• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Processor GFlops Compilation

Add Me

stanhemi | intel E1200 | 5.4412 | 3,4007 | 32 bit
intelcpu.jpg
 
1./ The P II seems to be quite a little performer! I'm impressed
2./ But your results arent really valid, since you didnt pass the stability test, who knows what "clocks" "timers" and other calculations are wrong
3./ Try to do a stable run, matching a lower i7 clock, and check how you perform relative

Huh? what do you mean I didn't pass the stability test? My system passed it just fine. all the results from each pass are exactly the same. Unless you want a screen shot of the little popup that comes up after the run completes. I closed that so I could get a screen shot of the results.
 
Update and Add Me Please

chuck216 | Phenom II X4 940 BE @ 3.5 Ghz | 41.92552 | 11.97872 | 64-bit | Fresh reboot

Here's a run off of a fresh reboot with proof of stability:



stableproof.jpg
 
Add Me

Bundy | Intel | Q6700 @ 3.4 Ghz | 42.22616 | 12.419 | 64 bit
 

Attachments

  • Intel burn test.JPG
    Intel burn test.JPG
    103.7 KB · Views: 942
I'm installing win 7 rc1 tonight and I'll re run the test in 64-bit mode, it seems to matter alot.
 
Can't BIOS is somehow screwed. Whenever I change any voltage the settings reset. It's an issue with the board, can't find a solution to it. Thus I can't run the bench at decent speeds. Interestingly enough I don't have any other problems at all, clocking a bit lower does make me able to run it, getting similar numbers to the other Xeons in the list then. I might look into the issue later.

Sorry to hear that YET ANOTHER Asus Z7S is troublesome.

Can you warranty it out for the DSEB/DG? That is what I have got, and it is rock solid. However, you will need to BSEL mod to OC the FSB since there is no BIOS options. Repeat DSEB is rock solid.
 
Huh? what do you mean I didn't pass the stability test? My system passed it just fine. all the results from each pass are exactly the same. Unless you want a screen shot of the little popup that comes up after the run completes. I closed that so I could get a screen shot of the results.

Chuck, I have NO IDEA why I commented that to you. I remember quite clearly seeing a table of inconsistent results. It must have been a different poster. Apologies for the confusion.
 
Chuck, I have NO IDEA why I commented that to you. I remember quite clearly seeing a table of inconsistent results. It must have been a different poster. Apologies for the confusion.

No problem, It made me think maybe I did have an unstable run and try another after a reboot that got me my best results so far.
 
Add Me

DOM | Xeon X3350 @3.6 | 46.736875 |12.98246527 | 64-bit |

Untitled.jpg
 
Add Me

stanhemi | E7200 @ 3400mhz | 21.7727 | 6.4037 | 32 bit
Screenshot - 27_05_2009 , 1_11_37 PM267.jpg
 
Add Me

stanhemi | Q9550 @ 3800mhz | 51.3565 | 13.5148
| 64 bit
Screenshot - 27_05_2009 , 1_44_14 PM.jpg
 
Add Me .

trickson | Q9650 @ 4.0GHz |46.3957 |

intelburntest.jpg


I am not sure I did this right Please let me know if it not thank you .
 
Last edited:
Kumitsu | Intel | Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3.0GHz | 17.0182

Test-1.jpg
 
Can I ask just how does one interpret the table ? I mean what does all the #s mean ?
 
Can I ask just how does one interpret the table ? I mean what does all the #s mean ?

basically the first is the time required to complete calculation.

The second Gflops is @ what speed the calculation is done at.

The last is the value the calculation came up with.

Its important that you do more then one, so you can verify if your cpu did the calculation correct.

So the one with the shortest time, and highest GFlop number basically takes Pie.
 
One suggestion, for those with Dual CPU scores, could we cut their Score/GHz in two because they have two physical processors? It makes it a bit skewed if we're comparing GFlops/GHz in different processors.
 
basically the first is the time required to complete calculation.

The second Gflops is @ what speed the calculation is done at.

The last is the value the calculation came up with.

Its important that you do more then one, so you can verify if your cpu did the calculation correct.

So the one with the shortest time, and highest GFlop number basically takes Pie.

OK but I still don't get it .
 
These scores are taken from a benchmark, which basically assigns a number relative to your system's performance. People compare these numbers to see whose system is faster.
 
These scores are taken from a benchmark, which basically assigns a number relative to your system's performance. People compare these numbers to see whose system is faster.

OK I get that but how do I know just were my system stands ?
 
OK I get that but how do I know just were my system stands ?

Look for someone who has a score simular to yours. And then check out what processor he's running.

I think my processor still holds first place at 60 Gflops.
 
I'm slowly messing around with overclocking. I'm hoping at some point to get this baby going at 3.6-3.7 on just air....but that'll be a future project.

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/2126/gfloptest.jpg

The key to overclocking the PII 940 is to concentrate on raising the multiplier first without changing the bus speed, once you get the highest possible multiplier, then try raising the bus speed a little. I can get 3.5 Ghz stable 17.5*200 with the v-core set to auto. so you should be able to get at least that if you ad some volts.
 
newteckie1: There are a couple results that are off by one column, results for Dom and stanhemi are shifted 1 column to the left without the manufacturer.
 
Back
Top