Preferably 1900x1200 , i don't want weird resolutions , or "TV standards" , im doing nothing with multimedia. I don't need TV card since those monitors are crap for gaming , i mean , it's not really gaming , it's just fast response , i don't want the screen to look lagy WHATEVER im doing. Logically , a good screen like this would also have good movies and other fast moving pics so... i don't know why companies brake down products to categories , it just doesn't work that way , they don't really make a good gaming monitor , like seeing on samsung right now , it's poor , i can't find a thing suitable , they have NOTHING at 2ms , but those are professional , ... im confused. 60FPS totally falls of , don't want that at all , i seen T260HD first hand , balanced , but not gaming since you need to have VSYNC to get rid of the lines because of 60 FPS of course , I need 75FPS(hz) or above , 2ms also , 4 ms would still be fine though if not possible. ASUS VW266H looks kind of cool , but it's a stupid design , it's tilted and i don't like that, reverw says it can't be untilted. I also don't want large pixels , i want good pixel density. ... i don't care about photo editing so those features. Im just not in this monitor area so much , found something , but this will take a week to review , some month to fully research the current market , i never bought a monitor my self , since this one was referred to me from a friend , when i didn't knew much, like 5 years ago. I see that samsung changed a bit with it's strategy , it just has wild mix of useless junk i see , for 10 minutes i looked the official site , some Economical Green Super LCD has 2ms , and some "speciality" or proofessional had 4ms , that just doesn't make sense at all. Thanks guys , around 300 EUR is the limit. Anyways LED doesn't seem bad , but isn't that expensive still? The focus goes to the actual panel , the core of the screen , smaller the pixels , the better!