• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan 6 GB

Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
282 (0.11/day)
Likes
62
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (stock voltage, 60C on hottest core)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz (from 4890>5870>460>660>680>460)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD (Steam) + 840 250GB SSD (Origin) + 840 EVO 1TB (work install)
Display(s) Samsung 34" S34E790C (3440x1440) + BenQ XL2420T 120Hz @ 1080p + 24" PHILIPS Touchscreen IPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Recon3D Fatal1ty + Z506 5.1 speakers/Logitech UE9000
Power Supply Corsair RM750i 750W 80PLUS Gold
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech PS/2 keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit (not sidegrading to Windoze 10 until I have to...)
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
This card is just a joke...I can see the promotional campaigns already:

GTX Turd of the Titan...one year late, overpriced at $1000, does not perform like a $1000 GPU, does not use the quality materials of a $1000 GPU (this doesn't use magnesium alloy of the 690 because it was "too expensive") and cannot even run future console ports with 6GB VRAM, since PS4 will use 8GB GDDR5. A gigantic fucking failure is what this card is. Judging by the release of this card, I will most likely skip the Kepler GPUs entirely at this rate.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
15,357 (3.93/day)
Likes
8,967
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
This card is just a joke...I can see the promotional campaigns already:

GTX Turd of the Titan...one year late, overpriced at $1000, does not perform like a $1000 GPU, does not use the quality materials of a $1000 GPU (this doesn't use magnesium alloy of the 690 because it was "too expensive") and cannot even run future console ports with 6GB VRAM, since PS4 will use 8GB GDDR5. A gigantic fucking failure is what this card is. Judging by the release of this card, I will most likely skip the Kepler GPUs entirely at this rate.
That's just too good a rant. :laugh:

I think the card is really good, but it is very late and ridiculously overpriced. If I was in the market for a card in this price range, I'd buy the 690 as it handily outperforms it. SLI issues be damned.

As it is, I just got myself an overclocked GTX 590 for the same price as a 680, which outperforms it and isn't all that far behind a Titan.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,240 (0.45/day)
Likes
503
This card is just a joke...I can see the promotional campaigns already:

GTX Turd of the Titan...one year late, overpriced at $1000, does not perform like a $1000 GPU, does not use the quality materials of a $1000 GPU (this doesn't use magnesium alloy of the 690 because it was "too expensive") and cannot even run future console ports with 6GB VRAM, since PS4 will use 8GB GDDR5. A gigantic fucking failure is what this card is. Judging by the release of this card, I will most likely skip the Kepler GPUs entirely at this rate.
not sure if serious.....
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
12,355 (3.92/day)
Likes
6,904
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7960X 4.5GHz 16c/16t 1.17V
Motherboard MSI XPower Gaming Titanium
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) 27" Acer Predator 2560x1440 144hz IPS + Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
282 (0.11/day)
Likes
62
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (stock voltage, 60C on hottest core)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz (from 4890>5870>460>660>680>460)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD (Steam) + 840 250GB SSD (Origin) + 840 EVO 1TB (work install)
Display(s) Samsung 34" S34E790C (3440x1440) + BenQ XL2420T 120Hz @ 1080p + 24" PHILIPS Touchscreen IPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Recon3D Fatal1ty + Z506 5.1 speakers/Logitech UE9000
Power Supply Corsair RM750i 750W 80PLUS Gold
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech PS/2 keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit (not sidegrading to Windoze 10 until I have to...)
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
not sure if serious.....

I'm dead serious. Last gen consoles had what, 256MB (PS3) and 512MB (360) VRAM? Now show me a graphics card that came out before the 360 and the PS3 with less VRAM than the consoles that can RUN any of the recent console ports, let alone PLAY them at anywhere near the same level of visual quality...oh that's right, you can't, because console ports are insanely bloated by the time they hit the PC. And because they are physically incapable of doing so due to not having enough VRAM or the API better than what the consoles have -- DX10 (as these cards did not hit the market until long after the consoles were released). I know it's usually a silly idea to play the waiting game with hardware releases but with the current retarded GPU pricing from Nvidia, it has never made more sense to wait than now.

P.S. W1zzard, you may want to change the review a bit in regards to the magnesium alloy, as this card doesn't use it (see here. Even the guy from Nvidia confirmed it in this live launch video (skip to 07:00)).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,566 (0.61/day)
Likes
1,475
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Das Keyboard Model S Ultimate
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 118405.21 BogoMIPS
inb4
please rewrite Your post in at least a bit more structured manner. Because I have a very hard time grasping the point You are trying to make due to Your post being a complete mess.
Thank You.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,664 (1.23/day)
Likes
1,013
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
Hey how come the Titan and 690 don't have bumpers like the 480 did?

I'm dead serious. Last gen consoles had what, 256MB (PS3) and 512MB (360) VRAM? Now show me a graphic card that came out before the 360 and the PS3 with less than 256MB VRAM that can run any of the recent console ports, let alone at anywhere near the same level of visual quality...oh that's right, you can't, because console ports are insanely bloated by the time they hit the PC. And because they are physically incapable of doing so due to not having DX10 (as these cards did not hit the market until long after the consoles were released).
That ram isn't dedicated to the gpu. It may even end up being hard partitioned like the PS3s. If the new wave of consoles were just game dedicated they would have been in the 2-3 gb range. The ram quantity is to support heavy PC-like multitasking and bloat. Even the richest next gen games will fall well within the Titan's vram limits.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
282 (0.11/day)
Likes
62
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (stock voltage, 60C on hottest core)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz (from 4890>5870>460>660>680>460)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD (Steam) + 840 250GB SSD (Origin) + 840 EVO 1TB (work install)
Display(s) Samsung 34" S34E790C (3440x1440) + BenQ XL2420T 120Hz @ 1080p + 24" PHILIPS Touchscreen IPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Recon3D Fatal1ty + Z506 5.1 speakers/Logitech UE9000
Power Supply Corsair RM750i 750W 80PLUS Gold
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech PS/2 keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit (not sidegrading to Windoze 10 until I have to...)
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
Hey how come the Titan and 690 don't have bumpers like the 480 did?



That ram isn't dedicated to the gpu. It may even end up being hard partitioned like the PS3s. If the new wave of consoles were just game dedicated they would have been in the 2-3 gb range. The ram quantity is to support heavy PC-like multitasking and bloat. Even the richest next gen games will fall well within the Titan's vram limits.
While that is debatable at this time, I can almost guarantee you that it will pretty much be entirely dedicated to the GPU, because the only reason system RAM existed in games consoles was either to

A. Run the operating system/graphical user interface OR
B. Used as cache/shared VRAM when the GPU ran out of dedicated VRAM OR
C. Pass data from the hard/optical drive to the VRAM of the GPU.

By using a tonne of fast VRAM and sharing it with both the processor and the graphics chip, they've removed the need for normal system RAM. That removes the need for options B and C (stated above), which means the only thing it will run is the graphical user interface & the OS, the rest will be entirely free to use for the graphics chip. The operating systems in consoles use about 1/20th of the memory resources of a desktop PC, if not much less (I read somewhere that PS3 uses about 8MB RAM for the OS when gaming -- that's about a 1/100th of the memory usage of Windows 7 at idle). Therefore you will need a graphics card with at least the same amount of VRAM to even stand a chance, regardless of the Titan's GPU performance.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,566 (0.61/day)
Likes
1,475
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Das Keyboard Model S Ultimate
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 118405.21 BogoMIPS
Games use a lot of memory for other assets - sounds, AI, physics engine, and a lot of other stuff in a game uses up a lot of memory which are NOT graphics related. Thus saying all the usage is from the graphics is false.
So when speaking of console ports, You have to take in mind that the memory a game is going to use is going to be distributed between the vRAM and system RAM. Definitely not a 1:1 split, but really, at least a gigabyte of game's assets would have absolutely 0 reason to be put on the vRAM.

So stop implying a GPU needs to have as much dedicated vRAM as a console has in total just to be able to run them.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.10/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Therefore you will need a graphics card with at least the same amount of VRAM to even stand a chance, regardless of the Titan's GPU performance.
Sounds unlikely in the extreme. A consoles spec needs to carry it through its entire life cycle - you either over-engineer or don't create enough separation between the previous consoles.
If you are under the impression that 6GB of GDDR5 will fall short of the requirement for the next gen of games, then every single gaming card built thus far becomes obsolete overnight...and do you really think that either vendor and the game developers are going to welcome that particular user base backlash ?
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,749 (4.49/day)
Likes
5,874
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
I think people are forgetting that the PS3 has 8Gb of shared GDDR5. I bet you in most cases that the PS3 will initially use significantly less of that memory for VRAM and will shift as the platform ages and more games come out for it.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,566 (0.61/day)
Likes
1,475
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Das Keyboard Model S Ultimate
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 118405.21 BogoMIPS
I think people are forgetting that the PS3 has 8Gb of shared GDDR5. I bet you in most cases that the PS3 will initially use significantly less of that memory for VRAM and will shift as the platform ages and more games come out for it.
That was exactly my point!
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
282 (0.11/day)
Likes
62
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (stock voltage, 60C on hottest core)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz (from 4890>5870>460>660>680>460)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD (Steam) + 840 250GB SSD (Origin) + 840 EVO 1TB (work install)
Display(s) Samsung 34" S34E790C (3440x1440) + BenQ XL2420T 120Hz @ 1080p + 24" PHILIPS Touchscreen IPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Recon3D Fatal1ty + Z506 5.1 speakers/Logitech UE9000
Power Supply Corsair RM750i 750W 80PLUS Gold
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech PS/2 keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit (not sidegrading to Windoze 10 until I have to...)
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
Games use a lot of memory for other assets - sounds, AI, physics engine, and a lot of other stuff in a game uses up a lot of memory which are NOT graphics related.
Nonsense. That "lot" of memory you're talking about is nothing compared to the amount taken up by the textures, models, objects etc.

Thus saying all the usage is from the graphics is false.
I never said it was going to be all of it, what I said was it is going to be the vast majority (90%-95% of it). Even with your supposed 1GB of VRAM dedicated for physics, sound and whatever else, it still leaves you with 1GB more than what you get in the Titan.

So stop implying a GPU needs to have as much dedicated vRAM as a console has in total just to be able to run them.
That's because it DOES, maybe not to run the game, but definitely to get anywhere near the same image quality and performance; every previous console release will only prove this. Stop trying to imply otherwise.


Sounds unlikely in the extreme. A consoles spec needs to carry it through its entire life cycle - you either over-engineer or don't create enough separation between the previous consoles.
If you are under the impression that 6GB of GDDR5 will fall short of the requirement for the next gen of games, then every single gaming card built thus far becomes obsolete overnight...and do you really think that either vendor and the game developers are going to welcome that particular user base backlash ?
What user backlash? And what do you mean by "obsolete"? Yes, a console's spec needs to carry it through its life cycle of 5-10 years...and remember, a PC graphics card's specs only need to carry it for about 1 year or less until the next generation hits.

Remember last console generation around this time, when the 7800GTX dropped and Far Cry was the ultimate benchmark at the time, for which it was overkill? Think of Far Cry (or Doom 3, both of the games were THE benchmarks back then IIRC) as today's Crysis 3.

We're on the 600 series now, which is the equivalent of last console generation's 6000 series Nvidia GPUs, and the Titan is the equivalent of the 7800GTX. All it means is that your currently proclaimed "overkill" cards that are running current gen games across 1-3 massive monitors will change to being "good enough" graphics cards at running next gen ports at 1080p, with some graphical settings tweaked (up or down, depending on how demanding the game will initially be on the consoles). There will be no "backlash", the same way there wasn't one when they released a 512MB version of the 7800GTX a few months after the 256MB version hit (which I'm betting is what will happen with the GTX 780 or whatever they will call their fully functioning GK110 follow up to the Titan with more VRAM) and the same way the 8000 series eventually butchered every 7000 series GPU.
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,749 (4.49/day)
Likes
5,874
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
Nonsense. That "lot" of memory you're talking about is nothing compared to the amount taken up by the textures, models, objects etc.
Only recently have games been starting to become 64-bit. A lot of games are still 32-bit and have the 32-bit memory limitation so your "lot" is usually still constrained to 2Gb.
I never said it was going to be all of it, what I said was it is going to be the vast majority (90%-95% of it). Even with your supposed 1GB of VRAM dedicated for physics, sound and whatever else, it still leaves you with 1GB more than what you get in the Titan.
This statement is confusing. Could you elaborate on this?
That's because it DOES, maybe not to run the game, but definitely to get anywhere near the same image quality and performance; every previous console release will only prove this. Stop trying to imply otherwise.
No it doesn't. You actually have it backwards. If anything the PC needs more resources because there is added overhead from everything else the computer is running. I'm willing to bet that your installation of Windows is many times larger than the OS for the PS3 will be because of what it's designed for. VRAM also doesn't determine image quality. There are cases where you drop the quality to get it to run better but that's not strictly a function of memory and implying that it is, quite frankly is wrong and you're spreading false information.

What user backlash? And what do you mean by "obsolete"? Yes, a console's spec needs to carry it through its life cycle of 5-10 years...and remember, a PC graphics card's specs only need to carry it for about 1 year or less until the next generation hits.
More or less. I've had my first 6870 for several years now and only upgraded to crossfire because I could. Most games (even Farcry 3,) run pretty well on it. So I wouldn't be so specific to say that video cards last for a year because I had my first 6870 for a couple years before I got a second one.
All it means is that your currently proclaimed "overkill" cards that are running current gen games across 1-3 massive monitors will change to being "good enough" graphics cards at running next gen ports at 1080p, with some graphical settings tweaked (up or down, depending on how demanding the game will initially be on the consoles).
That's not the problem. The problem is that for the added shaders and components in the Titan, it's performance is underwhelming for a price tag of $1000 USD. The Titan is not overkill because in reality it's not incredibly faster than the 7970 or the 680. The only thing that is overkill about the Titan is the price tag. Otherwise it looks like a damn fine piece of hardware.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
282 (0.11/day)
Likes
62
System Name 3D Vision & Sound Blaster
Processor Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (stock voltage, 60C on hottest core)
Motherboard Gigabyte P67A-D3-B3
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow SB-E Special Edition (with 3x 140mm Black Thermalright fans)
Memory Crucial 16GB (2x8GB 1600MHz CL8)
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX TITAN X 12288MB Maxwell @1350MHz (from 4890>5870>460>660>680>460)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD (Steam) + 840 250GB SSD (Origin) + 840 EVO 1TB (work install)
Display(s) Samsung 34" S34E790C (3440x1440) + BenQ XL2420T 120Hz @ 1080p + 24" PHILIPS Touchscreen IPS
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Windowed with 6x 140mm Corsair AFs
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster Recon3D Fatal1ty + Z506 5.1 speakers/Logitech UE9000
Power Supply Corsair RM750i 750W 80PLUS Gold
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Logitech PS/2 keyboard
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit (not sidegrading to Windoze 10 until I have to...)
Benchmark Scores 2fast4u,bro...
Only recently have games been starting to become 64-bit. A lot of games are still 32-bit and have the 32-bit memory limitation so your "lot" is usually still constrained to 2Gb.
Of which, about 1980MB is used for graphics. Vinska was trying to suggest that suddenly physics and sound engines have taken over our RAM when he/she couldn't be further from the truth. The progression of in-game physics and sound have been baby steps compared to the graphical leaps in games -- sound design has been at a standstill since around 2005 or whenever the last hurrah for EAX happened (which they don't use on consoles anyway) and physics have barely advanced in games, since almost all of the games use pre-calculated physics effects for the most impressive/demanding parts for easy porting between platforms.

This statement is confusing. Could you elaborate on this?
See above.

No it doesn't. You actually have it backwards. If anything the PC needs more resources because there is added overhead from everything else the computer is running. I'm willing to bet that your installation of Windows is many times larger than the OS for the PS3 will be because of what it's designed for. VRAM also doesn't determine image quality. There are cases where you drop the quality to get it to run better but that's not strictly a function of memory and implying that it is, quite frankly is wrong and you're spreading false information.
I have no idea what you're arguing about here. I specifically stated that current GPUs need at LEAST the same amount of VRAM to run next gen console ports to a good standard or at least at comparable level to the consoles. I think you read my comment backwards or something.

And YOU'RE the one seemingly spreading false information -- consoles, as you and every other PC enthusiasts believe, provide a "good enough" baseline of performance compared to desktops (and run at inferior minimal image quality compared to the PC), with driver overheads and so on (that you mentioned earlier), proves my comment 100% right.

More or less. I've had my first 6870 for several years now and only upgraded to crossfire because I could. Most games (even Farcry 3,) run pretty well on it. So I wouldn't be so specific to say that video cards last for a year because I had my first 6870 for a couple years before I got a second one.
That has nothing to do with what I said. What I said was a PC graphics card's performance lifespan is only relevant for the games that are released around their time or before their replacement is released, unless the developer is specifically aiming at lower tier PC hardware. Normally, nobody rages because their top of the line GPU has been superceeded by something faster and better -- it comes with the hobby.

That's not the problem. The problem is that for the added shaders and components in the Titan, it's performance is underwhelming for a price tag of $1000 USD. The Titan is not overkill because in reality it's not incredibly faster than the 7970 or the 680. The only thing that is overkill about the Titan is the price tag. Otherwise it looks like a damn fine piece of hardware.
I never disputed that. All I said was even though it is quite a bit more powerful than what the consoles are packing, the 6GB VRAM will limit its performance in next gen titles, judging by how badly most mainstream games are being ported nowadays.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,566 (0.61/day)
Likes
1,475
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name my box
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi x470 Ultimate
Cooling NZXT Kraken x72
Memory 2×16GiB @ 3200MHz, some Corsair RGB led meme crap
Video Card(s) AMD [ASUS ROG STRIX] Radeon RX Vega64 [OC Edition]
Storage Samsung 970 Pro && 2× Seagate IronWolf Pro 4TB in Raid 1
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Using optical S/PDIF output lol
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i
Mouse Razer Naga Epic
Keyboard Das Keyboard Model S Ultimate
Software Funtoo Linux
Benchmark Scores 118405.21 BogoMIPS
Of which, about 1980MB is used for graphics. Vinska was trying to suggest that suddenly physics and sound engines have taken over our RAM when he/she couldn't be further from the truth.
Should I show You a dump of a typical game's memory map w/ annotations what data goes where?
There is A LOT of data a game needs to use that is not directly related to graphics.
 
Top