• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

OpenGL Fur Benchmark

yeh as far as i know, ill reinstall both tomorra and get back to you!
 
OK! Will do ....after I translate the Pro Caelio (don't worry not all of it)
 
fur.png


stock cpu, loose ram timings (3-3-3-7 1T @400mhz), gpu running suicide @ 565/755 stock vgpu/vdimm :D


it beats out JC316s 8600GTS!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Atleast now I know 8800GTS is not memory speed bottlenecked in this benchmark:

FUR_2475.jpg

~9% bandwidth advantage yields 0.16% higher score. :rolleyes:
 
lol... i got 3 points higher, but on a side note i doubled my minimum frame rate :ohwell:

fur7.jpg
 
test.jpg


got it to run, turns out my beta drivers were no good, anyway not the best score but i think vista must have somthing to do with that:laugh:
 
SLI 7900GTs
SLI7900GTfurbenchmark.png


Single 7900GT
7900GTfurbenchmark.png


SLI 7600GTs
SLI7600GTfurbenchmark.png


Single 7600GT
7600GTfurbenchmark.png


x1650Pro
x1650Profurbenchmark.png


Overclocked 7300LE
7300LEoverclockfurbenchmark.png


Stock 7300LE
7300LEfurbenchmark.png


x300SE
x300sefurbenchmark.png
 
80 points!!

Now THATS proper hardcore!! :rockout:
 
My x1950pro with stock settings at 1680x1050 and 1280x1024 res.

1280x1024
FUR1280x1024.jpg


1680x1050
FUR1680x1050.jpg
 
884mhz/1026mhz on the gfx :)

fur.jpg
 
884mhz/1026mhz on the gfx :)

fur.jpg

wow better than I thought:toast:I should run one with out CF just to see how it compares to the HD2600xt...
 
if someone gets me a cf bridge i can try 2 :)
 
if someone gets me a cf bridge i can try 2 :)

lol...bless your self with a treat from the egg and grab the internal bridge in the process:toast:

withCF>>
withCF.jpg
withoutCF>>
withoutCF.jpg


Does a bit better than the highest end mid card...doesnt touch a HD2900 though.
 
lol...bless your self with a treat from the egg and grab the internal bridge in the process:toast:

withCF>>
withCF.jpg
withoutCF>>
withoutCF.jpg


Does a bit better than the highest end mid card...doesnt touch a HD2900 though.

well, put it this way, you did better than an 8800 ultra ;) and.. you beat the lowest 2900 score. great stuff!
 
wonder why Mr Weer.. hasnt brought his 2 Ultras along to teh party? surely they would rival if not beat a single 2900? esp if a x1950 crossfire comes close to 1 2900 card
 
They've seen the rest of the scores, including the single Ultra and are too afraid to post that they, indeed, got whipped by ATi or that the price premium they paid was not worth the small advantage.
 
They've seen the rest of the scores, including the single Ultra and are too afraid to post that they, indeed, got whipped by ATi or that the price premium they paid was not worth the small advantage.

Ya know every purchase you make in hardware is a gamble. That single ultra is mine (the 612 core one) and I do understand why people gloat about high benchmarks on what is supposed to be an inferior card.

I even commented about selling the card and buying one of the Pro's the boards are full of posts about. What I can't understand is why the ati cards on average seem to be whipping the nvidia cards in benchmarks yet every forum I post on people state the high end 8800 series (gtx and up) don't have cards that compete.

Can someone clear this up for me? I'm a slow learner. :laugh:
 
With my brand new HD2900 Pro 1GB GDDR4:rockout:

Shall the X1300 never be forgoten, Rest In Peace:cry:
 
Last edited:
Well it is just a benchmark and it's actually surprising to me that ATi cards are generally doing better on it. The GTX and Ultra series is generally doing better in games than the HD2900XT but the gap isn't nearly as large as it once was. So benchmark scores can be taken with a grain of salt. Maybe the coder is pro ATi and did something to the bench, who knows.

Nice score with the Pro, but what's with your Min FPS? You should probably run it twice in a row, might just be the bench loading that caused it.
 
Well it is just a benchmark and it's actually surprising to me that ATi cards are generally doing better on it. The GTX and Ultra series is generally doing better in games than the HD2900XT but the gap isn't nearly as large as it once was. So benchmark scores can be taken with a grain of salt. Maybe the coder is pro ATi and did something to the bench, who knows.

Nice score with the Pro, but what's with your Min FPS? You should probably run it twice in a row, might just be the bench loading that caused it.

Thanks man and here is a slightly better score.
 
Last edited:
Here is my score.Hmm but still waiting to get the memory and the second card :rockout:
 

Attachments

  • bench1.jpg
    bench1.jpg
    54.2 KB · Views: 580
Back
Top