Latest 4K 144 Hz Monitors use Blurry Chroma Subsampling

cyrand · Jun 18, 2018

I did not realize this was not common knowledge it was going to use 4:2:2 at 144hz. I am actually surprise if accurate that people getting 4:4:4 at 120hz. I saw this chart back in mid may that stated 98hz was the max you would get 4:4:4 at because of bandwidth limitation on the display port. https://www.anandtech.com/show/1272...ay-30-35in-and-bfgd-available-later-this-year

TristanX · Jun 18, 2018

These monitors are just joke. Ridiculous price, halo artifacts from FALD, insufficient bandwitch, insane power consumption and screamig cooling. Why NV just didn't add second DP connector, to vercome limitations? This could be enough for 170 Hz in HDR without any chroma subsampling. Maybe their G-Crap HDR is too limited to handle such bandwitch.

bug · Jun 18, 2018

Octopuss said:
From marketing point of view, it makes perfect sense.
...just like abandoning 16:10

It's not just marketing though, it has effects irl.

Years ago, 3dfx made the right decision and limited their cards at 65,536 colors, because that's all the hardware could realistically handle. Nvidia on the other hand had no issue slapping "16M colors" sticker on the box (with hardware support), even though you could not get anything playable using 16M colors. Users bought Nvidia in droves and in the aftermath Nvidia bought 3dfx.
A few years after that, ATI did the right thing and limited their entry-level cards to DX8.1, because, again, it was all the hardware could handle. Nvidia again slapped a DX9 sticker on their FX5200 cards and sold them in droves. Even though ATI's Radeon 9000/9100 were actually faster and you couldn't play any DX9 title on the FX5200.

That's why I treat failure to report these things as major fails for tech sites and have made a habit of pointing these out.

Vayra86 · Jun 18, 2018

I guess this is a whole new perspective on my statement that 120 fps / hz is more than fine for high refresh and going higher = pointless.

Now its not only pointless, but proven counterproductive.

qubit said:
There are two basic ways to beat motion blue: very fast refresh, aka 240Hz, or a strobing backlight. They can be combined for even better results. Today's fast LCD's with a strobe actually have better motion resolution than the old CRTs, simply because they're running at a faster refresh rate, they're inherently sharper with their fixed pixels and also have a lot of them (at least Full HD). I've been enjoying this since I got my Asus VG278HE 144Hz monitor back in 2012. It's possible to run a special utility to trick the strobe into activating without the NVIDIA driver being in 3D mode, which looks fantastic, if a little dim. My newer BenQ XL2720Z has much more flexible strobing since it's independent of graphics card vendor and works at any refresh rate. It's especially great at 60Hz for inducing migraine from all that flicker.

This right here is what sold me on my FG2421:

https://www.blurbusters.com/eizo-240hz-va-monitor-uses-strobe-backlight/

And it works everywhere

qubit · Jun 18, 2018

lynx29 said:
100hz is pretty smooth to look at too. I might try 240hz 1440p 27" someday when all that comes out, I think my dream monitor is 27" 240hz 1440p micro-LED, just seems to have 0 issues with any game I throw at it, that rez and size I mean, while if I try to play older games in 4k, its just a terrible experience trying to get the text and UI to scale, and many games don't even have mod support to fix it. I probably will have two monitors in the future, one for modern games, and one for older. lol

I'd like to see what 240Hz looks like with no dropped frames. Diminishing returns I should imagine, but awesome.

It's ironic how a better system can actually make your old games look worse due to their limitations.

bug said:
Huge difference between CRT and LCD though.
CRT: no image to speak of, just a dot moving at huge speeds to trick your eyes into seeing one.
LCD: image is always there, but you can't refresh it as fast.

When CRTs were everywhere, virtually everybody in their late thirties who used one at their job, had to wear glasses.
I think quantum dot could bring back that insanely fast refresh speeds while maintaining LCD's advantages. But it would take real quantum dot, not that contraption Samsung sells these days. Then again, Samsung's XL20 was also promising back in the day and the tech never took off...

Yeah, the basic difference is that LCD is a sample and hold display while CRT isn't, which leads to all that perceived motion blur. Note that the picture isn't really that blurred and you can test it easily yourself. Set the graphics card to 60Hz and move the mouse left and right. Follow it with your eyes: it looks blurred and blurrier as the pointer moves faster. Now keep your vision focused on the middle of the screen (ie no eye movement) and move the pointer left and right. You now see a series of perfectly sharp, stationary pointers, proving the perception illusion. It's all to do with the brain averaging the movement. With a CRT, the blur effect is actually still there, but much less pronounced.

There are two basic ways to beat motion blur: very fast refresh, ie 240Hz, or a strobing backlight. They can be combined for even better results. Today's fast LCD's with a strobe actually have better motion resolution than the old CRTs, simply because they're running at a faster refresh rate, they're inherently sharper with their fixed pixels and also have a lot of them (at least Full HD). I've been enjoying this since I got my Asus VG278HE 144Hz monitor back in 2012. It's possible to run a special utility to trick the strobe into activating without the NVIDIA driver being in 3D mode, which looks fantastic, if a little dim. My newer BenQ XL2720Z has much more flexible strobing since it's independent of graphics card vendor and works at any refresh rate. It's especially great at 60Hz for inducing migraine from all that flicker. :laugh:

www.blurbusters.com have all you could ever want to know about beating motion blur and the latest in high refresh, strobing monitors.

Caring1 said:
Up until recently I had and still used an original Fluoro backlit LCD monitor, and that thing ran hot enough to warrant a fan or two, I guess it would still be alive if it had them.

Or the fan would have failed anyway.

PowerPC · Jun 18, 2018

This is just ridiculous and sad.

When will we finally see HDMI 2.1 and DP 1.5 ? It almost seems like they are holding those technologies back just to sell us crap like this. Keep us in the old world as long as possible, so we'll need to buy new updated monitors once they come out. Put as many compromises as possible into today's monitors, so they seem like old world as soon as possible.

deu · Jun 18, 2018

GreiverBlade said:
oohhh that's actually what i thought .... there is a sweet spot for each persone ...

fortunately (or unfortunately ) mine is at 60-75hz (can tolerate 30hz but not for games) and i considere 1440p to be the ideal resolution up to 32" and just as for refresh rate, up to 1620p is nice (3K) but above is gimmick (fortunately was maybe because i can find decent price around these specs )

4k 120hz is a joke and 144hz even more ... maybe in one or two more GPU gen...

actually i rather hate the high res small size screen tendency .... 1440p/4K 24"? seriously? even at 1440/1620p 32" sitting at a adequate distance i can't see the pixels or any aliasing (never using FxAA or any AA since i swapped for that screen ) even worse with smartphone ... i have a 1440p 5.2", previously i had a 720p 5.6", 1080p 5.5" and 1200p 8" (luckily the 1440p 5.6 was at a price lower than the other 3 ... otherwise i would never take it)

Remember; The fact that these monitors are out in the market at a staggering price does not mean that the companies are 'pushing' these onto the customers. They just put cutting edge technology into a product to "test" the market and the supplychain. In 3-5 years everyone will have a 4K 144hz instead of a 1440p 144hz screen and that is good because then the GPUs will be able to keep up. For now they are an expensive peak into the new standard avaliable to the entusiast willing to pay.

medi01 · Jun 18, 2018

"If you are spending 2k, why you should go for a TV, not monitor 101"

Vayra86 · Jun 18, 2018

deu said:
Remember; The fact that these monitors are out in the market at a staggering price does not mean that the companies are 'pushing' these onto the customers. They just put cutting edge technology into a product to "test" the market and the supplychain. In 3-5 years everyone will have a 4K 144hz instead of a 1440p 144hz screen and that is good because then the GPUs will be able to keep up. For now they are an expensive peak into the new standard avaliable to the entusiast willing to pay.

The biggest problem with high refresh gaming is not the GPU, but the CPU. You can always dial down a few settings to reduce GPU load, but that doesn't work for CPU - it actually is counterproductive as GPU bottlenecks get removed means the CPU load will increase. And for competitive gaming there is also the limitation of server tickrates and network latency (try to get 8.33ms on PUBG, I challenge you

). Add onto that the general public doesn't even notice anything above 40~60 FPS as long as its stable, and you can safely conclude 120+Hz is a niche and always will be. Its not new either, this goes back to CRT days.

It still puzzles me why they keep pushing higher refresh rates than 120. Diminishing returns + impossible to achieve FPS make it virtually 100% worthless. I never even considered the bandwidth issue on top of all that

medi01 said:
"If you are spending 2k, why you should go for a TV, not monitor 101"

Strange comment. 98% of all TVs have horrible input lag even for regular desktop use. And TVs are generally cheaper for higher res and greater diagonals.

deu · Jun 18, 2018

Vayra86 said:
The biggest problem with high refresh gaming is not the GPU, but the CPU. You can always dial down a few settings to reduce GPU load, but that doesn't work for CPU. And for competitive gaming there is also the limitation of server tickrates and network latency. Add onto that the general public doesn't even notice anything above 40~60 FPS as long as its stable, and you can safely conclude 120+Hz is a niche and always will be. Its not new either, this goes back to CRT days.

It still puzzles me why they keep pushing higher refresh rates than 120. Diminishing returns + impossible to achieve FPS make it virtually 100% worthless. I never even considered the bandwidth issue on top of all that

I agree that there are situations where the CPU is the limit (especially in online FPS gaming), A good netcode will not punish your FPS, but punish the information the client receive; You have a visually buttery smooth experience but it might be the fact that clients/targets you are aiming for is being updated slow due to the low tickrate. Again depending on the game different setups have different advantages, but singleplayer gaming CPU should be able to deliever the frames. But again thanks to AMD we have 8c16thread CPUs to the mainstreamsegments already now

wiak · Jun 18, 2018

NVIDIA did something similar with their so called HDMI 2.0 Ready products that only did 4:2:0 sampling, not full proper 4:4:4, advised it as hdmi 2.0 but looked like crap

Kaotik · Jun 18, 2018

Why is the article not talking about the color depth? It's just as important and as big factor for this as resolution and refresh rate are.
120 Hz RGB works fine - as long as you limit yourself to 8-bit colors and thus rule out HDR.
10-bit colors, which allows HDR to function too, is limited to ~100Hz (98 Hz in case of these first monitors) if you want to keep RGB/YCbCr 4:4:4

bug · Jun 18, 2018

wiak said:
NVIDIA did something similar with their so called HDMI 2.0 Ready products that only did 4:2:0 sampling, not full proper 4:4:4, advised it as hdmi 2.0 but looked like crap

That's wasn't just Nvidia. HDMI 2.0 doesn't have the bandwidth to handle both 4:4:4 and HDCP 2.2 at the same time. Thank DRM for that one.

GreiverBlade · Jun 18, 2018

deu said:
Remember; The fact that these monitors are out in the market at a staggering price does not mean that the companies are 'pushing' these onto the customers. They just put cutting edge technology into a product to "test" the market and the supplychain. In 3-5 years everyone will have a 4K 144hz instead of a 1440p 144hz screen and that is good because then the GPUs will be able to keep up. For now they are an expensive peak into the new standard avaliable to the entusiast willing to pay.

mmhhh... well Medion did the right thing, for me, with a 32" 1440p (1620p capable) 60hz (75hz no sweat) 8ms (5ms on overdrive mode) IPS at 299chf/300.39usd

cutting edge? pffffffrt ... being a test lab rat paying an overpriced product is ... beyond :roll:

4K 144hz? no thanks, actual card are barely capable to do 2160p55.... 3k 75hz is enough (and i doubt the next gpu gen will be able to push more... my 1070 with her hefty stock oc improved by a home oc can't push 75fps at 1080p but manage to stay between 33 and 68 at 1440p and 30-59 at 1620p luckily above 1080p i can sacrifice AA and keep other setting to the max

)

ooohhhh 3-5yrs mmhhh my eyesight will not be as good as it is now (plot twist: i am suffering of hypermetropia astigmatism tho i don't wear glasses for reading or computer related stuff ... it act as a natural antialiasing

) maybe i will find 4k actually usefull in 5yrs :toast:

edit: don't they dare to keep 24" as a norm for 4K in 3-5yrs.... i can't go under 32" since my X58222

wiak · Jun 19, 2018

NVIDIA did something similar with their so called HDMI 2.0 Ready products that only did 4:2:0 sampling, not full proper 4:4:4, advised it as hdmi 2.0 but looked like crap

Prima.Vera · Jun 19, 2018

Geeeez. The quality difference is not just huge, is extremely huge. Anything less than 4:4:4 looks like a heavily compressed movie from 2000s.....

FordGT90Concept · Jun 19, 2018

They should have used DSC for 121-144 Hz. Alternatively, two DisplayPort connectors. Chroma subsampling is a copout.

Kaotik · Jun 19, 2018

FordGT90Concept said:
They should have used DSC for 121-144 Hz. Alternatively, two DisplayPort connectors. Chroma subsampling is a copout.

Can't use DSC when the G-Sync-scaler doesn't support it

FordGT90Concept · Jun 19, 2018

Kaotik said:
Can't use DSC when the G-Sync-scaler doesn't support it

Explains everything, including the DP1.4 firmware NVIDIA outed not too long ago.

Octopuss · Jun 19, 2018

Is this 4:x:x thing ever written anywhere? I can't even find it in reviews at tftcentral, and I can't imagine more reputable reviewer - so manufacturers probably don't publish it at all.

qubit · Jun 19, 2018

Octopuss said:
Is this 4:x:x thing ever written anywhere? I can't even find it in reviews at tftcentral, and I can't imagine more reputable reviewer - so manufacturers probably don't publish it at all.

I'd have thought for computers and monitors it would always be 4:4:4 as the picture has always been perfectly sharp, except in this stupid case. I'd surmise that this is why they never mention it.

Octopuss · Jun 19, 2018

I'd certainly hope so! But...

R-T-B · Jun 19, 2018

qubit said:
I'd have thought for computers and monitors it would always be 4:4:4 as the picture has always been perfectly sharp, except in this stupid case. I'd surmise that this is why they never mention it.

Not actually true. CRTs weren't perfect from a chroma sampling perspective, IIRC.

Few actually cared though, because CRTs tended to distort the shit out of image geometry anyways...

qubit · Jun 19, 2018

R-T-B said:
Not actually true. CRTs weren't perfect from a chroma sampling perspective, IIRC.

Few actually cared though, because CRTs tended to distort the shit out of image geometry anyways...

Oh gawd, yes. :rolleyes:

So glad to be free of that.

CRTs were analogue, so I don't see how this applies (chroma sampling imperfection). I don't know that much about it, so perhaps I'm missing something.

bug · Jun 19, 2018

Octopuss said:
Is this 4:x:x thing ever written anywhere? I can't even find it in reviews at tftcentral, and I can't imagine more reputable reviewer - so manufacturers probably don't publish it at all.

There's nothing to publish. The HDMI spec mandates support for 4:4:4, 4:2:2 and 4:2:0 since HDMI 2.0 (4:2:2 has been with us since HDMI 1.0). Obviously for higher refresh rates the bandwidth is simply not there, so the monitor has to use compression.
Now, if a monitor was using 4:2:2 or 4:2:0 to push FHD@60Hz, that would be something worth reporting. But that doesn't seem to be the case here.

Processor	Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard	Asus H670 TUF
Cooling	Arctic Freezer 34
Memory	2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s)	EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage	500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s)	Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case	Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s)	Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply	Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse	Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard	G.Skill KM780R
Software	Arch Linux + Win10

Processor	i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard	AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling	beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory	16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s)	ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage	Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s)	Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case	Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s)	Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply	EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse	XTRFY M42
Keyboard	Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software	W10 x64

System Name	Quantumville™
Processor	Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling	Noctua NH-D14
Memory	16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s)	MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB \| WD Black 4TB \| WD Blue 6TB
Display(s)	ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) \| Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case	Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s)	Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply	Corsair AX1600i
Mouse	Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard	Yes
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit

System Name	Bo-minator (my name is bo)
Processor	AMD 3900X
Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER
Cooling	Noctua NH-D15
Memory	G-SkiLL 2x8GB RAM 3600Mhz (CL16-16-16-16-36)
Video Card(s)	ASUS STRIX 1080Ti OC
Storage	Samsung EVO 850 1TB
Display(s)	ACER XB271HU + DELL 2717D
Case	Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s)	ASUS Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply	Antec HCP 1000W
Mouse	G403
Keyboard	CM STORM Quick Fire Rapid
Software	Windows 10 64-bit Pro
Benchmark Scores	XX

System Name	M3401 notebook
Processor	5600H
Motherboard	NA
Memory	16GB
Video Card(s)	3050
Storage	500GB SSD
Display(s)	14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software	Windows 10
Benchmark Scores	3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.

Latest 4K 144 Hz Monitors use Blurry Chroma Subsampling

cyrand

TristanX

bug

Vayra86

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit

PowerPC

deu

medi01

Vayra86

deu

wiak

Kaotik

bug

GreiverBlade

wiak

Prima.Vera

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"

Kaotik

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"

Octopuss

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit

Octopuss

R-T-B

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit

bug

Processor	Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard	Gigabyte B550I AORUS PRO AX 1.1
Cooling	Noctua NB-U12A
Memory	2x 32GB Fury DDR4 3200mhz
Video Card(s)	PowerColor Radeon 5700 XT Red Dragon
Storage	Kingston FURY Renegade 2TB PCIe 4.0
Display(s)	2x Dell U2412M
Case	Phanteks P400A
Audio Device(s)	Hifimediy Sabre 9018 USB DAC
Power Supply	Corsair AX850 (from 2012)
Software	Windows 10?

Processor	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard	Asus Prime X570 Pro
Cooling	Deepcool LS-720
Memory	32 GB (4x 8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC
Storage	Samsung PM9A1 (980 Pro OEM) + 960 Evo NVMe SSD + 830 SATA SSD + Toshiba & WD HDD's
Display(s)	Samsung C32HG70
Case	Lian Li O11D Evo
Audio Device(s)	Sound Blaster Zx
Power Supply	Seasonic 750W Focus+ Platinum
Mouse	Logitech G703 Lightspeed
Keyboard	SteelSeries Apex Pro
Software	Windows 11 Pro

System Name	main/SFFHTPCARGH!(tm)/Xiaomi Mi TV Stick/Samsung Galaxy S23/Ally
Processor	Ryzen 7 5800X3D/i7-3770/S905X/Snapdragon 8 Gen 2/Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk/HP SFF Q77 Express/uh?/uh?/Asus
Cooling	Enermax ETS-T50 Axe aRGB /basic HP HSF /errr.../oh! liqui..wait, no:sizable vapor chamber/a nice one
Memory	64gb Corsair Vengeance Pro 3600mhz DDR4/8gb DDR3 1600/2gb LPDDR3/8gb LPDDR5x 4200/16gb LPDDR5
Video Card(s)	Hellhound Spectral White RX 7900 XTX 24gb/GT 730/Mali 450MP5/Adreno 740/RDNA3 768 core
Storage	250gb870EVO/500gb860EVO/2tbSandisk/NVMe2tb+1tb/4tbextreme V2/1TB Arion/500gb/8gb/256gb/2tb SN770M
Display(s)	X58222 32" 2880x1620/32"FHDTV/273E3LHSB 27" 1920x1080/6.67"/AMOLED 2X panel FHD+120hz/FHD 120hz
Case	Cougar Panzer Max/Elite 8300 SFF/None/back/back-front Gorilla Glass Victus 2+ UAG Monarch Carbon
Audio Device(s)	Logi Z333/SB Audigy RX/HDMI/HDMI/Dolby Atmos/KZ x HBB PR2/Edifier STAX Spirit S3 & SamsungxAKG beans
Power Supply	Chieftec Proton BDF-1000C /HP 240w/12v 1.5A/4Smart Voltplug PD 30W/Asus USB-C 65W
Mouse	Speedlink Sovos Vertical-Asus ROG Spatha-Logi Ergo M575/Xiaomi XMRM-006/touch/touch
Keyboard	Endorfy Thock 75% <3/none/touch/virtual
VR HMD	Medion Erazer
Software	Win10 64/Win8.1 64/Android TV 8.1/Android 13/Win11 64
Benchmark Scores	bench...mark? i do leave mark on bench sometime, to remember which one is the most comfortable. :o

Processor	Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling	Noctua NH-D15
Memory	32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s)	ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage	2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s)	Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case	NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s)	Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply	Corsair 850W
Mouse	Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software	Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores	30FPS in NFS:Rivals

System Name	BY-2021
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard	MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling	Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory	2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s)	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage	Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s)	Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case	Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply	Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse	Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard	Tesoro Excalibur
Software	Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores	Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.

Processor	Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard	Asus TUF-Gaming B550-Plus
Cooling	Noctua NH-U14S
Memory	32GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo F4-3600C16D-32GTZNC
Video Card(s)	Sapphire Radeon Rx 580 Nitro+ 8GB
Storage	HP EX950 512GB + Samsung 970 PRO 1TB
Display(s)	HP Z Display Z24i G2
Case	Fractal Design Define R6 Black
Audio Device(s)	Creative Sound Blaster AE-5
Power Supply	Seasonic PRIME Ultra 650W Gold
Mouse	Roccat Kone AIMO Remastered
Software	Windows 10 x64

System Name	Pioneer
Processor	Ryzen R9 7950X
Motherboard	GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling	Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory	64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s)	XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage	2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s)	55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case	Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s)	TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply	FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse	Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard	WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software	Gentoo Linux x64