• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

Here is an small update of this patriot cl19 b-die kit.
 

Attachments

  • 3980 cl14 stable.JPG
    3980 cl14 stable.JPG
    452.4 KB · Views: 352
Already done :laugh: these A2s are no joke

It's really interesting to see how tRFC behaves in the presence of an iGPU. I can pass endless TM5 runs @ 133ns without moving VDIMM even an inch, but the GPU really doesn't like it. 130ns no POST. 133ns tests stable but crashes instantly opening a game. 135ns test stable, runs for a while until throwing a UNEXPECTED_KERNEL_MODE_TRAP. 138ns (290) works just fine though.

It was the same with the A0s, tRFC went all the way down to 140ns stable but only about 143-145ns was actually iGPU stable.

On the A0s I couldn't do tRRDL 4, tWTRL 8 or tWR 10 without needing more VDIMM, not yet sure if it's the same here. I'll probably play with tRTP next.

@FilipM that reminds me, the old GDM vs 2T debate seems to be rather interesting. 2T is *sometimes* faster in membench by half a second or so. But GDM consistently wins in AIDA read/write by about 500MB/s and copy by about 200MB/s. GDM might also be leading to better GPU performance, but I'll need to bench that.

View attachment 198959

If you have the time to do some cpu benchies and game runs, please share :D
 
If you have the time to do some cpu benchies and game runs, please share :D

Unfortunately it's going to be hard to bench Genshin until I can set up RTSS properly, but in the meantime Valley works well.

AIDA GDM vs 2T:

4200 gdm.png4200 2t.png

Membench GDM vs 2T:

4200 gdm membench edit.jpg4200 2t membench edit.jpg

Valley GDM vs 2T:

valley 4200 gdm (1).pngvalley 4200 2t.png

So yeah, mostly placebo in gaming :laugh: but definitely faster than the A0s at 4200 17-18-18:

valley stock cpu 2300 gpu (1).png
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately it's going to be hard to bench Genshin until I can set up RTSS properly, but in the meantime Valley works well.

AIDA GDM vs 2T:

View attachment 199077View attachment 199078

Membench GDM vs 2T:

View attachment 199138View attachment 199137

Valley GDM vs 2T:

View attachment 199081View attachment 199082

So yeah, mostly placebo in gaming :laugh: but definitely faster than the A0s at 4200 17-18-18:

View attachment 199083
If I remember correctly gdm makes tCL, tCWL, tWR and tRTP even values. If one of them is odd then 2T would probably give better performance.
 
That write speed i get is normal? This on an Asus X570 TUF
View attachment 200169
Yes, single chiplets like 5600X and 5800X get half speed vs 2 chiplets. Test dram calc to tweak your scores. 10ns lower latency with just ramtuning and a bit more speed should work :)
 
Sometimes tWR 10 and tRTP 5 works, that gave me a slight boost without requiring more voltage. tRRDL 6 and tWTRL 10 or 8 might work aswell :)

Unfortunately anything below 4/6/16 - 4/12/12 requires more VDIMM to stabilize, and it's looking like 0.02V or more at 4/4/16 - 4/8/10. :( 4/4/16 - 4/8/10, 4/6/16 - 4/8/10, 4/4/16 - 4/10/10, it's all the same: needs more VDIMM. It was a difference of like 300MB/s copy perf, no latency or membench improvement.

I know a lot of ppl run 4/4/16 - 4/8/10 and I remember BZ saying in a more recent video that the tighter timings shouldn't need extra voltage, but I suppose that's not the case.

My A0 B-die, 4Gb E-die and CJR also can't tighten past 4/6/16 - 4/12/12 without more voltage. Was hoping the better B-die could buck that trend somehow, but oh well.
 
Unfortunately anything below 4/6/16 - 4/12/12 requires more VDIMM to stabilize, and it's looking like 0.02V or more at 4/4/16 - 4/8/10. :( 4/4/16 - 4/8/10, 4/6/16 - 4/8/10, 4/4/16 - 4/10/10, it's all the same: needs more VDIMM. It was a difference of like 300MB/s copy perf, no latency or membench improvement.

I know a lot of ppl run 4/4/16 - 4/8/10 and I remember BZ saying in a more recent video that the tighter timings shouldn't need extra voltage, but I suppose that's not the case.

My A0 B-die, 4Gb E-die and CJR also can't tighten past 4/6/16 - 4/12/12 without more voltage. Was hoping the better B-die could buck that trend somehow, but oh well.
Okay, tried 12/6 or 10/5 tWR/tRTP? Those timings affect perf more.
 
Zentimings? Pbo? Safemode? :)
Whoops sorry!

No Pbo, no safe mode..

Next time I will post zentimings.. but really nothing special to see there..
 
patriot again with 11400..... ceers!

write >83000 is incorrect imho.... :)
 

Attachments

  • 4266.11.png
    4266.11.png
    86.4 KB · Views: 222
Last edited:
Nothing crazy.. just DOCP settings minus the mains..

docp.JPG


2T is still pretty quick :D
 
Micron E Die dual rank (32gb 3200mhz Ballistix Sport), subtimings seem to need to be pretty loose. Still getting WHEA errors at 2000mhz IF though, tried all kinds of voltages up to 1.2v SOC, no luck.

1900/3800 seems all good though at SOC 1.125v and can set 1T with GD disabled, still have some optimizing to do though.

4000-2000.PNG
3800-1900.PNG
 
Last edited:
Micron E Die dual rank (32gb 3200mhz Ballistix Sport), subtimings seem to need to be pretty loose. Still getting WHEA errors at 2000mhz IF though, tried all kinds of voltages up to 1.2v SOC, no luck.

1900/3800 seems all good though at SOC 1.125v and can set 1T with GD disabled, still have some optimizing to do though.

View attachment 201795View attachment 201793
I have done a lot of rev E tweaking on single rank that is. Post your zentimings and I can try to help you if you want? :)

Set tRAS to 32, tWR to 12 or 14, tFAW to 16 or 20 and try tRFC to 282 or 329. That should speed things up very much!
 
I have done a lot of rev E tweaking on single rank that is. Post your zentimings and I can try to help you if you want? :)
Sure, I did have to loosen some timings but I was able to tighten others. I can't seem to get much lower than 600 on tRFC, it won't even post most of the time at 554. 15 on tRDCWR and tRP was causing major stability problems, as did tRAS at 32. My board makes it a pain because I have to manually reset the bios every time it fails to post and lose all my settings, it will recover maybe 1 out of 10 times.

3800-19001.PNG
 
Sure, I did have to loosen some timings but I was able to tighten others. I can't seem to get much lower than 600 on tRFC, it won't even post most of the time at 554. 15 on tRDCWR and tRP was causing major stability problems, as did tRAS at 32. My board makes it a pain because I have to manually reset the bios every time it fails to post and lose all my settings, it will recover maybe 1 out of 10 times.

View attachment 201887
Okay. Safe suggestions: Try tRAS 34 (tCL+tRCDRD) and tRFC 580 or 590, tRRDS 5, tRRDL 7, tFAW 20, tWR 12, tRTP 8 or 6, tWTRS 4, tWTRL 12.

Fast: tRFC 570 or 560, tRRDS 4, tRRDL 6, tFAW 16, tWR 10, tRTP 5, tWTRS 4, tWTRL 8 or 10.

What ram voltage are you running? If 1.45V or above I would consider tRCDRD 20, then you can often lower tRP by 1 or 2.
 
Okay. Safe suggestions: Try tRAS 34 (tCL+tRCDRD) and tRFC 580 or 590, tRRDS 5, tRRDL 7, tFAW 20, tWR 12, tRTP 8 or 6, tWTRS 4, tWTRL 12.

Fast: tRFC 570 or 560, tRRDS 4, tRRDL 6, tFAW 16, tWR 10, tRTP 5, tWTRS 4, tWTRL 8 or 10.

What ram voltage are you running? If 1.45V or above I would consider tRCDRD 20, then you can often lower tRP by 1 or 2.
Thanks, that will give me some more values to try. Currently at 1.4v on the ram.

I did try tRFC of 590 and was getting errors after 10-20min of testing, similar issues with tFAW at 24, so I just bumped it up to 36.
I ended up enabling GDM which changed tCL to 16, just wasn't stable at 1t. Lowering those may have opened up some headroom for the other timings though, so I may be able to revisit those.

With those changes it does seem to be a much more stable, been testing for about 12h so far.
 
Back
Top