• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Super Pi 1m scores

Status
Not open for further replies.
so far we have the fastest overclocked amd score taking nearly twice as long as the fastest overclocked intel score..

we are talking nearly a 100% performance gain for the intel..

trog
 
jep or not?^^ i dont know i think my c2d is very fast (i had a 3200+@2.6gig before)

and now everything is running very fast^^
but sometimes it feels nor right to support intel ^^
 
so far we have the fastest overclocked amd score taking nearly twice as long as the fastest overclocked intel score..

we are talking nearly a 100% performance gain for the intel..

trog

It does not relate to most real world apps though, the Conroe does so well in super pi mainly due to the shared 4MB L2 cache ;)
 
ONLY with 1.5 XS AND checksum.

1. alpha0ne: 12.640 (Intel E6600 @ 4072)
2. IluvIntel: 13.594 (Intel E6600 @ 3752)
3. ssgwright: 13.953 (Intel E6700 @ 3650)
4. gR3iF: 14.328 (Intel E6600 stock)
5. mikelopez: 17.141 (Intel E6300 @ 3.36)
6. Lt_JWS: 17.250 (Intel E6400 @ 3.32)
7. largon: 17.905 (Intel E6400 @ 3392)
8. trog100: 26.547 (A64 4000+ @ 3.27)
9. mandelore: 26.937 (A64 4000+ @ 3093)
10. Wolverine: 27.171 (A64 3700+ @ 3.0)
11. giorgos th.: 27.562 (A64 3700+ @ 3065)
12. tigger69: 29.937 (Intel Pd 930 @ 4.431)
13. Alec$taar: 31.390 (A64 X2 4800+ @ 2840)
14. Ketxxx: 31.984 (A64 3200+ @ 2.65)
15. pt: 32.094 (A64 3000+ @ 2.6)
16. cdawall: 39.484 (A64 3000+ @ 2.48)
 
Last edited:
my 930 has 2mbx2 lvl 2 as well.could that be why it has done quite well in some of these tests?.
 
I did this one with the ram divider set @ 2:1 so ram is really holding me back ATM :(

1M 12.640s (Intel E6600 @ 4072MHz)


1M4072.jpg
 
"It does not relate to most real world apps though"


thankfully else i might feel the need to go out and buy one.. he he he

still impressive thow.. and the ridiculous overclocks..

trog
 
65nm my friend....
 
still trying to break 40s with my 2800+ 2.19Ghz
 
There are some pretty kick ass AMD configs in the charts! I guess even in the AMD league I am pretty behind :p . Posting my score is useless ATM (30.xxx secs in 1M).
 
its two differnt leagues thow aint it.. an amd league and an intel one.. he he

i think cache size does make a difference in super pi.. ran it on my winchester at 2.4 gig 512 cache.. the performance drop off was more than the mhz drop suggested it should be..

trog

ps.. gonna run it on my laptop.. P-M at 1.73 gig i think.. just out of curiosity..

44 seconds for the 1.73 mhz centrino laptop.. the winnie at 2.4 was about 37 seconds
 
Last edited:
the super pi with an amd cpu seems to come down to mosly pure cpu speed.. the 1 meg caches chips seem to do a little better than the 512 ones at a given mhz..

memory speed/timings dosnt seem to make a deal of difference..

trog
 
the super pi with an amd cpu seems to come down to mosly pure cpu speed.. the 1 meg caches chips seem to do a little better than the 512 ones at a given mhz..

memory speed/timings dosnt seem to make a deal of difference..

trog

the only reason i broke 40s is cause of timings on my ram got it down to 2.5-2-2-5 and it dropped almost 2s @ the same speed you can look at it one way but timings were the only way to break 40s w/ ddr266
 
"you wont i only get 39s w/ mine @ 2.48ghz"

"the only reason i broke 40s is cause of timings on my ram got it down to 2.5-2-2-5 and it dropped almost 2s @ the same speed you can look at it one way but timings were the only way to break 40s w/ ddr266"



my winnie at 2.4 gig gets 37 seconds at 429mhz.. timings cas 3.. way slower memory timings and way slower cpu speed..


odd but a possible explanation.. if u slow the memory speed down enough the timings play a bigger part.. they dont seem to make much dfference with my system..

my sandy has the best amd super pi score buts it only running cas three timing and cheapo ddr 400 ram at about 430mhz .. others might well be running expensive fast memory but i aint..

trog

ps.. just ran a few tests at cas 3 and cas 2.5 slightly less than half a second difference on my system tween the two with memory speeds around the 420mhz mark..
 
Last edited:
"you wont i only get 39s w/ mine @ 2.48ghz"

"the only reason i broke 40s is cause of timings on my ram got it down to 2.5-2-2-5 and it dropped almost 2s @ the same speed you can look at it one way but timings were the only way to break 40s w/ ddr266"



my winnie at 2.4 gig gets 37 seconds at 429mhz.. timings cas 3.. way slower memory timings and way slower cpu speed..


odd but a possible explanation.. if u slow the memory speed down enough the timings play a bigger part.. they dont seem to make much dfference with my system..

my sandy has the best amd super pi score buts it only running cas three timing and cheapo ddr 400 ram at about 430mhz .. others might well be running expensive fast memory but i aint..

trog

ps.. just ran a few tests at cas 3 and cas 2.5 slightly less than half a second difference on my system tween the two with memory speeds around the 420mhz mark..

maybe its just cause of my ddr266 and s754 setup that it makes such a huge diff
 
i think it must be.. the very much slower ram speeds must be bottlenecking the cpu slightly so any gain of any kind will help..

up round the 400 mark it dosnt seem to be so any gain dosnt help much..

trog

ps.. its interesting your much slower than normal ram speeds gets the score u get.. it does kinda back up the general statement that memory speeds dont make much difference with the amd chip.. down where u are they clearly make some difference.. but not much..
 
Last edited:
i think it must be.. the very much slower ram speeds must be bottlenecking the cpu slightly so any gain of any kind will help..

up round the 400 mark it dosnt seem to be so any gain dosnt help much..

trog

ps.. its interesting your much slower than normal ram speeds gets the score u get.. it does kinda back up the general statement that memory speeds dont make much difference with the amd chip.. down where u are they clearly make some difference.. but not much..

well im running the ram @ ddr333 to get that score so its not really all that much of a drop compared to most of you but yeah ddr400 makes a world of diff i could prob get a 36s super pi w/ the timings i set
 
well heres my new score...i couldnt find v1.5 and its at 2.75gigs and ddr400
 

Attachments

  • superpi.JPG
    superpi.JPG
    146 KB · Views: 504
16.282s @ prime stable freq
::
Core 2 Duo E6400 @ 3600 MHz 1.5V
Gigabyte GA-965P-DS4
2x1GB TeamGroup DDR667 @ 900 4-4-4-10
Watercooled CPU, VPU & MCH
 
ONLY with 1.5 XS AND checksum.

1. alpha0ne: 12.640 (Intel E6600 @ 4072)
2. IluvIntel: 13.594 (Intel E6600 @ 3752)
3. ssgwright: 13.953 (Intel E6700 @ 3650)
4. gR3iF: 14.328 (Intel E6600 stock)
5. largon: 16.282 (Intel E6400 @ 3.6)
6. mikelopez: 17.141 (Intel E6300 @ 3.36)
7. Lt_JWS: 17.250 (Intel E6400 @ 3.32)
8. trog100: 26.547 (A64 4000+ @ 3.27)
9. mandelore: 26.937 (A64 4000+ @ 3093)
10. Wolverine: 27.171 (A64 3700+ @ 3.0)
11. giorgos th.: 27.562 (A64 3700+ @ 3065)
12. tigger69: 29.937 (Intel Pd 930 @ 4.431)
13. Alec$taar: 31.390 (A64 X2 4800+ @ 2840)
14. Ketxxx: 31.984 (A64 3200+ @ 2.65)
15. pt: 32.094 (A64 3000+ @ 2.6)
16. cdawall: 39.484 (A64 3000+ @ 2.48)
 
Last edited:
Capture001.jpg

just for you

its stock 2,4 gig
 
just got dumped by gf and am pissed off who wants me to go for broke 3ghz on stock cooling neone :) im done w/ last place your ass is mine pt

edit well shit thats gay stupid sotck hsf grrrr. maybe better luck w/ scm2 though i hit 2.55ghz hehehe ;) needed to get ss of that
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top