private pleasure, while others prefers to dissect die-shots with an intense focus, a rush of blood as their eyes let our a laser-precision ray of concentration across the high definition image.

I also found 14nm+++(+?) very :roll:
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
14,703 (6.12/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Audio Device(s) Situational :)
Power Supply EVGA G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II (Best K/B ever... <3)
Software W10 x64
That TGL-U die looks like a huge complicated mess. Compare it to Rocket lake next to it.
It does still seem to have largely the same layout but there's like what... 10% reserved for the cores themselves?
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
7,604 (1.54/day)
Processor Intel i9 9900K @5GHz w/ Corsair H150i Pro CPU AiO w/Corsair HD120 RBG fan
Motherboard Asus Z390 Maximus XI Code
Cooling 6x120mm Corsair HD120 RBG fans
Memory Corsair Vengeance RBG 2x8GB 3600MHz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 2080 STRIX OC
Storage Samsung 250GB 960 EVO m.2, 970 EVO 1TB, Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 10TB Synology DS1515+ RAID5
Display(s) Acer Predator 32" 2560x1440 OC'd to 170MHz
Case Corsair 570x RBG Tempered Glass
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Corsair Void Wireless RGB
Power Supply Corsair HX850w Platinum Series
Mouse Logitech G602s
Keyboard Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 x64 Professional
Benchmark Scores Firestrike - 23520 Heaven - 3670
Sorry Intel. My 9900K 2 more cores and 4 more threads. I wont be downgrading cores. Especially if it's STILL not 10nm.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
3,808 (2.64/day)
Location
Norwegian, currently in Lund, Sweden
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
That TGL-U die looks like a huge complicated mess. Compare it to Rocket lake next to it.
It does still seem to have largely the same layout but there's like what... 10% reserved for the cores themselves?
10%? Including essential components like caches, the ring bus, etc, the CPU part of the SoC is easily 2/5 of the die. The rest is pretty run of the mill for a mobile SoC with a large GPU, though the inclusion of on-board TB4 and the die space needed for that is a decent chunk compared to comparable designs.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
4,756 (2.57/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk ATX
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition
Memory PNY Anarchy-X XLR8 Red DDR4-3200 16GB kit & PNY Anarchy-X XLR8 Red DDR4-2666 16GB kit
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
Storage Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500 GB, SanDisk Ultra II 480 GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster C27H711 OC refresh rate 110Hz
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S (PH-EC416PS)
Audio Device(s) EVGA NU Audio
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 310
Keyboard Logitech G G413 Silver
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit v21H1
So the backporting of the design did prevent the L2 Cache from staying at 1.25MB for each core it should of been. Wonder how much the smaller L2 Cache is affecting the IPC uplift?
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
14,703 (6.12/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Audio Device(s) Situational :)
Power Supply EVGA G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II (Best K/B ever... <3)
Software W10 x64
10%? Including essential components like caches, the ring bus, etc, the CPU part of the SoC is easily 2/5 of the die. The rest is pretty run of the mill for a mobile SoC with a large GPU, though the inclusion of on-board TB4 and the die space needed for that is a decent chunk compared to comparable designs.
The impression I get from looking at that die shot, is that Intel is STILL focused on making the best quad core mankind has ever seen. As if its a capital sin to go wider instead for performance.

Didn't they already figure out by now that approach is finite in terms of scaling? It echoes that they really don't, because they're still chasing 5 Ghz. What gives... are they too proud to copy chiplet designs or what?
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
4,756 (2.57/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk ATX
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition
Memory PNY Anarchy-X XLR8 Red DDR4-3200 16GB kit & PNY Anarchy-X XLR8 Red DDR4-2666 16GB kit
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
Storage Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500 GB, SanDisk Ultra II 480 GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster C27H711 OC refresh rate 110Hz
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S (PH-EC416PS)
Audio Device(s) EVGA NU Audio
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 310
Keyboard Logitech G G413 Silver
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit v21H1
Sorry Intel. My 9900K 2 more cores and 4 more threads. I wont be downgrading cores. Especially if it's STILL not 10nm.
How’s Rocket Lake taking away 2 cores, and 4 threads from your i9-9900K? There both 8 core designs. If you had the i9-10900K you would be right.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
7,604 (1.54/day)
Processor Intel i9 9900K @5GHz w/ Corsair H150i Pro CPU AiO w/Corsair HD120 RBG fan
Motherboard Asus Z390 Maximus XI Code
Cooling 6x120mm Corsair HD120 RBG fans
Memory Corsair Vengeance RBG 2x8GB 3600MHz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 2080 STRIX OC
Storage Samsung 250GB 960 EVO m.2, 970 EVO 1TB, Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 10TB Synology DS1515+ RAID5
Display(s) Acer Predator 32" 2560x1440 OC'd to 170MHz
Case Corsair 570x RBG Tempered Glass
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Corsair Void Wireless RGB
Power Supply Corsair HX850w Platinum Series
Mouse Logitech G602s
Keyboard Corsair K70 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 x64 Professional
Benchmark Scores Firestrike - 23520 Heaven - 3670
How’s Rocket Lake taking away 2 cores, and 4 threads from your i9-9900K? There both 8 core designs. If you had the i9-10900K you would be right.
Sorry thats what I meant. You dont downgrade from the previous variant.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
294 (0.17/day)
Location
Indonesia
System Name Nero Mini
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X EDC Bug+101MHz BCLK 4.3GHz Multi/4.74GHz Single
Motherboard Gigabyte X570i Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S+3x Noctua IPPC 3K
Memory Team Dark 3770MHz CL16 2x16GB 65.7ns
Video Card(s) Palit RTX 2060 Super JS Shunt Mod 2130MHz/1925MHz + 2x Noctua 120mm IPPC 3K
Storage Adata XPG Gammix S50 1TB + Samsung SM961 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD68W
Case Lian-Li TU-150
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Gold
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/submission/4581602_nero10578_cinebench___r20_ryzen_9_3900x_7740_marks
The impression I get from looking at that die shot, is that Intel is STILL focused on making the best quad core mankind has ever seen. As if its a capital sin to go wider instead for performance.

Didn't they already figure out by now that approach is finite in terms of scaling? It echoes that they really don't, because they're still chasing 5 Ghz. What gives... are they too proud to copy chiplet designs or what?
*Flashbacks to netburst*
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
3,808 (2.64/day)
Location
Norwegian, currently in Lund, Sweden
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
The impression I get from looking at that die shot, is that Intel is STILL focused on making the best quad core mankind has ever seen. As if its a capital sin to go wider instead for performance.

Didn't they already figure out by now that approach is finite in terms of scaling? It echoes that they really don't, because they're still chasing 5 Ghz. What gives... are they too proud to copy chiplet designs or what?
Maybe there's someone on their chip design team that decided back in ... 2010 or so that nobody would ever need more than four cores, and now has grown stubborn and delusional enough to force that view into chip development plans? :p
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
8,970 (4.16/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
That TGL-U die looks like a huge complicated mess. Compare it to Rocket lake next to it.
It does still seem to have largely the same layout but there's like what... 10% reserved for the cores themselves?
Looks the same to me. Right to left: graphics, CPU cores, various I/O. With RAM controller on the bottom. TGL-U only has 4 cores, probably that's why it looks they only take a small amount of space.

Now, the real kicker for me, is why did they cut into cache size? If you need to cut somewhere, cut into the IGP. Hell, AMD has many (most?) of its desktop CPUs without an IGP at all and it's doing just fine.

The impression I get from looking at that die shot, is that Intel is STILL focused on making the best quad core mankind has ever seen. As if its a capital sin to go wider instead for performance.

Didn't they already figure out by now that approach is finite in terms of scaling? It echoes that they really don't, because they're still chasing 5 Ghz. What gives... are they too proud to copy chiplet designs or what?
Even on the desktop you can see many tasks (mostly office related) don't actually scale that well with the number of cores*. And this is a mobile part.
AMD themselves have to resort to "what if you game while you stream at 4k" to make their CPUs look like they're using all those cores.

*You can still get good scaling up to 6 or 8 cores, but beyond that, it becomes very workload dependent.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
2,376 (3.03/day)
System Name Flavour of the month. I roll through hardware like it's not even mine (it often isn't).
Processor 3900X, 5800X, 2700U
Motherboard Aorus X570 Elite, B550 DS3H
Cooling Alphacool CPU+GPU soft-tubing loop (Laing D5 360mm+140mm), AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 32GB Patriot 3600CL17, 32GB Corsair LPX 3200CL16, 16GB HyperX 2400CL14
Video Card(s) 2070S, 5700XT, Vega10
Storage 1TB WD S100G, 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro, 1TB MX500, 500GB Hynix 2242 bastard thing, 16TB of rust + backup
Display(s) Dell SG3220 165Hz VA, Samsung 65" Q9FN 120Hz VA
Case NZXT H440NE, Silverstone GD04 (almost nothing original left inside, thanks 3D printer!)
Audio Device(s) CA DacMagic+ with Presonus Eris E5, Yamaha RX-V683 with Q Acoustics 3000-series, Sony MDR-1A
Power Supply BeQuiet StraightPower E9 680W, Corsair RM550, and a 45W Lenovo DC power brick, I guess.
Mouse G303, MX Anywhere 2, Another MX Anywhere 2.
Keyboard CM QuickFire Stealth (Cherry MX Brown), Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
Software W10
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Given how much area the IGP's frontend/backup requires, it seems almost criminal to only pair it with 32EU in the desktop chip.

It seems like the tiniest bit of reorganisation could have made a 48EU GT1 solution; For a start, QuickSync encode is a huge chunk of fixed-function hardware that is practically obsolete on higher-end desktop parts. Even though it's quick, it's miles behind even the old Pascal NVENC in speed and quality isn't great. If you're using QuickSync to shrink files you're in for a world of disappointment, because it's atrocious.

So yeah, QSV encode is increasingly niche, and honestly only seem to make sense for CPUs that go into NAS appliances, not desktop PCs. I'm pretty sure everyone cursing the pitiful 32EU IGP would much rather have had 50% or 100% more GPU horsepower....
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
5,544 (1.58/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
So this 8 Core will beat last year 10 Core on multithreaded apps? :)
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
2,376 (3.03/day)
System Name Flavour of the month. I roll through hardware like it's not even mine (it often isn't).
Processor 3900X, 5800X, 2700U
Motherboard Aorus X570 Elite, B550 DS3H
Cooling Alphacool CPU+GPU soft-tubing loop (Laing D5 360mm+140mm), AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 32GB Patriot 3600CL17, 32GB Corsair LPX 3200CL16, 16GB HyperX 2400CL14
Video Card(s) 2070S, 5700XT, Vega10
Storage 1TB WD S100G, 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro, 1TB MX500, 500GB Hynix 2242 bastard thing, 16TB of rust + backup
Display(s) Dell SG3220 165Hz VA, Samsung 65" Q9FN 120Hz VA
Case NZXT H440NE, Silverstone GD04 (almost nothing original left inside, thanks 3D printer!)
Audio Device(s) CA DacMagic+ with Presonus Eris E5, Yamaha RX-V683 with Q Acoustics 3000-series, Sony MDR-1A
Power Supply BeQuiet StraightPower E9 680W, Corsair RM550, and a 45W Lenovo DC power brick, I guess.
Mouse G303, MX Anywhere 2, Another MX Anywhere 2.
Keyboard CM QuickFire Stealth (Cherry MX Brown), Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
Software W10
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
But GAAAAAAMING will be better if you run decade-old titles at 720pLow; Rather than getting 600fps you'll get 700fps OMFG WOW!!!!1

In the real world, the game will run at whatever speed your GPU can spit out frames, but your encodes will run a little slower and your motherboard socket might turn into a puddle of hot slag under the 250W PL2 limit +/- whatever margin MSI and ASUS cheat by to try and gain an edge in benchmarks. I guess that's not really too different to the 10900K stunt processor/AKA space-heater.
 
Top