• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

The official memory latency benchmark competition

here's mine corsair xms cm3200pro unmatched pair at 240mhz 3338 timings
43.1ms baby not bad for a 3500 venice
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure how good my scores are. My current rig is running xp till I can get a copy of vista. I'm not gonna tweak anything till I'm running vista.
377382107_94256e94f5_o.jpg
 
guh i got 102.2 ns yesterday but i didnt post it im gong to go lowr maybe 2.5.2.2.4 or 5 maybe even 3 ;) ooo it will be fun how far can cheap ram go? im already at timings tighter than if my ram was running at 133 mhz :toast: :nutkick:
 
Not sure how good my scores are. My current rig is running xp till I can get a copy of vista. I'm not gonna tweak anything till I'm running vista.

why are you running your ram underclocked???
 
Fook joo all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, I didnt even oc my ram at all. I have it set to AUTO in the bios. Also, in my bios, I cant change my multipllier, only my HT )x1, x2, x3, x4 and c5)
 
Image2636.jpg


will post some with the ram @490 soon this is @ stock but timings are lower 2.5-3-3-7 Ultra ddr400 infineon chips
 
ddr492a.jpg

DDR492.jpg


i think i can do lower timings but not sure
 
why are you running your ram underclocked???

Those are the stock times. Plus this is only my first build so I've never done it before and wanted to wait till I got vista and had my system done before trying any oc'ing. What timings should my ram be if there underclocked?
 
ddr492a235.jpg



Ultra DDR400@492mhz 3.0-3-3-7-11
 
Those are the stock times. Plus this is only my first build so I've never done it before and wanted to wait till I got vista and had my system done before trying any oc'ing. What timings should my ram be if there underclocked?

in your sys specs it says ddr2 800
and you posted it at 670 :confused:
 


E6600 @ 3Ghz
G.Skill PC2 800 @ 500mhz 4-4-4-12 :)
 
ddr492a723.jpg

even better :D all i changed was the cpu multi this was @ 2.44ghz
 
in your sys specs it says ddr2 800
and you posted it at 670 :confused:

Well from what I read before my motherboard is locked to 667 and under so it won't do full 800. I woulda loved to get a better motherboard, but the p945 s3 was the best I could get at the time.
 
ScreenShot002.jpg

ScreenShot001.jpg


running 2x512MB G.Skill Cl2.5 (unmatched)

bring it on guys... ;)
 
Holy COW 28 :eek: wow p-jack nice! I think thats about the lowest latency i've ever seen. The closest i've seen to that was BH5 at 271 fsb running a cas latency of 1.5-2-2 and 3.7 volts here is a screenshot of the lowest i've previously ever seen (you have to click the image once to see it better)and this was not for 24/7 use. NOTE THIS SCREENSHOT IS NOT MY SYSTEM LOL WOW Your motherboard must have some great enhanced performance options yes? :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ScreenShot002.jpg

ScreenShot001.jpg


running 2x512MB G.Skill Cl2.5 (unmatched)

bring it on guys... ;)

bet 5€ that is a bug
we're you running anything on the background at the moment?
have you tried running it again?

@ketxxx: i suggest getting another tool to check latencys, this one is buggy
 
wow.jpg


5-5-5-18-22 2T Corsair 1066 C5 running at 800 C5.

For some reason it only tells me the latency and processor speed. I haven't played with my ram at all, it's totally initial boot up stock.
 
bet 5€ that is a bug
you probably win... :D
i must admit that my numbers seem abit TOO low compared to the other results submitted, especially for ddr1... :wtf:
we're you running anything on the background at the moment?
nope, everything stripped down to 26 windows-services, no progs running @ all...
have you tried running it again?
i hit the refresh button several times, and that was the lowest result i got, so i posted it... hmmm... looks too good to be true indeed.
@ketxxx: i suggest getting another tool to check latencys, this one is buggy
agreed.
 
ScreenShot003.jpg


this looks more reasonable...

it´s the very first benchmark run after everest startup, all following give results <29ns... :wtf:
 
ScreenShot003.jpg


this looks more reasonable...

it´s the very first benchmark run after everest startup, all following give results <29ns... :wtf:

looks much more acceptable
my lowest was 18 or something :laugh:
38.9 is the one i get after startup too
 
Tighter timings.



These times seem alright.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
table updated. @ pt 28ns is very possible on DDR memory, i had about 34ns on average. dont know if everest is buggy, all i can say is the version i use (3.01) doesnt have that problem.
 
table updated. @ pt 28ns is very possible on DDR memory, i had about 34ns on average. dont know if everest is buggy, all i can say is the version i use (3.01) doesnt have that problem.

don't know any other software that can check latency?
on the other thread the best was 30and something with ddr400@500 cas2
:confused:
 
Back
Top