Sunday, May 11th 2014

EK Water Blocks Unveils its Radeon R9 295X2 Full-Coverage Blocks

EK Water Blocks unveiled the first pictures of its full-coverage water block for AMD Radeon R9 295X2. It takes a meaty block to cool the 500-Watt dual-GPU monstrosity, which is also the fastest graphics card money can buy. The EK-FC R9-295X2 from EK is one of the few full-cover blocks that feature coolant channels that actually span the entire obverse length of the card. The channel is designed in a way that coolant is distributed uniformly to both the GPU systems, their neighboring memory, and the central portion of the card, housing its feisty VRM and PCIe bridge chip. The block comes in two variants, one with clear acrylic top over the two GPUs, with an aluminum central top; and one with opaque acetal top instead of clear acrylic. The two blocks come in two further variants, clear copper and nickel-plated copper block material. To top it all off, EK appears to either be bundling, or separately selling a single-slot expansion bracket for the card (a carryover from its HD 7990 block).

Source: OCaholic
Add your own comment

9 Comments on EK Water Blocks Unveils its Radeon R9 295X2 Full-Coverage Blocks

#1
kroks
nice
now we can fit 7x 295X2 :D
Posted on Reply
#2
MxPhenom 216
Corsair Fanboy
Sweet jesus, some nice blocks for sure.
Posted on Reply
#3
GhostRyder
Very nice looking block, love my 290x EK blocks.
Posted on Reply
#4
Svarog
I'm far from an expert in Watercooling.

But wouldn't it be better if the In/Out was in the middle of the block, so the pressure is even for both GPUs?
Posted on Reply
#5
d1nky
by: Svarog
I'm far from an expert in Watercooling.

But wouldn't it be better if the In/Out was in the middle of the block, so the pressure is even for both GPUs?
Maybe but it would need to be where it is so that multiple blocks/cards can be used in line
Posted on Reply
#6
pr0n Inspector
by: Svarog
I'm far from an expert in Watercooling.

But wouldn't it be better if the In/Out was in the middle of the block, so the pressure is even for both GPUs?
Looks like the water flows through gpu-vrm-gpu in a single path so it makes no difference. Restriction causes pressure drop which reduces flow rate and flow rate is what affects heat removal(other than block design obviously). Where in the loop is the pressure dropped doesn't matter, there's only one flow rate in a simple serial loop. And unlike air, water has a huge thermal capacity so unless you're removing a LOT of heat and have a VERY low flow rate the temperature difference of cooled and heated water is very minor.
Posted on Reply
#7
GhostRyder
by: Svarog
I'm far from an expert in Watercooling.

But wouldn't it be better if the In/Out was in the middle of the block, so the pressure is even for both GPUs?
In reality it would not make a noticeable difference. The flow is so fast that it just gets over all the components at a high enough rate that doing different locations of the connectors on the block itself won't really help much so they mostly put the focus on putting it in an area for convenience.

So its not much of a difference if any.
Posted on Reply
#8
manofthem
WCG-TPU Team All-Star!
by: Svarog
I'm far from an expert in Watercooling.

But wouldn't it be better if the In/Out was in the middle of the block, so the pressure is even for both GPUs?
An echo...? ;)

by: Svarog
Now i'm not using Watercooling, nor am an expert at it.

But should't the In/Out be in the middle of the Block? The second GPU is quite far away. Wouldn't it lose flow pressure?
Posted on Reply
#9
radrok
Aquacomputer blocks look 10x times better imo.
Posted on Reply