• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

International Memory Workshop: 3D NAND Flash to Reach 140 Layers By 2021

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
1,728 (2.65/day)
Likes
1,456
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
#1
3D NAND has been one of the most important new technologies in allowing for greater storage density in space-constrained hardware (isn't that always the case, though?) As we've stepped away from the usual 2D NAND to the nowadays market-leading 3D solutions, which stack layers of memory one on top of the other (thus making use of vertical space instead of the usually more costly horizontal one), memory density and price per GB has been steadily declining - a relationship that isn't quite as parallel as it may seem, but still occurs.





Applied Material's Sean Kang, speaking at Japan's International Memory Workshop (IMW), said that he expects future 3D NAND technologies to achieve 140 layers (up from today's leading 64-layer tech) by 2021. Increased numbers of layers will allow for increased die densities whilst keeping the same PCB real-estate and implementation area; at the same time, which is something the industry is craving for as data-sets only continue to increase in size. Before 2021 and its 140-layer NAND comes (which will require new fabrication materials), 90-layer solutions are expected to be launched this year, with a 20% decrease in layer height, down from its current 60 nm to 55 nm, which will allow for relatively stable stack heights, even as the number of layers increases significantly (by around 40% compared to 64-layer tech). Cheaper, more dense NAND tech - what isn't there to like?

 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
1,799 (0.87/day)
Likes
731
Location
Jacksonhole Florida
System Name DEVIL'S ABYSS
Processor i7-4790K@4.6 GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H110 (2 x 140mm)(3 x 140mm case fans)
Memory 16GB Adata XPG V2 2400MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 780 Ti Classified
Storage Intel 750 Series 400GB (AIC), Plextor M6e 256GB (M.2), 13 TB storage
Display(s) Crossover 27QW (27"@ 2560x1440)
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Cooler Master V1000
Mouse Ttsports Talon Blu
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 version 1709
Benchmark Scores Passmark CPU score = 13080
#2
I don't believe this. I am a founding member of The Flat SSD Society. Our mission is to prove that all NAND is 2D, and 3D NAND is a myth. You can keep your fake photos of layers, they're obviously photo-shopped. Join the fight against 3D SSDs!
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
756 (0.22/day)
Likes
146
Location
I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
System Name 2 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R7 1700 @ 3.9| Xeon 2680
Motherboard Asrock B350M Pro 4 | HP Z620
Cooling Water | Air
Memory 64gb | 128 gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | quadro K4000\GTX970
Storage 960 Evo 500gb, 860 evo 1tb, PM871 256gb Many Intel SSD's, Seagate barracuda pro 8tb.
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something
Case Corsair Carbide 88R
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse G500
Keyboard TT Meka G1
Software Ubuntu 17.10
#3
as hbm is essentially much the same so we should be seeing the same for gpu's eventually no?
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
5,549 (4.23/day)
Likes
3,339
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E5-2650 8c/16t @ 2.0GHz
Motherboard Cheap Chinese X 79
Cooling Coolermaster 240 RGB A.I.O.
Memory Geil 8Gb (2x4Gb) 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) iGPU, Nvidia GTX 710.
Storage Sandisk X 400 256Gb
Display(s) AOC 22" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Coolermaster Mastercase 5 RGB.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum
Software W10 Home Premium 64 bit
#5
More layers equals more heat to dissipate.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
2,356 (4.68/day)
Likes
1,544
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD FX-6300 - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock 970M Pro3
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - 4x4GB A-DATA 1866 Mhz (OC)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x 1 Tb Seagate something or other
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#6
as hbm is essentially much the same so we should be seeing the same for gpu's eventually no?
You mean for GPU dies ? Probably not , it would be unfeasible because of heat dissipation.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
756 (0.22/day)
Likes
146
Location
I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
System Name 2 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R7 1700 @ 3.9| Xeon 2680
Motherboard Asrock B350M Pro 4 | HP Z620
Cooling Water | Air
Memory 64gb | 128 gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | quadro K4000\GTX970
Storage 960 Evo 500gb, 860 evo 1tb, PM871 256gb Many Intel SSD's, Seagate barracuda pro 8tb.
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something
Case Corsair Carbide 88R
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse G500
Keyboard TT Meka G1
Software Ubuntu 17.10
#7
You mean for GPU dies ? Probably not , it would be unfeasible because of heat dissipation.
I meant if it's actually cost effective like they seem to indicate as well as space savings should the cost be simular for hbm was what I meant. :)
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
384 (0.62/day)
Likes
325
Location
Riverwood, Skyrim
System Name I haven't decided yet
Processor Intel i5 6500
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX/AC
Cooling Stock cooler
Memory G.Skill Aegis 1x16GB 2133MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 850EVO 500GB, 2TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) 32' Sony TV
Case Cooler Master Elite 130
Audio Device(s) Onboard, HD 599 cans
Power Supply Antec High Current Gamer HCG-520M (520W)
Mouse Rapoo (can't remember the model number)
Keyboard Rapoo v56
Benchmark Scores Look in the various benchmark threads
#8
So I guess it will be time to up the price by 140 times because we aren't making enough money per die vs planar NAND
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
2,764 (1.68/day)
Likes
2,832
Location
Kiev, Ukraine
System Name Evil Midget
Processor i3-6100
Motherboard MSI B150I PRO AC
Cooling Noctua NH-L9i
Memory 2x8GB Kinkston HyperX DDR4-2133 CL14
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX950 MINI
Storage Samsung XP941, Sandisk X400 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case LianLi Q11B
Audio Device(s) Int.
Power Supply SeaSonic 450W 80+ GOLD
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Zalman K500 modded
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Can fit into a backpack =)
#9
I don't believe this. I am a founding member of The Flat SSD Society. Our mission is to prove that all NAND is 2D, and 3D NAND is a myth. You can keep your fake photos of layers, they're obviously photo-shopped. Join the fight against 3D SSDs!
That just made my day. :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::roll::roll::roll:
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
48 (0.02/day)
Likes
25
#10
So I guess it will be time to up the price by 140 times because we aren't making enough money per die vs planar NAND
Well, considering we already have 64-layer NAND, then 140-layer is a factor of 2.2, still I don't disagree with you

Actually curious of what the thermal profile is on a 140-layer NAND chip.
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
1,160 (0.35/day)
Likes
255
Location
Latvia
System Name Personal \\ Work - HP EliteBook 840 G3
Processor i7-4790K \\ i7-6500U
Motherboard MSI Z97 Gaming 7
Cooling Noctua DH-15
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro 32GB 2400 MHz \\ 16GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) ASUS RoG Strix 1070 Ti\\ Intel 520 HD
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 512GB, WD Black 2 TB \\ Samsung 256GB SSD
Display(s) BenQ XL2411Z \\ FullHD + 2x HP ZR2440w external screens via docking station
Case Fractal Design Define Arc Midi R2 with window
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150 with Logitech Z323
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Software Windows 10
#11
More layers equals more heat to dissipate.
I somehow don't think that is going to be a big issue.
The capacity gains alone will be worth it.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
4,804 (3.57/day)
Likes
3,855
Location
Duiven, Netherlands
Processor i7 8700k 4.8Ghz @ 1.31v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
#12
I don't believe this. I am a founding member of The Flat SSD Society. Our mission is to prove that all NAND is 2D, and 3D NAND is a myth. You can keep your fake photos of layers, they're obviously photo-shopped. Join the fight against 3D SSDs!
This needs to be in a sig
 
Top