• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Reference PCB Pictured

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Here are some of the first pictures of the reference GeForce GTX 1080 PCB. NVIDIA is selling the reference-design card at a $100 premium, branded as "Founders Edition." Pictures reveal the PCB to be less crowded than the GTX 980 reference PCB. The PCB appears to feature a 6-phase VRM with DrMOS chips, drawing power from a single 8-pin PCIe power connector; the 16 nm GP104 ASIC, with a smaller die than the one featured on the 28 nm GM204, neighbored by eight 8 Gbit GDDR5X memory chips, which feature smaller packages than the ones GDDR5 chips usually come in. We wish someone zoomed in on its VRM controller.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
I don't quite understand the purpose of these, especially since they charge MORE for them. I mean, ASUS released Ares GTX 970 with white shroud and it was an exhaust cooler card as well while wasn't being a reference design. Reference used to be the baseline everyone had to release initially. Then we got aftermarket versions. What prevented them from doing the same and not discontinuing the reference models? I just don't understand the marketing model behind this one. I just don't.
 
We all want more, expansive pictures!
 
I don't quite understand the purpose of these, especially since they charge MORE for them. I mean, ASUS released Ares GTX 970 with white shroud and it was an exhaust cooler card as well while wasn't being a reference design. Reference used to be the baseline everyone had to release initially. Then we got aftermarket versions. What prevented them from doing the same and not discontinuing the reference models? I just don't understand the marketing model behind this one. I just don't.
I assume they will be selling really well initially as the card will probably be out of stock most of the time for at least the 4 initial months afters its release and im sure that Nvidia knows it too.
 
yep, sure looks like a videocard to me.
 
Interesting to see it's internals firsthand, and confirmation of the backplate on the Founder's Edition. I'm not a fan of these blower style coolers though myself. Every single one I've ever had has eventually had the fan bearings go out, and worse yet the fans are really bad about clogging with dust relatively quickly compared to the more AIB-style 2/3 larger fan/heatpipe designs. I also disagree with suggestions that they'll be $500 for an AIB 1070 at launch. I wouldn't expect many to pay over $120 over MSRP. at least for anything but a super-golden binned chip (like top of the line EVGA maybe).
 
I'm just confused as to why reference cards are going to cost $100 more. Isn't it traditional that non-reference designs with better coolers be more expensive? Or am I living in an upside-down world?

I assume they will be selling really well initially as the card will probably be out of stock most of the time for at least the 4 initial months afters its release and im sure that Nvidia knows it too.

I'm thinking that's going to be the case because a lot of gamers who haven't upgraded their rigs yet (R9 2xx/GTX 7xx and older) will most likely upgrade with this generations cards.
 
yep, sure looks like a videocard to me.

and here I thought they were going to pull a fast one and release a sound card!

...Wait, the HDMI controller has a soundcard built in! The sneakiness of it!
 
Looks like it will be easy to compact this into a mITX form factor...
 
and here I thought they were going to pull a fast one and release a sound card!

...Wait, the HDMI controller has a soundcard built in! The sneakiness of it!

Leave that to EVGA son, still waiting for more information on their one!
 
It is a engineering board... I haven't seen tantalum caps on retail ones. It even has a soldered on cap on the legs of an IC.

Otherwise, the board looks chaotic... the VRM part... I cannot see the VRM IC actually anywhere in the blur.

Move along people... nothing to see.
 
I'm just confused as to why reference cards are going to cost $100 more. Isn't it traditional that non-reference designs with better coolers be more expensive? Or am I living in an upside-down world?



I'm thinking that's going to be the case because a lot of gamers who haven't upgraded their rigs yet (R9 2xx/GTX 7xx and older) will most likely upgrade with this generations cards.

Nope waiting longer, at least until next year maybe the year after that but will just have to see what happens. I just know i will not be changing mine this year just no point.
 
Looks like it will be easy to compact this into a mITX form factor...
That's what I would see as awesome. I love these MITX cards and would love to build an MATX machine with two in a tiny case and have the two under water.

The design of the card looks fine, interested to see how it performs when overclocking and how non-reference designs improve that.
 
It still bugs me that they didn't do away with the sli bridge.
 
It still bugs me that they didn't do away with the sli bridge.

With their new HB SLI bridge it may still be advantageous for them to leave it on there.
 
With their new HB SLI bridge it may still be advantageous for them to leave it on there.

You mean they may get better than the horrid 66% scaling they get now?
 
It's possi
You mean they may get better than the horrid 66% scaling they get now?

If bandwidth between the GPUs is the cause, then yeah it's possible.

EDIT: We'll have to wait and see if there is a difference in the performance of SLI using the HB bridge or using a standard SLI bridge.
 
It's possi


If bandwidth between the GPUs is the cause, then yeah it's possible.

EDIT: We'll have to wait and see if there is a difference in the performance of SLI using the HB bridge or using a standard SLI bridge.

We already saw that the AMD cards scaled better as main cards using DX12 multi-GPU so it sounds like it is at least part of it.
 
This harvested circuit OMG (what a scam) , they think to sell at $ 600. As if somebody offered breadcrumbs turkey steak and then you get chicken instead of turkey meat because it does not immediately visible and think that you're pleased. Well, this is nothing new for NVIDIA, for the time Kepler KG 104 quadro we could see how much respect is worthy buyer in this co-operation. .And terror of purchase we can begin to look for the missing elements of electronics that would be appropriate to OC this card . Usurious manipulative attitude towards the customer . And there is none that would prohibit such a bad relationship with all this advertising (how this is a good product, and to be placed good OC) is in real terms throwing sand in the eyes.:shadedshu:
 
It still bugs me that they didn't do away with the sli bridge.

...thats an extra $30 (at least) in sales bro($25 in profit:)) ...gotta accessorize ! Especially in this RGB era. Still waiting on rgb sata cables. :rolleyes:
 
The amount of unused space hurts my head. Smaller Components, less power, same size PCB, blarg. I hope cards made by AIBs can make is smaller.
 
im really digg'n that backplate. I'll shell out the extra $100 for that+ day one use!

(and once Asus drops a Matrix I'll grab one of those :rockout: )
 
Does the extra space and size of the board not aid in heat dispersion?
The heatsink in the shroud appears to be the same size as a 980 heatsink, so shrinking the PCB may not be possible without compromising cooling.
 
Back
Top