- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 79 (0.02/day)
- Location
- Iran
System Name | S.A.S |
---|---|
Processor | i7 4790K |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-Pro Wifi ac |
Cooling | Enermax liqtech 120x |
Memory | 8GB Corsair Vengeance Pro 2400MHz |
Video Card(s) | Asus GTX 970 Strix |
Storage | Corsair Force GS 120 GB / Seagate Barracuda 1Tb |
Display(s) | LG W2286L 22 Inch |
Case | Green X5 Fusion |
Power Supply | Green GP1000B-OC |
Mouse | Logitech |
Keyboard | Logitech G110 |
Software | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
Benchmark Scores | X5638 |
The difference between them in performance/features is much bigger than it is in price and as I said before, the 980Ti is short on VRAM and won't last 2 years of stutter free performance. Go take a look at all the 780 Ti owners compared to Titan owners - 2 years ago people said a 780 TI is futureproof/has enough VRAM and now people with them are upgrading due to running out of memory. I've always followed the same mentality as you, as you can see, having a GTX 460 that had more than enough memory during its time, which now bites me in the backside in every new game because of the VRAM shortage.
Games nowadays double in VRAM requirements every 2 years or so, and with ~£140 between them it's not even a contest.
is it really worth to burn your money for 4% extra fps ? sounds great 6GB = 4%
just before release date of the witcher III , people said we need at least 6GB VRAM for it to play in ultra settings . and now the game needs maximum 1.75 GB VRAM.
the future is unknown my friend.
you are spending too much money on useless extra 6GB VRAM.
ok buy titanX for $999. next year i buy a $300 GPU which will eat your TITAN X