• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel's Upcoming Core i9 Skylake-X CPU Benchmarks Surface

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
2,754 (2.36/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
It seems that Intel's accelerated released schedule for its upcoming HEDT platform is starting to slowly bear fruits, with many details leaking through the cracks almost non-stop during the last few days (and before you ask, yes, I did have more links to show you.)

These should be two of the top performing processors in Intel's line-up, and the i9 7900X (10-core) and 7920X (12-core) have been tested on integer and floating point calculations. The 10-core i9-7900X (3.1 GHz base frequency, no Turbo listed)) scores 107 points in single-core benchmarks, and 1467 points in the multi-core test. The 12-core, 2.9 GHz base frequency 7920X, however, scores a head-scratchingly-higher 130 points in the same single-threaded benchmark, despite carrying the same architecture at... hmm... lower clocks. Maybe this processor's Turbo is working as expected, up to 3.25 GHz (average), and that's the factor for the higher single-core performance?





The fact that these scores were sourced from userbenchmark.com means that there isn't much reason to compare them between processors - it's an environment lacking the usual control usually found in reviews - so that may also be the reason for the discrepancy. Multi-threaded performance is more inline with what we'd expect to see, though, coming in at 1760 points. You should also note that the Core i9-7900X shows a base clock of 3.1 GHz, 0.2 GHz short of its official 3.3 GHz specification, which means we're probably not looking at final silicon. As always, and this should go without saying, take leaked benchmarks with some amount of salt (a pinch or a truckload, your mileage may vary.)

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.51/day)
It's so funny that enthusiast CPU's that are the most expensive are actually lagging behind consumer ones tech wise. Which is pure idiocy. HEDT should alway sbe ahead, not the other way around.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
322 (0.08/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z370-G GAMING AC
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro RGB
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16GB DDR4 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) Dell S2417DG 165Hz
Case NZXT H400i
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Cooler Master - Masterkeys Pro L RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64Bit
Why would they test such a monster in maybe one of the worst pc's of all time? lol
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
749 (0.23/day)
however, scores a head-scratchingly-higher 130 points in the same single-threaded benchmark, despite carrying the same architecture at... hmm... lower clocks.
If it smells...
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
291 (0.10/day)
Location
South Africa
It's so funny that enthusiast CPU's that are the most expensive are actually lagging behind consumer ones tech wise. Which is pure idiocy. HEDT should alway sbe ahead, not the other way around.
There's a reason for it. The consumer platform is the latest architecture where teething problems are worked out.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
344 (0.16/day)
There's a reason for it. The consumer platform is the latest architecture where teething problems are worked out.
so all consumer cpus are beta cpus? Thast ridiculous.

It is done that way because intel chooses to release and research and develop in that manner. There is no real reason for them to not release both platforms on the same timeline.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
170 (0.06/day)
System Name Matar Extreme PC.
Processor Intel Core i7-3930K CPU @4.2GHZ
Motherboard Gigabyte x79-ud3 Motherboard + Wifi & bluetooth
Cooling Corsair H-80i with Arctic Coolling MX-4
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHZ Quad Channel memory
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 970 Refrence Card @1456MHZ + Evga GT740 SC 2GB for physx
Storage 2x Samsung 840 250GB each SSD in RAID0 + 3TB Seagate for Storage
Display(s) Dell U3008 30" Monitor 2560x1600 with Dell Soundbar
Case Corsair Graphite 600T Black With clear Side window
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme
Power Supply Ultra X4 1050 Watts Modular PSU
Mouse Logitech M500 Lazer Mouse
Keyboard Logitech G19 - Xbox 360 controller
Software Windows 10 Home X64
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7710312 https://www.youtube.com/user/matttttar/videos
intel core i9 finally :) sweet I remember the first i7-980x was going to be named i9
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2014
Messages
473 (0.25/day)
Location
Fort Sill, OK
Processor Intel 7700K 5.1Ghz (Intel advised me not to OC this CPU)
Motherboard Asus Maximus IX Code
Cooling Corsair Hydro H115i Platinum
Memory 48GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4 3200 Dual Channel (2x16 & 2x8)
Video Card(s) nVIDIA Titan XP (Overclocks like a champ but stock performance is enough)
Storage Intel 760p 2280 2TB
Display(s) MSI Optix MPG27CQ Black 27" 1ms 144hz
Case Thermaltake View 71
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 1000 Platinum2
Mouse Corsair M65 Pro (not recommded, I am on my second mouse with same defect)
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 1803
Benchmark Scores Yes I am Intel fanboy that is my benchmark score.
so all consumer cpus are beta cpus? Thast ridiculous.

It is done that way because intel chooses to release and research and develop in that manner. There is no real reason for them to not release both platforms on the same timeline.
Mainstream platform always have been one step ahead of enthusiast platform. Look at Z170 and now Z270 versus very slight dated X99.
 
Last edited:

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.33/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I love how Intel all of a sudden has these extra cores to dole out once AMD brings it about during its comeback.

Pieces of shit.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,760 (1.92/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
so all consumer cpus are beta cpus? Thast ridiculous.

It is done that way because intel chooses to release and research and develop in that manner. There is no real reason for them to not release both platforms on the same timeline.
I can tell you the only reason that matters, your playing games , business is doing business and wont tolerate glitches or downtime.
Next to your need for more fps they win , and the public are not so much beta just pre final spec.
Another reason is binning dictates you pile up a lot of lower spec parts with sections that are defective early on and it can take time to build up enough with all its features working to sell for more to business.
Then you have verification testing to do for business that you don't for consumers and thats where the time between gets used.
A joint release is ONLY possible if you hold back consumer release until all that work is done.
That's not going to happen , and certainly not at intel right now , they got duals and quads all over the place by now.
Be stacked in every orifice soon;):) jk
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
344 (0.16/day)
I can tell you the only reason that matters, your playing games , business is doing business and wont tolerate glitches or downtime.
Next to your need for more fps they win , and the public are not so much beta just pre final spec.
Another reason is binning dictates you pile up a lot of lower spec parts with sections that are defective early on and it can take time to build up enough with all its features working to sell for more to business.
Then you have verification testing to do for business that you don't for consumers and thats where the time between gets used.
A joint release is ONLY possible if you hold back consumer release until all that work is done.
That's not going to happen , and certainly not at intel right now , they got duals and quads all over the place by now.
Be stacked in every orifice soon;):) jk
You seriously made all that up with not one shred of knowledge of their real intentions or business capabilities.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,760 (1.92/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
You seriously made all that up with not one shred of knowledge of their real intentions or business capabilities.
Yes because they aren't a science based company so they do what the feck they want ,not what makes scientific, engineering and logical sense , is it truly the case that you think i would make up something just to be dramatic or something.
This is how its done ,see ryzens release schedule or any telco chip maker etc etc
See my own employers tactics for delivering cutting edge mass spec systems.
Get it out in a working base config then stir the pot , quickly.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
344 (0.16/day)
Yes because they aren't a science based company so they do what the feck they want ,not what makes scientific, engineering and logical sense , is it truly the case that you think i would make up something just to be dramatic or something.
This is how its done ,see ryzens release schedule or any telco chip maker etc etc
See my own employers tactics for delivering cutting edge mass spec systems.
Get it out in a working base config then stir the pot , quickly.
they are a business that runs off profits. If anything the decisions are made based off profit reasons...derp derp.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,760 (1.92/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
they are a business that runs off profits. If anything the decisions are made based off profit reasons...derp derp.
Your delusional and clueless clearly ,is intel not making more money doing it the way i said , people still buy intel just because and upgrade just because , they cant and are not loosing cash doing it that way and business is then more incentivised to upgrade on cycle.

So because Ryzen is a good bit of competition for the first time in years and because you say so they should push out cpus quicker beating the laws of averages and physics in the process , my argument and opinion is an educated guess based on logical and sound industry practice ,yours is lacking.

Derp derp?? That about sums up your point thus far.

Edit so right ,myvphones stupid not me. Ish.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
7,165 (3.92/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2680 10c/20t 2.8GHz @ 3.0GHz
Motherboard Asrock X79 Extreme 11
Cooling Coolermaster 240 RGB A.I.O.
Memory G. Skill 16Gb (4x4Gb) 2133Mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 710
Storage Sandisk X 400 256Gb
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Home Premium 64 bit
i7-7900X ?
Sandra Database
Intel(R) ,i7-7900X%CPU @ (10C 20T 4GHz/4.5GHz, 2.4GHz IMC, 10x 1MB L2, 13.75MB L3)
4GHz/ 4.5GHz? seems a bit high for a multi-core.
175W sounds right though, I'd prefer a lower power CPU.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2013
Messages
344 (0.16/day)
4GHz/ 4.5GHz? seems a bit high for a multi-core.
175W sounds right though, I'd prefer a lower power CPU.
power needs skyrocket as you increase clocks.

My testing with IB showed this.


Mhz TDP F@H
3500 44.2-44.9 F@H
3100 32.7-33.1 F@H
2600 23.3-23.7 F@H
2000 16.0-17.2 F@H
1800 14.7-15.8 F@H
1600 14-14.5 F@H
1200 13-13.3 F@H

2GHz for a 4 core IB was the sweet spot in terms of efficiency. It is about 50% more efficient than 3.5GHz not even 4 or 4.5GHz. Granted this is assuming intel was truly putting the needed voltages on each clock. Their voltage algorithm is a bit over generous. I also noticed their turbo voltage was design in a really basic way.

1.2GHz base core boosted to 3.5 used way more voltage than 2.6base with 3.5ghz boost voltage. Not exactly intelligent in applying the right voltage.

I used max base clock allowed followed by turbo clock. IIRC 2.6 was max base clock.

This is why those 2Ghz 20 plus cores have such low TDP. If they were actually unlocked they would probably pull 400+ if not way more.
 
Last edited:
Top