Wednesday, July 12th 2023

Microsoft Closer to Finalizing Activision Blizzard Merger - FTC Injunction Request Rejected by US Judge

Microsoft is closing in on its proposed $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard—the company is celebrating another victory, following the conclusion of a crucial court case against the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Both parties were recently engaged in five days of arguments and deliberation—yesterday Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley's final ruling stated: Microsoft's acquisition of Activision has been described as the largest in tech history. It deserves scrutiny. That scrutiny has paid off: Microsoft has committed in writing, in public, and in court to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for 10 years on parity with Xbox. It made an agreement with Nintendo to bring Call of Duty to Switch. And it entered several agreements to for the first time bring Activision's content to several cloud gaming services."

The lady justice continued: "This Court's responsibility in this case is narrow. It is to decide if, notwithstanding these current circumstances, the merger should be halted—perhaps even terminated—pending resolution of the FTC administrative action. For the reasons explained, the Court finds the FTC has not shown a likelihood it will prevail on its claim this particular vertical merger in this specific industry may substantially lessen competition. To the contrary, the record evidence points to more consumer access to Call of Duty and other Activision content. The motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore DENIED."
Microsoft President and Vice Chair, Brad Smith, released his own statement regarding the victory: "We're grateful to the Court in San Francisco for this quick and thorough decision and hope other jurisdictions will continue working towards a timely resolution. As we've demonstrated consistently throughout this process, we are committed to working creatively and collaboratively to address regulatory concerns."

Xbox boss, Phil Spencer was also in a jubilant mood: "We're grateful to the court for swiftly deciding in our favor. The evidence showed the Activision Blizzard deal is good for the industry and the FTC's claims about console switching, multi-game subscription services, and cloud don't reflect the realities of the gaming market. Since we first announced this deal, our commitment to bringing more games to more people on more devices has only grown. We've signed multiple agreements to make Activision Blizzard's games, Xbox first-party games and Game Pass all available to more players than they are today. We know that players around the world have been watching this case closely and I'm proud of our efforts to expand player access and choice throughout this journey."

Microsoft is clear to complete the deal ahead of a July 18th deadline, but proceedings will be complicated by Britain's blocking of the merger. The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is now the final hurdle, and all involved seem to be open to further discussions. Smith issued a second statement that outlined renewed negotiation efforts: "In order to prioritize work on these proposals, Microsoft and Activision have agreed with the CMA that a stay of the litigation in the UK would be in the public interest."

Spencer is also ready to hammer out terms with the UK anti-trust body—in a memo sent to Microsoft employees he wrote: "After today's decision, we are turning our focus to the UK. As you may be aware, a few months ago, the UK Competition and Markets Authority recommended that the deal be prohibited. We disagree with the CMA's concerns and have challenged its decision on appeal. At the same time, however, we are considering how the transaction might be modified to address the CMA's concerns in a way that is acceptable to the CMA. In order to prioritize work on potential options, Microsoft and Activision have agreed with the CMA that pausing the appeal now would be in the public interest, and both we and the CMA have made a joint submission to the Competition Appeal Tribunal to this effect."
Sources: The Verge Article #1, BBC News, The Verge Article #2
Add your own comment

15 Comments on Microsoft Closer to Finalizing Activision Blizzard Merger - FTC Injunction Request Rejected by US Judge

#1
kapone32
The question I have is why is MS spending so much Money for this and worry about what that could imply for the future of PC Gaming.
Posted on Reply
#2
ZoneDymo
kapone32The question I have is why is MS spending so much Money for this and worry about what that could imply for the future of PC Gaming.
ermmm you gotta explain to me where that worry comes from...unless you are worried that they are spending so much money on a lootbox promoting company, then sure
Posted on Reply
#3
trparky
If Diablo 4 is left alone, I'm fine with this.
Posted on Reply
#4
Dan.G
trparkyIf Diablo 4 is left alone, I'm fine with this.
They could change the name to Diablo 4 Immortal. :roll:
Posted on Reply
#5
trparky
Dan.GThey could change the name to Diablo 4 Immortal. :roll:
Don't give them any ideas. Ideas are bad.
Posted on Reply
#6
Easo
trparkyIf Diablo 4 is left alone, I'm fine with this.
Personally for me it would be WC3: Refunded, sorry, Reforged being fixed - they started moving that way during the last year with some noticable progress after initially just abandoning it all, so maybe there is a hope.
Posted on Reply
#7
oxrufiioxo
trparkyIf Diablo 4 is left alone, I'm fine with this.
The kinda funny and slightly ironic thing is the person in charge of Diablo and the person in charge of Blizzard both worked for Microsoft.
Posted on Reply
#8
Ravenas
From a gaming perspective, Activision Blizzard games are really kind of nothing to me anymore and I'm surprised MS would pay what they did.

I own every Blizzard game up to Diablo 4 and the latest WoW expansion, and I'm surprised Diablo 4 sold as well as it did. Blizzard PC gaming died long ago for me; the games are too corporate cookie cutter now. The two legacy PC gaming juggernauts, Valve and Blizard, are now limited to just 1 - Valve.

I support American tech giants; however, I really wish the FTC would have had a competent director at the helm rather than the current young director whose mindset is blocking big tech just because they shouldn't be so big without providing and preparing for a good trial.
Posted on Reply
#9
oxrufiioxo
RavenasI support American tech giants; however, I really wish the FTC would have had a competent director at the helm rather than the current young director whose mindset is blocking big tech just because they shouldn't be so big without providing and preparing for a good trial.
Even though they just filed an Appeal that likely will also be blocked I was shocked at how bad the FTC handled this case they honestly in my opinion only made Microsoft look better and that is hard to do.
Posted on Reply
#10
Ravenas
oxrufiioxoEven though they just filed an Appeal that likely will also be blocked I was shocked at how bad the FTC handled this case they honestly in my opinion only made Microsoft look better and that is hard to do.
FTC filed an officially filed an appeal so we will see where it goes now.
Posted on Reply
#11
Sake
I see nothing wrong with this acquisition. They should just go on. But knowing Microsoft they will move everything to subscription. Just like Office 365 and soon Windows.
Posted on Reply
#12
Ravenas
SakeI see nothing wrong with this acquisition. They should just go on. But knowing Microsoft they will move everything to subscription. Just like Office 365 and soon Windows.
I don't think they should be able to buy up the market to force people into gamepass. It's essentially what's going on, they just keep buying up big developers and putting that content into gamepass.
Posted on Reply
#13
Wye
RavenasI don't think they should be able to buy up the market to force people into gamepass. It's essentially what's going on, they just keep buying up big developers and putting that content into gamepass.
For big companies organic growth alone(aka hiring individual people) is not realistic.
Mergers/acquisitions are the only significant way to grow.
They all do it: Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Amazon etc
Posted on Reply
#14
Ravenas
WyeFor big companies organic growth alone(aka hiring individual people) is not realistic.
Mergers/acquisitions are the only significant way to grow.
They all do it: Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Amazon etc
My comment wasn’t there to imply companies shouldn’t be able to conduct M&A.

Rather companies shouldn’t be allowed to push the market in a direction by buying up a large majority of the market because they have financials which allow it.

EDIT: That’s why I initially said that the FTC director is taking horrible direction. The focus shouldn’t be on cloud gaming dominance. There is dominance because there are essentially 0 players other than Microsoft that offer the service in the cloud that Xbox Gamepass Cloud does. Nvidia is different because they are streaming games that you already own. What’s anticompetitive is buying up the market to make gamepass appealing by forcing developers into a service they weren’t interested in. That in turn gives the consumer little option when weighing the pros and cons of the service because all the games they want are there, only because they MS owns the majority of the market through anticompetitive M&A.

Essentially, it becomes dumb to not sign up for a subscription like gamepass because a large majority of developers will now be forced on the service. Microsoft could then say well yes, Call of Duty or whatever game is not exclusive to Xbox, but it is exclusive to streaming services, ie, our service gamepass and we own all the content out there. It’s anticompetitive.

What stops MS from spending another $30 billion to buy up EA? Shareholders? Please MS market cap has not moved since news that the buyout can continue, but Activision shot up.

How could someone so incompetent be at the head of the FTC?
Posted on Reply
#15
oxrufiioxo
The FTC just took another L...... Honestly the FTC is a joke at this point hopefully Khan get's replaced with someone more competent this is their 4th or 5th L at this point. This deal is as good as done and while I never really cared one way or the other I am annoyed by the FTC wasting tax payer money with such a weak case it's almost like they have no understanding of the market as a whole

IF you really want to see how inept she is watch the video of her being grilled by congress yesterday the fact that much older house members have a better grasp of the market than she does is comical.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 5th, 2024 09:34 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts