• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

NVIDIA Working on GK110-based Dual-GPU Graphics Card?

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,328 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,426
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#1
GeForce GTX 295 showed that its possible to place two GPUs with ludicrously high pin-counts next to each other on a single PCB, and if you get a handle over their thermals, even deploy a 2-slot cooling solution. NVIDIA might be motivated to create such a dual-GPU graphics card based on its top-end GK110 chip, to counter AMD's upcoming "Volcanic Islands" GPU family, or so claims a VideoCardz report, citing sources.

Show full news post
 
Last edited:

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,129 (4.56/day)
Likes
3,697
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310 w/ QCK Mass mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
#2
If they make a Titan Ultra, to counter any AMD flag ship single GPU card coming later this year wouldn't that need to be near the same price point as the AMD card? meaning that would drop the Original Titan and the 780 prices quite a bit. This is assuming the AMD card is very much competitive to the current 780 and Titan, which I'm predicting will perform right inbetween them.

Now a dual GPU GK110 card would be crazy! Price would be right around ~$1300 I would think.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
1,890 (0.86/day)
Likes
813
Location
Brisbane QLD, Australia
System Name Белая коробка | Alienware 13R3 | Asus T300 Chi | Synology DS416 w/ 4X6TB WD Red | Huawei P10
Processor Intel i7-7700k @ 4.8GHz | Intel i7-7700HQ
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z270G | Dell/Alienware thing
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S w/ A15 & F12 | Double fan
Memory G.Skill 2X8gb Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000mhz | DDR4 2X8GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 500GB, Crucial MX200 500GB, 1X WD 4TB Black | 256gb M.2 SSD, 512GB Intel 600p M.2
Display(s) LG 27UD68 & BenQ FP241W (ANCIENT!) | 13" 1080p IPS & Sony X7000E 49" 4K HDR TV
Case InWin 301 (white) | Alienware 13R3
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | onboard sound -Onkyo 808 Receiver
Power Supply InWin Classic Series 900W | Dell 180W brick
Mouse Logitech G403 Wireless | Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G810 | Red Square OLD SCHOOL TKL - Gateron Blue
Software Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Citroen DS3 THP155 DSport6-spd manual|
#3
If they make a Titan Ultra, to counter any AMD flag ship single GPU card coming later this year wouldn't that need to be near the same price point as the AMD card? meaning that would drop the Original Titan and the 780 prices quite a bit. This is assuming the AMD card is very much competitive to the current 780 and Titan, which I'm predicting will perform right inbetween them.

Now a dual GPU GK110 card would be crazy! Price would be right around ~$1300 I would think.
Indeed, I'm waiting for AMD to release their next-gen cards before I upgrade. $1300 would be pretty good I think - $1300 over here would buy you a titan from a lower-end company haha. TITAN x2 or whatever it is going to be called will probably be around $2k here at least. damn....Very intense performance potential though.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#4
If they make a Titan Ultra, to counter any AMD flag ship single GPU card coming later this year wouldn't that need to be near the same price point as the AMD card? meaning that would drop the Original Titan and the 780 prices quite a bit. This is assuming the AMD card is very much competitive to the current 780 and Titan, which I'm predicting will perform right inbetween them.
A lot would depend on how AMD's Hawaii shapes up and where it falls in performance against the GK 110 - which itself has a lot of untapped potential, as demonstrated by the overclocking headroom of the higher voltage limit afforded the GTX 780 Classified (for example). Also not beyond the realms of possibility that Nvidia would marry the GK 110 with the 7GHz memory found on the 770/760 for a 780 Ti or whatever naming convention that's currently in vogue.
The Article said:
GeForce GTX 290 showed that its possible to place two GPUs with ludicrously high pin-counts next to each other on a single PCB
That would be the GTX 295
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,527 (0.46/day)
Likes
375
System Name Lailalo / Edelweiss
Processor FX 8320 @ 4.5Ghz / i7 3610QM @2.3-3.2Ghz
Motherboard ASrock 990FX Extreme 4 / Lenovo Y580
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus / Big hunk of copper
Memory 16GB Samsung 30nm DDR3 1600+ / 8GB Hyundai DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) XFX R9 390 / GTX 660M 2GB
Storage Seagate 3TB/1TB + OCZ Synapse 64GB SSD Cache / Western Digital 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080 / Lenovo 15.6 @ 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper / Lenovo Y580
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG / Whatever Lenovo used
Power Supply Antec Truepower Blue 750W + Thermaltake 5.25in 250W / Big Power Brick
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
#5
One of these days they'll finally move on from Kepler and develop something actually "new". :rolleyes:

Not that AMD is doing any different. Year after year of rehashes for both. Still have very minimal reason to upgrade from my 460s.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
420 (0.13/day)
Likes
121
System Name It does stuff
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620 + Fans Everywhere
Memory 16GB Crucial 1600Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 3TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2757, AOC 2243W
Case Antec Three Hundred Version Two
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DG PCI / Sony MDR-XB500s
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Mouse Redragon Phoenix
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Raw
Software Win10 64 Professional
#6
One of these days they'll finally move on from Kepler and develop something actually "new". :rolleyes:

Not that AMD is doing any different. Year after year of rehashes for both. Still have very minimal reason to upgrade from my 460s.
Yeah, cause GCN isn't new or anything :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
197 (0.13/day)
Likes
67
#7
One of these days they'll finally move on from Kepler and develop something actually "new". :rolleyes:

Not that AMD is doing any different. Year after year of rehashes for both. Still have very minimal reason to upgrade from my 460s.

While not going that far on the 460 not having a valid upgrade (I'm pretty sure the 760 at $250 or the 7950 at $200 are valid choices there), I think it is sad that AMD sat on the 7000 series all year and that nVidia did a simple rename on the old lines because I can still remember the (good) old days when nVidia would pop out a new card at the drop of a hat. When the Geforce 2 came out months after the Geforce 1 or the Geforce FX5900 came out months after the FX5800 series. Or the ATI 9800 Pro soon after the 9700 Pro.

Those were great days in some ways. Of course, the driver situation was abhorrent, especially on the ATI side, and things were a lot more iffy about games working properly. Plus, SLI (where it existed) was incredibly iffy.

Still, those were fun times. Now we have cards sitting on the same tech with little updates for years. Years. Not hard to imagine a future where nVidia doesn't even bother to release a rename/rebranding and in that year, I doubt AMD would even feel compelled to release something new at the end of the year like they do right now.

I suspect AMD is going to try and ride the wave of gaming interest from new consoles with their new hardware. If that's the case, then expect cards to hit the $299, $399 and/or $499 price points as "counterpoints" to the upcoming next gen consoles. They'll make a big, big push to argue they're in all the consoles and they're in all the important ports (except Watch Dogs or AC4) from next gen's launch. It's a fair argument. I'm sure they'll have a great bundle of games for their coupon system they've constructed by November, too.

That's assuming the rumors are accurate and not just smoke 'n mirrors to unnerve nVidia/customers who might go 7xx series. I find it hard to imagine AMD releasing a $550 card when a $400 console is being released and called, "next gen." It seems like that'd be the price point they'd target aggressively. "Why spend that $400 on a PS4 when you can buy a Radeon with 6GB and Titan-like performance? Plus, you get access to three new games we've just lined up in our bundle. Including Battlefield 4."

That'd be a compelling argument and it would light a fire under nVidia's butt.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
322 (0.19/day)
Likes
169
#8
All of you guys are missing something very big, it's almost unbelievable how shortsighted people can be.

Die shrinks in the past were mostly painless, whereas nowadays not only you have to develop new architectures, you also have to take into account all the intricacies of new nodes - I hope you haven't forgotten how painful it's recently been for both NVIDIA and AMD to move to new nodes.

Then maybe you'll recall that modern GPUs are extremely complex beasts containing up to 6 billions of transistors. How many of you could design such things? How many of you even have the knowledge of high-level APIs to access them? Direct3D, OpenCL, CUDA, OpenGL, etc. etc. etc.

Modern GPUs have almost surpassed the x86/x86-64 architecture in terms of complexity, and definitely surpassed it in terms of transistors count.

Then what about TDP? Do you really think NVIDIA and AMD really want to create beasts consuming over 500W of electricity? Yeah, there'll be a market for them - they'll probably move 10K units and bankrupt.

Still, you'll be screaming, "give us moar!" (sic)
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,275 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,363
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#9
NVIDIA could turn its attention to such a card if it finds AMD's R9 2xxx within its grasp.
That would really be sad. This is an architecture that is over a year old at this point, it was so competitive that they just sat on the higher end GPU for 6 months before releasing it to the public. If GK110 is competitive with AMD's next generation that means nVidia might stick with GK110(but hopefully at lower prices) for another 6 months+. They've had a year and a half to just sit and perfect their next gen GPU...that thing better be a beast or nVidia is doing something wrong.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#10
Do not want.

Would probably be retardedly cripped by a "barely enough" PWM section, like my Titans.

There's no fun in having a powerhouse if you can't tweak it, especially because these cards are rarely purchased by people who do not tweak.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,230 (1.48/day)
Likes
661
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
#11
nothing will be like GTX690, all dual GPU's from nvidia fail
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,275 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,363
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#12
Do not want.

Would probably be retardedly cripped by a "barely enough" PWM section, like my Titans.

There's no fun in having a powerhouse if you can't tweak it, especially because these cards are rarely purchased by people who do not tweak.
Barely enough PWM? The Titan has a pretty beefy 6-Phase PWM setup. The Titan consumes about 50w less than a GTX570, and those made due with a 4-Phase PWM setup. There is plenty of room to tweak in the Titan design, but nVidia is limiting things in other ways.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#13
Barely enough PWM? The Titan has a pretty beefy 6-Phase PWM setup. The Titan consumes about 50w less than a GTX570, and those made due with a 4-Phase PWM setup. There is plenty of room to tweak in the Titan design, but nVidia is limiting things in other ways.
It's crappy and it has a lot of vdroop and it definitely is not up to the challenge of overclocking.

So it's barely enough to get the card through stock ;)
 

17seconds

New Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Likes
1
#14
The original article also mentioned that Nvidia is planning to release a whole new series of mid- and low-end cards under the GTX 700/Ti moniker. It also listed Maxwell as coming in early 2014. Both tidbits every bit as interesting as the GTX 790 and Titan Ultra rumors.
http://videocardz.com/45403/nvidia-to-launch-more-cards-this-year-maxwell-in-q1-2014

I think it's interesting that it is taking two generations for AMD to catch up to the performance of the GK110 chip. As most are aware, this chip was supposed to be the GTX 680, but GK104 was cheap and competitive enough to keep GK110 on the shelf. All the same, the chips in the current crop of GTX 780's have a manufacturing date of Summer 2012, so they could have come out at any time over the past year.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#15
Do want GM110 :Q____

Imagine the leap over GK110. ..
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,275 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,363
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#16
It's crappy and it has a lot of vdroop and it definitely is not up to the challenge of overclocking.

So it's barely enough to get the card through stock ;)
The two Titans I've held in my hands both did over 1GHz clock, the PWM seems to be more than enough for overclocking, and not anywhere near "barely enough for stock".
 

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,129 (4.56/day)
Likes
3,697
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310 w/ QCK Mass mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
#17
The two Titans I've held in my hands both did over 1GHz clock, the PWM seems to be more than enough for overclocking, and not anywhere near "barely enough for stock".
yea well enough for stock clocks. I think Nvidia knows well enough what type of power delivery system they need on there cards to operate out of the box. If you want more out of the card than reference get a vendors non reference cards.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,888 (1.01/day)
Likes
742
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
#18
The Titans VRM looks like a joke when compared to what a reference 7970 comes with. The Titan has a stock voltage of 1.125v the caps are flat and the coils are of questionable origin probably rated at 40A where as the 7970 uses 6 or 7 60a coiltronics coils alowing a power draw of 360+a and over 500w total power out put. The Titan has 240a and maximum 288w power out put.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
83 (0.03/day)
Likes
21
#19
To those hoping to see Maxwell in Q1:

Absolutely no way in hell will that happen unless it's in minute volumes / paper launch. They have major problems with it. I'd be amazed if it hits the channel in competitive volume before Q3.

That's if it even makes it ... they've cancelled a hell of a lot of stuff in the last 18 months.

P.S. If that Videocardz article is right about first Maxwell cards being 28nm, it'll be hugely watered down. Maxwell was always intended to be 20nm. I simply can't imagine this is true. Everything on the grapevine says yields will be horrific for Maxwell ... but if 28nm is true it probably means it's totally unviable in its 20nm form - rejigging it for 28nm would probably mean a complete redesign, which would be really expensive and unlikely to be very competitive.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,079 (0.95/day)
Likes
1,156
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
#20
nV are smart enough to have left performance on the table with the GK110, sure it is a year old already but as the K6000 has shown the 28nm process has matured enough to produce full a fledged GK110 at good clock speeds with perfectly reasonable power consumption.

It should come as no surprise to anyone they have options up their sleeve to rain on AMD's impending parade. Equally it's unlikely they have been sitting on their hands the whole time counting their money and waiting for AMD to respond.

Things are finally going to get interesting again rather than yet another discount and an ever expanding bundle of games. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
83 (0.03/day)
Likes
21
#21
nV are smart enough to have left performance on the table with the GK110, sure it is a year old already but as the K6000 has shown the 28nm process has matured enough to produce full a fledged GK110 at good clock speeds with perfectly reasonable power consumption.

It should come as no surprise to anyone they have options up their sleeve to rain on AMD's impending parade. Equally it's unlikely they have been sitting on their hands the whole time counting their money and waiting for AMD to respond.

Things are finally going to get interesting again rather than yet another discount and an ever expanding bundle of games. :rolleyes:
They don't have any options, though. GK110 is way too low yield to put in cards that aren't expensive. If they could produce it cheaply and at high yields, it'd be in them. The new AMD cards are replacing everything from the mid range up.

Maxwell isn't coming for a long time, and is reportedly suffering even worse yields than ever before ... and I don't believe the VC article about 28nm.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#22
To those hoping to see Maxwell in Q1:Absolutely no way in hell will that happen unless it's in minute volumes / paper launch. They have major problems with it. I'd be amazed if it hits the channel in competitive volume before Q3.
That's if it even makes it ... they've cancelled a hell of a lot of stuff in the last 18 months....Everything on the grapevine says yields will be horrific for Maxwell ... but if 28nm is true it probably means it's totally unviable in its 20nm form - rejigging it for 28nm would probably mean a complete redesign, which would be really expensive and unlikely to be very competitive.
Wow. That's a whole lot of supposition with no supporting evidence. Hope you got the information from a more reliable source than your pro-AMD leaker:
From what I hear, the first showing [of Bulldozer] was delayed due to final bugs being ironed out of the chipset / mobos.
Nope. The 900 series chipsets arrived a full five months before Bulldozer.
If anything, I'd call it a good omen. If they're confident enough to not show it at all this close to launch, they must think performance is pretty good. It's still meant to be launching mid-late April.
You were only six months out...so maybe not that good an omen

As for Maxwell, I've yet to see any definitive information regarding yields, performance, or cancellations - with the notable exception of Charlie D, who has a habit of declaring new GPUs (for page views) followed by the imaginary GPUs then being cancelled (also for page views). Old ploy. Most people with any sense don't buy into it. Feel free to share with the group any actual information.

As for yields in general, if AMD are supposedly delivering "Titan-beating-performance" then they are almost certainly going to have to do it with the largest die yet used on an ATI/AMD GPU product - it certainly should eclipse the 420mm^2 of the R600, so I wouldn't bank on any miracles in pricing. AMD's initial pricing of the HD 7990 (and HD 7970 before it) and the FX-9590 should be seen as an indicator of what to expect vis-à-vis the given performance.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#23
The two Titans I've held in my hands both did over 1GHz clock, the PWM seems to be more than enough for overclocking, and not anywhere near "barely enough for stock".
So how comes there's like 0.04v-0.06v Vdroop when playing with voltage over 1.25v?

I've seen it drop as little as 1.261v when setting it 1.32v.

That not a good VRM. Good for me was reference Volterra on my two 6990s.
 
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
Likes
3
#24
roadmap

People seem to forget that GPU designs are developed YEARS before release. Both Nvidia and AMD have products in varying stages that won't come out until 2016. Along the way processes get refined and advancements occur but bottom line is these products have a long time from drawing board to consumer. It's funny when I read some comments that indicate the poster thinks, oh a product came out from company A, now company B will immediately do this to respond. Not how it works.
As far as a dual 110, I think it would be an incredible performer.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,275 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,363
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#25
So how comes there's like 0.04v-0.06v Vdroop when playing with voltage over 1.25v?

I've seen it drop as little as 1.261v when setting it 1.32v.

That not a good VRM. Good for me was reference Volterra on my two 6990s.
Because it was never designed, and there really isn't a need, to go over 1.2v. That is certainly not "stock" your talking about here, so the statement that it is barely enough for stock is absurd. In fact, it will handle the maximum voltage nVidia makes available to you by default without a problem, the PWM only becomes an issue when you push beyond 1.2v. And even at 1.2v the Titans I had both did 1,040Hz, that is good enough in my books. A Titan at 1,040MHz is insane as it is, the tiny amount more you'd get by going higher is pointless.