Yeah that would be pretty much every section.
Or someone who works in the creative industry? Or who wants a powerful UNIX-based machine with all the bells and whistles of a consumer-level OS? Or simply prefers Mac OS X to Windows?
And, frankly, the fact that Macs are essentially PCs running OS X now and partly as such are priced much more competitively, anyone using these same old tired arguments from 1997 is the idiot who actually doesn't know anything about modern computers.
Reason one sucked, I've more programs to run on windows, I've a greater number of tools to play with to create something. ( so theoretically more variables for creativity!)
I've never seen ANYTHING creative wise ( I assume you mean photomanip and video editing things like that) that a MAC pc can do that a regular one cannot.
2 and 3 are cool though.
How ever last statement is rediculous, that's the reason most pc enthusiasts hate macs.
(I.E you pay up to 1.5 times as much for the same hardware :S )
Because they're BRANDED pcs and that's all. ( oh yeah different os too but hey, software can be made to run on most things
)
Now I'm all for "each to their own" but when people say macs are better than PCs ( in anyway, even just "creative media" it just really annoys me, they're both pcs for a start so at the end of the day it should come to do performance, productivty,price and ease of use.
The first ones are measurable ( £2000 pc vs £2000 mac. pc wins!)
So the only real deciding factor is if you prefer the OS. Which is more than fair enough, if I don't like an OS I try other ones too.
That or your just into cheap allu being plastered all over the place and the brand image.
/end rant. sorry!
Incase this all seems to negative, I'm trying to say at the end of the day it's preferance.
Do Macs hold any performance crowns for anything by the way?
*edit* @ sneeky just saw your post, delete this one should you see it fit.