• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Swiftech Withdraws H220 CPU Liquid Cooling Kit from US Market

Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
1,961 (0.41/day)
Likes
954
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.85GHz
Motherboard Asus Prime X370-Pro
Cooling Corsair H110i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200
Video Card(s) Galax GeForce GTX 1080 EXOC-SNPR
Storage 512GB Plextor M8PeG NVMe, 500GB Crucial MX200
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Roccat ISKU
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/j1yypa
#26
Asetek are danish, not american, just saying...
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
3,630 (1.09/day)
Likes
938
Location
Vietnam
System Name Gaming System / Laptop / HTPC
Processor i5 8600K @4.6Ghz / i5 540m / i7 970
Motherboard Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / Acer / Shuttle sx58j3
Cooling CM Seidon 120 XL / Laptop Cooling / SE-903
Memory T Group Nighthawk (3000 MHz)/ 4GB DDR3 / 12gb DDR3
Video Card(s) Colorful 1080Ti / G210m / 7870XT
Storage 750G MX300 + 3TB HDDs / 250G Ultra II /250G 850 EVO
Display(s) Dell U2515H + Asus VX239H/ 15.6" Laptop Screen / 720p 42" Plasma TV
Case Cooler master HAF 922 / Laptop Case / Corsair Air 240
Audio Device(s) On Board Realtek
Power Supply Andyson N700 Titanium / Laptop Power / ACBell 700 W
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CM Quickfire XT (Cherry MX Reds)
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Firestrike = xxxxx Timespy = 9097 Heaven = xxxx
#27
The claim Asetek is making has nothing to do with the idea of AIO liquid cooling, their claims are based on the idea of combining the pump and waterblock into one unit. As far as I've seen they were the first to demonstrate and begin the process to patent this idea way back in 2003.

And Asetek has been producing AIO liquid coolers for OEMs since at least 2005. The HP Blackbird was the first real consumer level product to see an AIO unit from Asetek, and it came out in 2007, but they had been doing AOI units for workstation and server class computers for a least 2 years before that.
Ahh, I apologize then. I didn't know Astek had done it first.
however, the patents are for the AIO system. Including radiator, pump and waterblock.

The 2 patents they are using (in one of the lawsuits) are these:

The two patents are intrinsically related: the latter was filed back in 2010, while the former revised the design of the system to better reflect the state of the art when it was filed in 2011. Both include reference to the use of a liquid-cooling system connected to a pump and radiator, designed to be fully integrated into a single maintenance-free design - and if you think that sounds a little broad, you might be right given that the patents encompass 'different embodiments of the heat exchanging system as well as means for establishing and controlling a flow of cooling liquid.'

- from the link you provided. It seems like they give out patents for anything nowadays. People have been combining pumps, waterblocks and radiators for years. I remember when I was 16 or so and people were pulling radiators from mini's (the car) to use in their computers.
 
Joined
Sep 4, 2005
Messages
657 (0.15/day)
Likes
77
#28
this ladies and gentlemen is how sad/small the US DIY market is, that is a company is even threatened with patent infringement, they would rather save the litigation money and pull the product lol.
 

tigger

I'm the only one
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
10,476 (2.44/day)
Likes
1,673
System Name Black to the Core MKIV
Processor Intel I7 6700k
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming socket 1151
Cooling NZXT Kraken X61 280mm radiator
Memory 2x8gb Corsair vengeance LPX 2400 DDR4
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon R9 290 4gb ddr5
Storage Patriot Blast 120gb ssd Boot and WD10EADX-22TDHB0 1TB Data
Display(s) Dell 2408WFP 24" 1920x1200
Case Nzxt IS 340
Audio Device(s) Asus xonar dsx pci-e
Power Supply Corsair CX750
Mouse Logitech G502
Software Win 10 Pro x64
#29
The claim Asetek is making has nothing to do with the idea of AIO liquid cooling, their claims are based on the idea of combining the pump and waterblock into one unit. As far as I've seen they were the first to demonstrate and begin the process to patent this idea way back in 2003.

And Asetek has been producing AIO liquid coolers for OEMs since at least 2005. The HP Blackbird was the first real consumer level product to see an AIO unit from Asetek, and it came out in 2007, but they had been doing AOI units for workstation and server class computers for a least 2 years before that.
My CM aquagate R80 is from 2005.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,278 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,368
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#30
Asetek may be completely in the right under current law, but one could question if the laws might need revision. I don't know enough to say if Asetek is abusing the patent laws but other companies have. It could be even that the real patent trolls are so prevalent that any company using the patent laws seems like a patent troll whether or not they are.
I agree, companies like Rambus abuse the shit out of the law. In this case Asetek is in the right. They aren't trying to use some vague patent that doesn't really apply to the actual product to sue companies for money. They also aren't suing over products that they never intend to product.

Patent Trolls, Patent Trolls, we are Patent Trolls... Negotiation is irrelevant, you will be Trolled. Resistance is futile. :D

In truth Swiftech kit is quite OK, but CM Eisberg Prestige trounces everything from Asetek. Asetek are simply pissed off at the competition. Euphemism "patent infringement" is just smoke screen.

Thinking at the Asetek HQ is: sales dropping we should troll somebody for lost 'profits'.
Actually, up until this point Asetek really couldn't sue anyone. Because the patents took so long to be approved they had no real way to enforce them, they had to wait for the patent to be approved.

Now that the patents are approved they can start going after the people infringing on them.

Generally a patent troll pulls up some old patent that doesn't apply to anything they currently produce. Asetek isn't being a patent troll here, not everyone that sues for patent infringement is being a patent troll. Asetek is genuinely protecting its ideas and products, and they aren't suing for money like a patent troll does.

Ahh, I apologize then. I didn't know Astek had done it first.
however, the patents are for the AIO system. Including radiator, pump and waterblock.

The 2 patents they are using (in one of the lawsuits) are these:

The two patents are intrinsically related: the latter was filed back in 2010, while the former revised the design of the system to better reflect the state of the art when it was filed in 2011. Both include reference to the use of a liquid-cooling system connected to a pump and radiator, designed to be fully integrated into a single maintenance-free design - and if you think that sounds a little broad, you might be right given that the patents encompass 'different embodiments of the heat exchanging system as well as means for establishing and controlling a flow of cooling liquid.'

- from the link you provided. It seems like they give out patents for anything nowadays. People have been combining pumps, waterblocks and radiators for years. I remember when I was 16 or so and people were pulling radiators from mini's (the car) to use in their computers.
Yes, but the part they are contesting is the pump/block combo. This isn't an argument over AIO coolers, it is entirely based on the idea of combining the pump/block into one unit, which Asetek patented back 2003. Patents cover all the new ideas presented in them, and as far as I can tell no one was even thinking about combining the pump and block before 2003/4 when Asetek filed these patents.

My CM aquagate R80 is from 2005.
Your point?
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
84 (0.05/day)
Likes
10
#31
These days, patents mostly seem to be used to obstruct innovation. We'd probably be better off getting rid of them entirely. There is no reason to think that the lack of a 2-decade monopoly will stop individuals or companies from innovating new designs.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,230 (1.48/day)
Likes
661
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
#32
nice, i seek too many times about h220 in god price, always $150 and above with low availability
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
3,630 (1.09/day)
Likes
938
Location
Vietnam
System Name Gaming System / Laptop / HTPC
Processor i5 8600K @4.6Ghz / i5 540m / i7 970
Motherboard Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / Acer / Shuttle sx58j3
Cooling CM Seidon 120 XL / Laptop Cooling / SE-903
Memory T Group Nighthawk (3000 MHz)/ 4GB DDR3 / 12gb DDR3
Video Card(s) Colorful 1080Ti / G210m / 7870XT
Storage 750G MX300 + 3TB HDDs / 250G Ultra II /250G 850 EVO
Display(s) Dell U2515H + Asus VX239H/ 15.6" Laptop Screen / 720p 42" Plasma TV
Case Cooler master HAF 922 / Laptop Case / Corsair Air 240
Audio Device(s) On Board Realtek
Power Supply Andyson N700 Titanium / Laptop Power / ACBell 700 W
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CM Quickfire XT (Cherry MX Reds)
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Firestrike = xxxxx Timespy = 9097 Heaven = xxxx
#33
Their original patent was filed May 6th 2005. The patent in question is an continuation on the patent filed Jan 1st 2009. I see nothing about 2003. If CM released a product in 2005, you can bet your ass it was in development since at least 2004.

I can't find the original patent. But, I'd be very interested to see it.

Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20120061058.pdf (pdf)

Edit - Found it

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2006119761A1?cl=en

http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week34/OG/html/1381-3/US08245764-20120821.html

It's quite a lot of reading and I'm going to bed, so i'll take a look later. However, it seems they patented every possible type of heatsink. I'm not sure if it mentions a pump + waterblock in a single unit until the latest patent.

From a very quick read through. I think you are wrong. The pump + waterblock component of the patent only seems to have been added this past year (2012). I need to read it in full to check nothing is mentioned in the earlier patent though, but logic is; if it is mentioned in a prior patent, why would they request a continuation?

I can;t believe that it is in their 2005 filing.
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,278 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,368
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#34
Their original patent was filed May 6th 2005. The patent in question is an continuation on the patent filed Jan 1st 2009. I see nothing about 2003. If CM released a product in 2005, you can bet your ass it was in development since at least 2004.

I can't find the original patent. But, I'd be very interested to see it.

Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20120061058.pdf (pdf)

Edit - Found it

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2006119761A1?cl=en

http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week34/OG/html/1381-3/US08245764-20120821.html

It's quite a lot of reading and I'm going to bed, so i'll take a look later. However, it seems they patented every possible type of heatsink. I'm not sure if it mentions a pump + waterblock in a single unit until the latest patent.

From a very quick read through. I think you are wrong. The pump + waterblock component of the patent only seems to have been added this past year (2012). I need to read it in full to check nothing is mentioned in the earlier patent though, but logic is; if it is mentioned in a prior patent, why would they request a continuation?

I can;t believe that it is in their 2005 filing.
The pump block combo's original drawing uses Socket 478 mounting, its been in there for a while...

Edit: This is the original patent filed in 2004. It clearly has the pump/block combo in it.

http://www.google.com/patents/EP1923771A1
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
509 (0.22/day)
Likes
165
System Name NZXT 980 Z
Processor 3570K
Motherboard AsRock Z77 O/C Formula
Cooling Custom Liquid
Memory 2133MHz Mushkin Blackline 64g
Video Card(s) 2 X Asus GTX 670 full cover EK blocks
Storage 240 mushkin 2x120 samsungs
Display(s) Asus "24 144Hz
Case Switch 810
Audio Device(s) creative
Power Supply Seasonic platinum
Software w7 steam futuremark
#35

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
26,559 (6.38/day)
Likes
7,461
Location
Houston
System Name Team Blue
Processor 5960X@4.8 1.42v
Motherboard Asus X99M-WS
Cooling EK Supremecy EVO, MCR220-Stack+MCR220+MCR320, D5-PWM+EK X-RES 140
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill Trident Z 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's+ EVGA reference 1080Ti soon to be under water
Storage Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB
Display(s) Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz
Case Caselabs Mercury S5
Audio Device(s) Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200w
Mouse Thermaltake Theron
Keyboard Thermaltake Poseidon ZX
Software W10P
Benchmark Scores Zoom zoom mofo
#36
i take it this does not involve the apogee II???
That's what I was trying to figure out in the previous thread. The apogee drive and apogee drive II both appear to violate the patents...
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,278 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,368
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#37
i take it this does not involve the apogee II???
That's what I was trying to figure out in the previous thread. The apogee drive and apogee drive II both appear to violate the patents...
See that is what differentiates a patent troll from a company legitimately defending its patents. The Apogee Drive doesn't compete with any Asetek products. It is really in a different market segment from Asetek products. Asetek products are for people that don't want a custom water loop, that just want a sealed no hassle AIO liquid cooler. The Apogee Drive II is for people that do want custom liquid cooling, they are different market segments. The courts have demonstrated that they will not allow a company that has no products, and no plans to release products in a market segment, to enforce patents in that market segment. If Asetek was really a patent troll they could go after the Apogee Drive, but they obviously aren't. They are only going after products that infringe on their patents in market segments they are actually in.
 

sneekypeet

Unpaid Babysitter
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
24,628 (5.77/day)
Likes
9,355
System Name His
Processor Intel i7 5930K
Motherboard Asus Maximus V Extreme
Cooling Thermalright True Spirit 140 BW Rev.A
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum ROG
Video Card(s) nVidia GTX 1080 SLI with EVGA Hybrid coolers.
Storage Samsung 960 Pro / Crucial MX300 750GB / Seagate 1TB Spinner
Display(s) Sony 43" 4K 60hz
Case SilverStone Temjin TJ11
Audio Device(s) Realtek on board > Sony receiver > Cerwin Vega's
Power Supply Thermaltake TPSG 1050W
Mouse Always Changing
Keyboard Always Changing
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
#38
See that is what differentiates a patent troll from a company legitimately defending its patents. The Apogee Drive doesn't compete with any Asetek products. It is really in a different market segment from Asetek products. Asetek products are for people that don't want a custom water loop, that just want a sealed no hassle AIO liquid cooler. The Apogee Drive II is for people that do want custom liquid cooling, they are different market segments. The courts have demonstrated that they will not allow a company that has no products, and no plans to release products in a market segment, to enforce patents in that market segment. If Asetek was really a patent troll they could go after the Apogee Drive, but they obviously aren't. They are only going after products that infringe on their patents in market segments they are actually in.
well said!:rockout:
 

erocker

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
42,380 (10.17/day)
Likes
18,023
Processor Intel i7 8700k
Motherboard Gigabyte z370 AORUS Gaming 7
Cooling Water
Memory 16gb G.Skill 4000 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 1080
Storage 3 x Samsung Evo 850 500GB, 1 x 250GB, 2 x 2TB HDD
Display(s) Nixeus EDG27
Case Thermaltake X5
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Zowie EC1-B
Software Windows 10
#39
So... Couldn't they just sell the drive, rad and tubes, with a little bottle of coolant in one nice little package... just not put together?
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
5,626 (2.38/day)
Likes
2,986
Processor Intel I7 4790k (stock)
Motherboard ASRock H97M-ITX/ac LGA 1150 Intel H97
Cooling Prolimatech megahalem
Memory Crucial 2x4gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 3gb
Storage OWC Mercury SSD 240 GB
Display(s) Asus 144hz
Case Raijintek Metis
Power Supply Corsair SF600 600w psu
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
#40
So... Couldn't they just sell the drive, rad and tubes, with a little bottle of coolant in one nice little package... just not put together?
They could. But that leaves what is most scary about watercooling left for someone who hasn't done it before.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,278 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,368
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#41
So... Couldn't they just sell the drive, rad and tubes, with a little bottle of coolant in one nice little package... just not put together?
Sure, but at that point why would anyone buy it? If they are going to do that, you might as well buy one of their other kits.

Edit: It seems they already do that anyway. You just have to provide you own tubing. http://www.swiftech.com/h2o-x20-elite.aspx
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
3,630 (1.09/day)
Likes
938
Location
Vietnam
System Name Gaming System / Laptop / HTPC
Processor i5 8600K @4.6Ghz / i5 540m / i7 970
Motherboard Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / Acer / Shuttle sx58j3
Cooling CM Seidon 120 XL / Laptop Cooling / SE-903
Memory T Group Nighthawk (3000 MHz)/ 4GB DDR3 / 12gb DDR3
Video Card(s) Colorful 1080Ti / G210m / 7870XT
Storage 750G MX300 + 3TB HDDs / 250G Ultra II /250G 850 EVO
Display(s) Dell U2515H + Asus VX239H/ 15.6" Laptop Screen / 720p 42" Plasma TV
Case Cooler master HAF 922 / Laptop Case / Corsair Air 240
Audio Device(s) On Board Realtek
Power Supply Andyson N700 Titanium / Laptop Power / ACBell 700 W
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard CM Quickfire XT (Cherry MX Reds)
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Firestrike = xxxxx Timespy = 9097 Heaven = xxxx
#42
The pump block combo's original drawing uses Socket 478 mounting, its been in there for a while...

Edit: This is the original patent filed in 2004. It clearly has the pump/block combo in it.

http://www.google.com/patents/EP1923771A1
Fair enough. I couldn't find that patent before. It'd be interesting to see if Coolermaster had anything in development before that patent was filed. Apparently, neither parties are commenting on the case.

They should at least be required to license the patent out, I personally do not like the Antek units very much and think it would be a shame to see those as the only option.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,278 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,368
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#43
Fair enough. I couldn't find that patent before. It'd be interesting to see if Coolermaster had anything in development before that patent was filed. Apparently, neither parties are commenting on the case.

They should at least be required to license the patent out, I personally do not like the Antek units very much and think it would be a shame to see those as the only option.
Yeah, right now it seems Asetek is taking the stance that they don't licence their technology. However, if it went to court, the past precedent is that the court will force them to license the technology at a reasonable price.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,442 (1.00/day)
Likes
1,866
#44
Merely combining elements of prior engineering art should not constitute a patent; it's just an idea that anyone can describe. I could patent 100 ideas a day by simply describing them in writing, any damn fool thing I could dream up, and just wait for some sucker to make something that I could claim infringes on my patent. Oh wait, that would make me a patent troll. The problem is in the Patent Office. I'm not saying they're corrupt, but if not, they are unique among all the government agencies. Patents should only be issued for specific designs that improve on prior art in tangible ways. Instead we have thousands of patents for "improved turbo design" after some brainiac added a few fins or just swirled a port with a die grinder. Or someone screwed a pump to a water block and thought they invented something, and the idiots in the Patent Office agreed to grant them a patent worded so vaguely that nobody else can screw a pump to a water block without paying them, even when it's a vastly improved design that makes the original look crude in comparison.

Here's the fun of the US patent system, a patent isn't really worth squat until it enters court.

Let's say I patent a bicycle with a laser cannon mounted on the front. Some levity is needed, so just hang with me. Both the bicycle and the laser cannon might be patentable works, but my patent is the combination. Company X decides to take their own laser and bicycle combination to the market. I automatically win the patent suit, right?

-WRONG-

Company X and I go to court. A judge looks at the patent, and needs to determine two things. One, is the patent actually valid for the situation. As this is a clear case of similar products, we're still in business there. Two, does the patent actually describe a new or non-trivially derived use of material to complete its stated objective.

Point two is sketchy. The patent office has approved the patent, but a judge can basically invalidate it. The patent failing to pass the judge's scrutiny means that it is not a valid and defensible patent, and you've got a worthless patent.

With the flood of patents hitting the US patent office, more and more of these patents are being invalidated, despite approval. It's severely screwed up, but nobody's trying to fix it because it would take patent lawyers. Patent lawyers make huge amounts of money in patent litigation, so they aren't chomping at the bit to change things.


So, best case Swiftech goes to court, spends huge amounts of money, and gets the patent overturned. The problem is the legal fees in this sort of transaction can never be recouped. Cooler Master might be able to afford this, but Swiftech might be too small. Worst case, litigation leads to the patent being upheld. This sort of patent will kill pretty much everyone not buying from Asetek. Goodbye market diversity, and reasonable pricing.

I think Swiftech is just conceding the fight, because the legal fees are too large. It's shameful that this is where we are, and even more shameful that this sort of patent was approved in the US.
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#45
If I could patent a square with rounded corners and a button I would.
Apple would steal that Idea CD and you would be in litigation for years.:toast:
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#46
Here's the fun of the US patent system, a patent isn't really worth squat until it enters court.

Let's say I patent a bicycle with a laser cannon mounted on the front. Some levity is needed, so just hang with me. Both the bicycle and the laser cannon might be patentable works, but my patent is the combination. Company X decides to take their own laser and bicycle combination to the market. I automatically win the patent suit, right?

-WRONG-

Company X and I go to court. A judge looks at the patent, and needs to determine two things. One, is the patent actually valid for the situation. As this is a clear case of similar products, we're still in business there. Two, does the patent actually describe a new or non-trivially derived use of material to complete its stated objective.

Point two is sketchy. The patent office has approved the patent, but a judge can basically invalidate it. The patent failing to pass the judge's scrutiny means that it is not a valid and defensible patent, and you've got a worthless patent.

With the flood of patents hitting the US patent office, more and more of these patents are being invalidated, despite approval. It's severely screwed up, but nobody's trying to fix it because it would take patent lawyers. Patent lawyers make huge amounts of money in patent litigation, so they aren't chomping at the bit to change things.


So, best case Swiftech goes to court, spends huge amounts of money, and gets the patent overturned. The problem is the legal fees in this sort of transaction can never be recouped. Cooler Master might be able to afford this, but Swiftech might be too small. Worst case, litigation leads to the patent being upheld. This sort of patent will kill pretty much everyone not buying from Asetek. Goodbye market diversity, and reasonable pricing.

I think Swiftech is just conceding the fight, because the legal fees are too large. It's shameful that this is where we are, and even more shameful that this sort of patent was approved in the US.

We sure appreciate the education. Being computer nerds, I think we know what a patent is and what happens when companies steal the idea or design...

Swiftech is bending cause their lawyers told them too.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#47
The patent in question covers that L-shaped fitting on the block/pump, which can turn around 180° while remaining watertight.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,442 (1.00/day)
Likes
1,866
#48
See that is what differentiates a patent troll from a company legitimately defending its patents. The Apogee Drive doesn't compete with any Asetek products. It is really in a different market segment from Asetek products. Asetek products are for people that don't want a custom water loop, that just want a sealed no hassle AIO liquid cooler. The Apogee Drive II is for people that do want custom liquid cooling, they are different market segments. The courts have demonstrated that they will not allow a company that has no products, and no plans to release products in a market segment, to enforce patents in that market segment. If Asetek was really a patent troll they could go after the Apogee Drive, but they obviously aren't. They are only going after products that infringe on their patents in market segments they are actually in.
Here's where we're going to have to differentiate opinions on the matter.

Asetek has filed a patent that is basically applicable to any closed loop heat transfer system. You're looking at a patent from a computer hardware focused company, and only seeing that one application.

In reality, houses can use a system of tubes beneath the flooring for heating and cooling. A heat transfer segment, with an integrated pump, can push the heated or cooled liquid out and into the tubes. The tubes then transfer a portion of their heat into the surroundings. These systems have been around in high-end houses and building for decades.

Now, tell me that Asetek has a case. A patentable system must demonstrate that it is a unique solution, and not a trivial combination of existing components.

So, Swiftech is doing the only sensible thing. They are forgoing the huge money pit that this litigation will cost. They are pulling the product that they think might be the source of this litigation, and they are changing their aims.


I cannot call this trolling, because it isn't. I'm calling this a crappy patent, that should never have been approved by the US patent system. Because it would take a law suit to challenge this, Swiftech is backing down. They cannot afford the litigation, but hopefully someone else will.

As far as not suing for other products, just wait. Rarely do companies stop when something is proven viable. If one lawsuit threat stops the AIO competitors, another could well kill the custom loop makers. Who's to say that Asetek won't be designing these systems in the near future? I prefer to allow action to speak, and Asetek's licensing refusal speaks volumes about their intents.



Edit:
Let's clarify one more thing. If you were to spend 20 minutes, and remove all references to CPU and computer what do you have? A patent for a generic closed loop heat transfer system, where the pump happens to be integrated with one of the heat transfer surfaces. I could make the same claims about any car radiator, home heating/cooling system, and the environmental water heating systems used in houses (black sacks on the roof absorb solar energy, heat water, then the heated water is used in the house).

This indicates that the patent was improperly awarded, and any judge presented with it should invalidate it for not meeting basic requirements. If the US patent office was competent and well staffed this crap never would have been given out in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
1,595 (0.84/day)
Likes
636
Location
Jacksonhole Florida
System Name DEVIL'S ABYSS
Processor i7-4790K@4.6 GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H110 (2 x 140mm)(3 x 140mm case fans)
Memory 16GB Adata XPG V2 2400MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 780 Ti Classified
Storage Intel 750 Series 400GB (AIC), Plextor M6e 256GB (M.2), 13 TB storage
Display(s) Crossover 27QW (27"@ 2560x1440)
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Cooler Master V1000
Mouse Ttsports Talon Blu
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 version 1709
Benchmark Scores Passmark CPU score = 13080
#49
The patent in question covers that L-shaped fitting on the block/pump, which can turn around 180° while remaining watertight.
Are the Cool IT-made products next on the list, since they also employ the rotating fittings? If so, Corsair has problems...
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#50
Are the Cool IT-made products next on the list, since they also employ the rotating fittings? If so, Corsair has problems...
Yes, Asetek does have an ongoing litigation with CoolIT.