Monday, July 11th 2022

Intel's Upcoming Core i9-13900K Appears on Geekbench

New week, new leak, as an engineer sample of Intel's upcoming Raptor Lake based Core i9-13900K has appeared in the infamous Geekbench database. It seems to be one of the ES samples that has been making the rounds over the past few weeks, but this is the first time we get an indication of what the performance might be like. There are no real surprises in terms of the specifications, we're looking at a base clock of 3 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.5 GHz, which has already been reported for these chips. The 24-core, 32-thread CPU was paired with 32 GB of 6400 MHz DDR5 memory and an ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme motherboard. Unfortunately the test results are reported as invalid, due to "an issue with the timers" on the system.

That said, we can still compare the results with a similar system using a Core i9-12900K on an ASUS ROG Strix Z690-F Gaming board, that's also paired up with 32 GB of 6400 MHz DDR5 memory. The older Alder Lake system is actually somewhat faster in the single core tests where it scores 2,142 points versus 2133 points for the Raptor Lake based system, despite having a maximum frequency of 5.1 GHz. The Raptor Lake system is faster in the multi-core test at 23,701 vs. 21312 points. However, it's no point doing any kind of analysis here, as the Raptor Lake results are all over the place, with it beating the Alder Lake CPU by a significant amount in some tests and losing against it in others, where it shouldn't be falling behind, simply based on the higher clock speed and additional power efficient cores. At least this shows that Raptor Lake is running largely as intended on current 600-series motherboards, so for those considering upgrading to the 13th gen of Intel CPUs, there shouldn't be any big hurdles to overcome.
Sources: @BenchLeaks, via Videocardz
Add your own comment

10 Comments on Intel's Upcoming Core i9-13900K Appears on Geekbench

#2
P4-630
TheLostSwedeCore i9-1290K
:oops::D
Posted on Reply
#3
TheLostSwede
News Editor
P4-630:oops::D
Fixed.
Too damn many zeros these days.
Posted on Reply
#4
DeathtoGnomes
TheLostSwedehe older Alder Lake system is actually somewhat faster in the single core tests where it scores 2,142 points versus 2133 points for the Raptor Lake based system, despite having a maximum frequency of 5.1 GHz.
It can be said this is within the margin of error, how many tries were done to get this 2133. There are a number of reasons there is a 9 losing point difference, granted the dinosaur lake should have been faster from the get go.
Posted on Reply
#5
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
TheLostSwedebut this is the first time we get an indication of what the performance might be like.
From geek bench?? Lolol
Posted on Reply
#6
docnorth
It seems the CPU is almost ready, of course not drivers, codes etc. It will be interesting to see if RL indeed brings IPC improvements as rumored, not only higher clocks and mooaar cache.

Btw nice work @TheLostSwede providing a comparable 12900K setup.
Posted on Reply
#7
Tsukiyomi91
and ES 13900K that has a peak boost of 5.5 is pretty impressive. This could mean the production 13900K will still have higher boost clocks over the 12900K but much more refined, obviously.
Posted on Reply
#8
pavle
More like baby_duck_lake, but I guess the name is a coverup for its true performance...
Posted on Reply
#9
Owen1982
4 Channels? Or 4 sticks?
Posted on Reply
#10
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Owen19824 Channels? Or 4 sticks?
DDR5, so two sticks and four channels, since each stick is two 32-bit channels.
Posted on Reply
May 9th, 2024 18:57 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts