Super Pi 1m scores

[giorgos th.]

ONLY with 1.5 XS AND checksum.

1. alpha0ne: 12.704 (Intel E6600 @ 3990.5)
2. IluvIntel: 13.594 (Intel E6600 @ 3752)
3. gR3iF: 14.328 (Intel E6600)
4. mikelopez: 17.141 (Intel E6300 @ 3.36)
5. Lt_JWS: 17.250 (Intel E6400 @ 3.32)
6. trog100: 26.547 (A64 4000+ @ 3.27)
7. mandelore: 26.937 (A64 4000+ @ 3093)
8. Wolverine: 27.171 (A64 3700+ @ 3.0)
9. giorgos th.: 27.562 (A64 3700+ @ 3065)
10. tigger69: 30.031 (Pd 930 @ 4.4)
11. Alec$taar: 31.390 (A64 X2 4800+ @ 2840)
12. Ketxxx: 31.984 (A64 3200+ @ 2.65)
13. pt: 32.094 (A64 3000+ @ 2.6)
14. cdawall: 39.484 (A64 3000+ @ 2.48)

 

[trog100]

it dont matter a great deal but my sandy is a 4000+.. same core just a later production run chip.. and half the price.. he he he

my eight month old 3700 sandy never quite managed the 3 gig mark at 1.5 volts.. the newer 4000+ makes 3 gig at its default 1.35 core voltage.. it makes 3.3 with a little more voltage..

but looking at the intel scores it all becomes a mute point.. as a performance chip the amd 64 is dead..

the king is dead.. long live the king.. he he he

trog

 

[_33]

I think I'm gonna sell my rig and get a ASUS P5NSLI and an E6300 and overclock it to hell . Why the hell spend 300$ on an Opteron 165......... OMFG!!! Tell me I'm an idiot.

 

[trog100]

firstly the intel scores exagerate real life gains..

read this for a bit of consolation..

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTEwOCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

but to be honest i dont think spending big money on a faster cpu/system is a good idea at the moment.. if u want to improve gaming performance and have some money to spend.. spend it on a ffaster grfx card..

trog

 

[_33]

firstly the intel scores exagerate real life gains..

read this for a bit of consolation..

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTEwOCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

but to be honest i dont think spending big money on a faster cpu/system is a good idea at the moment.. if u want to improve gaming performance and have some money to spend.. spend it on a ffaster grfx card..

trog

100% agreed on the GFX part. But isn't the Conroe a chip that gives a decent increase on games framerates already from the getgo? I read a lot of benches where the Conroe system usually gives a solid 10 to 20 FPS extra over the FX60 for example.

 

[Lt_JWS]

Real world gaming isn't much better but it is alittle over my 3800X2 @ 2.8 If you've got a nice PC there's no need to upgrade.. unless your a score whore like me lol

 

[Boneface]

new one with new sys is 33.141s

 

[mandelore]

hay boneface (hell that sounds like an insult! ) download and try it using the 1.5 version of super pi

Mand

 

[b1lk1]

How about a dual PI score running it with both cores at the same time.

Opteron 165 @ 2.8GHz 9X311:

 

[gR3iF]

 

[gR3iF]

 

[mandelore]

How about a dual PI score running it with both cores at the same time.

I was thinking the exact same thing, since 2 cores v 1 just aint a level playing field AMD needs the glory here hahaha

 

[trog100]

got a slightly better amd 64 one.. he he

switched all my taskbar bits and bobs off and tweaked the cpu to 3.27 gig.. kept getting errors at 3.3.. my crappy memory is at its limit i think..

trog

 

[alpha0ne]

Here is my superPi_1.5 1Mb run:

Hey Rodney will you lend me your Corsair 8000UL's please, I promice I'll look after them

 

[giorgos th.]

ONLY with 1.5 XS AND checksum.

1. alpha0ne: 12.704 (Intel E6600 @ 3990.5)
2. IluvIntel: 13.594 (Intel E6600 @ 3752)
3. gR3iF: 14.328 (Intel E6600 stock)
4. mikelopez: 17.141 (Intel E6300 @ 3.36)
5. Lt_JWS: 17.250 (Intel E6400 @ 3.32)
6. largon: 17.905 (Intel E6400 @ 3392)
7. trog100: 26.547 (A64 4000+ @ 3.27)
8. mandelore: 26.937 (A64 4000+ @ 3093)
9. Wolverine: 27.171 (A64 3700+ @ 3.0)
10. giorgos th.: 27.562 (A64 3700+ @ 3065)
11. tigger69: 29.937 (Intel Pd 930 @ 4.431)
12. Alec$taar: 31.390 (A64 X2 4800+ @ 2840)
13. Ketxxx: 31.984 (A64 3200+ @ 2.65)
14. pt: 32.094 (A64 3000+ @ 2.6)
15. cdawall: 39.484 (A64 3000+ @ 2.48)

 

[_33]

I would be extremely surprized if an E6300 would do 1M in 12 seconds.

 

[SeeK]

Gah, I got something like 28 secs. That was when the CPU almost died from overclocking and the memories had read/write errors all the time. You don't even want to hear my non-clocked time.

If only I'd win a few mil on a lottery... Core 2 Duo and Gemini GPU. And a MacBook Pro or maybe even a Mac Pro to play with.

 

[largon]

17.905s

w/ crappola 1x512MB DDR848 4-4-4-12.

 

[Ripper]

This is my score on super PI

http://store3.data.bg/djcd/Bench/Bench4.1G.JPG

prescott 478 2.4Ghz FSB533 1MB cache
AIR COOLING TT silent tower 2x92mm NMB

 

[giorgos th.]

welcome Ripper.
where is it?

 

[alpha0ne]

I would be extremely surprized if an E6300 would do 1M in 12 seconds.

With the right DDR2 using 4GB of ram and sub zero it should doable

The best time I have got is only 12.640s @ 4072MHz as my ram is really holding me back (maybe just a crap batch ) but with 4GB of the best available PC1000 mid 10s times would be easy, all I need is to win lotto so I can buy some

 

[gR3iF]

or ask coolaler if he lends you his stuff for two days^^

 

[alpha0ne]

or ask coolaler if he lends you his stuff for two days^^

All I want is his DDR2

 

[Deleted member 24505]

got a slightly faster score=

 

[ssgwright]