Super Pi 1m scores

[SirKeldon]

nflesher, it's not that you, that's an incredible result, 1 second better than my 6400+ B.E at 3,57Ghz with memory at 1190Mhz ... intel's ALU it's just incredible, it should be renamed to "numbers? they're just the breakfast! where's my dinner?"

 

[nflesher87]

nflesher, it's not that you, that's an incredible result, 1 second better than my 6400+ B.E at 3,57Ghz with memory at 1190Mhz ... intel's ALU it's just incredible, it should be renamed to "numbers? they're just the breakfast! where's my dinner?"

for some reason it seems that the mobile architecture is more efficient at superpi calculations than desktops core 2's clock for clock, how strange! especially since they're much lower wattage!

 

[trt740]

for some reason it seems that the mobile architecture is more efficient at superpi calculations than desktops core 2's clock for clock, how strange! especially since they're much lower wattage!

did you sell your E2200

 

[Wetbehindtheears]

Here's my effort @ stock speed

 

[nflesher87]

did you sell your E2200

not yet, someone at [H] offered $70 shipped for it though

it was just too painful going from a Q6600 G0 all the way down to the E2200

 

[nflesher87]

Here's my effort @ stock speed

what speed was that at? you should be able to get a lot lower

 

[SirKeldon]

for some reason it seems that the mobile architecture is more efficient at superpi calculations than desktops core 2's clock for clock, how strange! especially since they're much lower wattage!

Umm interesting, i'll give a try on my C2D T7100 @ 1,80Ghz (Asus F3Sc Laptop) and see what happens, if also beats my AMD64 X2 6400+ B.E. clocked with 50% less speed on CPU and RAM ... i'll get stuck.

 

[JrRacinFan]

what speed was that at? you should be able to get a lot lower

I am pretty sure an e8400 stock is 2.6Ghz. Don't quote me on that though.

@SirKeldon

In a way, that would really suck.

 

[SirKeldon]

So better not to try it JrRacinFan before i start crying anyway, it will be just that, the demonstration of the Intel's ALU, but well, ALU it's just not all the CPU and neither all the rig, of course the performance on my desktop is three times better than laptop in almost everything, but i'll get stuck of that high speed on SuperPi calculation since as nflesher says, mobile cpu's are meant to be power-efficients and not performance-crunchers.

 

[Wetbehindtheears]

what speed was that at? you should be able to get a lot lower

I was just killing time before fit did his sweepstake - everything stock on air @ moment (3 ghz) i'm waiting for fits maximus then i'll start playing with things. I did have it up to 4ghz just to piss my bro off when i first got it but was a bit unsure of true temps so backed off!! I'm sure it'll go a lot lower than that

 

[nflesher87]

I was just killing time before fit did his sweepstake - everything stock on air @ moment (3 ghz) i'm waiting for fits maximus then i'll start playing with things. I did have it up to 4ghz just to piss my bro off when i first got it but was a bit unsure of true temps so backed off!! I'm sure it'll go a lot lower than that

haha alright well in that case not bad at all

 

[boshuter]

My bad....... seems the checksum validation isn't working at this time.

 

[boshuter]

Can I play too

This time on the 8400 is not good, ram timings were extremely loose and I was just running one pi run after another to test the cpu, no tweaks, all services running, etc. I just wanted to show the difference in this 8400 on stock air to a run with my E6700 on dice and fully tweaked. I'll get back with dice results on the E8400 very soon.

E8400, loose ram, no tweaks, stock air...

E6700 @ 4.7ghz, good ram timings, fairly well tweaked, Mousepot with dice.

 

[JrRacinFan]

That's just wrong boshuter! Just plain out wrong! What motherboard you running those on?

 

[boshuter]

That's just wrong boshuter! Just plain out wrong! What motherboard you running those on?

LOL... the 8400 is in a P5K vanilla, completely stock in that run. It has all mods now and insulated for dice, I'm hoping to be able to do that this weekend. I'm having problems getting over 550-560fsb with this setup though, not sure if it's the board or the cpu. I should know when I put the tube on it and get it cold, if it's the board (or seems to be), I'll stick it in a 965 chipset board and try again.... if it seems it's the cpu... well, at least it's a killer for air/water.

The 6700 was in a P5B.

 

[JrRacinFan]

On the P5k sounds like board limited. Nice run with the P5B!!!

 

[trt740]

On the P5k sounds like board limited. Nice run with the P5B!!!

The P5K is considered one of the best overclocking P35 boards made mine has 8 phase power and will do 550FSB with a E8400 and with my old X3210 65nm Quad 500 mghz FSB

 

[boshuter]

The P5K is considered one of the best overclocking P35 boards made mine has 8 phase power and will do 550FSB with a E8400 and with my old X3210 65nm Quad 500 mghz FSB

I agree, the P5K is a great board, but 550fsb is not enough with an 8400, that won't even get 5ghz. The Wolfdales seem to be doing much better on the 965 boards, if getting it cold won't fix my 550-560fsb limit I'll try it on 965 and see what happens.

 

[JrRacinFan]

What I meant TRT is that the e8400 sounds like it can be pushed more than what the board can. I never intended it to sound like the P5K isn't a good clocker.

 

[trt740]

I agree, the P5K is a great board, but 550fsb is not enough with an 8400, that won't even get 5ghz. The Wolfdales seem to be doing much better on the 965 boards, if getting it cold won't fix my 550-560fsb limit I'll try it on 965 and see what happens.

My god a maximus X38/x48 or a 780i board won't even come close to 550FSB it is funny your going backwards to get a older chipset lol.

 

[boshuter]

My god a maximus X38/x48 or a 780i board won't even come close to 550FSB it is funny your going backwards to get a older chipset lol.

I agree, but there is no getting around the fact that the 965 chipset and Wolfdale is the combo to have. I have been seeing some 550fsb numbers on X38/X48 lately, but they are rare. Most good P5K boards should do 600fsb easily, thats why I'm not sure if it's the board or my cpu that is blocking me. I'm hitting a brick wall right at 550-560 at any multi. Putting the cpu on dice should tell me if it's the cpu or the board, unless the cpu just has a fsb limit??? I"ve never ran into that before, but I've never had to run this much fsb before either.....lol

 

[allen337]

Notice the B3 stepping

12.343 ~~ http://img169.imageshack.us/my.php?image=p1trpum5.png .

 

[nflesher87]

Notice the B3 stepping

12.343 ~~ http://img169.imageshack.us/my.php?image=p1trpum5.png .

not bad, how many volts is it requiring to run at 4.2?

 

[allen337]

not bad, how many volts is it requiring to run at 4.2?

Had it @ 1.7 and 1.75 but 1.7 was stable read 1.66?. Memory is holding me back right now cant find the right combination.

 

[pagalms]

My best result so far:
27,766