Tuesday, August 12 2008
Now that the PhysX engine is a lot closer to every NVIDIA owner, new benchmarks designed to test these physics capabilities are unavoidable. First among many are the developers at oZone3D, releasing their first version of FluidMark, a physics benchmark based on NVIDIA's PhysX engine that measures the physics processing capabilities of CPUs, Ageia cards and OpenGL 2.0 compliant graphics card like NVIDIA GeForce 5/6/7/8/9/GTX200 (and higher), AMD/ATI Radeon 9600+, 1k/2k/3k/4k (and higher) or a S3 Graphics Chrome 400 series with the latest graphics drivers. This benchmark performs a fluid simulation by imitating the renderering of lava. Real physics parameters such as viscosity are used. SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) algorithm is enabled to increase the realism of the simulation. To test the FluidMark v1.0.0 please click here.

Source: oZone3D.Net
posted by malware - 11:00 PM |  Related News

User comments
by Darkrealms (August 12th - 5:23 PM) - Reply
Can someone with PhysX check this out. It won't do anything unless the driver is installed??
Error: PhysX Engin initialization failed. Verify your PhysX Driver.
by Richieb0y (August 12th - 6:12 PM) - Reply
its good but i dont think it stress the GPU(cuda) much

but the nvidia powerpack demos are cool and everthing runs fluid on the physx part

does some1 know any good full physx game dont give me UT3 b/c i have it on xbox and there arent many physx there
by 3xploit (August 12th - 6:29 PM) - Reply
I get a black screen and nothing happens. Do I have to do something to start the benchmark?
by KieranD (August 12th - 7:06 PM) - Reply
i get a black screen to then it finishes and its as if nothing happened
by 3xploit (August 12th - 7:35 PM) - Reply
by: KieranD;925986
i get a black screen to then it finishes and its as if nothing happened
how long did it take to finish and did you get a score?
by thebeephaha (August 12th - 7:47 PM) - Reply
Same black screen.
by p_o_s_pc (August 12th - 7:59 PM) - Reply
it worked for me and i think it looked kinda cool.
by 3xploit (August 12th - 8:07 PM) - Reply
does cpu count in this benchmark?
by p_o_s_pc (August 12th - 8:11 PM) - Reply
by: 3xploit;926127
does cpu count in this benchmark?
i have no idea. I overclocked the GPU and got about 700 higher i will try clocking the CPU and see what it does.
by p_o_s_pc (August 12th - 8:20 PM) - Reply
by: 3xploit;926127
does cpu count in this benchmark?
CPU does affect the score. so yes cpu does count. I have 2 SS below one of stock CPU and stock GPU, the other OC CPU stock GPU

Stock CPU


OC CPU
by SpookyWillow (August 12th - 8:26 PM) - Reply
by p_o_s_pc (August 12th - 8:34 PM) - Reply
by: SpookyWillow;926160
heres my score 1741 http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/score.php?id=d6f7cdb994acc579d4eca4615672c550

<====== specs
from that score i would have to say that only the CPU is doing the physX. Isn't there a thread around here that tells you how to get it to run on ATI?
by SpookyWillow (August 12th - 8:49 PM) - Reply
no idea, if someone knows how i will gladly run it again :D
by newtekie1 (August 12th - 11:39 PM) - Reply
I just get a black screen also.
by p_o_s_pc (August 12th - 11:45 PM) - Reply
for those of you that it does work for please post SS of your results in the thread linked below http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=68293
by newtekie1 (August 13th - 1:03 AM) - Reply
Oddly, I still get a result even with just a black screen.
by Scrizz (August 13th - 1:17 AM) - Reply
w00t time to go out and buy a S3 graphics card! :laugh: :wtf: :shadedshu :confused: :cry: :D
by KieranD (August 13th - 1:25 AM) - Reply
1993 is what i got and that seems majorly low

i just decreased the resolution to a smaller size and it worked
by p_o_s_pc (August 13th - 1:41 AM) - Reply
by: KieranD;926536
1993 is what i got and that seems majorly low

i just decreased the resolution to a smaller size and it worked
do you have physx installed for your card?
by KieranD (August 13th - 2:28 AM) - Reply
8800gt and i had the latest drivers and physx from that pack
by p_o_s_pc (August 13th - 2:44 AM) - Reply
by: KieranD;926614
8800gt and i had the latest drivers and physx from that pack
you should have been getting around 5k or more. Also did you physX enabled?
by Kursah (August 13th - 2:47 AM) - Reply
Under Vista x64 I ran it, it was a black screen...when it was done, it said my rig (see sys specs), with my GTX260 OC'd could only muster 2.2k lol. I went to the score submission list on the Ozone site, 260's are around the 10k-12k region, the few that submitted that is...mine is OC'd to 702/1512 GPU/Shaders and 1200 Memory, I have more room, and I may back down...just wanted to see what I'd get lol...hopefully they get it x64 compatable soon!

:toast:
by thebeephaha (August 13th - 3:06 AM) - Reply
Still can't get it to not be a black screen but this is my score:

by Kursah (August 13th - 3:15 AM) - Reply
LoL! Well the reason I got 2.2K was due to the fact I had the GPU F@H client running lol! I can game fine w/it on...at least most of my games. So I always forget it's on!

But I got quite a bit better w/it turned off: 7405

Still not what I'm seeing GTX's scoring, but the score boards are probably high OC's under good cooling too. I suppose I could OC further...but this'll be my only run until x64 is properly supported. Enjoy!

by Wile E (August 13th - 4:54 AM) - Reply
by: Richieb0y;925886
its good but i dont think it stress the GPU(cuda) much

but the nvidia powerpack demos are cool and everthing runs fluid on the physx part

does some1 know any good full physx game dont give me UT3 b/c i have it on xbox and there arent many physx there

Your UT3 on 360 has nothing to do with this. You have to download the mod for PC. It makes a noticeable difference with Physx enabled.
by Mussels (August 13th - 9:55 AM) - Reply
by: Richieb0y;925886
its good but i dont think it stress the GPU(cuda) much

but the nvidia powerpack demos are cool and everthing runs fluid on the physx part

does some1 know any good full physx game dont give me UT3 b/c i have it on xbox and there arent many physx there


because UT3 on the xbox doesnt have it? lol. Its additional map packs that add the physx into UT3.

Edit: damn it, wile E beat me to it.
by KieranD (August 13th - 2:17 PM) - Reply
x64 vista might be why its not working correctly

either way i have geforce ticked in my physx properties
by Mussels (August 13th - 2:23 PM) - Reply
by: KieranD;927346
x64 vista might be why its not working correctly

either way i have geforce ticked in my physx properties
it works fine on both my systems in vista x64.

Make sure you have the right video drivers AND the right version of physX.
Post your comment