• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

What is the Series X GPU Relative to?

What is the Series X GPU relative to?


  • Total voters
    27
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
83 (0.01/day)
Location
San Antonio, TX
System Name Geil
Processor Ryzen 6900HS
Memory 16GB DDR5
Video Card(s) Radeon 6700S
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 120Hz 2560x1600
Software Windows 11 home premium
Microsoft makes the 'driver', and it probably performs around a 6800 since it can get much closer to metal with custom dev kits.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2022
Messages
106 (0.13/day)
System Name Lenovo LOQ 15
Processor Ryzen 7 7840HS
Memory Crucial 32GB (2 x 16) DDR5 5600 SODIMM
Video Card(s) RTX 4050 Mobile OC @ 2.8 GHz (dGPU)/ Radeon 780M (iGPU)
Storage Micron MTFDKCD512TFK 512GB (Will Upgrade)
Display(s) 1080p 144Hz Laptop Display
Audio Device(s) Laptop Realtek Speakers (Dolby Atmos for Headphones)
Software Windows 11
Microsoft makes the 'driver', and it probably performs around a 6800 since it can get much closer to metal with custom dev kits.
Huh? Never heard of that. Could you be able to elaborate on how dev kits can boost the hardware power of the Xbox Series X?
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
83 (0.01/day)
Location
San Antonio, TX
System Name Geil
Processor Ryzen 6900HS
Memory 16GB DDR5
Video Card(s) Radeon 6700S
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 120Hz 2560x1600
Software Windows 11 home premium
Huh? Never heard of that. Could you be able to elaborate on how dev kits can boost the hardware power of the Xbox Series X?

There are less layers of software between the developers game engine and the silicon, vs something on PC. So it's a bit silly to count pixel pipes and shaders, then look at bandwidth and say ... it must compare to this PC graphics because they have similar specs. But even then ... it has more TMU's, and Shaders than the 6700XT, as well as way more bandwidth, so it's kind of strange in the first place that it's even being compared to a 6600XT. In reality in a closed system in the way 'Scarlett' is configured (xbox series x gpu), it can most likely hit the 6800 and maybe even fall in between a 6800 and XT.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.55/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
There are less layers of software between the developers game engine and the silicon, vs something on PC. So it's a bit silly to count pixel pipes and shaders, then look at bandwidth and say ... it must compare to this PC graphics because they have similar specs. But even then ... it has more TMU's, and Shaders than the 6700XT, as well as way more bandwidth, so it's kind of strange in the first place that it's even being compared to a 6600XT. In reality in a closed system in the way 'Scarlett' is configured (xbox series x gpu), it can most likely hit the 6800 and maybe even fall in between a 6800 and XT.

3328/208/64

It is a Unique Exclusive part for Microsoft.

You can't compare it to a 6800/XT either.


3840/240/96


4608/288/128

The PS5 GPU Oberon is just a 6700M (IGP) that has a slightly higher clock speed than a 6700, with a larger memory bus (256)(192)(160)


2304/144/64


 
Joined
Mar 24, 2022
Messages
106 (0.13/day)
System Name Lenovo LOQ 15
Processor Ryzen 7 7840HS
Memory Crucial 32GB (2 x 16) DDR5 5600 SODIMM
Video Card(s) RTX 4050 Mobile OC @ 2.8 GHz (dGPU)/ Radeon 780M (iGPU)
Storage Micron MTFDKCD512TFK 512GB (Will Upgrade)
Display(s) 1080p 144Hz Laptop Display
Audio Device(s) Laptop Realtek Speakers (Dolby Atmos for Headphones)
Software Windows 11

3328/208/64

It is a Unique Exclusive part for Microsoft.

You can't compare it to a 6800/XT either.


3840/240/96


4608/288/128

The PS5 GPU Oberon is just a 6700M (IGP) that has a slightly higher clock speed than a 6700, with a larger memory bus (256)(192)(160)


2304/144/64


Isn't the Theoretical Performance much more reliable to take as a conclusion than the render config? I'm not that smart but I believe the Theoretical Performance is the final result and makes up for the conclusion for how a card can perform. Render config shows its materials instead I believe. Any corrections?
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
83 (0.01/day)
Location
San Antonio, TX
System Name Geil
Processor Ryzen 6900HS
Memory 16GB DDR5
Video Card(s) Radeon 6700S
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 120Hz 2560x1600
Software Windows 11 home premium
Would be an interesting TPU review to read. 6600xt, 6700xt, 6800 vs Scarlett on the same games with a similar CPU. My money would be on 6800 like performance.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.55/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Considering game devs suffer consolitis, the games are far more optimized on console and hardly touched for PC.

Physical hardware present is still present.

You would have to figure out a way to oc the XBO to make up for lack in hardware.

Sorry this is apple's to oranges comparison. It may be rdna2 but there is no apu/igp/gpu to compare scarlet to.

Would be an interesting TPU review to read. 6600xt, 6700xt, 6800 vs Scarlett on the same games with a similar CPU. My money would be on 6800 like performance.
Did you not read the links I provided?

Isn't the Theoretical Performance much more reliable to take as a conclusion than the render config? I'm not that smart but I believe the Theoretical Performance is the final result and makes up for the conclusion for how a card can perform. Render config shows its materials instead I believe. Any corrections?
Theoretical is up in the air, the physical hardware is proof that no the Scarlett is not a 6800 or 6800xt, it is a custom igp.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
83 (0.01/day)
Location
San Antonio, TX
System Name Geil
Processor Ryzen 6900HS
Memory 16GB DDR5
Video Card(s) Radeon 6700S
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 120Hz 2560x1600
Software Windows 11 home premium
Of course I have read them. I think you are misunderstanding. I'm not saying they are the same GPU or that they are apples to apples. In fact my point is inverse, because I'm saying that this apples to oranges difference is precisely the reason why Scarlett will perform better in a relative sense, hitting much closer to its peak rates of performance. Games can get down deeper to the silicon and do a lot more custom things with the GPU. As dev kits get more mature, it will become more apparent.

I also think devs do a pretty good job on PC ports in general today. There is a bad apple here and there but this is not 2005.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2022
Messages
106 (0.13/day)
System Name Lenovo LOQ 15
Processor Ryzen 7 7840HS
Memory Crucial 32GB (2 x 16) DDR5 5600 SODIMM
Video Card(s) RTX 4050 Mobile OC @ 2.8 GHz (dGPU)/ Radeon 780M (iGPU)
Storage Micron MTFDKCD512TFK 512GB (Will Upgrade)
Display(s) 1080p 144Hz Laptop Display
Audio Device(s) Laptop Realtek Speakers (Dolby Atmos for Headphones)
Software Windows 11
Of course I have read them. I think you are misunderstanding. I'm not saying they are the same GPU or that they are apples to apples. In fact my point is inverse, because I'm saying that this apples to oranges difference is precisely the reason why Scarlett will perform better in a relative sense, hitting much closer to its peak rates of performance. Games can get down deeper to the silicon and do a lot more custom things with the GPU. As dev kits get more mature, it will become more apparent.

I also think devs do a pretty good job on PC ports in general today. There is a bad apple here and there but this is not 2005.
Series X playing MCBE Ray Tracing (Without Upscaling) (1080p) (8 Chunk) Hits about 56-60 Frames per second. A tad bit slower than 2080 Ti with same settings.

It has been tried on the Minecraft preview which is series x optimized and has RTX for these consoles. (It was there since yesterday morning).

NGL you are maybe correct.
 
Top