• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Post Your BaseMark GPU Scores!

Scores are clickable (Green score)
[TABLE=head]
Name|GPU|Min. FPS|Avg. FPS|Max. FPS|API|Score
Tomgang|GTX 1080 Ti|76|95|148|Vulkan 1.0|9597
ruff0r|GTX 1080 Ti|52|90|184|Vulkan 1.0|9067
Hardi|GTX 1080 Ti|72|90|139|Vulkan 1.0|9013
Hardi|GTX 1080 Ti|48|86|177|OpenGL 4.3|8684
Tomgang|GTX 1080 Ti|40|77|161|OpenGL 4.3|7734
ViperXTR|GTX 1070|44|55|84|Vulkan 1.0|5556
Fluffmeister|GTX 980 Ti|42|53|81|Vulkan 1.0|5369
ShurikN|GTX 1060 6GB|25|32|48|OpenGL 4.3|3229
ShurikN|GTX 1060 6GB|19|31|75|Vulkan 1.0|3173
xkm1948|R9 FURY X|21|30|52|OpenGL 4.3|3081
MrGenius|R9 280X|17|21|33|OpenGL 4.3|2196
[/TABLE]


Mobile:
[TABLE=head]
Name|GPU|Min. FPS|Avg. FPS|Max. FPS|API|Score
ViperXTR|Snapdragon 636|4.18|7.29|18.00|Vulkan 1.0|728
[/TABLE]


concept table it shows what the leaderboard would look like
Perhaps it's more accurate if you put in Adreno 509, Snapdragon 636 is the SoC, Adreno is the GPU
 
basemark 6-21-18.JPG


Uninstalled.
 
Does that mean we have to Rebench new scores?
I wont care only if a v2

[TABLE=head]
Name|CPU|GPU|Min. FPS|Avg. FPS|Max. FPS|API|Score
Tomgang|i7 980X|GTX 1080 Ti|76|95|148|Vulkan 1.0|9597
ruff0r|i7 2600K|GTX 1080 Ti|57|95|151|Vulkan 1.0|9508
Hardi|R7 2700X|GTX 1080 Ti|72|90|139|Vulkan 1.0|9013
Hardi|R7 2700X|GTX 1080 Ti|48|86|177|OpenGL 4.3|8684
Tomgang|i7 980X|GTX 1080 Ti|40|77|161|OpenGL 4.3|7734
ViperXTR|i5 3570K|GTX 1070|44|55|84|Vulkan 1.0|5556
Fluffmeister|i7 920|GTX 980 Ti|42|53|81|Vulkan 1.0|5369
Zyll Goliath|Xeon E5645|GTX 970|36|36|54|OpenGL 4.3|3627
Zyll Goliath|Xeon E5645|GTX 970|27|35|54|Vulkan 1.0|3560
ShurikN|i5 7300HQ|GTX 1060 6GB|25|32|48|OpenGL 4.3|3229
ShurikN|i5 7300HQ|GTX 1060 6GB|19|31|75|Vulkan 1.0|3173
xkm1948|i7 6950X|R9 FURY X|21|30|52|OpenGL 4.3|3081
MrGenius|i7 3770K|R9 280X|15|23|36|OpenGL 4.3|2336
[/TABLE]


Mobile:
[TABLE=head]
Name|CPU|GPU|Min. FPS|Avg. FPS|Max. FPS|API|Score
ViperXTR|Snapdragon 636|Adreno 509|4.18|7.29|18.00|Vulkan 1.0|728
[/TABLE]
 
Last edited:
I wont care only if a v2

[TABLE=head]
Name|CPU|GPU|Min. FPS|Avg. FPS|Max. FPS|API|Score
Tomgang|i7 980X|GTX 1080 Ti|76|95|148|Vulkan 1.0|9597
ruff0r|i7 2600K|GTX 1080 Ti|52|90|184|Vulkan 1.0|9067
Hardi|R7 2700X|GTX 1080 Ti|72|90|139|Vulkan 1.0|9013
Hardi|R7 2700X|GTX 1080 Ti|48|86|177|OpenGL 4.3|8684
Tomgang|i7 980X|GTX 1080 Ti|40|77|161|OpenGL 4.3|7734
ViperXTR|i5 3570K|GTX 1070|44|55|84|Vulkan 1.0|5556
Fluffmeister|i7 920|GTX 980 Ti|42|53|81|Vulkan 1.0|5369
Zyll Goliath|Xeon E5645|GTX 970|36|36|54|OpenGL 4.3|3627
Zyll Goliath|Xeon E5645|GTX 970|27|35|54|Vulkan 1.0|3560
ShurikN|i5 7300HQ|GTX 1060 6GB|25|32|48|OpenGL 4.3|3229
ShurikN|i5 7300HQ|GTX 1060 6GB|19|31|75|Vulkan 1.0|3173
xkm1948|i7 6950X|R9 FURY X|21|30|52|OpenGL 4.3|3081
MrGenius|i7 3770K|R9 280X|15|23|36|OpenGL 4.3|2336
[/TABLE]


Mobile:
[TABLE=head]
Name|CPU|GPU|Min. FPS|Avg. FPS|Max. FPS|API|Score
ViperXTR|Snapdragon 636|Adreno 509|4.18|7.29|18.00|Vulkan 1.0|728
[/TABLE]

Update my score please :)
test4.jpg
 
Apparently they just released 1.0.2 already after 1 day.

http://downloads.basemark.com/BasemarkGPUFree_1.0.2.exe
Still no Vulkan. Still shoots my GPU load to 92% as soon as I open the thing. Nice little GPU preheat session before I can get the actual benchmark running. Which is helpful...NOT! Wish they'd take a little more time between updates and actually fix the damn thing. So disappoint...:shadedshu:
 
Last edited:
Open gl score... not much different:

1529635512326.png
 
when you guys do runs post both scores in 1 post it makes it easier for me.

Sorry!!!

I'm dumb and just realized the two options when re reading the thread. :lovetpu:
 
Radeon User(s)

Can someone who knows what their are doing please test this benchmark with the latest Vulkan version 1.1.77.0 which was released two days ago.

Download from this website https://vulkan.lunarg.com/sdk/home
Yeah...no Vulkan for me either. Tried versions 1.1.70, 1.1.73, and 1.1.77. No go with any of them.
I'm going to try with earlier 1.0.xx versions too. Since their site states Vulkan 1.0. But it shouldn't matter since LunarG states the following...
LunarG said:
...Vulkan 1.1 guarantees compatibility for 1.0 applications.
https://vulkan.lunarg.com/home/welcome

There's also a 1.1.78 somewhere...supposedly. I can't find it though.

EDIT: AMD users(who can't get the benchmark to run with Vulkan) need to run Adrenaline 18.5.1 drivers or earlier!!!

I installed Adrenalin 18.2.1 which comes with Vulkan 1.0.65. Now my card(280X) runs the benchmark with Vulkan.

R9 280X
basemark4.PNG

basemark3.PNG
 
Last edited:
I'm going to try with earlier 1.0.xx versions too. Since their site states Vulkan 1.0. But it shouldn't matter since LunarG states the following...
https://vulkan.lunarg.com/home/welcome

There's also a 1.1.78 somewhere...supposedly. I can't find it though.

EDIT: AMD users need to run a version 1.0.xx of Vulkan!!!

Or not. Because, if it runs on your card the way it runs on mine, it's not going to run well at all. I installed Adrenalin 18.2.1 which comes with Vulkan 1.0.65. Now my card(280X) runs the benchmark with Vulkan. But it runs HORRENDOUSLY slow. As soon as it finishes running I'll show you what will undoubtedly be the lowest score posted yet. Should be done running in the next 10-15 minutes.
GCN1.0 cards dont fully support vulkan 1.1 anyways 280x is gcn1

Conformance for gcn1 ends at vulkan 1.0
 
GCN1.0 cards dont fully support vulkan 1.1 anyways 280x is gcn1

Conformance for gcn1 ends at vulkan 1.0
Well you better fix your database then. Because it says my card supports 1.1.73.
Wait so which Vulkan should I install? SDK?
Runtime. RT is what comes with the AMD drivers. SDK might work too(not 100% sure about that though). But if you're trying to install a version 1.0.xx with newer drivers it's not going to work. I don't know why. But even after completely uninstalling the version 1.1.70 RT from Adrenaline 18.6.1 and installing 1.0.65 RT instead the benchmark still fails to run. It's like the driver is calling for a version 1.1.xx that doesn't exist. Or something. I dunno. Kinda rubs me the wrong way that I have to revert to Adrenaline 18.2.1 to run the benchmark. Is what it is. I'd care more if I wasn't fully ready to pull the trigger on a Vega 64 ASAP. If I don't win one of these bids on ebay pretty soon I'm gonna have to break down and buy a new one. :ohwell:
 
Last edited:
Well you better fix your database then. Because it says my card supports 1.1.73.

Runtime. RT is what comes with the AMD drivers. SDK might work too(not 100% sure about that though). But if you're trying to install a version 1.0.xx with newer drivers it's not going to work. I don't know why. But even after completely uninstalling the version 1.1.xx RT from Adrenaline 18.6.1 and installing 1.0.65 RT instead the benchmark still fails to run. It's like the driver is calling for a version 1.1.xx that doesn't exist. Or something. I dunno. Kinda rubs me the wrong way that I have to revert to Adrenaline 18.2.1 to run the benchmark. Is what it is. I'd care more if I wasn't fully ready to pull the trigger on a Vega 64 ASAP. If I don't win one of the bids on ebay pretty soon I'm gonna have to break down and buy a new one. :ohwell:
The thing is 1.1 api runs on gcn 1.0 but its not fully supported
 
@amd guys. try driver 18.5.1, thank you

there seems to be a vulkan issue with driver 18.5.2 and am awaiting a response from amd regarding the bug on vKCreateGraphicsPipeline


Update: My Results
opengl.PNG
vulkan.PNG
 
Last edited:
I'm going to try with earlier 1.0.xx versions too. Since their site states Vulkan 1.0. But it shouldn't matter since LunarG states the following...
https://vulkan.lunarg.com/home/welcome

There's also a 1.1.78 somewhere...supposedly. I can't find it though.

EDIT: AMD users(who can't get the benchmark to run with Vulkan) need to run a version 1.0.xx of Vulkan!!!

I installed Adrenalin 18.2.1 which comes with Vulkan 1.0.65. Now my card(280X) runs the benchmark with Vulkan.

R9 280X
View attachment 102792
View attachment 102793

Excellent work & finding, Welldone!
 
@amd guys. try driver 18.5.1, thank you

there seems to be a vulkan issue with driver 18.5.2 and am awaiting a response from amd regarding the bug on vKCreateGraphicsPipeline


Update: My Results
View attachment 102797View attachment 102798
Hmmm.....seems a bit strange...it´s just so big difference between Vulkan and Open GL results....did you tried to repeat the test few times in Open GL?
 
Hmmm.....seems a bit strange...it´s just so big difference between Vulkan and Open GL results....did you tried to repeat the test few times in Open GL?
Most likely since i was browsing while doing opengl ahaha ill redo it

update: i redid it.

1529659176162.png


weird. maybe its because im using a ryzen 7 1700 @4ghz ? no idea

retested vulkan and noticed that openGL only used a single core therefore limiting performance. ?
 
Last edited:
When it finishes downloading, I'll run it on my RX480 and see how I score. But for now, here's my phone: Sony Xperia XZ w/ Snapdragon 820 Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo), Adreno 530 GPU, 3GB RAM and 32 GB storage

Screenshot_20180622-185840[1].png
 
8600k stock
GTX980 OC
8Gb DDR4 3066


Score 4212
@jboydgolfer

Capture.PNG
 
Last edited:
Samsung G S9 Plus EU Exynos 9810 Octa GPU: Mali-G72 MP18
1529669493396.png


Lenovo T570 I5-7200U Intel HD620 16GB DC mem
1529669571001.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top