• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

THREAD CLOSED!!! Post Your AMD RyZen Blender Benchmarks at 200 Samples!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 50521
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
My result (200 samples)- Xeon E5450 at 3,0GHz - 4:06
test run.jpg

and 100 samples is 2:07
test 100.jpg
 
Last edited:
Socket 771 representing! beast.
 
apparently AMD used 150 samples.
 
Intel X5675 @4.2GHz

200 Samples, 1:09:10



B8ZxTNO.png



Will post 150 samples later or on another thread.
 
Last edited:
Intel E5-1650 @4.8GHz
200 samples 1:00:61


ryzen-e5-1650-4800.png
 
Because there are some of us who dont want to mess with Windows.

You missed the point. He said they could have used a nix machine vs a windoze machine to cheat. Why even bother doing that? They can just rig the whole damn thing.
 
FX-8320 4.02GHz
Both tests ran 3 times, the best was selected
200 Samples: 2:53:71
200S 4G.png


150 Samples: 2:10:54
150S 4G.png
 

Attachments

  • 200S 4G.png
    200S 4G.png
    1 MB · Views: 445
1:02:73 200 samples

6700k @ 4.8ghz, 4.5ghz cache. RAM @ 3333mhz 14-17-17-32 1T

4.8_4.5_3.3_14-17-32-525 run2.png

I really hope Zen is as good as we're being lead to believe. Could be game changing :D
 
Last edited:
200 Samples - Dual Xeon E5405 at 2,0GHz - 3:15
200 samples.png
 
Last edited:
Never used blender before, I downloaded the files, Im not sure how to run it???
 
You get it installed, then download the first link in the first post, it's a 7mb file that opens with blender, then just click render > render image, or press F12. I'm pretty sure it's set at 200 frames by default.
 
You missed the point. He said they could have used a nix machine vs a windoze machine to cheat. Why even bother doing that? They can just rig the whole damn thing.

But they didn't use Linux machines in the demonstration, that hasn't even been contested, someone mentiond they COULD have. The point was people using linux in the the benchmark thread, unless the poster says otherwise, who are you to say? Why was it so important for you to have to comment on my post anyway? You could have just ignored it.
 
But they didn't use Linux machines in the demonstration, that hasn't even been contested, someone mentiond they COULD have. The point was people using linux in the the benchmark thread, unless the poster says otherwise, who are you to say? Why was it so important for you to have to comment on my post anyway? You could have just ignored it.

WTF? Why you quote me in the first place? The guy insinuated that they could have cheated by using nix. Which is is why I replied. Your quoting me actually has no point.
 
I'm still as confused as @qubit. Is this in order to compare what we have with the AMD results of Ryzen?
 
I'm guessing i'll just wait for the launch of Ryzen, and see how it bench then. According to what the blender benchmark is showing in this thread, Ryzen went from pretty good to " un coup d'épée dans l'eau" (meh).

OFFTOPIC: I have created an account just to ask you for this:
Your avatar is beautiful. Could you please name me the anime/manga you have it from.
I would like to have this picture not to use it as an avatar.
Or is it your own drawing?

Thanks in advance
 
and.....epeen is important? :rolleyes:

On forums like this, epeen is everything. I thought you knew that. ;)

Extreme OCing and showing off, taking pictures of clean builds, water cooling, it's all part of epeen.

It's important. It's self esteem. It's the man's way, or geek's way.
 
On forums like this, epeen is everything. I thought you knew that. ;)

Extreme OCing and showing off, taking pictures of clean builds, water cooling, it's all part of epeen.

It's important. It's self esteem. It's the man's way, or geek's way.

No. Epeen is buying the most expensive thing and bragging. Sharing your overclocking perils and exploits, build mods and catastrophes is sheer geekery.
Epeen is the same as a fud in a Ferrari with a gold medallion.
 
200 - 2:02.31

200-png.82058


150 - 1:32.45

150-png.82059


Should I feel bad now?
 

Attachments

  • 200.PNG
    200.PNG
    1.3 MB · Views: 1,002
  • 150.PNG
    150.PNG
    1.3 MB · Views: 1,037
After some testing i got some funny results with cuta aktive aswell. All test are with 200 and a old I7 920 at 4.1 GHz and two GTX 970 in sli.

First CPU alone 1:50.40

AMD_render_200.jpg


Cuda active one card 2:14.75

AMD_bench_med_cuda_et_kort.jpg


Cuda active 2 cards active 1:09.25

AMD_bench_med_cuda_2_kort.jpg


This is the settings used

Settings.jpg


So cuda aktive with one card is slower than CPU alone. Not what i exspected with this old CPU. CPU is still better than one card.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top