• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

LCD Makers Settle Price-Fixing Case

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,681 (7.42/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Five major LCD panel makers, including Samsung, Sharp, Hitachi, HannStar, and Chimei Innolux; agreed to pay over US $553 million in settlement to regulators for a price-fixing case. The case by regulators alleged that these companies colluded to fix prices of LCD panels 1999 and 2006, affecting billions of dollars of commerce. The scam unearthed in 2006, by regulators of Japan, Korea, United States, and the European Union. Many companies and executives have since pleaded guilty to criminal antitrust violations and paid more than US $890 million in fines so far.

The latest payout of $553 million is aimed to resolve claims by "indirect" purchasers that bought televisions and computers with thin film transistor LCDs, as well as claims by eight USA states: Arkansas, California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New York, West Virginia and Wisconsin. It also includes payments of $14.7 million by the companies to settle civil fine and penalty law claims by the states, the office of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said. He stated "This price-fixing scheme manipulated the playing field for businesses that abide by the rules, and left consumers to pay artificially higher costs for televisions, computers and other electronics."

The composition of this payout includes US $240 million by Samsung, $115.5 million by Sharp, $110.3 million by Chimei Innolux, $39 million by Hitachi, and $25.7 million by HannStar. Smaller contributors to this payout include $5.3 million by Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., and $2.9 million by Epson.

Interestingly, these are not the only companies that are part of the racket. Taiwan-based AU Optronics, which is a very large display panel manufacturer that sells panels to major ODMs, and Korea's LG Electronics are yet to settle.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Wow. Talk about catching your hand in the cookie jar. This is true anti-trust unlike that witch hunt the EU was on with Intel. I notice Toshiba and NEC are not on that list. Good to see.
 
It makes me sad to see a company I like (Samsung) involved in this :(
 
It makes me sad to see a company I like (Samsung) involved in this :(

ya, this is the kind of news that pisses you off but I really hated to see that Samsung got rapped up into this shady bs
 
So are we getting checks?
 
So are we getting checks?

Exactly. From the pockets of currupt companies into the pockets of other currupt companies. The consumer never wins. Only companies and governments win. The world will never change.
 
"US $553 million in settlement to regulators" - So what do we "The Customers" get??? After all thats Our money in the first place!!
 
What? SONY isn't involved? BLASPHEMY!
 
It makes me sad to see a company I like (Samsung) involved in this :(

ya, this is the kind of news that pisses you off but I really hated to see that Samsung got rapped up into this shady bs

Wasn't Samsung involved in the whole price fixing of RAM a few years ago? It doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
 
Before reading the responses I was going through the article thinking whats that like a .02 for each consumer. Already shaking my head saying to myself they wouldnt dare give that money back to the people it actually screwed.
Anyway I did get my .08 check from a settlement between Ebay and a foreign outfit. I have no idea what it was even about but hey I did get supposedly my cut. :laugh:
 
Before reading the responses I was going through the article thinking whats that like a .02 for each consumer. Already shaking my head saying to myself they wouldnt dare give that money back to the people it actually screwed.
Anyway I did get my .08 check from a settlement between Ebay and a foreign outfit. I have no idea what it was even about but hey I did get supposedly my cut. :laugh:

You can bet the lawyers got their cut too. Only difference is, their piece of the pie is about 100000x larger than yours.
 
sonsabitches:mad: I want my money back
 
You can bet the lawyers got their cut too. Only difference is, their piece of the pie is about 100000x larger than yours.

No, this was government regulation, which means the money goes to the tax coffers, and government lawyers are salaried and are not paid contingency fees. Generally only private class actions actually return money to those wronged.
 
Last edited:
I have a feeling everyone corporate won out from use consumer on this deal.
The scam had been going on for a very long time and within that time I am sure they guilty companies have made a fair bit more than they have had to dish out.

So regardless of their shady dealings, they have made a profit and the people who have finally nabbed them have taken a slice of the pie as well.

Win win.

Besides the paying consumer.
 
Back
Top