• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Samsung Preparing a 27-inch WQHD (2560 x 1440) Monitor

Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
1,714 (0.60/day)
Likes
408
System Name Eldritch
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
Motherboard MSI B350 PC Mate
Cooling Satan's butthole after going to Taco Bell
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Flare X
Video Card(s) nVidia (Gigabyte) GT 740 2GB
Storage 80 GB IBM, 2 TB WD Green
Display(s) Dell 2007WFP
Software Debian Buster
#26
Neh, for games resolution is to big. Games will work like carp on native...
If you have that much money you might as well get a 7970, which should be able to handle that in sleep mode.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
1,257 (0.27/day)
Likes
603
Location
South Africa
System Name Firelance
Processor i5-3570K @ 4.6GHz / 1.19V
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H @ F16h mod BIOS
Cooling Corsair H105 + 4x Gentle Typhoon 1850
Memory 2x 8GB Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3-1600 CL9 @ CL7
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC @ 2000 core / 2300 mem
Storage 2x 256GB Samsung 840 Pro (RAID-0) + Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 (3TB)
Display(s) Dell U2713HM (25x14) + Acer P243W (19x12)
Case Fractal Design ARC XL
Audio Device(s) Logitech G930
Power Supply Seasonic M12-II Bronze Evo Edition 750W
Mouse Logitech G400
Keyboard Logitech G19
Software Windows 7 Professional x64 Service Pack 1
#27
2560x1600 or GTFO.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
4,016 (1.17/day)
Likes
900
Location
Ohio
System Name Desktop|| Virtual Host 0
Processor Intel Core i5 2500-K @ 4.3ghz || 2x Xeon L5630 (total 8 cores, 16 threads)
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V || Dell PowerEdge R710 (Intel 5520 chipset)
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100 || Stock hotplug fans and passive heatsinks
Memory 4x4gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 || 12x4gb Hynix DDR3 1066 FB-DIMMs
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 760 Gaming Twin Frozr 4GB OC || Don't know, don't care
Storage Hitachi 7K3000 2TB || 6x300gb 15k rpm SAS internal hotswap, 12x3tb Seagate NAS drives in enclosure
Display(s) ViewSonic VA2349S || remote iDRAC KVM console
Case Antec P280 || Dell PowerEdge R710
Audio Device(s) HRT MusicStreamer II+ and Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 || Don't know, don't care
Power Supply SeaSonic X650 Gold || 2x870w hot-swappable
Mouse Logitech G500 || remote iDRAC KVM console
Keyboard Logitech G510 || remote iDRAC KVM console
Software Win7 Ultimate x64 || VMware vSphere 6.0 with vCenter Server 6.0
Benchmark Scores Over 9000 on the scouter
#28

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,096 (9.58/day)
Likes
13,521
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + bob marley zion's
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#29
I prefer a 16:9 display to a 16:10 display actually.
same. 2D desktop doesnt concern me with all the aspect ratio fuckups games get.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.95/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#30
I still prefer 16:10 if the vertical resolutions are the same. Actually, I prefer 4:3 if the vertical resolution is constant.

Vice versa if the horizontal resolutions stay the same.

And all I want to know is, how is the color accuracy on these PLS panels? Are they true 8 bit? Do they look as good as a calibrated IPS?
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#31
Same here, I love 16:10 :)
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,072
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#32
I still prefer 16:10 if the vertical resolutions are the same. Actually, I prefer 4:3 if the vertical resolution is constant.
You're joking right?? How could you prefer a 4:3 aspect ratio? :banghead: You obviously never used you PC at your work and for work...I use 2 monitors with 16:9 and still don't have enough horizontal space to run stuff...:confused::confused:
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#33
Actually 4:3 aspect ratio would be better than this 16:9 2560x1440, because 4:3 would be 2560x1920 if I'm not mistaken, so you don't lose horizontal space :)
You "only" gain more vertical pixels
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,058 (1.07/day)
Likes
1,122
Location
Geneva, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
#34
16:10! However, I'll take anything 1920x1200 or greater (which would include this Samsung), as I can still get what I want out of it. At least 1920 wide for movies/video and at least 1200 high for old locked 4:3 games.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.95/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#35
You're joking right?? How could you prefer a 4:3 aspect ratio? :banghead: You obviously never used you PC at your work and for work...I use 2 monitors with 16:9 and still don't have enough horizontal space to run stuff...:confused::confused:
Yes I have, and reread my post. I said if the horizontal resolutions are the same, 4:3 is better. 4:3 has MORE horizontal space in that case.

16:9 = 2560 x 1440
16:10 = 2560 x 1600
4:3 = 2560 x 1920

Now, if the vertical resolutions were the same, 16:9 is obviously better

16:9 = 2560 x 1440
16:10 = 2304 x 1440
4:3 = 1920 x 1440
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,946 (2.25/day)
Likes
2,309
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
#36
Looks are more important than functionality. :rolleyes: Remember you wouldn't want to see unsightly cables.

Pretty stupid if you ask me. :banghead:
Go what yourself? ;)

Its about how much you are paying, along with how much value you find in it. So if users who are going to buy this would rather have no cables showing, and rather have it wall mounted they should either have that option, or they won't buy it.


By your comment, everyone should just accept what they get, leading to no real innovation.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
4,016 (1.17/day)
Likes
900
Location
Ohio
System Name Desktop|| Virtual Host 0
Processor Intel Core i5 2500-K @ 4.3ghz || 2x Xeon L5630 (total 8 cores, 16 threads)
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V || Dell PowerEdge R710 (Intel 5520 chipset)
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100 || Stock hotplug fans and passive heatsinks
Memory 4x4gb Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 || 12x4gb Hynix DDR3 1066 FB-DIMMs
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 760 Gaming Twin Frozr 4GB OC || Don't know, don't care
Storage Hitachi 7K3000 2TB || 6x300gb 15k rpm SAS internal hotswap, 12x3tb Seagate NAS drives in enclosure
Display(s) ViewSonic VA2349S || remote iDRAC KVM console
Case Antec P280 || Dell PowerEdge R710
Audio Device(s) HRT MusicStreamer II+ and Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 || Don't know, don't care
Power Supply SeaSonic X650 Gold || 2x870w hot-swappable
Mouse Logitech G500 || remote iDRAC KVM console
Keyboard Logitech G510 || remote iDRAC KVM console
Software Win7 Ultimate x64 || VMware vSphere 6.0 with vCenter Server 6.0
Benchmark Scores Over 9000 on the scouter
#37
Yes I have, and reread my post. I said if the vertical resolutions are the same, 4:3 is better. 4:3 has MORE horizontal space in that case.

16:9 = 2560 x 1440
16:10 = 2560 x 1600
4:3 = 2560 x 1920

Now, if the horizontal resolutions were the same, 16:9 is obviously better

16:9 = 2560 x 1440
16:10 = 2304 x 1440
4:3 = 1920 x 1440
It appears as though you've got 'horizontal' and 'vertical' backwards.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,072
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#38
Yes I have, and reread my post. I said if the vertical resolutions are the same, 4:3 is better. 4:3 has MORE horizontal space in that case.

16:9 = 2560 x 1440
16:10 = 2560 x 1600
4:3 = 2560 x 1920

Now, if the horizontal resolutions were the same, 16:9 is obviously better

16:9 = 2560 x 1440
16:10 = 2304 x 1440
4:3 = 1920 x 1440
At least, do you know the difference between Horizontal and Vertical?? Anyways, it seems that you are obsessed with numbers, seems pointless to continue the debate...Just remember that for games and movies, the wider the screen, the better. And this is exactly why I prefer a 16:9 monitor...
 

w3b

New Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2011
Messages
68 (0.03/day)
Likes
9
Location
Australia
System Name Black n Blue
Processor Intel Core i7 930 (running at stock)
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P SE2
Memory OCZ PC3-12800 Platinum 3 x 2GB - OCZ3P1600VL6GK
Video Card(s) Sapphire ATi Radeon HD5850 Toxic 1GB (765/1125)
Storage OS: Samsung F3 1TB HD103SJ, Data: 2 x Samsung HD203WI
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 2443BW+
Case Antec 1200 [original version]
Audio Device(s) Onboard (Realtek ALC889A)
Power Supply Antec CP 850w PSU [Antec Signature in larger box according to JonnyGuru]
Software MS Win7 SP1 x64 OEM [yes it's legit =P ]
Benchmark Scores No world records here, just a new box I bought after sticking with an Intel P4 socket 478 PC (with n
#39
Way too expensive, paper specs look good. :cool:

Seeing 16:10 still kicking around is very promising for future monitors though as I like the extra vertical space over 16:9, not to mention it looks better than a 16:9 screen physically.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16:10#16:10_-_properties
The 16:10 ratio, at 1.6, is close to the golden ratio (1.618, often denoted φ).
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#40
Just remember that for games and movies, the wider the screen, the better. And this is exactly why I prefer a 16:9 monitor...
Maybe if you play on a console, but if you play on a PC the additional resolution of a 4:3 AR will be used, always keeping the width constant (aka 2560).
For movies? I don't use my monitor, TVs is what I use :)
So 16:9 is good on a TV, OK, but on a PC I'd rather pick 2560x1920 than 2560x1440.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,072
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#41
Maybe if you play on a console, but if you play on a PC the additional resolution of a 4:3 AR will be used, always keeping the width constant (aka 2560).
Can you please translate that? I am not familiar with geeky terms...or logic
:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#42
Sorry, I mean that with 4:3 Aspect Ratio vs 16:9 Aspect Ratio you'd only gain more space on PC games that aren't BOUND to 16:9 (console ports).
So if you have 2560x1920 you actually use the additional resolution versus the 2560x1440 of a 16:9 screen.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.95/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#43
It appears as though you've got 'horizontal' and 'vertical' backwards.
lol. You're right. My bad.
At least, do you know the difference between Horizontal and Vertical?? Anyways, it seems that you are obsessed with numbers, seems pointless to continue the debate...Just remember that for games and movies, the wider the screen, the better. And this is exactly why I prefer a 16:9 monitor...
This is mostly a misunderstanding, as I had a serious brain fart, and mixed up horizontal and vertical in my mind. lol.

Wider is better is only true for a monitor if it gives more resolution. A 16:10 or 4:3 monitor that has the same horizontal resolution is able to display everything a 16:9 monitor can, pixel perfect.

A theoretical 2560x1920 monitor will display absolutely everything that a 2560x1440 can, but the opposite is not true.

Therefore, the 4:3 monitor is the most versatile. It can still display all the 16:9 content for movies and TV, but it can do a hell of a lot more when you aren't watching movies or TV.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
318 (0.10/day)
Likes
28
Location
New York, NY
System Name The Baconator
Processor Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.00GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-790FX
Cooling Zalman 9900 CPU Cooler
Memory 16Gb DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD 5870
Storage OS: WD 300Gb @ 10,000rpm. Storage: 2 x 1Tb @ 7,200rpm
Display(s) ASUS 27" LED 1080p Monitor
Case Cooler Master Sniper Medium Tower
Audio Device(s) MoBo Integrated
Power Supply Corsair PSU 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
#44
I think a couple of years back or so Wile E and I had the same discussion of 16:9 vs 16:10. You won't be changing his mind, and mine hasn't either as I still prefer 16:9.

Heck where is the 21:9 TV Vizio promised?
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
5,105 (1.33/day)
Likes
1,249
Location
Kansas
Processor Core i5 3570K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Pro4
Cooling Zalman CNPS10X Extreme
Memory 2x4GB GSkill Sniper
Video Card(s) MSI GTX970 Gaming
Storage 240GB OCZ ARC 100, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) LG 23" 1920x1080
Case Antec P100
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Software Windows 8.1 Pro 64
#45
i use the speakers on my monitor (teamspeak/skype/etc) all the time
They're also good for office environments where space is premium and less cords is good.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.95/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
#46
I think a couple of years back or so Wile E and I had the same discussion of 16:9 vs 16:10. You won't be changing his mind, and mine hasn't either as I still prefer 16:9.

Heck where is the 21:9 TV Vizio promised?
I can respect it just being a preference. It's just when people make blanket statement like it's universally better is when I step in. It being better or worse is mostly determined by resolution.

2560x1440 is obviously better than 1920x1200. But then, 2560x1600 would be better still, strictly in terms of abilities.

And Phillips has 21:9 TVs if you are interested. And they are 2560x1080, so much better than the current crop of 1080p tvs. I wouldn't mind having one. http://www.philips.co.uk/c/cinema-21-9/30849/cat/#filterState0=CINEMA219_FLAT_TV_SE_GB_CONSUMER=true
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
318 (0.10/day)
Likes
28
Location
New York, NY
System Name The Baconator
Processor Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.00GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-790FX
Cooling Zalman 9900 CPU Cooler
Memory 16Gb DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD 5870
Storage OS: WD 300Gb @ 10,000rpm. Storage: 2 x 1Tb @ 7,200rpm
Display(s) ASUS 27" LED 1080p Monitor
Case Cooler Master Sniper Medium Tower
Audio Device(s) MoBo Integrated
Power Supply Corsair PSU 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
#47
I can respect it just being a preference. It's just when people make blanket statement like it's universally better is when I step in. It being better or worse is mostly determined by resolution.

2560x1440 is obviously better than 1920x1200. But then, 2560x1600 would be better still, strictly in terms of abilities.

And Phillips has 21:9 TVs if you are interested. And they are 2560x1080, so much better than the current crop of 1080p tvs. I wouldn't mind having one. http://www.philips.co.uk/c/cinema-21-9/30849/cat/#filterState0=CINEMA219_FLAT_TV_SE_GB_CONSUMER=true
I'm well aware of Philips' offering, however, it's still European market only, and the premium cost of importing it + the premium cost of the TV itself would make my hair bleed...
 

Black Panther

Senior Moderator™
Staff member
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
8,957 (2.33/day)
Likes
2,166
System Name Great White Bengal
Processor i7 930 @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R
Cooling Scythe Yasya
Memory 12GB (3 x 4GB DDR3 Geil Black Dragon)
Video Card(s) Zotac 670 4GB
Storage eSata Seagate 2TB -- 240GB SSD Sandisk Extreme
Display(s) 27" 2560x1440 Dell U2711
Case NZXT Switch 810 White
Audio Device(s) Onboard sound & Z5500 Speakers
Power Supply Corsair 850W Gold
Mouse Asus ROG Sica
Keyboard Motospeed
Software Windows 10
#48
I bought a dell 2560x1440 during 2010. I'll try to figure out the advantages/disadvantages once I finish playing Skyrim ;)
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
#49
There are no disadvantages on a higher res monitor other than the need for beefier GPUs :)
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,072
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#50
lol. You're right. My bad.
This is mostly a misunderstanding, as I had a serious brain fart, and mixed up horizontal and vertical in my mind. lol.

Wider is better is only true for a monitor if it gives more resolution. A 16:10 or 4:3 monitor that has the same horizontal resolution is able to display everything a 16:9 monitor can, pixel perfect.

A theoretical 2560x1920 monitor will display absolutely everything that a 2560x1440 can, but the opposite is not true.

Therefore, the 4:3 monitor is the most versatile. It can still display all the 16:9 content for movies and TV, but it can do a hell of a lot more when you aren't watching movies or TV.
You are right in only one aspect. And that is Windows desktop applications. As i said, in games or movies, the wider the screen the MORE information you have displayed on your screen . Here the resolution in irrelevant, the ratio is making the difference. ;)