• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Researchers Build a CPU Without Silicon Using Carbon Nanotubes

Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,885 (2.28/day)
An order of magnitude? My CPU is multiple orders faster.
Your Ryzen is also many orders faster than other CPUs made today. Computers aren't just the x86 machines we think about most of the time.
If you're around 40 or more, your PC CPU is multiple orders faster than another PC CPU you've likely owned in the past.

Anyway, this is all irrelevant.
Even if these carbon CPUs can only do very simple stuff today, they'll catch up at some point. Maybe in 5, 10 or 50 years - we don't know that. But we know their theoretical limits are far beyond what silicon offers.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2019
Messages
131 (0.92/day)
Processor R7 1700 non-X @ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte AORUS Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32 GB 3200 MT/s CL16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64
Storage 2x 500 GB SSD, 2x 3 TB HDD
Case Silverstone FT02
Software Manjaro Linux, W10 if I have to
Your Ryzen is also many orders faster than other CPUs made today. Computers aren't just the x86 machines we think about most of the time.
If you're around 40 or more, your PC CPU is multiple orders faster than another PC CPU you've likely owned in the past.

Anyway, this is all irrelevant.
Even if these carbon CPUs can only do very simple stuff today, they'll catch up at some point. Maybe in 5, 10 or 50 years - we don't know that. But we know their theoretical limits are far beyond what silicon offers.
Well yes, I hope new technologies will catch up to and surpass current ones. I'm pointing out an error in the text, current CPUs are not AN order of magnitude faster.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
10,471 (5.47/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
I'm picking Quantum CPUs will be out for the consumer before this ever makes it to market
The logical way forward is more specialization. I don't think silicon is out the door anytime soon, despite all the progress made in that area. It will take several decades (!) for silicon to run out of juice for at least the consumer market. And even then it will remain relevant for a large part of that market for another decade or more. There is also a point where 'enough is enough' and its likely that sort of CPU is still easily made on silicon. We've already actually reached that point, as we notice our old CPUs do a pretty good job even today.

Within that time I do believe quantum computing and perhaps solutions such as CNT will slowly start doing 'things' but not for us lowly consumer peasants. But cryptography, for example, and perhaps for CNT, applications that rely on extremely low power use - what about space? - and aren't computationally intensive, or less time critical.

You have to consider the fact that we've become pretty good at building efficient CPUs by now, so any new material is going to have to combat a highly finetuned set of best practices and architectures. But our CPUs also rely on several factors these new materials won't rely on, or in a different way - temperature, power, packaging etc.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 1, 2018
Messages
570 (1.39/day)
Imagine the people that made the first computer with vacuum tubes, which was order of magnitude faster and much quieter than previous computer using mechanical relays:
"THIS IS THE FUTURE"

It was... for about 15 years.

It's absolutely amazing how come we've come in less than the lifetime of a single person.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
5,322 (1.77/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
I'm picking Quantum CPUs will be out for the consumer before this ever makes it to market
This. Time to put de x86 dinosaur out of its misery tbh. It has been along for too many years, time for a new architecture and design based on quantum tech.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
1,983 (1.22/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
Gotta love how it only took 6 comments for someone to bash Intel on an article having nothing to do with them.
OP asked for it, ignoring how inadequate does word "thrash" describe cited post.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,885 (2.28/day)
This. Time to put de x86 dinosaur out of its misery tbh. It has been along for too many years, time for a new architecture and design based on quantum tech.
No, quantum CPUs will not replace x86. They don't support the instruction set, they can't be run in room temperature. And it makes no sense anyway.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,235 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,885 (2.28/day)
have you heard about the magnetic cooling ???

Yeah, I've heard about multiple ways of cooling an object to near 0K. :) That's a fairly common problem in physics.
Any way you do this, you need a lot of energy (and time!) to cool the chip to near 0K - not to mention making it stay there under load.

But that's hardly relevant in this discussion. Because even if you're able to buy and run a quantum computer, it's still not a solution for general computing. Quantum processors are being developed for particular problems at which they'll be vastly superior to deterministic chips.
They will in fact work as "hardware accelerators" for particular tasks (e.g. tensor cores, hardware RNG), not standalone machines.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,235 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
Yeah, I've heard about multiple ways of cooling an object to near 0K. :) That's a fairly common problem in physics.
Any way you do this, you need a lot of energy (and time!) to cool the chip to near 0K - not to mention making it stay there under load.

But that's hardly relevant in this discussion. Because even if you're able to buy and run a quantum computer, it's still not a solution for general computing. Quantum processors are being developed for particular problems at which they'll be vastly superior to deterministic chips.
They will in fact work as "hardware accelerators" for particular tasks (e.g. tensor cores, hardware RNG), not standalone machines.
Relevant, really? The size of the cooling solution shown in the article matters, quantum computers currently require a huge elaborate system. The article doesnt say how much exactly power is required, and I'm sure you know more than those on the research team, and judging from the photo it can fit your bedroom closet, so it must need 440 atleast.

If you're buying a quantum computer your not buying it to use for "general computing". LOL
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
3,352 (0.93/day)
Location
Gougeland (NZ)
System Name Cumquat 2000
Processor AMD RyZen R7 2700 @ 3400MHz
Motherboard Asus TUF X470-Plus Gaming
Cooling Cryorig R1 Universal
Memory 16GB GSkill TridentZ DR4-3200 16-18-18-38 1.35V
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX580 Gaming 8GB
Storage 1X Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SATA AHCI 1x Sandisk 128GB PCIe, 12TB of HDD Storage
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2457 MHD 75Hz FreeSync 1920x1080p
Case SilverStone Raven RV02B-W + 3x SS AP181 + USB3.0 upgrade
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro PCIe + Pioneer VSX-531 amp Technics 100W Speaker set
Power Supply Enermax RevolutionXT II 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10 X64 PRO (build 1903)
Benchmark Scores it sucks even less much now ;)
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
1,618 (1.75/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua NHU-14S TR4
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,885 (2.28/day)
Relevant, really? The size of the cooling solution shown in the article matters, quantum computers currently require a huge elaborate system. The article doesnt say how much exactly power is required, and I'm sure you know more than those on the research team, and judging from the photo it can fit your bedroom closet, so it must need 440 atleast.
It takes around 20 seconds to go from the article *you suggested* to the corporate website of this team:
https://kiutra.com
The photo in that article shows their current product - a research cryostat.
It's way too weak for a quantum processor, so we should treat its requirements as a lower limit (likely by a significant margin):
Power consumption: 6.6-7.2 kW
Cooling water: 6-9 l/min, 5-25°C


The cryostat IBM actually uses isn't much larger, but surely is a lot more advanced and expensive.
131022


If you're buying a quantum computer your not buying it to use for "general computing". LOL
The idea that quantum computers will replace what we have today was suggested in earlier post - you've followed it.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,235 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
It takes around 20 seconds to go from the article *you suggested* to the corporate website of this team:
https://kiutra.com
The photo in that article shows their current product - a research cryostat.
It's way too weak for a quantum processor, so we should treat its requirements as a lower limit (likely by a significant margin):
Power consumption: 6.6-7.2 kW
Cooling water: 6-9 l/min, 5-25°C


The cryostat IBM actually uses isn't much larger, but surely is a lot more advanced and expensive.
View attachment 131022


The idea that quantum computers will replace what we have today was suggested in earlier post - you've followed it.
yea maybe you should have spent that 20 seconds before you replied to me, afterall, I was replying to you not what everyone else said. Misunderstandings happen when speaking generically.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,885 (2.28/day)
yea maybe you should have spent that 20 seconds before you replied to me, afterall, I was replying to you not what everyone else said. Misunderstandings happen when speaking generically.
Replying to Prima.Vera, I said quantum computers won't replace x86 because - among other things - they need very low temperatures.
You said, quoting this particular comment, that there's something called magnetic cooling. In the following post you've also mentioned the size being somehow compact.
Is all that true? Or maybe I misunderstood something?

Let's move to the subject you started: the cooling itself. I can talk about that. Do you at least acknowledge that it's extremely hard to run these computers?
What's your opinion? What was your goal when you decided to challenge me on cryostats?
And now you're backing off in such a rough way... :eek:
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,235 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
Replying to Prima.Vera, I said quantum computers won't replace x86 because - among other things - they need very low temperatures.
You said, quoting this particular comment, that there's something called magnetic cooling. In the following post you've also mentioned the size being somehow compact.
Is all that true? Or maybe I misunderstood something?
I was referring to whats in the article not anything more. The image you posted is misleading. The image from the article clearly shows how small it is and after
Let's move to the subject you started: the cooling itself. I can talk about that. Do you at least acknowledge that it's extremely hard to run these computers?
What's your opinion? What was your goal when you decided to challenge me on cryostats?
And now you're backing off in such a rough way... :eek:
You just picked a random product to use for power reference? which happens to be the largest unit they have. I'm surprised more people didnt call you out.

as for backing away, yea real life calling....
 
Top