1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by FX-GMC, Mar 14, 2014.

  1. RealNeil

    RealNeil

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    628 (2.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    Location:
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
    Tried tweaking mine a little and got the same score. I guess it's good enough for now.

    Same Old Shtuff.JPG

    Same Old2.JPG
     
  2. z1tu

    z1tu

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    481 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Romania
    Wait, you have 2 r9 280x and that's the max score you can get? There must be a problem as you should get 1000 with only one. I think you should be getting around 1500-1600.
     
  3. AlienDemigod

    AlienDemigod

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    42 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    My first Heaven score with my new 780ti. I7-4790k-4.6 GPU-1150/1750-stock clocks first heaven run stock.png
     
  4. 05_ACR_SRT4 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2014
    Messages:
    2 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    i7 3770k @ 4.7GHZ 2x HD 7990 @ 1150/1700 --- 145.7fps --- 3669

    [​IMG]
     
  5. AlienDemigod

    AlienDemigod

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    42 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Nice score.
     
  6. RealNeil

    RealNeil

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    628 (2.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    276
    Location:
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
    ^^Agreed^^
     
  7. AlienDemigod

    AlienDemigod

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    42 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    I7-4790k-4.6, 780ti-1200/1800, I just want a top ten and I will be happy. rsz_heaven_1200-1800.jpg
     
  8. AlienDemigod

    AlienDemigod

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    42 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    I7-4790K-4.6, 780ti-1227/1800-top ten by one point. lol woohoo! rsz_heaven_1700plus.jpg
     
  9. Jetster

    Jetster

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,671 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,450
    Location:
    Oregon
    [​IMG]
     
  10. AlienDemigod

    AlienDemigod

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    42 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    It looks like you might be using a generic microsoft driver. I would make sure I had the latest driver directly from nvidia.
     
  11. Jetster

    Jetster

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    5,671 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,450
    Location:
    Oregon
    That's the IGPU. I had just uninstalled the driver for it. Not a big deal. I was trying to have it not show at all
     
  12. 05_ACR_SRT4 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2014
    Messages:
    2 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Thanks

    Thanks!


    To the OP can the number of gpu's be changed for mine? i run 2 7990's which have 2 gpu on each card.

    thanks
     
  13. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,690 (2.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    665
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    I was surpassed O.O
     
  14. newconroer

    newconroer

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,312 (1.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    373
    There REALLY REALLY needs to be a separate chart for 1600p users. I appreciate it's not as common as 1080p, but there are a heck of a lot more 1600p systems out there now days, and 4k is not too far off(well it's all ready here) and surround vision type setups.

    We standardize settings that involve all the highest graphics possible(sans the AA) and yet we're limited by 1080p resolution.

    We should also try it with Vsync and see what variance people have not only between different hardware, but even the same hardware on different machines. Hiccups, stutters, and all other of little things that go bump, would affect the results. Instead of wildly varying scores that don't tell us much, we'd have close scores that indicate how different CPU,GPU,Motherboard and RAM combinations compete versus one another.
     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2014
  15. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    923 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    372
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    Good idea. Here's the next step. (Not trying to be rude but I don't want to be responsible for 3 times as many charts....)


    [​IMG]
     
    HazMatt and GreiverBlade say thanks.
  16. newconroer

    newconroer

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,312 (1.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    373
    Apologies, I guess "real life" not only keeps you from updating the front page, but also makes you defensive against suggestions.
    Good to know.
     
  17. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    923 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    372
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    My edit came too late. Oh well. I do like the suggestion tho.

    On the other hand I don't much care for you criticizing whether or not I have the time to do something. Guess I learned something about you as well.

     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2014
    GreiverBlade says thanks.
  18. dcf-joe

    dcf-joe

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    401 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Location:
    Nebraska, USA
    Single GTX670 Gigabyte Windforce @ 1306 MHz core / 1753 MHz memory (stock cooler)
    i7 2600K @ 4.8 GHz

    I think I can get over 1000 points, but I am getting tired of running this benchmark for now.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. dcf-joe

    dcf-joe

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    401 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Location:
    Nebraska, USA
    This is the absolute best that I can get this card to perform. I feel good that I was able to beat out a 280x and also come somewhat close to a 7970!

    Single GTX670 Gigabyte Windforce @ 1306 MHz core / 1851.5 MHz memory (stock cooler)
    i7 2600K @ 4.8 GHz

    [​IMG]

     
  20. Knoxx29

    Knoxx29

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,480 (3.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Location:
    Germany
    Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0 Basic (Direct3D11).jpg
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. night.fox

    night.fox

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,047 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Location:
    south korea
    Quadfire 2x 290x (stock clocks) + 2x 290 (stock clocks)

    4770k - 4.389 ghz something. Weird cause bios setting is set to auto for base clock and if i set bclk to 100 still will show less than 100 on gpu-z.


    [​IMG]
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,678 (2.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,015
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    not even slightly weird ... CPU-Z always show the bus speed a bit lower.
    mine is set to 103, and on every previous monitoring or any of my 5 rigs the bus speed is slightly lower (from 0.2 to 0.7~)
    jjkl.jpg
    the only thing i have who is weird atm ... is my PciE link version on my R9 290 i get 2.0 even on load ...
     
    night.fox says thanks.
  23. night.fox

    night.fox

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,047 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Location:
    south korea

    check your bios settings. pci lanes might be set to pci gen 2. Try setting it to Gen 3 and see if it helps
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  24. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,678 (2.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,015
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    even weirder ... PciEx configuration : auto/Gen1/Gen2 .... and i use a Z97 mobo + haswell cpu ... wtf is that catch ... (i see not other option aside )
     
  25. night.fox

    night.fox

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,047 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    606
    Location:
    south korea
    ouch bios update i guess?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (0 members and 6 guests)

Share This Page