• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Post your CrystalDiskMark speeds

Are you using some kind of RAM cache software?
In fact I still did.
I switched my games hdd for an ssd last week thats why I was testing.
I left that asus ram cache thing as it was...
anyhow thanks!
 
This is my result with my nVme drive:

130917
 
I'm pretty sure they all are now. pretty sure this thread stopped being about HDD speeds around page 3 or 4.
Im currently not on my Ryzen setup why bother with those speeds
 
I'm pretty sure they all are now. pretty sure this thread stopped being about HDD speeds around page 3 or 4.

The 7000 MB/s I posted was without ram cache. The bottleneck tends to be the interface with the really fast drives.
 
well, you just can't achieve these speeds with old gen nvme drives....
 
NameDriveSizeTypeRPMConnectorSeq Q32T1 (R/W)Raid
@chrisnelADATA SX82001TBNVMeM.23204.4/2753.3

131481


Here is the Z370 build I did a month ago. 8700K and ADATA SX8200 960GB. Pretty amazing drive.

View attachment 112307


And my 960 Pro with 6950X on a X99

View attachment 112308

The ADATA SX8200PNP NVMe drives are the best value for money. An excellent alternative to the expensive Samsung drives.

Got 3204.4/2753.3 on mine.
 

Attachments

  • crystaldiskmark on C 20190909.PNG
    crystaldiskmark on C 20190909.PNG
    42.5 KB · Views: 585
This should solidify my spot at the bottom of the chart.

This drive is a few years older than I am.

4.2GB IBM Deskstar 5400RPM 96KB cache

NzPEpvt.png
 
I could probably do worse with my Quantum Bigfoot 1.2GB 5.25" HDD but I currently do not have anything with a PATA port on it to test it
 
This should solidify my spot at the bottom of the chart.

This drive is a few years older than I am.

4.2GB IBM Deskstar 5400RPM 96KB cache

NzPEpvt.png
This should solidify my spot at the bottom of the chart.

This drive is a few years older than I am.

4.2GB IBM Deskstar 5400RPM 96KB cache

NzPEpvt.png
I posted almost the exact same numbers with my Atari

My nums:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 6.0.2 x64 (C) 2007-2018 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : https://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 8217.374 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 8287.655 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1106.681 MB/s [ 270185.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 897.293 MB/s [ 219065.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 436.735 MB/s [ 106624.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 394.877 MB/s [ 96405.5 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 51.339 MB/s [ 12533.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 274.812 MB/s [ 67092.8 IOPS]

Test : 1024 MiB [C: 28.5% (102.7/360.7 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/10/18 3:39:15
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)



S'okay I guess.
Betcha hate that it's text

I posted almost the exact same numbers with my Atari

My nums:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 6.0.2 x64 (C) 2007-2018 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : https://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 8217.374 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 8287.655 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1106.681 MB/s [ 270185.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 897.293 MB/s [ 219065.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 436.735 MB/s [ 106624.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 394.877 MB/s [ 96405.5 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 51.339 MB/s [ 12533.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 274.812 MB/s [ 67092.8 IOPS]

Test : 1024 MiB [C: 28.5% (102.7/360.7 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/10/18 3:39:15
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)



S'okay I guess.
Betcha hate that it's text

I'm a-gonna stop the hate before it hates
134388
2019.10.18_CDM.JPG


I have no idea what I'm doing in this forum.
APologies if I am making a mess of this thread.
134389
 
with this solid caching software or other of similar sort, these results are not counted for...
 
2x Sabrent 500 gig Pcie 4/raid0/64K stripe (AMD raid), Strix I x570/3700x @4.2/16 gigs G.Skill NeoZ:
 

Attachments

  • duh.png
    duh.png
    117.6 KB · Views: 552
2x Sabrent 500 gig Pcie 4/raid0/64K stripe (AMD raid), Strix I x570/3700x @4.2/16 gigs G.Skill NeoZ:

Pretty numbers, kemosabe.
Now for the real test: get Aura to function even minimally for five seconds

2x Sabrent 500 gig Pcie 4/raid0/64K stripe (AMD raid), Strix I x570/3700x @4.2/16 gigs G.Skill NeoZ:

The 4th gen nvme makes a pretty massive difference, eh. I'm happy with my numbers when I don't think about how much 5, 1tb 970 Pros cost compared to those Sabrents. Are you rockin' the crazy ZZ Top heatsinks?

with this solid caching software or other of similar sort, these results are not counted for...
Not sure what you're trying to say, homie. I think you need to re-write that Unicode patch
 
simple as that, you are using some kind of caching software to be able to achieve these numbers with crystal, or you have a numerous ssd's in a raid0 though.. but single ssd with sata is max 550mb/s and nvme gen 3 is up to 3500mb/s....
 
After setting up my raid 5 for my new storage server at home, I managed to get these few results -

135176


Not bad considering they are 2Tb 7.2k SAS 6 spinner drives :) Me thinks the raid card was definitely helping a little there but still, very impressive results I think :) Oh and some raid 0 in case anyone was interested :)

135178
 
NameDriveSizeTypeRPMConnectorSeq Q32T1 (R/W)Raid
@Wolfman99 ADATA SX82001TBNVMeM.23292.0/3232.9



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 6.0.2 x64 (UWP) (C) 2007-2018 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : https://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes


Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3292.038 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3232.909 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1294.844 MB/s [ 316124.0 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1494.590 MB/s [ 364890.1 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 511.160 MB/s [ 124794.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 395.585 MB/s [ 96578.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 69.803 MB/s [ 17041.7 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 221.888 MB/s [ 54171.9 IOPS]

Test : 1024 MiB [C: 7.0% (66.4/953.2 GiB)] (x5) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/10/29 19:28:03
OS : Windows 10 [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
135180
1572395976302.png
 
After setting up my raid 5 for my new storage server at home, I managed to get these few results -

View attachment 135176

Not bad considering they are 2Tb 7.2k SAS 6 spinner drives :) Me thinks the raid card was definitely helping a little there but still, very impressive results I think :) Oh and some raid 0 in case anyone was interested :)

View attachment 135178
very impressive numbers with hdd's though. What raid card did you use and ssd caching?
 
very impressive numbers with hdd's though. What raid card did you use and ssd caching?

I believe it's a Perc 730 Mini, 2Gb cache :) It's in one of my R730 servers at home, I'm rather happy with it :)
 
One of my boxes needs urgently upgrading to SSD, I presume...
 

Attachments

  • Crystal_Disk_WD7500BPVT.jpg
    Crystal_Disk_WD7500BPVT.jpg
    135 KB · Views: 453
  • Crystal_info_WD7500BPVT.jpg
    Crystal_info_WD7500BPVT.jpg
    336.1 KB · Views: 451
Attached at HP 250 G6 Notebook, 8 GB RAM, Windows 10 Pro Version 1903 Build 18362.449

Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500 GB
Samsung 840 EVO USB 500 GB

1.jpg


1_1.jpg





2.jpg


2_2.jpg
 
HP Z440 Workstation.

Ran the tests with 4GiB payload to 512GB HP TurboDrive Gen ?II?

SAMSUNG MZVPV512HDGL-000H1

Drive E.PNG

Then 1024GB HP TurboDrive Gen ?II?

SAMSUNG MZVKW1T0HMLH-000H1

Drive D.PNG
Seems like the PCIe 2.0 x4 is throttling the speed considerably.

2nd 1024GB HP TurboDrive Gen ?II?

SAMSUNG MZVKW1T0HMLH-000H1

Drive C.PNG
OS overhead is on this drive.
 
Samsung 970 Evo:
CrystalMark-602-Samsung-970-Evo.jpg
CrystalInfo-803-Samsung-970-Evo.jpg
 
bench.JPG


Adata XPG S50 1tb gen4
 
Got a bunch of retired datacenter drives from my dad's employer, so I replaced the single 8TB drive in my media server with five 3TB ones in RAID 5.

basvRFU.png


5x 3TB WD Red 5400RPM SATA II 64MB cache in RAID 5.
 
Hi! I share results of Sabrent Rocket 1tb:

CRD SR1.jpg
Anotación 2019-12-07 173027.jpg


A couple of questions:

- What size of sector do you have in your PC and why: 4K or 512e?

- Although the disk almost reaches the theoretical maximum in SeqQ32T1 (3400 and 3000 MB / s), it lowers a lot of performance in 4KiB. Does it have to do with the first question of the sector size? Another reason?

Thank you very much :)
 
Back
Top