• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

OpenGL Fur Benchmark

Having a bit of issues with this now. I was running 800 GPU and memory would vary between 900 and 950 depending if I forgot to reclock it when messing around. Anyways I DL'd Rivatuner since it would allow me to go over the 800 cap that CCC has.

When OC'ing with Riva I can OC the 1st GPU just fine. But when I run the test no matter if the shortcut is renamed it will only run using 1 card. It will run stable and ran great at 849mhz I knockedo ut like 6.5k score. But the second I OC the 2nd GPU in Riva it goes unstable in furmark. Running both the 1st and 2nd GPU's at the same clocks, 800, 836, 849 they would all crash, but if I just didn't OC the 2nd GPU it would run 1 card fine.

Even when OCing the second GPU it wouldn't use it, would sit at about 100fps then go unstable. Where as running at 750 GPU it runs well over 160fps.
 
dark2099
3xGTX260 216SP
12477

Capture010.jpg
 
Another for fun.
dark2099
3xGTX260 216SP
13082

Capture011876.jpg
 

jazzy jay
HIS HD 4850 IceQ 4 Turbo 512MB 4850 (RV770) x 2 in crossfire (stock)
8983 Furmarks
DRIVERS: Catalyst 8.12 (Win XP PRO 32bit) DX9 august 2008

2yl9pb8.jpg


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 2666 MHz (10 x 266) ؟؟ Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 ؟؟ Corsair XMS2 2x2GB DDR2-800 (5-5-5-18 @ 400 MHz) 1.89V ؟؟ HIS HD 4850 IceQ 4 Turbo 512MB 4850 (RV770) x 2 in crossfire ؟؟ ICH9R/DO/DH SATA AHCI Controller 2 x WD WD6400AAKS 640GB 7200 RPM SATA-II 16MB CACHE ؟؟ ASUS DRW-2014L1T DVD/RW/RAM/DL ؟؟ ASUS MK241H HDMI 24" LCD @1920x1200 60Hz ؟؟ Logitech G15 Keyboard Logitech MX 400 Laser Mouse ؟؟ Thermaltake Toughpower 750W PSU 4 x 12 Volt dedicated rails 60A ؟؟ Antec P182SE Case 3 x 120mm fans ؟؟ Logitech X 530 Speakers ؟؟ Dual gigabit LAN D-LiNK DIR-120 ROUTER

 
Last edited:
Add This

Well playing with the Volt tool. Threw it to 1.225 and threw some more shader.

Fur 1.jpg


5062
 
Mlee49
4830 overclocked to 640/1050
4590 right in the mix with some 4850's I see :rolleyes:

furmark.jpg


Will run a CF set up later this week! :D
 
My MASSIVE SCORE!

:roll:
 

Attachments

  • furmark.jpg
    furmark.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 523
I realise it's not nice to post on this thread asking questions with no bench scores to post
but I feel I need to bring this to the attention of the thread.

I would like to participate in this thread fully but I need more verifications.

On attempt to install ATITOOL 0.29 from techpowerup mirrors in Vista32 I receive the following error.

Windows could not verify the "publisher" of this "driver" ( it's not digitaly signed ? )

I'm not certan why ATITOOL is attempting to install a driver or why and for WHAT ...

I sense it would alter my cat drivers, and that would be a no no in my books.

I'm asking about this because I feel ATITOOL would be a good thing but I'm cautious.

Does anyone else get the same message I do under vista32 ...

I feel if they proceeded with the installation after being warned thats not a very good policy.

Do we know who the publisher of the software is, and why vista32 says it's not signed ?

I do have another question, but this issue should be delt with first ...

reguardless of what happens I want you all to know I appreciate your posts and all your efforts
on this thread as it helps me make a better judgement call on my second more critical question.

Thank you all very much and I hope to post a good scores.
 
It cannot verify the publisher because it is not a Microsoft Signed driver. There are several programs out that cannot be verified by Microsoft. This does not mean they are BAD or destructive in anyway if you know where and what you are downloading. ATITOOL is used by several several people and is a very popular tool. Vista32 gives warnings on any program it seems. The program is easily removable if you do not like it also.
 
I tried, but fail
2009-02-21_000454-rRbUC.jpg
 
Add This

First run with fur on SLI

Sli Fur 1368.jpg



Cold Storm
9539
 
3900 from one single 4830:

032.jpg


Overclocked:

furmark3.6OC.jpg


Dual 4830's in crossfire :D

furmarkcCF6601080.jpg

9043


:rockout::rockout::rockout:
 
Thank you for the information sweeper , I gave you a thank you for the post.

I found out that W1zzard is the programmer of ATI-Tools and I can now ask a more serious question.

I can't seem to find any documentation on what the AGP VDDQ voltage should be for
my Sapphire Radeon HD 3850 AGP 512MB version.

Kiriakost who has an identical motherboard and video card stated that he likes to set his at 1.7 volts and that makes his stuff stable.

but does anyone know what the factory recommends on it ?

I'd sure like to know because I know how easy it is to kill a video chip.

and this issue has me very worried , I won't have any money for a long time to replace it if I dammage it , and there is no life time warrenty , only the time frame specified by newegg for an RMA should things go wrong.
 
Having a bit of issues with this now. I was running 800 GPU and memory would vary between 900 and 950 depending if I forgot to reclock it when messing around. Anyways I DL'd Rivatuner since it would allow me to go over the 800 cap that CCC has.

When OC'ing with Riva I can OC the 1st GPU just fine. But when I run the test no matter if the shortcut is renamed it will only run using 1 card. It will run stable and ran great at 849mhz I knockedo ut like 6.5k score. But the second I OC the 2nd GPU in Riva it goes unstable in furmark. Running both the 1st and 2nd GPU's at the same clocks, 800, 836, 849 they would all crash, but if I just didn't OC the 2nd GPU it would run 1 card fine.

Even when OCing the second GPU it wouldn't use it, would sit at about 100fps then go unstable. Where as running at 750 GPU it runs well over 160fps.

I take it Riva doesn't automatically OC the second GPU when in CFX mode?
 
hey man i get a 249 score lol i have a ATI RV610 based integrated gpu Radeon 3100 ...what the hell ?? i eman how can i have such lower score..do you do the bencvhmark in full screen or windowed???
 
hey man i get a 249 score lol i have a ATI RV610 based integrated gpu Radeon 3100 ...what the hell ?? i eman how can i have such lower score..do you do the bencvhmark in full screen or windowed???

Benchmark in fullscreen.

I don't know if it affects your GPU, but I know most ATI cards will stay at their idle clocks if you use windowed mode. Fullscreen is needed to get the cards to go into there full working clocks.
 
Looks that we have '' New top scorer '' at the old ASUS P4C800E DLX family ... :toast:

:D :D :D

3362 oMarks :toast:
 

Attachments

  • HD3850-GREECE.gif
    HD3850-GREECE.gif
    72.9 KB · Views: 589
New score.......
:D
 

Attachments

  • 2-23-09.jpg
    2-23-09.jpg
    105.5 KB · Views: 438
Last edited:
Thank you for the information sweeper , I gave you a thank you for the post.

I found out that W1zzard is the programmer of ATI-Tools and I can now ask a more serious question.

I can't seem to find any documentation on what the AGP VDDQ voltage should be for
my Sapphire Radeon HD 3850 AGP 512MB version.

Kiriakost who has an identical motherboard and video card stated that he likes to set his at 1.7 volts and that makes his stuff stable.

but does anyone know what the factory recommends on it ?

I'd sure like to know because I know how easy it is to kill a video chip.

and this issue has me very worried , I won't have any money for a long time to replace it if I dammage it , and there is no life time warrenty , only the time frame specified by newegg for an RMA should things go wrong.

I run mine at stock 1.5v or 1.6v when I add an aftermarket cooler to keep the card cool and monitor my temps also. I tried mine at 1.7v and the BIOS gave a warning. If you are not going to overclock the card 100% of the time, stock voltage should be fine which should be 1.5v.
 
Here's mine, I know that I'm not enter to the main list 'cause I'm not using the 1280X1024 res, It's 'cause my monitor only supports 1440X900 res.

anyway, I wanna just show you how much it perform a 8800GTS.
 

Attachments

  • Dibujo.jpg
    Dibujo.jpg
    204.8 KB · Views: 451
wow looking at those scores, makes my 8800GT look weak =/ (only scored 2807)
 
:)
 

Attachments

  • 3392.jpg
    3392.jpg
    173.8 KB · Views: 483
Last edited:
Back
Top