• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Microsoft Surface with Windows 8 RT Priced, Starts at $499

Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
1,756 (0.77/day)
Likes
479
Location
Cussing desert
System Name Ironic
Processor AMD FX8350 4.2ghz 1.32v (stock volts)
Motherboard CHVF-Z 990FX
Cooling Swiftech Maelstrom/MCP355, EK Supremacy, XT45 360mm rad
Memory 16GB Gskill Ripjaws x
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 reference
Storage Hitachi 1tb HDD; 60gb OCZ SATA III ssd
Display(s) Achieva Shimian 27" 2560x1440
Case Cooler Master HAF 932
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply EVGA supernova 850 G2
Mouse $20 logitech
Keyboard Possibly the cheapest you can buy
Software Windows 7
#51
128gb storage, ivy i5, 4gb ram, full size usb 3.0. its the tablet to end all tablets!
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
20,921 (6.24/day)
Likes
10,022
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#52
Plus RT will have Office 2013 oob.





PCMAG posted a comparison table between Surface and iPad


http://www1.pcmag.com/media/images/361928-surface-with-windows-rt-vs-apple-ipad.jpg?thumb=y
Surface RT vs iPad
$499 = $499
1.4 GHz quad-core > 1.0 GHz dual-core
2 GB RAM > 1 GB RAM
32 GB storage > 16 GB storage ($599 to upgrade to 32 GB)
10.6" > 9.7"
1366x768 < 2048x1536
802.11abgn > 802.11bgn
720p front cam > "VGA" front cam
720p rear cam < 1080p rear cam
USB 2.0, microSDXC, headset, mini DisplayPort > 30-pin dock connector (going obsolete), headphone jack
31.5 Wh < 42.5 Wh battery

I think it's pretty clear you get a lot more bang for your buck from equally priced Surface compared to the latest and greatest iPad. The only two major advantages iPad has over Surface is the bigger battery and the higher pixel density in the screen. It isn't clear which packages is more power efficient (probably iPad because Tegras are quite hungry) but, even though the iPad has a fancy screen, it doesn't have the GPU power to back it up like the Surface does. I think, for 2D content, the iPad wins but 3D content, the Surface wins.

I'm very certain Microsoft can and will sell the Surface for less than $500. They are launching at $500 to see how it competes with iPad in the same prace bracket. If Surface launches with a splat, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see the price drop to $400 or even $300 which makes the choice it a no-brainer.

Surface Pro is going to compete with laptops and, seeing what price Surface debuted for, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see Surface Pro go for $1000.


If you are building a "Metro style" app you have to use their store no matter what platform you are targetting.
This is a huge turn-off for developers like me that program pro-bono. I hope they reevaluate this policy and, instead, adopt an authentication program not unlike Games for Windows Live certification. I'm certain they do it for DRM sake but Microsoft needs to realize that DRM is unpopular--businesses always win when they choose customers over providers.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
381 (0.16/day)
Likes
39
#53
I'll be interested when the pro debuts, altho w/ this pricing 1k for the pro seems likely and that might be more then I'll be willing to spend.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,205 (0.41/day)
Likes
364
Location
The Netherlands
System Name PC || Laptop
Processor AMD FX-8350 @ 4,8GHz || i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX || default
Cooling Corsair H100i Push-Pull|| Stock
Memory Samsung 30nm 4x4GB @ 1930MHz|| 2x8GB LVDDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290 @ 1060MHz / 1600MHz || Nvidia Geforce 960M
Display(s) Samsung S23A750D 120Hz + others|| 15,6" 1080P
Case Corsair 500R Fans Galore ||
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX/XD ||
Power Supply Corsair AX860i || 120Watt 19V OEM adaptor
Software Win 10 64bit || Win 10 64bit
#54
For all you designers and illustrators out here: The presentation that was given a while ago when surface was introduced mentioned that the surface pro had a stylus added to the design, and that the touch controller registering that stylus had a way higher resolution than the display itself.

I'm not claiming to be an expert on design/illustrations, but I cant really remember any other tablet/touchscreen having those same specifications. So i guess that íf you wanted something to do graphical work on, the surface pro would would atleast better then the average tablet/ipad.
 
Last edited:

ELPCU

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
5 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
#56
Surface RT vs iPad
$499 = $499
1.4 GHz quad-core > 1.0 GHz dual-core
2 GB RAM > 1 GB RAM
32 GB storage > 16 GB storage ($599 to upgrade to 32 GB)
10.6" > 9.7"
1366x768 < 2048x1536
802.11abgn > 802.11bgn
720p front cam > "VGA" front cam
720p rear cam < 1080p rear cam
USB 2.0, microSDXC, headset, mini DisplayPort > 30-pin dock connector (going obsolete), headphone jack
31.5 Wh < 42.5 Wh battery

I think it's pretty clear you get a lot more bang for your buck from equally priced Surface compared to the latest and greatest iPad. The only two major advantages iPad has over Surface is the bigger battery and the higher pixel density in the screen. It isn't clear which packages is more power efficient (probably iPad because Tegras are quite hungry) but, even though the iPad has a fancy screen, it doesn't have the GPU power to back it up like the Surface does. I think, for 2D content, the iPad wins but 3D content, the Surface wins.

I'm very certain Microsoft can and will sell the Surface for less than $500. They are launching at $500 to see how it competes with iPad in the same prace bracket. If Surface launches with a splat, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see the price drop to $400 or even $300 which makes the choice it a no-brainer.

Surface Pro is going to compete with laptops and, seeing what price Surface debuted for, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see Surface Pro go for $1000.
How 'bout comparing Surface vs. Asus Transformer Infinity or Nexus 7?

I cannot see any reason to choose surface over asus or Nexus 7,
especially Nexus 7 is too cheap to even argue.



I don't care how much battery capacity put in, if they aren't last long due to power consumption of heavier OS. So At least we need to see what is happening after it comes out. and 32GB doesn't tell much, cuz window RT takes more than 12GB by itself. I don't care camera spec as well, becuz I don't see any practical use with big fat tablet. There is still pros, but other android tablets already has that.

hardware spec isn't everything. If it is, then Android should already killed Apple.

In terms of martket share, Android tablets were totally dominated by iPad.
I'm not a big fan of apple, but I think the price of Surface is ridiculus.
I feels MS need to set price much more aggressive(like 350-ish) to take some market share pie away from iPad.


If this is window 8, it will be totally different story.
However with Window 8 RT, which cannot run and x86 base programs,
I cannot see any reason to choose Surface over competitive Android Tablets except free Microsoft Office App.

Yes, I know it is growing fast, but window app store is still weak, and there are All iPad accessory around my local store while not much for Android or something else.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
20,921 (6.24/day)
Likes
10,022
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#57
Surface competes with iPad. There is no aspect of the Nexus 7 tablet that competes with Surface except sharing a Tegra 3 processor. e.g. screen is 3" smaller, storage capacity is 2-4 times less, half the RAM, no DisplayPort out, etc. The $200/$250 price tag matches the spec differences.

Microsoft won't directly compete with Android (at least in the near future)--that's up to the OEMs and whether or not they think they can compete.


Surface is superior in almost every way to the iPad and at the same price. There's no reason why it shouldn't compete.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
1,756 (0.77/day)
Likes
479
Location
Cussing desert
System Name Ironic
Processor AMD FX8350 4.2ghz 1.32v (stock volts)
Motherboard CHVF-Z 990FX
Cooling Swiftech Maelstrom/MCP355, EK Supremacy, XT45 360mm rad
Memory 16GB Gskill Ripjaws x
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 reference
Storage Hitachi 1tb HDD; 60gb OCZ SATA III ssd
Display(s) Achieva Shimian 27" 2560x1440
Case Cooler Master HAF 932
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply EVGA supernova 850 G2
Mouse $20 logitech
Keyboard Possibly the cheapest you can buy
Software Windows 7
#58
How 'bout comparing Surface vs. Asus Transformer Infinity or Nexus 7?
or Transformer Prime. If I do upgrade from mine, it will probably be the surface pro, and not for several months at the earliest.
 
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
4,422 (1.59/day)
Likes
1,603
System Name RemixedBeast
Processor Intel i5 3570K @ 3.4Ghz
Motherboard ASRock Z77 Pro3
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 16GB Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) EVGA Nvidia GTX 650 Ti SSC 1GB
Storage 1.5TB Seagate/128GB Samsung 840
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster P2350 23in @ 1920x1080 + LG Flatron 19in Widescreen 1440x900
Case Antec Three Hundred Two
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro 80 // Fiio E7 Amp/DAC
Power Supply 620w Antec High Current Gamer HCG-620M
Mouse Logitech G700s/G502
Keyboard Logitech K740
Software Windows Server 2012 x64 Standard
Benchmark Scores Network: APs: Cisco Meraki MR32, Ubiquiti Unifi AP-AC-LR and Lite, Ligowave NFT-3AC
#59
no vmware view for it... but there's vmware view for ipad....
not as many apps for winRT as ipad.... not gonna work for enterprises that don't have the cash to spend on the surface pro.

I think they need to lower the price 100 bucks... then it would be in line to be a consumption device to compete with the ipad.

everyone was hopeing to score one of these for 250-350.... that is an ideal price point for many. 500 is way too much to pay considering the lack of winRT apps avalible right now desipte the DP being accessible more then a year ago.


businesses might get the pro, however it will be as much an an ultrabook so they will just spring for one of those instead.
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
14,405 (3.56/day)
Likes
4,257
System Name VHOST01 | Desktop
Processor i7 980x | i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard Gigabyte x58 Extreme | AsRock MicroATX Z170M Exteme4
Cooling Prolimatech Megahelams | Stock
Memory 6x4 GB @ 1333 | 2x 8G Gskill Aegis DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GT 210 | Nvidia GTX 970 FTW+
Storage 4x2 TB Enterprise RAID5 |Corsair mForce nvme 250G
Display(s) N/A | Dell 27" 1440p 8bit GSYNC
Case Lian Li ATX Mid Tower | Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) NA | On Board
Power Supply SeaSonic 500W Gold | Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse N/A | Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard N/A | Posiden Z RGB Cherry MX Brown
Software Centos 7 | Windows 10
#60
when the ipad first came out, apple haters were saying how useless a device it was and how stupid because nobody needs one. (of course those people live in their mom's basement and work bagging groceries so how would they know what real people need).

now you have a half dozen companies creating their own tablet devices with varying degrees of usage at varying price points and it seems now even the apple haters love their tablets so long as it doesn't say apple on it. let's be clear, apple leads the way in innovation and they have the sales figures to prove it. everyone else is just riding their coattails to a decent profit.
 

naoan

New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
303 (0.10/day)
Likes
62
System Name AMD?
Audio Device(s) onboard
Software 7 X64
#61
How much space does the $499 New iPad 16GB give you after the OS install?

Remind you again why you would want it.... well, its a much more capable tablet when compared to a iPad, thats why.
To the people saying its too expensive, you need to read the specs, understand its made directly by Microsoft, and that its not just a typical $200 Nexus 7 type tablet. It's way more capable than any tablet out on the market today. Surface isn't a tablet, its more like a tablet-laptop hybrid. I'm excited for Microsoft and Windows 8. I want to see the Surface Pro pricing!
How much more capable is it compared to el cheapo Nexus 7 and why would I (or anybody) want that capability? Is it unique to WinRT? Can't I get it simpler, easier or cheaper on the widely available ecosystem of Android or iOS?

Why is it a tablet-laptop hybrid when it can't even run x86 app? What makes it oh so great?

Enlighten me.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,400 (5.82/day)
Likes
8,922
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name The Mailbox 4.5
Processor Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD, 500Gb WD (7200) 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080
Case Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) and a Wacom Intuos 4 tablet.
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#62
when the ipad first came out, apple haters were saying how useless a device it was and how stupid because nobody needs one. (of course those people live in their mom's basement and work bagging groceries so how would they know what real people need).

now you have a half dozen companies creating their own tablet devices with varying degrees of usage at varying price points and it seems now even the apple haters love their tablets so long as it doesn't say apple on it. let's be clear, apple leads the way in innovation and they have the sales figures to prove it. everyone else is just riding their coattails to a decent profit.
Apple didn't invent tablets. They just made them shiny. I have some brass polish in my kitchen. Am I an innovator too?

The Surface is gonna be way bigger in a corporate environment then the iPad could ever be.
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
14,405 (3.56/day)
Likes
4,257
System Name VHOST01 | Desktop
Processor i7 980x | i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard Gigabyte x58 Extreme | AsRock MicroATX Z170M Exteme4
Cooling Prolimatech Megahelams | Stock
Memory 6x4 GB @ 1333 | 2x 8G Gskill Aegis DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GT 210 | Nvidia GTX 970 FTW+
Storage 4x2 TB Enterprise RAID5 |Corsair mForce nvme 250G
Display(s) N/A | Dell 27" 1440p 8bit GSYNC
Case Lian Li ATX Mid Tower | Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) NA | On Board
Power Supply SeaSonic 500W Gold | Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse N/A | Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard N/A | Posiden Z RGB Cherry MX Brown
Software Centos 7 | Windows 10
#63
Apple didn't invent tablets. They just made them shiny. I have some brass polish in my kitchen. Am I an innovator too?

The Surface is gonna be way bigger in a corporate environment then the iPad could ever be.
apple made the tablet USEFUL for the every day person. that is what separates a profitable company from a bankrupt company. nobody was mass marketing tablets because nobody was willing to do the market research or felt it was a too risky venture. apple saw an opportunity where nobody else did and engineered a fabulous product that some 30 million people now own. they did A LOT more than just take a tablet from 2004 and make it shiny. you would have to be completely computer illiterate to think that is the case.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,400 (5.82/day)
Likes
8,922
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name The Mailbox 4.5
Processor Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD, 500Gb WD (7200) 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080
Case Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) and a Wacom Intuos 4 tablet.
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#64
apple made the tablet USEFUL for the every day person. that is what separates a profitable company from a bankrupt company. nobody was mass marketing tablets because nobody was willing to do the market research or felt it was a too risky venture. apple saw an opportunity where nobody else did and engineered a fabulous product that some 30 million people now own. they did A LOT more than just take a tablet from 2004 and make it shiny. you would have to be completely computer illiterate to think that is the case.
The only thing Apple does really well is marketing. Thats it. iPad is marketing. The one thing MS does really bad is marketing. Surface is a tool. MS will market it as a toy. However I'm willing to bet money you will see the surface WAY more in a corporate environment then you will the iToy......err iPad. The Surface is for reps in the field who need to SEAMLESSLY interact with corporate....oh and it has Angry Birds too. Why do you think they can charge so much more for it other then better hardware? BECAUSE THEY KNOW Businesses have been SCREAMING for a MS tablet. So I ask you if someone was willing to give you a Surface Pro or an iPad which would you choose?
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
14,405 (3.56/day)
Likes
4,257
System Name VHOST01 | Desktop
Processor i7 980x | i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard Gigabyte x58 Extreme | AsRock MicroATX Z170M Exteme4
Cooling Prolimatech Megahelams | Stock
Memory 6x4 GB @ 1333 | 2x 8G Gskill Aegis DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GT 210 | Nvidia GTX 970 FTW+
Storage 4x2 TB Enterprise RAID5 |Corsair mForce nvme 250G
Display(s) N/A | Dell 27" 1440p 8bit GSYNC
Case Lian Li ATX Mid Tower | Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) NA | On Board
Power Supply SeaSonic 500W Gold | Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse N/A | Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard N/A | Posiden Z RGB Cherry MX Brown
Software Centos 7 | Windows 10
#66
The only thing Apple does really well is marketing. Thats it. iPad is marketing. The one thing MS does really bad is marketing. Surface is a tool. MS will market it as a toy. However I'm willing to bet money you will see the surface WAY more in a corporate environment then you will the iToy......err iPad. The Surface is for reps in the field who need to SEAMLESSLY interact with corporate....oh and it has Angry Birds too. Why do you think they can charge so much more for it other then better hardware? BECAUSE THEY KNOW Businesses have been SCREAMING for a MS tablet. So I ask you if someone was willing to give you a Surface Pro or an iPad which would you choose?
i would take the ipad(which i already own one) over a windows POS because I like the interface, the OS, the weight, the responsiveness, and the design. obviously i can't compare those attributes to the windows POS yet because i havn't held one and it took M$ 4 years to come up with their own tablet. sorry too little too late.

and since when is having a toy like an ipad wrong? isn't that what tpu is all about? we buy computer components we certainly don't need because we like them. they are our toys. people like toys so whether they use it for work or play who cares?
 

ELPCU

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
5 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
#67
Surface competes with iPad. There is no aspect of the Nexus 7 tablet that competes with Surface except sharing a Tegra 3 processor. e.g. screen is 3" smaller, storage capacity is 2-4 times less, half the RAM, no DisplayPort out, etc. The $200/$250 price tag matches the spec differences.

Microsoft won't directly compete with Android (at least in the near future)--that's up to the OEMs and whether or not they think they can compete.


Surface is superior in almost every way to the iPad and at the same price. There's no reason why it shouldn't compete.
U still don't understand my point?

I know MS wants to compete with iPad, not Android. But we are in competitive market.
If customer bought one tablet, no matter Android or iPad he bought, he will unlikely buy another tablet such as Surface. And that makes competition. Yes, Nexus 7 might not make 'direct' competition, but If I buy Nexus 7, I will not going to buy other tablet for a while. AND nexus 7 is cheap enough to choose it over other 10" high spec tablets

I see no reason(except free MS office) to buy Surface over Android tablets.
If you want to see a direct competition from Android; There is Asus Transformer tablet series.


And Android OEM company used exactly same strategy like MS's current plan: having better HW spec, and Window 8 "RT" like OS. and they totally bombed by iPad in term of market share. It seems same thing will happens to MS if they don't make it cheaper. IT CAN'T COMPETE against iPad with this price. You said it can or it will prevail, but then question is Why could'nt Android destroy apple already?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
381 (0.16/day)
Likes
39
#68
they did A LOT more than just take a tablet from 2004 and make it shiny.
your right they took their ipod touch and made it bigger instead.

I'll give apple alot more credit for the iphone then the ipad, The fact that they didn't add any functionality to the ios is dissapointing, it should have shipped w/ osx or a completly new os.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,092 (0.31/day)
Likes
127
Processor Core i7 3930K / Core i7 5820K
Motherboard Asus P9X79 Deluxe / Asus X99-A
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212 Plus
Memory 32GB DDR3 1600 (8x4GB)
Video Card(s) GTX 670
Storage Corsair Force Series 3 120GB SSD (2x) Samsung 840 500GB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Antec P180
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 650W
Software Windows 8 Pro 64bit
#69
Online retailers are already taking preorders for Windows 8 tablets running off of Ivy Bridge and Atom hardware. The was a price range for the models I looked at.

For example, the Acer Iconia W700:

W700-6607
W700-6691
W700-6465
W700P-6459

I forget the price rang but I think it was about ~$800 to ~$1200. The lowest price one was a Core i3 I believe and the highest price model was a Core i5. I’d have to double check though.

The Acer Iconia W510 uses an Intel Atom Z2760 Clover Trail. There was a price range here too.

Anyway, Microsoft Surface Pro pricing will likely be close to Ivy Bridge Windows 8 tablets that are already citing their prices. Im guessing ~$800 at least. If it comes in significantly lower then that I would be surprised. I'm not talking ~$750 but ~$600 because ~$600 would be shocking IMO.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
5,900 (2.22/day)
Likes
6,568
#70
“You can’t appreciate it, without seeing it. Go to a store” says ... Bill Gates :D

 
Last edited by a moderator:

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
20,921 (6.24/day)
Likes
10,022
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#71
I'm very certain Microsoft can and will sell the Surface for less than $500. They are launching at $500 to see how it competes with iPad in the same prace bracket. If Surface launches with a splat, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see the price drop to $400 or even $300 which makes the choice it a no-brainer.
Looks like I was partially right: Surface's High Profit Margin Reveals Microsoft's Ape-Apple Strategy

They estimate Microsoft is making about $300 per sale. What remains to be seen if Microsoft reduces the price to increase volume and really put pressure on iPad. The article points out a potential reason for this: Microsoft has priced itself as a premium product so as to not drive out its Windows 8 RT competitors (Dell, Samsung, Asus, etc.). Microsoft has internal competition it has to watch out for, unlike Apple.
 
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
5,167 (1.65/day)
Likes
944
Processor Intel Core i5-3570K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI
Cooling Corsair A70 (Passive)
Memory Samsung 8GB MV-3V4G3D/US
Storage Samsung PM841 256GB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case BitFenix Prodigy (Arctic White)
Power Supply FSP Zen 400 (Fanless)
Software OS X 10.9.1 Mavericks
#72
The article points out a potential reason for this: Microsoft has priced itself as a premium product so as to not drive out its Windows 8 RT competitors (Dell, Samsung, Asus, etc.). Microsoft has internal competition it has to watch out for, unlike Apple.
It's okay because it's Microsoft and not Apple. An iPad for $500 is unreasonable, but when Microsoft adopts both the same pricing policy with their higher-than-Apple profit margin and the same "walled garden" policy with regards to the Windows Store, all is merry.

Hoorah! :toast:
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
14,405 (3.56/day)
Likes
4,257
System Name VHOST01 | Desktop
Processor i7 980x | i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard Gigabyte x58 Extreme | AsRock MicroATX Z170M Exteme4
Cooling Prolimatech Megahelams | Stock
Memory 6x4 GB @ 1333 | 2x 8G Gskill Aegis DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GT 210 | Nvidia GTX 970 FTW+
Storage 4x2 TB Enterprise RAID5 |Corsair mForce nvme 250G
Display(s) N/A | Dell 27" 1440p 8bit GSYNC
Case Lian Li ATX Mid Tower | Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) NA | On Board
Power Supply SeaSonic 500W Gold | Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse N/A | Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard N/A | Posiden Z RGB Cherry MX Brown
Software Centos 7 | Windows 10
#73
the reviews for both the surface rt and pro are pretty bad. once again microsoft created a product for a niche that does not exist.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
14,880 (3.45/day)
Likes
5,413
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Dell SK-3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
#74
the reviews for both the surface rt and pro are pretty bad. once again microsoft created a product for a niche that does not exist.
Oh it does exist, it's the execution that has come under fire.

A second generation of the Surface Pro would probably be excellent.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,205 (0.41/day)
Likes
364
Location
The Netherlands
System Name PC || Laptop
Processor AMD FX-8350 @ 4,8GHz || i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX || default
Cooling Corsair H100i Push-Pull|| Stock
Memory Samsung 30nm 4x4GB @ 1930MHz|| 2x8GB LVDDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290 @ 1060MHz / 1600MHz || Nvidia Geforce 960M
Display(s) Samsung S23A750D 120Hz + others|| 15,6" 1080P
Case Corsair 500R Fans Galore ||
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX/XD ||
Power Supply Corsair AX860i || 120Watt 19V OEM adaptor
Software Win 10 64bit || Win 10 64bit
#75
I'd say that Microsoft is kinda stuck in the place they're in at the moment for pricing. Any higher and people would complain even more(justified ofc). But as FordGT also said, they just cant price it much lower because they'll outcompete the OEM's normally selling windows products.

I'd say that if anyone was to blame, it would be the OEM's who are selling stuff with windows on it.
Apparently those OEM's are so inefficient, that Microsoft who has arguably way less experience in manufacturing of devices can so easily outperform them. I mean, I've never heard OEM's like ACER or dell having such a big margins, while usually they also offer way less in the way of build quality compared to the surface tablets(think of all the plasticky stuff out there).

Edit: Thanks for the link btw, interesting read
 
Last edited: