TXchargeryou know your a nerd when heavy lifting refers to transporting your cpu case

yeah because i bought a case just to transport my cpu

i suppose all my other hardware is in a totally different case? :nutkick:

that is the first, and probably only time i will use the nutkick emoticon :roll:

TXchargeryou know your a nerd when heavy lifting refers to transporting your cpu case

These things weigh 40lbs, dry. With all of my components and watercooling, mine tips the scales at 70lbs.

Wile EYou're right, cause your Dimention 3000 case and p4 are so much more 1337 than my X2 and Stacker. /sarcasm :laugh:

Sorry, couldn't resist.

hellz ya, my dell case weighs over 90lbs and my P4 is running at over 8ghz... im a professional :rolleyes:

want to make your life better with zero work on your part? start lying about everything in your life, theres no reason to ever tell the truth

TXchargerhellz ya, my dell case weighs over 90lbs and my P4 is running at over 8ghz... im a professional :rolleyes:

want to make your life better with zero work on your part? start lying about everything in your life, theres no reason to ever tell the truth

Who's lying about what?

Wile EWho's lying about what?

....


theres no way my case weights anywhere near 90lbs...

or my processor runs that fast...

or that the p4 is one of the best processors ever...

you just confused me...

tx for saying his so worthy prescHOTT is at 8ghz. lol

TXchargerhellz ya, my dell case weighs over 90lbs and my P4 is running at over 8ghz... im a professional :rolleyes:

want to make your life better with zero work on your part? start lying about everything in your life, theres no reason to ever tell the truth

This post sounded like a personal attack on me. That's why I asked you who you were referring to.

no it wasnt... im really tired and i was listening to daniel tosh whos officially funny as heck, and thats part of his thing and i started lying just for kicks cause this thread is already beat to hell

right... ok.. im just gonna go stand over ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------> here

TXcharger....


theres no way my case weights anywhere near 90lbs...

Mine weighs very close to 90lbs loaded. :laugh:

I need to put wheels on it.

But then again, solid red oak is just too damn sexy to pass up.

But please get this back close to topic :)

DippyskoodlezMine weighs very close to 90lbs loaded. :laugh:

I need to put wheels on it.

But then again, solid red oak is just too damn sexy to pass up.

But please get this back close to topic :)

Wait, there was a point to this thread? Oh yeah, I forgot about that. lol

Anyway, I really hope the Phenom is not a let down. I don't want to see what would happen to AMD if this flops.

Wile EWait, there was a point to this thread? Oh yeah, I forgot about that. lol

Anyway, I really hope the Phenom is not a let down. I don't want to see what would happen to AMD if this flops.

I dont see why it should be.
In theory it should be superior to C2D, as it is TRUE dual core.

ex_revenI dont see why it should be.
In theory it should be superior to C2D, as it is TRUE dual core.

Core2 is a true dual as well. :slap: Are you thinking of quads, by chance? lol

ex_revenI dont see why it should be.
In theory it should be superior to C2D, as it is TRUE dual core.

"true" doesn't mean better in any way shape or form, really.

In technical terms its "better" because its a unified design.

Performance wise, is completely independent.

Last time i checked phenom was designed to be on par or even beat C2Ds by a small margin.....It was never designed to go up against Intels latest CPUs thus i think AMD will still be second...
I miss the Athlon x64 days...

HellasVagabondLast time i checked phenom was designed to be on par or even beat C2Ds by a small margin.....It was never designed to go up against Intels latest CPUs thus i think AMD will still be second...
I miss the Athlon x64 days...

Me thinks you need to check your sources again... :rolleyes: Last time I checked, the current AM2 is already on par with the current C2Ds in their respective price brackets. Example, you take a stock 6000+ @ $169 USD as of July 21st and compare it to a stock E6600 @ $220 USD, both CPUs pretty much trade blows with eachother in benchmarks and real world applications but the 6000+ is at least $50 cheaper... With the new Intel price cuts about to go into effect shortly, the E6600 may or may not be much close in price to the 6000+ but that still dosen't change the fact that both CPUs are on par with eachother @ stock aka real world applications that your average user knows or cares about.

Ok, seriously, no blanket statements in this thread about anything, unless you provide links and/or reliable numbers to back up any claims.

Otherwise this thread is going to derail into the normal amd/intel banter.

DippyskoodlezOk, seriously, no blanket statements in this thread about anything, unless you provide links and/or reliable numbers to back up any claims.

Otherwise this thread is going to derail into the normal amd/intel banter.

:nutkick:

j/k! :D

Your absolutely correct and I'll refrain from such slip ups in the future.

SovereignMe thinks you need to check your sources again... :rolleyes: Last time I checked, the current AM2 is already on par with the current C2Ds in their respective price brackets. Example, you take a stock 6000+ @ $169 USD as of July 21st and compare it to a stock E6600 @ $220 USD, both CPUs pretty much trade blows with eachother in benchmarks and real world applications but the 6000+ is at least $50 cheaper... With the new Intel price cuts about to go into effect shortly, the E6600 may or may not be much close in price to the 6000+ but that still dosen't change the fact that both CPUs are on par with eachother @ stock aka real world applications that your average user knows or cares about.

I'm pretty sure he was referring to clock for clock comparisons, not so much price.

I never heard of a single AMD Cpu to go up against C2Ds ( Not talking about the best AMD with the worst C2D ). Any benchmarks to prove this ? And again we aint talking about Price / Performance ratio but pure performance.

DippyskoodlezOk, seriously, no blanket statements in this thread about anything, unless you provide links and/or reliable numbers to back up any claims.

Otherwise this thread is going to derail into the normal amd/intel banter.

Oops. I missed it too. Sorry Dip.

DippyskoodlezOk, seriously, no blanket statements in this thread about anything, unless you provide links and/or reliable numbers to back up any claims.

Otherwise this thread is going to derail into the normal amd/intel banter.

Wile EOops. I missed it too. Sorry Dip.

HellasVagabondI never heard of a single AMD Cpu to go up against C2Ds ( Not talking about the best AMD with the worst C2D ). Any benchmarks to prove this ? And again we aint talking about Price / Performance ratio but pure performance.

i guess that dosen't apply to "Staff" members... :ohwell:

There are benchmarks around the internet where C2Ds get above ALL AMDs, even the latest FX so yes it doesnt apply when you have proof.

When the Dippy says to drop it, you listen to the Dippy.