Friday, August 25th 2006
Internet is faster in Europe then USA.
PC World asked its editors around the world how fast the internet is where they live, and got some pretty surprising results. In general, the maximum bandwidth of broadband in Europe is greater then the maximum bandwidth in the United States. There are certain areas in the United Kingdom where DSL subscribers can get 24Mb/s download speeds. Companies such as Talk talk offer combo deals for broadband and phone. Fiber optics are much more common in Europe then they are in the United States, with plans offering 100Mb/s download speeds. Depending on where you live, internet in Europe is also cheaper then it is in the United States. Spanish DSL customers can get 20Mb/s service for 40 Euros ($51) a month, while Norwegian customers have to spend 469 Kroners ($75) a month for the same service. However, there is one distinct advantage for internet in the United States. While Americans are charged for their bandwidth every month, most Europeans are charged for their usage limits.
Source:
Yahoo! News
38 Comments on Internet is faster in Europe then USA.
Mind you one thing I do like about the ADSL service I have is there is no fair usage policy.
While most companies offer "unlimited services" most of the time they have a fair usage clause in the contract meaning they can put 'restrictions' on the service they supply you if you use alot of bandwidth, so if your like me who does a LOT of downloading and uploading you end up getting your speed reduced, or certain internet activity such as p2p, usenet etc blocked.
I've only found one that doesnt from ADSL providers here in the UK, the one I'm with Griffin Internet. They're a lot more expensive than other companies for the speed you get but combined with the faster than standard up speed for my line (400kb/sec rather than 256kb/sec), a nice static ip as standard and what I really call an unlimited service rather than a unlimited untill you reach a limit service I think they're pretty good. Plus they have a technical support quality I've never experienced before.
Wow the end of that sounded like an ad lol.
Very glad we don't have that kinda of charging like in america though.
It pisses me off how companies can call these plans "unlimited" when they are clearly unlimited at full speed until you reach a limit :shadedshu
6mb down/up iirc, & was the FASTEST IN THE NATION, bar-none... I had used Time Warner RoadRunner for years on broadband before it, not even CLOSE...
(They pull a pretty simple trick for it w/ the DOCSIS compliant routers/hubs they use, & by section, they put say 250 people on a section, where that section can take 500 easily... they invested smartly, & got a HUGE SURGE of customers because of it in fact that year! Because, regardless of what they TELL folks or what you hear? IT IS ALL SHARED BANDWIDTH!)
BUT, great rates for USA... However, still - Not like the rates you guys are describing...
In 2003, I took work as a Tier #2 & then promo to Tier #1 network engineer for CableVision, NYC!
I got handed the stuff others in Tier #3 couldn't solve, etc. (one problem COMPAQ/HP were blaming us for, I proved QUITE otherwise (they were shipping one model of machine with WAY too 'amped up/aggressive' network card driver parameters... I tuned 'em down, & BINGO... that model of machine 'suddenly' worked for our modems (both Motorola Surfboards 4200, best there was imo, & even other models)).
Nope, I took that job, not coding but with reason: Easy work for me imo, & I needed a job fast, NY is hellishly expensive!
ANYHOW!
Coding jobs (even one offered by MS to me, & I did not approach they (for their crash debug dump analysis team for Windows Error Reporting) & to this day? I don't KNOW how the hell they got ahold of me to be honest!)
Anyhow - but I only got 3/4 questions they asked on phase #2, some of the hardest I have EVER seen in fact about coding - I'll post the 3 I recall if you like just so you can SEE how MS interviews (testing intellect imo & problem solving skills)?
They were taking TOO long to kick back to me in interviews. I needed to make money fast.
* SO, I used their network for free of course, part of the job bennies.
APK
P.S.=> TimeWarner? They only caught up, iirc, last year to Cablevision's rate... Someone said it above: It's ALL about money, fat checks mgt. gets, stockholders want returns YESTERDAY & higher quarterly earnings...
How you gonna do that, if you have to PAY for good talent (costs), good equipment (costs) & still show them that, especially when you have DSL, which iirc, is geographically unconstrained, whereas cable broadband providers, are in regions...?
Still, root of all this? Well 10mb is the limit anyhow... regardless of us having 100mbit capable NIC or gigabit ethernet, on consumer commodity broadband afaik @ least.
apk
I recall reading something about the lack of choice in ISPs in america with some areas only having 2-3 providers.
Seems a strange concept to me in the UK coz wherever there are phone lines here there are a great deal of providers.
Like I said though dunno if thats true, ifit is can see why the prices are so high, not enough competition lol
However AFAIK, France is the place to be for an internet connection in Europe. Just look at the prices charged by one of their best providers.
translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://adsl.free.fr/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DFreebox%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG
30 euros for the internet/telephone and HDTV content on demand(well you dont get premium channels), also availability is still limited to big cities i think.
I think we'll get closer to these prices as soon as internet telephone calling becomes the norm and the need to pay for a telephone line disappears. BT are introducing something similar called BT Vision, but the prices are still no where near as good and they force you to pay for a telephone line.