• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

Core i5 13600K 5.5P/4.4E/4.8C DDR4 4200 C16

cachemem1.png
 
Downclock from 7200MHz to 6400MHz. 2 pairs of G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-7200J3445G1GX2-TZ5RS.
Its an i5-13600K, just AIDA64 not showing correctly.

2023_09_25_08_50_IMG_3440.PNG


2023_09_22_12_33_IMG_3334.JPG2023_09_22_12_31_IMG_3331.JPGsnap028.png
 
Last edited:
1695693411507.png
 
Just updated Aida64 on my 13900K & 8200Mhz 48GB DDR5.
On the new 6.92.6600 from previous 6.90.6500 i go from 1650 GB/s to under 800 GB/s on L3 Read, and from 960 GB/s to 750 GB/s on Copy. Write was also a bit lower.

Tried several times, restarted my pc and its very consistent on these numbers on the new version.

So i tried reverting back to 6.90.6500 and i was back to "normal" numbers again.
 
Simkin said:
Just updated Aida64 on my 13900K & 8200Mhz 48GB DDR5.
On the new 6.92.6600 from previous 6.90.6500 i go from 1650 GB/s to under 800 GB/s on L3 Read, and from 960 GB/s to 750 GB/s on Copy. Write was also a bit lower.
Click to expand...
Could it be that they changed the testing method from running P and E cores to now only P cores?
 
Did some quick tuning, could probably still do better, but can't be bothered to sink the time in stability testing.

This is 100% stable.


1696531504592.png


dgianstefani said:
Did some quick tuning, could probably still do better, but can't be bothered to sink the time in stability testing.
Click to expand...
I lied.

Stable, promise I'm done this time lol (it's not an addiction).

1696536318380.png


2133 FLCK otherwise same settings.

1696542060707.png


Realised FCLK needs to be 2067 to be in 3:2 sync with MCLK, 2067x1.5=3100=6200MT/2

Shaved off another ns by reducing FCLK.

1696545688050.png
 
Realised I had my memory controller voltage very low at 1.1, limiting tuning, set to 1.35 which is completely safe, managed tighter timings and 57 ns!

1696798597796.png


Zentimings gets voltages wrong BTW.
 

Played around with BLCK OC, got stable 101.5 with same timings. I adjusted tRFC so ns stayed at 150, had issues booting when I tried tuning tRFC to lower than that in the past.

As a bonus my CPU now boosts 75 MHz higher too :D
1697214165094.png
 
dgianstefani said:
Played around with BLCK OC, got stable 101.5 with same timings. I adjusted tRFC so ns stayed at 150, had issues booting when I tried tuning tRFC to lower than that in the past.

As a bonus my CPU now boosts 75 MHz higher too :D
View attachment 317394
Click to expand...
Yep, playing around with BCLK, not so far behind
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (122)_edit_116437131097351.png
    Screenshot (122)_edit_116437131097351.png
    892.2 KB · Views: 131
  • 5800X3D_4,709_4000 CL14_BCLK_103,50.png
    5800X3D_4,709_4000 CL14_BCLK_103,50.png
    991.4 KB · Views: 133
dgianstefani said:
Did some quick tuning, could probably still do better, but can't be bothered to sink the time in stability testing.

This is 100% stable.


View attachment 316323


I lied.

Stable, promise I'm done this time lol (it's not an addiction).

View attachment 316337

2133 FLCK otherwise same settings.

View attachment 316348

Realised FCLK needs to be 2067 to be in 3:2 sync with MCLK, 2067x1.5=3100=6200MT/2

Shaved off another ns by reducing FCLK.

View attachment 316362
Click to expand...
Took your advice on the FLCK at 2067 from 2100 since I'm also running at 6200MT's and seen similar 1 ns improvement in Latency.
Aida64: 61.2 to 60.2ns. Before I was under the impression that the FLCK wasn't in anyway linked with the memory controller but apparently this isn't true..


ZenTimings_Screenshot.png
 
Last edited:
Finally under 60 ns :)

3 times back to back 59.7 so looks solid to me.
Benchmarking / Gaming hard past ~ 48 hours with no issues thus far..
Quite a boost over "EXPO"
Read: 87K MB/s
Write: 96K MB/s
Copy: 85K MB/s

Aida64 59.7 ns Latency.png
ZenTimings_Screenshot.png
 
Last edited:
Almost time for a new toy..

Screenshot 2023-10-15 145843.png
 
G Skill F5-6000J4040F16G :)

at4x.png
 
Aida64 59.1 ns.png
ZenTimings_Screenshot.png
 
Last edited:
I will join you guys for some X3D action :)

Screenshot 2023-10-17 172455.png
 
Who is closer to reality, aida64 or occt?
4x48 GB = 192 GB.
Only P core, Ecore de-activated, Hyper T de-activated.
 

Attachments

  • occt_vs_aida64.png
    occt_vs_aida64.png
    238 KB · Views: 175
Last edited:
How are some getting mid 50's with similar settings? What I'm I missing? Perhaps its my MB.. Regardless still a decent bump from "EXPO" 67ns
I wonder if disabling "GDM" would change anything but can't for the life of me locate it in the Asus BIOS.. My R9 7900X scores top 2% in 3DMARK Time Spy so don't think its my CPU..
Aida64 59.0 ns.png
ZenTimings_Screenshot.png


Aida64 59.0 ns.png
ZenTimings_Screenshot.png
 
Last edited:
Finally under 59ns :)

Write: 97K MB/s
Copy: 84K MB/s
Aida64 58.4 ns.png
ZenTimings_Screenshot.png
 
tRFC will get you every time :toast:
 
Working on a solid daily driver profile with the new 14 KF chip. :)

8400CL36 cache memory.jpg
 
Last edited:
mrcardio33x said:
How are some getting mid 50's with similar settings? What I'm I missing? Perhaps its my MB.. Regardless still a decent bump from "EXPO" 67ns
I wonder if disabling "GDM" would change anything but can't for the life of me locate it in the Asus BIOS.. My R9 7900X scores top 2% in 3DMARK Time Spy so don't think its my CPU..
View attachment 318449View attachment 318450

View attachment 318449View attachment 318450
Click to expand...

Before disabling GDM (which will likely have you redo the entire timing set down to the tertiaries, if you can even achieve it), try to raise your FCLK. 6400's too high for Zen 4, and your FCLK is a little on the low side for that kind of speed grade. At least 2167 should be doable. Also, your VSOC is quite high, I wouldn't go above this if you plan to keep this CPU for any meaningful amount of time.
 
Dr. Dro said:
Before disabling GDM (which will likely have you redo the entire timing set down to the tertiaries, if you can even achieve it), try to raise your FCLK. 6400's too high for Zen 4, and your FCLK is a little on the low side for that kind of speed grade. At least 2167 should be doable. Also, your VSOC is quite high, I wouldn't go above this if you plan to keep this CPU for any meaningful amount of time.
Click to expand...

Sure about that? I thought VSOC above 1.30v was "high".. I'm at 1.27v.. I just changed it the BIOS to 1.25v - Hopefully it remains stable..

How is 6400MT/s "too high" for Zen 4 if I've been running it stable for a while now? Plus its giving me the best results.

Also, tried FCLK at 2033-2200 and 2133 gives best results.

Just tried 6200 MT/s at 2200FCLK and the results where significantly worse. So went back to my current 6400 MT/s at 2133FCLK - Changed VSOC to 1.25v until I can find out how 1.27v is "too high".. Obviously if remains stable I'll keep it at 1.25v - no need to run higher than required..

Can you point me to documentation or anything that suggest 1.27v VSOC is "high / putting my CPU at risk of an early death"?

Perhaps what you are saying was true months ago, updates have been made more recently. I'm running SK Hynix A-Die.

As far as GDM I can't even locate it in the Asus BIOS put really not that concerned / probably wont effect much regardless.

Thanks for the response regardless.
ZenTimings_Screenshot.png
 
Last edited:
mrcardio33x said:
Sure about that? I thought VSOC above 1.30v was "high".. I'm at 1.27v.. I just changed it the BIOS to 1.25v - Hopefully it remains stable..

How is 6400MT/s "too high" for Zen 4 if I've been running it stable for a while now? Plus its giving me the best results.

Also, tried FCLK at 2033-2200 and 2133 gives best results.

Just tried 6200 MT/s at 2200FCLK and the results where significantly worse. So went back to my current 6400 MT/s at 2133FCLK - Changed VSOC to 1.25v until I can find out how 1.27v is "too high".. Obviously if remains stable I'll keep it at 1.25v - no need to run higher than required..

Can you point me to documentation or anything that suggest 1.27v VSOC is "high / putting my CPU at risk of an early death"?

Perhaps what you are saying was true months ago, updates have been made more recently. I'm running SK Hynix A-Die.

As far as GDM I can't even locate it in the Asus BIOS put really not that concerned / probably wont effect much regardless.

Thanks for the response regardless.View attachment 318705
Click to expand...
GDM is mem_buff on Asus.

Addr_cmd = buff is gdm off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top