• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Researchers Build a CPU Without Silicon Using Carbon Nanotubes

Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
231 (0.28/day)
It is no secret that silicon manufacturing is an expensive and difficult process which requires big investment and a lot of effort to get right. Take Intel's 10 nm for example. It was originally planned to launch in 2015, but because of technical difficulties, it got delayed for 2019. That shows how silicon scaling is getting more difficult than ever, while costs are rising exponentially. Development of newer nodes is expected to cost billions of Dollars more, just for the research alone and that is not even including the costs for the setting up a manufacturing facility. In order to prepare for the moment when the development of ever-decreasing size nodes becomes financially and physically unfeasible, researchers are exploring new technologies that could replace and possibly possess even better electrical properties than silicon. One such material (actually a structure made from it) is Carbon Nanotube or CNT in short.

Researchers from MIT, in collaboration with scientists from Analog Devices, have successfully built a CPU based on RISC-V architecture entirely using CNTs. Called RV16X Nano, this CPU is currently only capable of executing a classic "Hello World" program. CNT is a natural semiconductor, however, when manufactured, it is being made as a metallic nanotube. That is due to the fact that metallic nanotubes are easier to integrate into the manufacturing ecosystem. Its has numerous challenges in production because CNTs tend to position themselves randomly in XYZ axes. Researchers from MIT and Analog Devices solved this problem by making large enough surfaces so that enough random tubes are positioned well.



The CPU is based on the RISC-V architecture, particularly it is designed to handle 32-bit wide instructions in a 16-bit wide memory address design. Being that all stages of the CPU pipeline (Instruction Fetch, Decode, Register Read, Execute and Write Back) are 16-bit in width, the CPU is officially declared as 16-bit. It uses 14,000 logic gates, like AND or NOT gates, to become a fully functional design. Given the careful manipulation of nanotubes, researchers managed to pull off 100% yield, meaning that all of the 14,000 gates worked correctly. Here is the waveform of execution of the Hello World program (while it isn't exactly Crysis, given the position of this technology, it is quite an impressive achievement):



The technology isn't perfect, yet. The chip ran at a very low clock speed of only 10 kHz, which means that your average CPU is an order of magnitude faster than this. With all of the flaws, this demonstration is an important achievement for the technology - a proof of concept. It shows that you are able to manufacture a working example of CPU based on something that doesn't require silicon and possibly is even better than it. We just haven't perfected all of the bits and pieces required to get CNTs at the same level of performance we already have.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
426 (0.19/day)
About time. We've been hearing about CARBON NANOTUBES for what seems like a decade without so much as a working prototype.
I highly suggest you check out Coreteks's latest video where he speculates on the next 30 years of chip manfufacturing including CARBON NANOTUBES:
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
4,281 (2.04/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
I read an article a few years ago on Ars Technica about using carbon nanotubes to replace silicon. It's pretty interesting. The scientists speculated that using carbon nanotubes for transistors could be up to 5 times faster than silicon while using 1/5th the power. That would be an incredible advancement for so many devices if they can work the bugs out.

If carbon nanotubes doesn't work out then some other material will. Silicon is definitely not the future. It's getting more and more expensive as the process node shrinks. One day it may be possible to continue to shrink but not economically feasible to do so.

computer chip


"A new kind of computer chip (array of chips on the wafer pictured above) contains thousands of transistors made with carbon nanotubes, rather than silicon. Although the current prototypes can’t compete with silicon chips for size or speed yet, carbon nanotube-based computing promises to usher in a new era of even faster, more energy-efficient electronics."

 
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
3,080 (2.27/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk ATX
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu with AM4 bracket
Memory PNY Anarchy-X XLR8 Red DDR4 3200 MHz C15-17-17-17-35
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
Storage Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 500 GB, SanDisk Ultra II 480 GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster C27H711 OC refresh rate 110Hz
Case Phantek Eclipse P400S (PH-EC416PS)
Audio Device(s) EVGA NU Audio
Power Supply EVGA 850 BQ
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 310
Keyboard Logitech G G413 Silver
Software Windows 10 Professional 64-bit v1903
Unfortunately silicon was still involved in the process.
Arstechnica said:
the researchers made a silicon surface with metallic features that were large enough to guarantee several nanotubes would typically bridge the gaps between the metal.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
349 (1.18/day)
Carbon Nanotube process is also an expensive and difficult process which requires big investment and a lot of effort to get right.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Messages
120 (0.31/day)
System Name Lovely Milky Milky
Processor 7800X at 4GHz
Motherboard EVGA X299 FTW K
Cooling Custom milky loop
Memory 32GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 3200MHz quad channel
Video Card(s) MSI GTX1080Ti SeaHawk EK X
Storage A-DATA 512GB M.2, 750GB Samsung SSD, 2x 1TB Seagate Pipeline HDD's
Display(s) AOC CQ32G1 32" Curved 144Hz 1440p
Case Aerocool Quartz Pro
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seagate Snow Silent 750W
Mouse Fnatic Flick 2
Keyboard Drevo Blademaster TE
Software Windows 10 Pro
Raging at my PC and calling it a CNT will be valid finally
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
149 (0.05/day)
Intel's 10nm 4 year delay is not much of an example since the rest of the industry is going in to 5nm and already working on 3nm.

With 10nm they put all eggs in one basket and failed, greed and hubris got in their way by selecting the cheaper way to do 10nm by default.

You could say karma is a b1tch, this one decision gave AMD the future lead in the cpu business and i am so happy Intel screwed over them self's.

A greedy company like Intel should never ever have any kind of monopoly because they will self destruct by prioritising profit over technical advancements.

I am sure someone will develop a new way of doing cpu's without silicon long before Intel.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
533 (0.74/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Desktop5
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE) (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage Kingston HyperX Fury 240 GB // Toshiba 2 TB HDD // WD 2 TB HDD // Mushkin Triactor 3DL 256 GB
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Mouse Logitech Wireless Mouse M280 // Microsoft Trackball Optical 1.0
Keyboard HP Vectra VE keyboard (Part # D4950-63004)
Software Windows 10
Carbon nanotubes can not replace current silicon-based technologies because there is no way to mass-produce them yet. With current technology, you could make at best a few dozens of thousands of carbon nanotube transistors in a relatively short time. A processor would need at least hundreds of millions (for example, the Core i7 980 had 1170 million transistors and 8-core Ryzen processors almost reach the 5 billion mark). And then you would have to make millions of processors.

Besides, and before that, you need to have people in R&D that know all the ins and outs of carbon nanotubes, and we still haven't discovered everything about them. So, I'd say it would take ten years more at least before we see them in everyday technologies.
I said this sometime ago, and while I haven't changed my opinion, hopefully it will take a little less time to see it in actual products.

The next few years sure look quite interesting, though.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
118 (0.49/day)
Intel's 10nm 4 year delay is not much of an example since the rest of the industry is going in to 5nm and already working on 3nm.

With 10nm they put all eggs in one basket and failed, greed and hubris got in their way by selecting the cheaper way to do 10nm by default.

You could say karma is a b1tch, this one decision gave AMD the future lead in the cpu business and i am so happy Intel screwed over them self's.

A greedy company like Intel should never ever have any kind of monopoly because they will self destruct by prioritising profit over technical advancements.

I am sure someone will develop a new way of doing cpu's without silicon long before Intel.
Gotta love how it only took 6 comments for someone to bash Intel on an article having nothing to do with them.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
1,329 (1.03/day)
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Carbon
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14
Video Card(s) RX Vega 64 Red Devil
Storage M.2 Samsung Evo 970 250MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) realtec 5.1
Power Supply Corsair AXi 760W
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Carbon nanotubes. Yeah been hearing about this a lot lately. It doesn't mean necessarily that the advancement will have to take 30 years to catch-up. This depends on the research and how many companies or probably researchers will be involved. This is a rough estimate and believe it or not, it will be way faster. Starting is basically the worst part after that you take a leap forward. Especially if you have a proof of concept and we have that already.
 

rutra80

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
11 (0.05/day)
So it roughly is as fast as ENIAC from 1945, though surely more energy efficient...
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
3,339 (0.93/day)
Location
Gougeland (NZ)
System Name Cumquat 2000
Processor AMD RyZen R7 2700 @ 3400MHz
Motherboard Asus TUF X470-Plus Gaming
Cooling Cryorig R1 Universal
Memory 16GB GSkill TridentZ DR4-3200 16-18-18-38 1.35V
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX580 Gaming 8GB
Storage 1X Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SATA AHCI 1x Sandisk 128GB PCIe, 12TB of HDD Storage
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2457 MHD 75Hz FreeSync 1920x1080p
Case SilverStone Raven RV02B-W + 3x SS AP181 + USB3.0 upgrade
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro PCIe + Pioneer VSX-531 amp Technics 100W Speaker set
Power Supply Enermax RevolutionXT II 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10 X64 PRO (build 1903)
Benchmark Scores it sucks even less much now ;)
I'm picking Quantum CPUs will be out for the consumer before this ever makes it to market
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,603 (1.75/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua NHU-14S TR4
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
I'm picking Quantum CPUs will be out for the consumer before this ever makes it to market
Haha probably not you have to hit -1,000,000 Kelvin to get Quantum CPUs to even do what they are supposed to do. We will need an Alexa sized cooler to be able to do that at home and that is many years away.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
118 (0.49/day)
Haha probably not you have to hit -1,000,000 Kelvin to get Quantum CPUs to even do what they are supposed to do. We will need an Alexa sized cooler to be able to do that at home and that is many years away.
Not only that, but quantum computers don't lend themselves well to doing everyday tasks. For certain problems, yes they eventually can be faster than classical computing, but for the consumer, no.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,603 (1.75/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua NHU-14S TR4
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Not only that, but quantum computers don't lend themselves well to doing everyday tasks. For certain problems, yes they eventually can be faster than classical computing, but for the consumer, no.
Exactly they are building them to do calculations for complex problems at the molecular level, or solving quantum mechanics equations mostly but the thought of a CPU processor having 4 different states for instructions is crazy.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
118 (0.49/day)
Exactly they are building them to do calculations for complex problems at the molecular level, or solving quantum mechanics equations mostly but the thought of a CPU processor having 4 different states for instructions is crazy.
Yeah. I can grasp how classical computing works, but start reading about quantum computing and my head hurts.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,603 (1.75/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua NHU-14S TR4
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Yeah. I can grasp how classical computing works, but start reading about quantum computing and my head hurts.
I know super position, entanglement were so easy for me to understand at a high level but the details are indeed headache inducing.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,289 (0.58/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Exactly they are building them to do calculations for complex problems at the molecular level, or solving quantum mechanics equations mostly but the thought of a CPU processor having 4 different states for instructions is crazy.
Who knows, maybe for example games are calculated eventually on an ingame molecular level for realism :p
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,860 (2.28/day)
I'm picking Quantum CPUs will be out for the consumer before this ever makes it to market
So?
Different computers for different tasks.

CNT is just another candidate for future CPUs like we have today: deterministic, binary. We know silicon's potential is ending. We already have better semiconductors that work (like GaN), but they're more expensive, so won't be used until there's no other way.
Quantum computers will be used for different problems. You won't run Windows on them. Ever.
Haha probably not you have to hit -1,000,000 Kelvin to get Quantum CPUs to even do what they are supposed to do. We will need an Alexa sized cooler to be able to do that at home and that is many years away.
Seriously...
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
313 (0.28/day)
System Name Sillicon Nightmares
Processor Intel i5 4690K (4.7GHZ 1.372vcore, 4.0GHZ 1.192vring, VCCIN 1.84v)
Motherboard Asrock Fatal1ty Z97X Killer BIOS P2.40
Cooling DEEPCOOL Gamer Storm CAPTAIN 360
Memory 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaws V 2400mhz 10-14-13-32 2T, vDIMM 1.775v
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Strix 6GB OC, Core: 2190mhz, Vcore: 1.075v, Mem: 4909mhz (Sillicon Lottery Jackpot)
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD, WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430 1080p 144HZ + (2) Samsung SyncMaster 913v 1280x1024 75HZ + A Shitty TV For Movies
Case Deepcool Genome ROG Edition
Audio Device(s) Bunta Sniff Speakers From The Tip Edition
Power Supply Corsair CX430M + CableMod Cables
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Shitty Dell Office Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores 12 101 Firestrike (3rd for my hardware)
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,212 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
The question is whats the smallest size is achieveable that is still practical, will CNT be better or will silicone in the long run? That is assuming smaller is still better. I'm betting that CNT will be more reliable when the process reaches picometers (unless they use angstroms as the unit of measure).
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,860 (2.28/day)
IIRC, CNTs are better conductors of heat, too! IMO, this is a step in the right direction.
Not really.
A single CNT can be a fantastic thermal conductor... along it rotational axis ("through" the tube) and basically an insulator in perpendicular direction.
A randomly aligned CNT material is a worse thermal conductor than copper.

Making big chunks of aligned CNTs is at this moment under research. It may never be easy and cheap enough to be used in consumer CPUs or cooling solutions.

Also, keep in mind the best thermal conductivity is true for CNTs that are electric conductors - hence not usable as silicon replacement.
CNTs that end up in CPUs (if it ever happens) will have different physical properties and lower thermal conductivity.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2019
Messages
131 (0.98/day)
Processor R7 1700 non-X @ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte AORUS Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32 GB 3200 MT/s CL16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64
Storage 2x 500 GB SSD, 2x 3 TB HDD
Case Silverstone FT02
Software Manjaro Linux, W10 if I have to
An order of magnitude? My CPU is multiple orders faster.
 
Top