THREAD CLOSED!!! Post Your AMD RyZen Blender Benchmarks at 200 Samples!

[TheGuruStud]

Interesting to me is how much better Linux does on this program than Windows I was seeing 30-40% better performance with machines at work

That's normal, really. Bulldozer does well in linux for a lot of stuff.

 

[eidairaman1]

That's normal, really. Bulldozer does well in linux for a lot of stuff.

Lighter Weight OS, just like how some will take stock roms for Galaxy Phones and Debloat them and optimize them for speed.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

This really needs to be converted to a table. Here's the ones in the OP changed:
[table="head"]User|Processor|Clockspeed|Time|Notes
zedn|Xeon E5-2687Wv4|3000|0:44.52
Feklar|6900K|3200|0:51.11
ReJZor|5820K|4500|0:51.14
cdawall|5820K|4540|0:51.39
xkm1948|5820K|4250|0:54.20
Nephilim666|3930K|4400|1:05.05
PMP_Ghost|6700k|4400|1:09.58
Kursah|4790k|4800|1:12.17
Breaz|Xeon 5650|4200|1:12.40
m0nt3|FX-8320|4500|1:14.79|Linux
avenger001|4790k|4700|1:15.16
Psychoholic|4790k|4600|1:15.28
Dia01|4790k|4400|1:21.58
Luke51087|4770K|4000|1:28.18
biowiet|4790K|4400|1:30.03
hiepgia|Xeon E3-1231v3|3400|1:37.92
acperience7|4670K|4000|2:06.30
natr0n|Phenom II X6|4000|2:16.76
Nuckles56|6500|3400|2:25.94
Nuckles56|4700MQ|2230|2:39
Melvis|Pentium G3258|4000|2:42:47|Linux
silentbogo|6100|3700|2:46.80
TheLaughingMan|FX8350|4000|2:55.81
Kursah|4200U|2290|5:22.28
ShurikN|380M|2530|7:37.84[/table]
Pretty easy to do, just someone has to maintain it...

can someone please write something that would make this whole process easier and more efficient.

TBH this thread is a shambles. People are keen to contribute but if the data isnt tabulated regularly and simple things like rules established then it just ends up a mess .........like it is now. It has hapenned in a similar fashion in other threads and it makes it pointless trying to contribute in any useful manner.

The thread may be getting loads of views but how many of those people are taking a look at it for decent data and leaving disappointed?


If a poll can be added to a thread how can it be difficullt to input data in a field and link it to a table.?


TPU should be able to do MUCH better than this.

 

[jaggerwild]

I had a good laugh reading this thread, seeing people getting frustrated(cause first time poster wont do as told) pricless!!!!

 

[JAYDIP]

Here IS MINE

51.33 Sec

 

[FilipM]

My post is somehow missing...

W3520 @ 4510MHz - 1:39.38, 200 Samples

 

[FordGT90Concept]

can someone please write something that would make this whole process easier and more efficient.

TBH this thread is a shambles. People are keen to contribute but if the data isnt tabulated regularly and simple things like rules established then it just ends up a mess .........like it is now. It has hapenned in a similar fashion in other threads and it makes it pointless trying to contribute in any useful manner.

The thread may be getting loads of views but how many of those people are taking a look at it for decent data and leaving disappointed?


If a poll can be added to a thread how can it be difficullt to input data in a field and link it to a table.?


TPU should be able to do MUCH better than this.

The formatting is just:
USERNAME|PROCESSOR|MHZ|TIME (leading zero if under 1 minute for sort reasons)|NOTES

Who wants to adopt the thread for score keeping? @xkm1948 gave it up

 

[Nordic]

Close thread, move on.

 

[Filip Georgievski]

Here is my score:
02.25 for the old grandpa I5-750 OCed at 3.3GHZ.

 

[rvborgh]

24.52 seconds... 48 core Opteron 61xx (K10 cores) running at 3.0 GHz.

 

[EarthDog]

dropboxed a picture... attach to the forums man...




Anyway, i think mine was missed earlier? Beat that time any, ran as 200 with 2.78a

Earthdog / 6950x @ 4.2GHz / 32.02



I didn't include the 3rd CPUz because my first screenshot is the load speed.

Who wants to adopt the thread for score keeping? @xkm1948 gave it up

Not I... sorry.

 

[rvborgh]

fixed

 

[fullinfusion]

Lighter Weight OS, just like how some will take stock roms for Galaxy Phones and Debloat them and optimize them for speed.

Oh get off your 7 and get on 10 bro!

You wont regret it

 

[fullinfusion]

dropboxed a picture... attach to the forums man...




Anyway, i think mine was missed earlier? Beat that time any, ran as 200 with 2.78a

Earthdog / 6950x @ 4.2GHz / 32.02

View attachment 82168

I didn't include the 3rd CPUz because my first screenshot is the load speed.


Not I... sorry.

That's FAST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Nice

 

[cdawall]

That's FAST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Nice

Yea he beat my 40 second 5960x run... By alot. I'll have to crank the optys up.

 

[Enterprise24]

6500 @ 5.1Ghz

 

[sil3ntearth]

2:31.43

 

[Block10]

 

[dyonoctis]

OFFTOPIC: I have created an account just to ask you for this:
Your avatar is beautiful. Could you please name me the anime/manga you have it from.
I would like to have this picture not to use it as an avatar.
Or is it your own drawing?

Thanks in advance

It's from : https://www.artstation.com/artist/kuvshinov_ilya

 

[Block10]

I will try my best to keep everyone's score up to date!


Download link for the demo:

http://download.amd.com/demo/RyzenGraphic_27.blend


BLENDER Download:

https://www.blender.org/download



Settings Requirement:

Sample at 200 and 200 only
Use Blender version 2.78A only
3 CPU-Z tabs:
one main tab, one memory tab, one stress tab running to show your CPU's running frequency.

Any results other than 200 sample will be discarded.






Results:

Spoiler: clicky

zedn, Xeon2687WV4---3GHz, 44.52
Feklar, 6900k---3.2GHz, 51.11
ReJZor, 5820k---4.5GHz 51.14
cdawall, 5820k---4.54GHz, 51.39
xkm1948, 5820k---4.25GHz, 54.20
Nephilim666, 3930K---4.4GHz 1:05.05
PMP_Ghost, 6700k---4.4GHz 1:09.58
Kursah, 4790k---4.8GHz 1:12.17
Breaz, Xeon5650---4.2GHz 1:12.40
m0nt3, FX8320---4.5GHz, 1:14.79_____Linux
avenger001, 4790k---4.7GHz 1:15.16
Psychoholic, 4790k---4.6GHz 1:15.28
Dia01, 4790k---4.4GHz 1:21.58
Luke51087, 4770k---4GHz, 1:28.18
biowiet,4790k---4.4GHz, 1:30.03
hiepgia, XeonE3 1231v3---3.4GHz 1:37.92
acperience7, 4670k--4GHz, 2:06.30
natr0n, PhenomIIx6---4GHz, 2:16.76
Nuckles56, 6500---3.4GHz, 2:25.94
Nuckles56, 4700MQ---2.23GHz, 2:39
Melvis, PentiumG3258---4GHz, 2:42:47_____Linux
silentbogo, 6100---3.7GHz 2:46.80
TheLaughingMan, FX8350---4GHz 2:55.81
Kursah, 4200U---2.29GHz 5:22.28
ShurikN, 380M---2.53GHz, 7:37.84

Block10rd, 6700k---4.0GHz 57.54

 

[eidairaman1]

Oh get off your 7 and get on 10 bro!

You wont regret it

I might move after zen, 7 works perfect on my rig bro. Im putting 7 home 64 on a 754 rig with 3GB ram and a 6450 lol.

 

[Andrew Bodega]

Noob member - saw this AMD challenge and couldn't resist .... sorry about the res; seems Blender doesn't do 4k

4960x @ 4.6GHz .... 45.20

 

[TheLaughingMan]

Rerun using the instructions provided on AMD's site to match what Zen ran at. I apparently had something wrong the first time

CPU: AMD FX-8350 STOCK (4.0 GHz, 4.2 GHz turbo)
Time: 2 minutes 15 seconds

 

[EarthDog]

Just an FYI, I reported the thread to get this closed since the OP(@xkm1948) appears to have bailed on it.

 

[fullinfusion]

Just an FYI, I reported the thread to get this closed since the OP(@xkm1948) appears to have bailed on it.

personally Id like a new thread and not this mess