Friday, October 26th 2007

Crysis Demo Publicly Available Later Today

Anyone who has been unsuccessful in getting the Crysis demo using FilePlanet should be glad to hear that the demo will be publicly available to everyone in just over 12 hours (12 hours and 47 minutes as I write this). An in-official site which is counting down to the launch can be found here, although the servers will probably struggle to cope with demand at first given that Crysis is one of the most anticipated games so far this year, so it may be worth waiting for a few external sites to start hosting the demo. Anyone who has already ordered Crysis via EA should be able to download the demo already via EA's downloader.

Update: Unfortunately EA has decided to delay the public release by an extra day, so it's now going to be released tomorrow. Sorry for the disappointment, from a quick look it seems the delay could be linked to issues with the 24 hour exclusive for customers purchasing Crysis via the EA Store.
Source: Crysis Demo
Add your own comment

141 Comments on Crysis Demo Publicly Available Later Today

#126
newconroer
If anyone wants to bump their GPU up but cannot with Riva, check out the link at the end of this thread page by me:

forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=42997


Looks to be working, only problem is you can't push your Memory clock over 950(1900). Hmm.....

I knew I shoulda played it first with 163 drivers!
Posted on Reply
#127
OnBoard
It was actually good : o I though the nanosuit was even ok and I've hated it from what I've seen in videos, but I got my ass kicked couple times in normal already =) Found settings that gave good constant 25-43 framerate for me.

Posted on Reply
#128
InitialG
OnBoardIt was actually good : o I though the nanosuit was even ok and I've hated it from what I've seen in videos, but I got my ass kicked couple times in normal already =) Found settings that gave good constant 25-43 framerate for me.
I was really surprised at how well it ran, running an 8800gts and e6550 and it didn't seem to go below 30 hardly ever

given that it was a slide show on my amd 3200 and 7800gs I was prepared to only be able to go to medium with my 8800 but it held its own at high.
Posted on Reply
#129
OnBoard
320 or 640mb version and resolution? Would be nice to hear how it runs on someone with 2900pro/xt.

edit: lazy mans way to get firewood =)

<a href="http://img43.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=77063_Crysis.exe_10__122_705lo.jpg" target=_blank><img src="http://img43.imagevenue.com/loc705/th_77063_Crysis.exe_10__122_705lo.jpg" border="0"></a><a href="http://img172.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=77070_Crysis.exe_11__122_664lo.jpg" target=_blank><img src="http://img172.imagevenue.com/loc664/th_77070_Crysis.exe_11__122_664lo.jpg" border="0"></a><a href="http://img168.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=77072_Crysis.exe_12__122_1021lo.jpg" target=_blank><img src="http://img168.imagevenue.com/loc1021/th_77072_Crysis.exe_12__122_1021lo.jpg" border="0"></a>
Posted on Reply
#130
springs113
download speeds of 1.05mb is pretty pathetic to what im use to...well...nowadays
Posted on Reply
#132
DRDNA
springs113download speeds of 1.05mb is pretty pathetic to what im use to...well...nowadays
www.speedtest.net/ go ahead and post a screenie ;)
Posted on Reply
#133
AsRock
TPU addict
OnBoard320 or 640mb version and resolution? Would be nice to hear how it runs on someone with 2900pro/xt.

edit: lazy mans way to get firewood =)

<a href="http://img43.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=77063_Crysis.exe_10__122_705lo.jpg" target=_blank><img src="http://img43.imagevenue.com/loc705/th_77063_Crysis.exe_10__122_705lo.jpg" border="0"></a><a href="http://img172.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=77070_Crysis.exe_11__122_664lo.jpg" target=_blank><img src="http://img172.imagevenue.com/loc664/th_77070_Crysis.exe_11__122_664lo.jpg" border="0"></a><a href="http://img168.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=77072_Crysis.exe_12__122_1021lo.jpg" target=_blank><img src="http://img168.imagevenue.com/loc1021/th_77072_Crysis.exe_12__122_1021lo.jpg" border="0"></a>
Max detail AA set to x2( not tryed it at another other yet ) using 1600x1200 runs sweet. I'm happy.. Was cool running over that tin house lol.


Looks like they done a great job with it :) :) :).

EDIT: V High details not available. v card memory limitation ( 512 ) ?.
Posted on Reply
#134
springs113
AsRockMax detail AA set to x2( not tryed it at another other yet ) using 1600x1200 runs sweet. I'm happy.. Was cool running over that tin house lol.


Looks like they done a great job with it :) :) :).

EDIT: V High details not available. v card memory limitation ( 512 ) ?.
man at 1400 by 1050 this game was putting my 1950pro to tears....dear i say stutta...man i cant wait for that rv670....hopefully in xfire too
Posted on Reply
#135
springs113
also on my system high detail levels were avaible but that was where i was skipping from time to time...with everything maxed out...high...on vista 64 bit with 2gigs ballistix 150 raptor x... 6420 @ 2.9 and a 1950pro or should i say poor 1950
Posted on Reply
#136
springs113
by the way my download is 15741 kb/s and upload is 1370 kb/s and this is on my bros optimum online connection...i have fios....
and i know when i was downloading it for him on his cable connection.. 1.5 mb/s on my fios i was getting 2.47 mb/s
Posted on Reply
#137
OnBoard
AsRockMax detail AA set to x2( not tryed it at another other yet ) using 1600x1200 runs sweet. I'm happy.. Was cool running over that tin house lol.


Looks like they done a great job with it :) :) :).

EDIT: V High details not available. v card memory limitation ( 512 ) ?.
Very High is Vista / DX10 only. Seems DX9 performance is there with plenty =)
Posted on Reply
#138
Schmuv
Wasnt DX10 supposed to run a lot fast than DX9? Maybe someone running both XP and Vista could post a performance comparison on the demo? Would be very cool!
Posted on Reply
#139
OnBoard
Well what I've read the DX10 performance isn't there. It does some things faster than DX9, but also adds new stuff (SM4) and byebye goes the performance :) This is from another forum:

"8800GTX only runs DX10 @ 15fps (and DX9 in 25-30)"
Posted on Reply
#140
DEFEATEST
I was getting 17-30ish fps on max 1024x768 no aa
x1950xt 256
x2 4600
2gig ddr2 800
funny though, when I turn aa on at all I get crazy neon screen. Drivers I guess?
the game does look incredible in some spots though!
Posted on Reply
#141
AphexDreamer
OnBoardWell what I've read the DX10 performance isn't there. It does some things faster than DX9, but also adds new stuff (SM4) and byebye goes the performance :) This is from another forum:

"8800GTX only runs DX10 @ 15fps (and DX9 in 25-30)"
From my experince and from reading here forums.tweakguides.com/showthread.php?p=75394#post75394, the only time DX10 makes a performance impact is when you put your settings on very high, but lets say you have DX10 and DX9 both on all high settings then their is really no performance diffrence and they both look the same.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 14th, 2024 07:40 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts