FreedomEclipse
~Technological Technocrat~
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- Messages
- 23,385 (3.76/day)
- Location
- London,UK
System Name | Codename: Icarus Mk.VI |
---|---|
Processor | Intel 8600k@Stock -- pending tuning |
Motherboard | Asus ROG Strixx Z370-F |
Cooling | CPU: BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 {1xCorsair ML120 Pro|5xML140 Pro} |
Memory | 32GB XPG Gammix D10 {2x16GB} |
Video Card(s) | ASUS Dual Radeon™ RX 6700 XT OC Edition |
Storage | Samsung 970 Evo 512GB SSD (Boot)|WD SN770 (Gaming)|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300|2x 2TB Crucial BX500 |
Display(s) | LG GP850-B |
Case | Corsair 760T (White) |
Audio Device(s) | Yamaha RX-V573|Speakers: JBL Control One|Auna 300-CN|Wharfedale Diamond SW150 |
Power Supply | Corsair AX760 |
Mouse | Logitech G900 |
Keyboard | Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻ |
well i got a 1070 but didn't OC it more than factory OC as it's not needed at all for now (well ... 1080p ... later maybe, tho i doubt a 1440p would need a 1080 performances level ... and 4K is not my thing either )
although i did choose it after seeing OC result of many 1070 custom versus 1080 results (and maybe probably because the Zip code of my hometown is exactly the number of cuda core on that GPU ... )
edit... well nope my actual zipcode is 1911 ... that's 9 cuda core less
Im feelin the same, I want a powerful card, but the 1080 is so much more expensive here and TPUs reviews always say that an overclocked 1070 will do 1080 speeds. so it seems like a no brainer if you get what i mean. I have no interest in 144 or 165hz monitors or VR for that matter.
:EDIT:
basicly, youre looking at around 40% price difference in between a good 1070 and the most basic non FE 1080 In this case the 1080 is a Palit 1080 Gamerock and that percentage only goes up depending on how badass you want your 1080 to be.
There is a 59% difference between a MSI 1070 X & an ROG STRIX 1080
Last edited: