Saturday, March 14th 2009

Galaxy Prepares GeForce GTX 260 1792 MB

As NVIDIA partners attempt to cash in on the good sales of GeForce GTX 260, by lining up numerous custom-designed models based on the said GPU, Galaxy has added yet another to its lineup: a GeForce GTX 260 accelerator with twice the amount of memory as its reference design, all 1792 MB of it. Galaxy worked on two areas of this card: cooling and memory. Towards memory, the company chose to use the high-density Samsung K4J10324QD-HJ1A memory chip, that has a capacity of 1 Gb (128 MB). 14 such chips populate the 448-bit GDDR3 memory bus to dole out a total 1792 MB of memory capacity.

Towards cooling, Galaxy used a custom GPU cooler that spans across the length of the card. Its GPU contact block gives out five heatpipes that direct heat to a dense array of alumium fins. Three fans are employed to cool the card. The airflow passively cools the memory, the 4+1 phase VRM area has a heatsink of its own, so does the NVIO2 processor. Expreview put the card through a series of test to bring out its performance increment over the 896 MB GeForce GTX 260. The games World in Conflict and Company of Heroes saw significant increments in average frame-rates.
Source: Expreview
Add your own comment

45 Comments on Galaxy Prepares GeForce GTX 260 1792 MB

#26
FryingWeesel
now if they could only get these things size down by one fan on that cooler :P
Posted on Reply
#27
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
AltecV1how really needs over 22":rolleyes:
me :D
Posted on Reply
#29
niko084
GREAT looking card, too bad it's another massive waste of money on marketing and e-pein.
Posted on Reply
#30
ascstinger
AltecV140"+1360x768=BAD GRAFICS
And poor spelling + knocking another member's stuff (much less a mod) = a great way to make a point :rolleyes:

nice card, but overkill for my 1680x1050 res
Posted on Reply
#31
Selene
if its any thing like the 2gig GTX285, the memory is wasted 95% of the time, the bus simple can not take advantage of it.
Posted on Reply
#32
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
AltecV140"+1360x768=BAD GRAFICS
i thank you for you knowing absolutely nothing about the screen in question, taking this thread off topic, and your bad spelling.

Please, go troll elsewhere. my TV is going to look a hell of a lot better than anything you've got.
edit: oh wait, it actually DOES. i have the 226BW on my lan system, and it looks like arse in comparison. its got poor viewing angles, an overly red image and has strange flickering with certain images.
Posted on Reply
#33
Selene
Musselsi thank you for you knowing absolutely nothing about the screen in question, taking this thread off topic, and your bad spelling.

Please, go troll elsewhere. my TV is going to look a hell of a lot better than anything you've got.
edit: oh wait, it actually DOES. i have the 226BW on my lan system, and it looks like arse in comparison. its got poor viewing angles, an overly red image and has strange flickering with certain images.
well that screan rez is not as good as a 22" 1680x1050 or a 24" 1920x1200, so you could get away with a lesser video card, even tho the screan is big, the rez is not and does not need as much vram.
Posted on Reply
#34
Wile E
Power User
AltecV1how really needs over 22":rolleyes:
Me.

22"= 1680x1050 = shitty for HD movies. It's either an upscaled 720p image, or a downscaled 1080p image.

24" = 1920x1200 = perfect for HD movies. Plays 1080p at its native resolution.

Better looking games are just an added benefit.
Musselsi thank you for you knowing absolutely nothing about the screen in question, taking this thread off topic, and your bad spelling.

Please, go troll elsewhere. my TV is going to look a hell of a lot better than anything you've got.
edit: oh wait, it actually DOES. i have the 226BW on my lan system, and it looks like arse in comparison. its got poor viewing angles, an overly red image and has strange flickering with certain images.
That's because your 22" monitor has a Tn-Film panel in it. (all 22" are Tn-Film) Buy a 20" or 24" with either a PVA panel, or an IPS panel of some sort, and your games will look like ass on the TV in comparison. (Provided the same quality settings can be used)
Posted on Reply
#35
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
Wile EMe.

22"= 1680x1050 = shitty for HD movies. It's either an upscaled 720p image, or a downscaled 1080p image.

24" = 1920x1200 = perfect for HD movies. Plays 1080p at its native resolution.

Better looking games are just an added benefit.



That's because your 22" monitor has a Tn-Film panel in it. (all 22" are Tn-Film) Buy a 20" or 24" with either a PVA panel, or an IPS panel of some sort, and your games will look like ass on the TV in comparison. (Provided the same quality settings can be used)
correct on the TN panel, the guy bagging my screen out has the same 22". that was my point.

admittedly its off topic now, so can we please get back to discussing this uber card?
Posted on Reply
#36
Wile E
Power User
Musselscorrect on the TN panel, the guy bagging my screen out has the same 22". that was my point.

admittedly its off topic now, so can we please get back to discussing this uber card?
Ahh, fair enough. Yeah, I would rather games on your HDTV vs your 22" monitor as well.

Well then, back on topic. lol. I hope more manufacturers release double frame buffer cards. I like not having to worry about running out of video memory. lol.
Posted on Reply
#37
Haytch
Samsung . . . @ the top of the game.
Posted on Reply
#38
lemonadesoda
Musselsi thank you for you knowing absolutely nothing about the screen in question, taking this thread off topic, and your bad spelling.

Please, go troll elsewhere. my TV is going to look a hell of a lot better than anything you've got.
edit: oh wait, it actually DOES. i have the 226BW on my lan system, and it looks like arse in comparison. its got poor viewing angles, an overly red image and has strange flickering with certain images.
Instruction to tell member to go troll elsewhere: good.

Trolling the member back: bad.
Posted on Reply
#39
AltecV1
Musselsi thank you for you knowing absolutely nothing about the screen in question, taking this thread off topic, and your bad spelling.

Please, go troll elsewhere. my TV is going to look a hell of a lot better than anything you've got.
edit: oh wait, it actually DOES. i have the 226BW on my lan system, and it looks like arse in comparison. its got poor viewing angles, an overly red image and has strange flickering with certain images.
i have hdtv at home and i have used it as a monitor,my experience is that they arent that good!BUT THAT IS MY OPINION NOT YOURS:rolleyes:!!!!!!!!YOu should be nicer do people,coz you are the moderator!!!! Now back do the card
Posted on Reply
#40
hooj
I might get one of these !!

Aswell as a whole new computer LOL !!
Posted on Reply
#43
squallho1
Galaxy Representative
thebeephahaI like this card because the cooler is dual slot not triple by the looks of it, and that it has more ram.

For a single card provided the price is right might be my next upgrade.
Yes the cooler is a customized dual-slot cooler, and it looks nice definitly.
NeSeNViThat's why I like Galaxy: non reference design, but how about loudness?
I don't have exact noise figure yet, but AFAIK it is a quiet one.
niko084GREAT looking card, too bad it's another massive waste of money on marketing and e-pein.
We'll have a normal 896MB version using this cooler too.

-------------------------
We will definitly send one to techPowerUp for review once we have the card ready, so please stay tuned ;)
Posted on Reply
#44
Selene
squallho1Yes the cooler is a customized dual-slot cooler, and it looks nice definitly.



I don't have exact noise figure yet, but AFAIK it is a quiet one.



We'll have a normal 896MB version using this cooler too.

-------------------------
We will definitly send one to techPowerUp for review once we have the card ready, so please stay tuned ;)
cant wait for the reviews, would like to see were and if the vram helps much if any, from other reviews it does not seam to help much if at all.
Posted on Reply
#45
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
squallho1Yes the cooler is a customized dual-slot cooler, and it looks nice definitly.



I don't have exact noise figure yet, but AFAIK it is a quiet one.



We'll have a normal 896MB version using this cooler too.

-------------------------
We will definitly send one to techPowerUp for review once we have the card ready, so please stay tuned ;)
Thanks for dropping buy and posting, and most definately thanks for sending TPU a review sample. Dont forget you can bribe the moderator staff with them too ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 23rd, 2024 03:13 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts