• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Sapphire Reps Leak Juicy Details on AMD Radeon Navi

Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
So It looks like there won't be a $330 card with RTX2070 level of performance and that leak was a fake. For me that's not surprising, but these new prices are quite high. It means Navi should perform quite well, but price/performance ratio won't be great.

Let's say the "Pro" is right in the middle between RTX2060 and RTX2070 and "XT" is 10% over RTX2070 then It would look like this:
(Performance was calculated based on Performance summary in 4K from this review: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_1650_SC_Ultra_Black/27.html)
RX 570 4GB - 52% ($130) -> 159% price/performance ratio
GTX 1060 6GB -59.5% ($200) -> 118% price/performance ratio
RX 580 8GB - 62% ($190) -> 130% price/performance ratio
RX 590 8GB - 69% ($220) -> 124% price/performance ratio
GTX 1660 6GB - 70.5% ($220) -> 127% price/performance ratio
GTX 1660Ti 6GB - 81% ($280) -> 115% price/performance ratio
Vega 56 8GB - 93% ($320) -> 115% price/performance ratio
RTX 2060 6GB - 100% ($350) -> 113% price/performance ratio
Vega 64 8GB - 103.5% ($400) -> 103% price/performance ratio
Navi "Pro" 8GB - 110.5% ($399) -> 110% price/performance ratio
RTX 2070 8GB - 121% ($480) -> 100% price/performance ratio
Navi "XT" 8GB - 133% ($499) -> 106% price/performance ratio

Turing was criticized because of Its price/performance ratio and now look at this. If the performance and price is correct then It doesn't look good for Navi. I am not sure If It's a successor to Vega or to Polaris or to both, but Polaris is much better and even Vega 56 has a bit better performance/price ratio.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,465 (4.40/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
The Linux radeonsi driver got updates, so it's still GCN for sure.
You do know GCN is nothing more than a label, right?
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,901 (1.16/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Night Rider | Mini LAN PC | Workhorse
Processor AMD R7 2700X | i7 2600 | i7 970
Motherboard MSi AM4 Pro Carbon | GA-H77M-D3H | Gigabyte EX58-UD5
Cooling AMD Wraith cooler| Coolermaster Gemini with Noctua 3000RPM Fan | Big shairkan B
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill Ripjaws 3600MHz| 2x4GB Corsair 1600 | 6x2GB DDR3 1300 Corsair
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 OC in Sli | Gainward GTX 650 TI GS | ASUS 7970 Matrix
Storage 250GB Plextor SSD Por 5 /1TB WD Black | 500GB WD ES/WD Black | WD 320/Seagate 320
Display(s) LG 27" 1440P| Samsung 20" S20C300L/DELL 15" | 22" DELL/19"DELL
Case LIAN LI PC-18 | Mini ATX Case (custom) | Atrix C4 9001
Audio Device(s) Onboard | Onbaord | Onboard
Power Supply Silverstone 750 | Silverstone Mini 450W | Corsair CX-750
Mouse Coolermaster Pro | Rapoo V900 | Gigabyte 6850X
Keyboard MAX Keyboard Nighthawk X8 | Creative Fatal1ty eluminx | Some POS Logitech
Software Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64/Windows 10 Home
It means it will be another underwhelming, power-hungry product again just like Radeon VII, it claimed to beat 2080 but actually beaten badly by it.
Not as much now it seems
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,578 (1.75/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Pretty disappointed by these prices TBH, even if I'd be happy with the performance. Given the well-established terrible value of the RTX series, I find it entirely reasonable for AMD to undercut them on price at the same performance - even with a more expensive process they have the advantage of not having mostly useless* RT cores and Tensor cores making the die twice the size it needs to be.

*For now, at least - we'll see in 2-3 years if RTRT catches on.

You do know GCN is nothing more than a label, right?
Uhm, no. It's a core architecture, which AMD has iterated on since they abandoned the previous TeraScale architecture. There are many variants, but they share a core framework and a lot of functionality. No GCN variant is fundamentally different from any other - just improved upon, added features to, etc. That's why AMD's early GCN cards have had such excellent longevity.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,465 (4.40/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
It's a core architecture, which AMD has iterated on since they abandoned the previous TeraScale architecture. There are many variants, but they share a core framework and a lot of functionality. No GCN variant is fundamentally different from any other - just improved upon, added features to, etc.
So there is a God written rule that they need to name it in a specific way ? GCN 5 is drastically different from GCN 1 in pretty much every way, they are worlds apart both in feature set and microarthitectural differences that change the clocks/power etc. It's a label that they may chose to keep using or not, it doesn't mean anything in particular if they do.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.61/day)
So It looks like there won't be a $330 card with RTX2070 level of performance and that leak was a fake. For me that's not surprising, but these new prices are quite high. It means Navi should perform quite well, but price/performance ratio won't be great.

Let's say the "Pro" is right in the middle between RTX2060 and RTX2070 and "XT" is 10% over RTX2070 then It would look like this:
(Performance was calculated based on Performance summary in 4K from this review: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_1650_SC_Ultra_Black/27.html)
RX 570 4GB - 52% ($130) -> 159% price/performance ratio
GTX 1060 6GB -59.5% ($200) -> 118% price/performance ratio
RX 580 8GB - 62% ($190) -> 130% price/performance ratio
RX 590 8GB - 69% ($220) -> 124% price/performance ratio
GTX 1660 6GB - 70.5% ($220) -> 127% price/performance ratio
GTX 1660Ti 6GB - 81% ($280) -> 115% price/performance ratio
Vega 56 8GB - 93% ($320) -> 115% price/performance ratio
RTX 2060 6GB - 100% ($350) -> 113% price/performance ratio
Vega 64 8GB - 103.5% ($400) -> 103% price/performance ratio
Navi "Pro" 8GB - 110.5% ($399) -> 110% price/performance ratio
RTX 2070 8GB - 121% ($480) -> 100% price/performance ratio
Navi "XT" 8GB - 133% ($499) -> 106% price/performance ratio

Turing was criticized because of Its price/performance ratio and now look at this. If the performance and price is correct then It doesn't look good for Navi. I am not sure If It's a successor to Vega or to Polaris or to both, but Polaris is much better and even Vega 56 has a bit better performance/price ratio.
Once again AdoredTV was wrong. How surprised I am. Also, if PS5/Xbox 2 have a RTX 2070 equivalent GPU, and retail for 400€/500€, they can be great products for the price tbh. Will be interesting to see what happens in the next 12 months.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,628 (4.11/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 G.Skill
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
So there is a God written rule that they need to name it in a specific way ? GCN 5 is drastically different from GCN 1 in pretty much every way, they are worlds apart both in feature set and microarthitectural differences that change the clocks/power etc. It's a label that they may chose to keep using or not, it doesn't mean anything in particular if they do.
I don't know, I'm looking at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_Core_Next
and I don't see those drastic differences. Little additions and resources reshuffling, yes, but nothing more.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
Once again AdoredTV was wrong. How surprised I am. Also, if PS5/Xbox 2 have a RTX 2070 equivalent GPU, and retail for 400€/500€, they can be great products for the price tbh. Will be interesting to see what happens in the next 12 months.
They would be fantastic for that price, but let's be honest, that price is too low for the leaked specs(8C, 16-24GB Ram, SSD, ~Vega 64 performance).
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
966 (0.41/day)
Processor Ryzen 1200
Motherboard X370 Prime A
Cooling Wraith Prism
Memory 16gb
Video Card(s) RX580 8gb Nitro+
Power Supply Seasonic 620w
Software Win 10 x64
It's important that AMD won't screw up the launch like they did with VII
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
226 (0.93/day)
Why should AMD care about RTX 2080Ti competitor? it's not economical for resource limited company like AMD who needs to fight 2 giant like Intel and Nvidia.
They have the Gaming Consoles, Game Streaming (MS/Google), and will try to catch as much market possible with APU's for low end graphic and up until Vega64 performance level with competitive Navi cards, isn't it most of the market?
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
597 (0.32/day)
Sapphire is actively working on custom designs for the Navi architecture, and mentioned that "work on a "Toxic" version of Navi is complete, and it is watercooled"
This doesn't bode well.
Sapphire usually has excellent air cooling solutions, their tri-fan cards are legendary.
If they need to water cool it may mean out of control power consumption.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
10,088 (5.42/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
If true, it will be interesting to see what the people of "a mainstream card should not cost more than $250" will have to say...
Same as before, they will just sit on it for another X period of time. History repeats. If there's nothing suitable to upgrade to, you simply don't upgrade. For GPU, relative price/perf is always an item, because really that's all there is.

Beaten badly = 7%. LOL.


Power-hungry? Check rumours and check real power consumption of Vega. Green fanboy.
Yes its underwhelming. There is no new price point, no new performance metric, no RT development and its practically the same arch on a shrink. And it still has lower perf/watt than its competitor that is on a larger node. Its just further postponing the inevitable really while leaving the playing field mostly to Nvidia.

Check rumours... :slap: that's all we ever do isn't it, until the product is released and most of it gets confirmed.
 
Last edited:

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
516 (0.34/day)
Radeon vii is barely any faster than 2070. Navi will be on par with 1660Ti on 7nm or 2660ti performance wise. And 2x power.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,465 (4.40/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
If they need to water cool it may mean out of control power consumption.
GTX 1070 had watercooled versions didn't it ? And it was what, 150W ?
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
552 (0.11/day)
Location
Malaysia
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard Gigabyte AB350M Gaming 3 F31 BIOS
Cooling Arctic Freezer 64 Pro
Memory 2x8GB Samsung OEM B-die 2133MHz @ 3133MHz
Video Card(s) Galax GTX 1070 Katana
Storage 120GB Samsung Evo 840 SSD+ 2TB Seagate Barracuda + 2TB Seagate Surveillance
Display(s) 24" LG 24MP59G
Case Tecware Nexus M
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium HD with Kurtzweil KS-40A
Power Supply Corsair CX750M
Mouse Logitech G402 Hyperion Fury
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire Pro Cherry MX Black
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I skip if its still on 4 shader engine.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
597 (0.32/day)
GTX 1070 had watercooled versions didn't it ? And it was what, 150W ?
Read my post fully.
Sapphire has no tradition in WC cards; their forte is triple fans.
They may have chosen to go water, or they may have been forced to.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
475 (0.68/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GB(2x4GB) DDR3-800MHz [1600MT/s]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560 4GB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Delux DLC-MV888
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech OP-620D
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point
It means it will be another underwhelming, power-hungry product again just like Radeon VII, it claimed to beat 2080 but actually beaten badly by it.
Are you talking about Nvidia's current generation. Cause most of current Nvidia cards have 3 Fans. 3 Slot wide cooler and some has AIO watercooling and some even has custom water block to cool them. If Nvidia cards runs cooler, is there any need of 3fan ,3 slot and water cooling? :confused::confused::confused:
Or they dont run cool?
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
226 (0.93/day)
Maybe they went WC since this 7nm is very dense and WC is very beneficial as seen on Radeon VII and it makes more sense rather current GPU's that can already OC great with just air-cooling? (NV cards boost no problem over 2000Mhz).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,433 (0.93/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Read my post fully.
Sapphire has no tradition in WC cards; their forte is triple fans.
They may have chosen to go water, or they may have been forced to.
Sapphire had many Atomic cards that were AIO cooled, it is only after Fiji that they stop making them.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,465 (4.40/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Read my post fully.
Sapphire has no tradition in WC cards; their forte is triple fans.
They may have chosen to go water, or they may have been forced to.
Watercooled does not mean power consumption out of control. That's all I have to say.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,628 (4.11/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 G.Skill
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Watercooled does not mean power consumption out of control. That's all I have to say.
More like, that's what you need to believe.
Because surely you have noticed there's a dearth of water cooled RX 560 or GTX 1030 cards.
 
Top