• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

You can even get 8x8GB DDR3-2400 for a lot less than that.
 
Cheapest I have seen for an 8GB stick of 2400 DDR3 is $60. If I'm going to replace all 8x8GB sticks in use I don't want to cheap out on it. Then again a 980 TI would be a nice improvement over my old 660s.

PS
I probably would have upgraded a lot of this last year as planed, but my car won priority. Engine parts, swap parts, and machine work adds up fast. :D
 
Last edited:
A 980TI would be a huge step up from a pair of 660s. So yeah, probably do that first^^

( I was looking for 8x8gb DDR3-2400 kits and you can get G.SKILL RipjawsZ and Corsair Vengeance Pro for around 420 over here, and prices are still decreasing. )
 
<-------------------------New Build , just trying out some tighter timings,

looking good so far :)

cachemem88824.png


thats coming from my trusty q9550 / ip35e / 6Gb DDR2 system
and here it is...........

cachemem190.png
 
Last edited:
i am still tuning, slowly getting better results with this x99. Compared to others no so good... Faster clocks=slower. Some benches are better with less Hrz some with lesser timings...

aida5.50-erixx(4000cpu3000ram-10-2015.png
 
Your uncore ratio seems really low to me. A higher one would give you higher bandwith values.
 
RandomSadness said:
Your uncore ratio seems really low to me. A higher one would give you higher bandwith values.
Click to expand...
you mean the CPU multiplier of 40x ? Or the NB clock, which seems low to me too. Sorry. I am getting a little confused sometimes, everything has 2 or 3 namings depending if it is the manual, websites, Rog-Raja, etc...
 
erixx said:
you mean the CPU multiplier of 40x ? Or the NB clock, which seems low to me too. Sorry. I am getting a little confused sometimes, everything has 2 or 3 namings depending if it is the manual, websites, Rog-Raja, etc...
Click to expand...
North Bride Clock, yes. Did you manually lower it in BIOS? Are you running XMP? The default multiplier is 30x for my 5820k, yours should be near it. You could try 40x at 1.25v.
 
now i get it. yes there is a 24x value in "Min Cache Ratio" and "Max Cache Ratio" in UEFI. It was set that way on its own after selecting XMP. Restarting to try it now, but my Cache voltage is 0,8 v, I will try something lower than 1,25 V
 
I currently run my CPU matching core and uncore ratios. 36 (stock) at 0.955v (undervolted) for the CPU clock and 36 at 1.10v for CPU uncore.
 
Playing around with what I have, I wouldn't call it too shabby for not touching the bclk straps. I don't really want to spend the time figuring out why it won't take anymore, even at lower clocks. The 3820 keeps up pretty well, all things considered.
mem.JPG
 
cachemem.jpg

hi to all i just got registered ! can u help me ? i think i have low L2 scores and L3 . what do u think ? tried everything to raise them i seen those with the same cpu that got around 400gbS L2 Read scores . i tried everything and didnt got around that even raising the uncore from auto and Oc :/ can u help me ? i have 2x8 gb ripjaws X 2400mhz
 
Last edited:
(Edit: @AlwaysHope of course man! :)

I reinstalled my UEFI BIOS (when are we going to call it one way or the other?) and I am really (unexpectedly) enjoying tweaking again (bios 2001 mobo X99-S), I am just adding and adding to it...
My Kingston HyperX XMP profile for 2666 is 14-14-14, 2T (1,35 v), and now I am at 13-14-14-1T (1,38 v) .... having fun, but now I am getting a really improved (but not all values!...) test to show off:
cachemem3.png
 
Had to back off the OC on the CPU because of instabilities
 

Attachments

  • cachemem.jpg
    cachemem.jpg
    152.3 KB · Views: 646
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top