ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Dual forms the company's best efforts to sell a custom-design RTX 4070 SUPER at the NVIDIA baseline price. Over the past few GPU launches, NVIDIA has been encouraging its partners to focus on bringing value to their custom graphics cards at the MSRP, including giving them a day earlier media reviews, which is a great move, as now partners are incentivized to make their lower-priced cards better. You wouldn't want your cheapest custom design card to look ugly and leave a bad first impression on buyers before reviews of your swanky OC cards come out a day later. ASUS understands this, and has designed a beautiful baseline custom card with its latest crop of "Dual" graphics cards. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is part of a three-SKU mid-lifecycle refresh of the RTX 40-series, just like NVIDIA did with the RTX 20-series SUPER. They don't introduce any new features, but are meant to offer improved performance at given price-points, when compared to the cards they displace in the product stack.
NVIDIA had left a rather large performance gap between the GeForce RTX 4070 and the RTX 4070 Ti (which it had originally branded as the "RTX 4080 12 GB"); which over time was exploited by AMD to introduce its Radeon RX 7800 XT. The new RTX 4070 SUPER is meant to be an "almost RTX 4070 Ti" product at the $600 original price of the RTX 4070; while the RTX 4070 Ti is being retired from the product stack, and replaced by the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER at its original $800 price, which goes on sale next week—so big changes in the $500-800 segment are afoot. The new RTX 4070 SUPER is being recommended by NVIDIA for maxed out AAA gaming at 1440p, including with ray tracing, although we found even the original RTX 4070 to be plenty capable of 4K UHD gameplay—just be a little smart with your game settings, or take advantage of DLSS or DLSS 3 Frame Generation.
Since the RTX 4070 only uses 46 out of the available 60 SM (streaming multiprocessors) available on the AD104, NVIDIA has a vast gap in which to carve out the new GPU. The RTX 4070 SUPER gets 56 SM, which is very close to the 60 of the RTX 4070 Ti. There are proportionate increases in other components, including 224 Tensor cores, 56 RT cores, and 224 TMUs, all amounting to a 21% increase in SIMD resources over the RTX 4070. NVIDIA also maxed out the ROP count on the AD104, enabling all 80 of them, compared to the 64 on the RTX 4070. The on-die L2 cache size has been increased to 48 MB from 36 MB on the RTX 4070, and is now on par with the RTX 4070 Ti. The rest of the memory sub-system is unchanged, and you get 12 GB of 21 Gbps GDDR6X memory across a 192-bit memory bus, yielding 504 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The generationally larger on-die cache helps NVIDIA narrow the memory bus, although the memory size has increased compared to even the previous-generation RTX 3070 Ti, with its 8 GB.
As we mentioned earlier, the RTX 40 SUPER series are based on the existing 5 nm Ada Lovelace graphics architecture, and as such there are no feature changes except performance uplifts at given price points. Ada introduces a new generation CUDA core with increased IPC and support for new math formats, as well as shader execution reordering, a feature that speeds up ray tracing. The new 3rd generation RT core, besides increased ray intersection performance, debuts displaced micro-meshes, which enables greater complexity in ray traced objects. The new optical flow accelerator component enables the GPU to draw alternate frames entirely using AI, cutting out the main raster machinery, which is how DLSS 3 Frame Generation works.
The ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Dual features a slick, two-tone product design, with alternating matte black and tinted see-through polycarbonate crowning the heatsink underneath. The card uses a pair of large Axial Tech fans, which come with webbed impellers to guide all their airflow axially. Since NVIDIA has increased the TGP of the RTX 4070 SUPER by 10% over the RTX 4070, the solo 8-pin PCIe power connector makes way for the modern 12VHPWR, an NVIDIA designed adapter is included in the box. The ASUS RTX 4070 Super Dual is priced exactly at the $600 baseline. There is a variant with a slight factory overclock, called the Dual OC, which should be priced slightly higher.
Short 10-Minute Video Comparing 8x RTX 4070 Super
Our goal with the videos is to create short summaries, not go into all the details and test results, which can be found in our written reviews.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super Market Segment Analysis
Price
Cores
ROPs
Core Clock
Boost Clock
Memory Clock
GPU
Transistors
Memory
RTX 4060 Ti
$390
4352
48
2310 MHz
2535 MHz
2250 MHz
AD106
22900M
8 GB, GDDR6, 128-bit
RX 6700 XT
$300
2560
64
2424 MHz
2581 MHz
2000 MHz
Navi 22
17200M
12 GB, GDDR6, 192-bit
RTX 3070
$310
5888
96
1500 MHz
1725 MHz
1750 MHz
GA104
17400M
8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3070 Ti
$350
6144
96
1575 MHz
1770 MHz
1188 MHz
GA104
17400M
8 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
RX 6800
$450
3840
96
1815 MHz
2105 MHz
2000 MHz
Navi 21
26800M
16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RX 7700 XT
$430
3456
96
2171 MHz
2544 MHz
2250 MHz
Navi 32
26500M
12 GB, GDDR6, 192-bit
RX 6800 XT
$500
4608
128
2015 MHz
2250 MHz
2000 MHz
Navi 21
26800M
16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3080
$450
8704
96
1440 MHz
1710 MHz
1188 MHz
GA102
28000M
10 GB, GDDR6X, 320-bit
RTX 4070
$540
5888
64
1920 MHz
2475 MHz
1313 MHz
AD104
35800M
12 GB, GDDR6X, 192-bit
RX 7800 XT
$510
3840
96
2124 MHz
2430 MHz
2425 MHz
Navi 32
28100M
16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RX 6900 XT
$650
5120
128
2015 MHz
2250 MHz
2000 MHz
Navi 21
26800M
16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RX 6950 XT
$630
5120
128
2100 MHz
2310 MHz
2250 MHz
Navi 21
26800M
16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3090
$800
10496
112
1395 MHz
1695 MHz
1219 MHz
GA102
28000M
24 GB, GDDR6X, 384-bit
RTX 4070 Super
$600
7168
80
1980 MHz
2475 MHz
1313 MHz
AD104
35800M
12 GB, GDDR6X, 192-bit
ASUS RTX 4070 Super Dual
$600
7168
80
1980 MHz
2475 MHz
1313 MHz
AD104
35800M
12 GB, GDDR6X, 192-bit
RTX 4070 Ti
$750
7680
80
2310 MHz
2610 MHz
1313 MHz
AD104
35800M
12 GB, GDDR6X, 192-bit
RTX 4070 Ti Super
$800
8448
96
2340 MHz
2610 MHz
1400 MHz
AD103
45900M
16 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
RX 7900 XT
$760
5376
192
2000 MHz
2400 MHz
2500 MHz
Navi 31
57700M
20 GB, GDDR6, 320-bit
RTX 3090 Ti
$1050
10752
112
1560 MHz
1950 MHz
1313 MHz
GA102
28000M
24 GB, GDDR6X, 384-bit
RTX 4080
$1200
9728
112
2205 MHz
2505 MHz
1400 MHz
AD103
45900M
16 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
RTX 4080 Super
$1000
10240
112
2295 MHz
2550 MHz
1400 MHz
AD103
45900M
16 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
Architecture
The Ada graphics architecture heralds the third generation of the NVIDIA RTX technology, an effort toward increasing the realism of game visuals by leveraging real-time ray tracing, without the enormous amount of compute power required to draw purely ray-traced 3D graphics. This is done by blending conventional raster graphics with ray traced elements such as reflections, lighting, and global illumination, to name a few. The 3rd generation of RTX introduces the new higher IPC "Ada" CUDA core, 3rd generation RT core, 4th generation Tensor core, and the new Optical Flow Processor, a component that plays a key role in generating new frames without involving the GPU's main graphics rendering pipeline. The GeForce Ada graphics architecture driving the RTX 4070 SUPER leverages the TSMC 5 nm EUV foundry process to increase transistor counts.
The new GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is based on the same AD104 silicon as the original RTX 4070 and the RTX 4070 Ti. The former is heavily cut down from the silicon, while the latter maxes it out. The RTX 4070 SUPER doesn't strike a middle-ground between the two, but rather tilts close to the RTX 4070 Ti. Out of the 60 streaming multiprocessors physically present on the silicon, the RTX 4070 SUPER gets a substantial 56, or 93% of the available shaders. In comparison, the RTX 4070 only enabled 46 SM, or just 76% of them. Besides increasing the SM count, NVIDIA gave the RTX 4070 SUPER the full 48 MB of L2 cache present on the silicon, compared to just 36 MB on the RTX 4070; and the full ROP count of 80, compared to 64 on the RTX 4070. What sets the RTX 4070 SUPER apart from the RTX 4070 Ti is 4 SM worth 512 CUDA cores, the lack of dual NVENC accelerators (the RTX 4070 SUPER has just one of the two NVENC units enabled, just like on the RTX 4070); and a higher power TGP of 285 W on the RTX 4070 Ti, while the RTX 4070 SUPER TGP is set to 225 W. The lower power limits might affect boost frequency residency.
With 56 out of 60 SM enabled, the RTX 4070 SUPER enjoys 7,168 CUDA cores, 224 Tensor cores, 56 RT cores, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. As we mentioned, it gets the full 48 MB of L2 cache, which should make its memory sub-system identical to that of the RTX 4070 Ti—you get 12 GB of 21 Gbps GDDR6X memory across a 192-bit memory bus. We'll explain later how the seemingly narrow memory bus shouldn't worry you.
The component hierarchy of the 5 nm AD104 silicon is similar to that of several past generations of NVIDIA GPUs. It features a PCI-Express 4.0 x16 host interface that supports PCI-Express Resizable BAR; and a 192-bit GDDR6X memory bus that drives its 12 GB of memory. The GigaThread Engine forms the front-end of the GPU as a processor, and controls traffic among the five graphics processing clusters (GPCs). Each of the five GPCs on the AD104 has a Raster Engine with 16 ROPs, and six Texture Processing Clusters (TPCs). Each of these has two Streaming Multiprocessors (SM), and a Polymorph unit. Each SM contains 128 CUDA cores across four partitions. Half of these CUDA cores are pure-FP32; while the other half is capable of FP32 or INT32. The SM retains concurrent FP32+INT32 math processing capability. The SM also contains a 3rd generation RT core, four 4th generation Tensor cores, some cache memory, and four TMUs. With six TPCs per GPC on the AD104, there are a total of 60 SM. NVIDIA carved the RTX 4070 SUPER by disabling two TPCs. The AD104 features two NVENC accelerators, and one NVDEC accelerator. The RTX 4070 Ti has both NVENC units enabled, but the RTX 4070 SUPER, like the RTX 4070, has one of the two NVENC units disabled.
3rd Gen RT Core and Ray Tracing
The 3rd generation RT core accelerates the most math-intensive aspects of real-time ray tracing, including BVH traversal. Displaced micro-mesh engine is a revolutionary feature introduced with the new 3rd generation RT core. Just as mesh shaders and tessellation have had a profound impact on improving performance with complex raster geometry, allowing game developers to significantly increase geometric complexity; DMMs is a method to reduce the complexity of the bounding-volume hierarchy (BVH) data-structure, which is used to determine where a ray hits geometry. Previously, the BVH had to capture even the smallest details to properly determine the intersection point. Ada's ray tracing architecture also receives a major performance uplift from Shader Execution Reordering (SER), a software-defined feature that requires awareness from game-engines, to help the GPU reorganize and optimize worker threads associated with ray tracing.
The BVH now needn't have data for every single triangle on an object, but can represent objects with complex geometry as a coarse mesh of base triangles, which greatly simplifies the BVH data structure. A simpler BVH means less memory consumed and helps to greatly reduce ray tracing CPU load, because the CPU only has to generate a smaller structure. With older "Ampere" and "Turing" RT cores, each triangle on an object had to be sampled at high overhead, so the RT core could precisely calculate ray intersection for each triangle. With Ada, the simpler BVH, plus the displacement maps can be sent to the RT core, which is now able to figure out the exact hit point on its own. NVIDIA has seen 11:1 to 28:1 compression in total triangle counts. This reduces BVH compile times by 7.6x to over 15x, in comparison to the older RT core; and reducing its storage footprint by anywhere between 6.5 to 20 times. DMMs could reduce disk- and memory bandwidth utilization, utilization of the PCIe bus, as well as reduce CPU utilization. NVIDIA worked with Simplygon and Adobe to add DMM support for their tool chains.
Opacity Micro Meshes
Opacity Micro Meshes (OMM) is a new feature introduced with Ada to improve rasterization performance, particularly with objects that have alpha (transparency data). Most low-priority objects in a 3D scene, such as leaves on a tree, are essentially rectangles with textures on the leaves where the transparency (alpha) creates the shape of the leaf. RT cores have a hard time intersecting rays with such objects, because they're not really in the shape that they appear (they're really just rectangles with textures that give you the illusion of shape). Previous-generation RT cores had to have multiple interactions with the rendering stage to figure out the shape of a transparent object, because they couldn't test for alpha by themselves.
This has been solved by using OMMs. Just as DMMs simplify geometry by creating meshes of micro-triangles; OMMs create meshes of rectangular textures that align with parts of the texture that aren't alpha, so the RT core has a better understanding of the geometry of the object, and can correctly calculate ray intersections. This has a significant performance impact on shading performance in non-RT applications, too. Practical applications of OMMs aren't just low-priority objects such as vegetation, but also smoke-sprites and localized fog. Traditionally there was a lot of overdraw for such effects, because they layered multiple textures on top of each other, that all had to be fully processed by the shaders. Now only the non-opaque pixels get executed—OMMs provide a 30 percent speedup with graphics buffer fill-rates, and a 10 percent impact on frame-rates.
DLSS 3 Frame Generation
DLSS 3 introduces a revolutionary new feature that promises a doubling in frame-rate at comparable quality, it's called AI frame-generation. Building on DLSS 2 and its AI super-resolution (scaling up a lower-resolution frame to native resolution with minimal quality loss); DLSS 3 can generate entire frames simply using AI, without involving the graphics rendering pipeline, it's also possible to enable frame generation at native resolution without upscaling. Later in the article, we will show you DLSS 3 in action.
Every alternating frame with DLSS 3 is hence AI-generated, without being a replica of the previous rendered frame. This is possible only on the Ada graphics architecture, because of a hardware component called the optical flow accelerator (OFA), which assists in predicting what the next frame could look like, by creating what NVIDIA calls an optical flow-field. OFA ensures that the DLSS 3 algorithm isn't confused by static objects in a rapidly-changing 3D scene (such as a race sim). The process heavily relies on the performance uplift introduced by the FP8 math format of the 4th generation Tensor core. A third key ingredient of DLSS 3 is Reflex. By reducing the rendering queue to zero, Reflex plays a vital role in ensuring that latency with DLSS 3 enabled is at an acceptable level. A combination of OFA and the 4th Gen Tensor core is why the Ada architecture is required to use DLSS 3, and why it won't work on older architectures.
Ada Rebalanced Memory Subsystem
The previous-generation GeForce RTX 3070 Ti featured a 256-bit wide GDDR6 memory interface driving its 8 GB of 19 Gbps-rated GDDR6X memory (608 GB/s bandwidth), while the RTX 4070, RTX 4070 SUPER, and RTX 4070 Ti, use narrower 192-bit interfaces. This is made up for with use of faster 21 Gbps memory speed (504 GB/s). You'll notice that besides the top RTX 4090, every SKU in the RTX 40-series has a generationally narrower memory interface (albeit with faster and larger memory). This shouldn't bother you, and here's why. With the new Ada Lovelace graphics architecture, NVIDIA has tried to re-balance the memory sub-system such that there's dependence on larger on-die caches, allowing NVIDIA to narrow down the GPU's GDDR6 memory interface. The obvious benefit of this to NVIDIA is reduced costs, let's make no mistake about it, but NVIDIA maintains that this isn't a big problem for the GPU.
The last-level cache, or L2 cache, of NVIDIA Ada GPUs is anywhere between 8-10 times larger than the ones on the previous-generation Ampere GPUs. The AD104 silicon powering the RTX 4070 SUPER has a 48 MB L2 cache, compared to the 4 MB of the GA104 silicon powering the RTX 3070 Ti. NVIDIA illustrated an example of how the larger on-die LLC reduces video memory pressure (trips to GDDR6) by anywhere between 40% to 60% on the same GPU, by soaking up a larger number of memory access requests by the shaders.
The L2 cache is unified victim cache to the GPU's various GPCs and their local TPCs. Data that isn't hot enough (frequently accessed enough) to be resident on the small L1 caches of the SM, is ejected to the L2 cache, and depending on its heat, pushed to the GDDR6 video memory. The L2 cache is an order of magnitude faster than than video memory in terms of latency, and so having frequently-accessed data reside there offers a considerable benefit.
As we mentioned earlier from NVIDIA's claims, this re-balancing of the memory sub-system between the on-die LLC and video memory lowers the GPU's access to the latter by as much as 60%, which means the GPU can make do with a narrower 192-bit wide GDDR6X memory bus. NVIDIA has used generationally faster 21 Gbps memory chips in the RTX 4070 SUPER. NVIDIA developed a new means of presenting the memory bandwidth that takes into account the contribution of the L2 cache, its hit-rate, and the consequent reduction in video memory traffic.