• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

NVIDIA CUDA Emulator for every PC

BOWAHAHA, that's was very funny and romantic idea
 
lol good one TPU. I'm sad now. :(
 
hahaha, best joke all day. :D
 
Why anyone would want to run Physx, the tech is bad and I wouldnt throw money at it either, like buying a dedicated physx card, Havok is superiour to Physx in every shape way and form.

Physx had promise in the early days until Nvidia got involved.
 
i installed this program and now my video card will only run in super low resolution as if i dont have a gpu

how in the hell do i uninstall this i dont even see the ap in contorl panel for uninstall?

this really pisses me off!
 
shevanel said:
i installed this program and now my video card will only run in super low resolution as if i dont have a gpu

how in the hell do i uninstall this i dont even see the ap in contorl panel for uninstall?

this really pisses me off!
Click to expand...

It doesn't install. It's like GPU-Z, it doesn't even do anything except say april fools.
 
DrPepper said:
It doesn't install. It's like GPU-Z, it doesn't even do anything except say april fools.
Click to expand...

Bawamo now you've been had bwahaha:roll::roll:
 
Was about to report to my boss that you illegally publicly announced a premature software in the makings.
 
Last edited:
REVHEAD said:
Havok is superiour to Physx in every shape way and form.
Click to expand...

PhysX is actually far more capable as a physics platform, the tech demos prove that. The problem that made PhysX so poorly used and implemented was that it didn't run on ATi hardware. Havok on the other hand works on pretty much any computer, so it is actually used by developers for more than just basic eye candy.
 
Not sure I got the right download . . . says something in (what appears to be) arrabic. The only ENG I can read is Havok then a mathematical operator > and the word PhysX.

So, what, if you have Havok installed this won't work right? :banghead:
 
Hey its April fool tweet :twitch: :slap:

cud1.jpg


cud2.jpg


cud3.jpg


:banghead:

U can never run a CUDA on STREAM :nutkick:
 
:shadedshu

I only saw the headline of the post and immediatly sent the link to a friend. Poor guy. :laugh:
 
bah, its late on the 2nd here so i thought this wasnt a joke
 
REVHEAD said:
Why anyone would want to run Physx, the tech is bad and I wouldnt throw money at it either, like buying a dedicated physx card, Havok is superiour to Physx in every shape way and form.

Physx had promise in the early days until Nvidia got involved.
Click to expand...
Havok does not have hardware accelleration. Physix has both software and hardware accelleration. Its basically just a middleware for rendering. Just like fastree or other rendering engines. Only difference is Physx can use a dedicated hardware for calculating. There are plenty of other Physics middleware out there. Heck, some even opt not to use middleware and come up in house with their own engine and hardcode it in their app.
 
They don't. But nobody still wants to tie it to a single GPU, thus the whole 15 games that use the actual GPU rendered Physx.
 
Omega drivers are coming back maybe we still got the chance...
http://www.omegadrivers.net/

Lets some smarty pants reverse this lock down Cuda and process with CL, Stream or Compute...game developers should know if this can be done pronto!
 
April fools day sucks, I haven't even seen one good joke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top